Kenneth Yakubu

INPLASY202650023 Transitioning from Gestational Diabetes to Type 2 Diabetes across African Contexts: A Systematic Review of Incidence, Risks and Protective Factors, and Health System Opportunities.…

Introduction The co-occurrence of multiple long-term conditions, that is, multimorbidity, is increasing globally and is associated with lower quality of life and increased risk of death. The risk and prevalence of multimorbidity are higher among women compared with men, but currently, evidence focusing on women’s multiple long-term conditions during the perinatal period is limited. Existing evidence needs to be examined to determine the extent to which maternal multimorbidity or women’s multiple health needs related to pregnancy have been addressed, especially for women living in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) where this burden of disease is the highest. The objective of this scoping review is to map existing evidence in LMICs on (a) Study designs and data sources, (b) Context-relevant definitions and descriptions, (c) Associated risk and protective factors, (d) Relevant maternal and infant health outcomes and (e) Treatments and interventions used to manage multiple long-term conditions before, during and after pregnancy. Methods and analysis This scoping review will be conducted using Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement extension for scoping reviews. This review will include observational, experimental or quasi-experimental studies, as well as systematic or umbrella reviews, on multimorbidity in women of reproductive age (15–49 years) in prepregnancy, pregnancy or up to 6 weeks after childbirth in LMICs. The studies will focus on definitions, risk and protective factors and management strategies for multiple long-term conditions before, during and after pregnancy. Studies of morbidity in women with a single index condition or conditions that are not related to pregnancy or childbirth will be excluded. A search strategy will be developed using thesaurus (including MeSH) and free-text terms for ‘maternal morbidity’ or ‘multiple long-term conditions’ and associated keywords such as multimorbidity, co-morbidity and unmet health needs related to pregnancy and/or childbirth for women living in LMICs. Electronic (EBSCOhost (CINAHL Ultimate, STM Source, Medline Ultimate), Cochrane Library, Web of Science or Scopus and Google Scholar) and grey literature databases will be searched from database inception. Reference lists and bibliographies of key topic articles will also be searched, and any additional papers that meet the inclusion criteria will be obtained. There will be no limitations on dates or languages. Records will be independently screened, selected and extracted by two researchers. Data will be presented in tables and narrative summaries. Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval is not required as this scoping review will summarise previously published data. Findings from the review will be disseminated through various platforms, including peer-reviewed journals, conferences and community meetings. Study registration Open Science Framework (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/FYCR8).

Health workers are pivotal for non-communicable disease (NCD) service delivery, yet often are unavailable in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). There is limited evidence on what NCD-related tasks non-physician health workers (NPHWs) can perform and their effectiveness. This study aims to understand how task-sharing is used to improve NCD prevention and control in LMICs. We also explored barriers, facilitators, and unexpected consequences of task-sharing. Databases searched in two phases and included MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, Cochrane, and clinical trial registries, and references of included studies from inception until 31^st July 2024. We included randomised control trials (RCTs), cluster RCTs, and associated process evaluation and cost effectiveness studies. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool v2. PROSPERO: CRD42022315701. The study found 5527 citations, 427 full texts were screened and 149 studies (total population sample>432567) from 31 countries were included. Most studies were on tasks shared with nurses (n=83) and community health workers (n=65). Most studies focussed on cardiovascular disease (n=47), mental health (n=48), diabetes (n=27), cancer (n=20), and respiratory diseases (n=10). Seventeen studies included two or more conditions. Eighty-one percent (n=120) of studies reported at least one positive primary outcome, while 19 studies reported neutral results, one reported a negative result, eight (5.4%) reported mixed positive and neutral results, and one reported neutral and negative findings. Economic analyses indicated that task-sharing reduced total healthcare costs. Task-sharing is an effective intervention for NCDs in LMICs. It is essential to enhance the competencies and training of NPHWs, provide resources to augment their capabilities, and formalise their role in the health system and community. Optimising task-sharing for NCDs requires a holistic approach that strengthens health systems while supporting NPHWs in effectively addressing the diverse needs of their communities. Registration: PROSPERO CRD42022315701.

Background: This study examined skilled health worker (SHW) migration governance in African countries and Australia, with an emphasis on areas of influence for achieving an equitable global health workforce distribution.Methods: We used a mixed-methods research design with African SHW migrants in Australia. An institutional and rights-based framing of governance guided thematic analysis of the interviews, which was mapped to survey findings from a Bayesian Exploratory Factor Analysis.Results: The findings imply that Australian state actors enforce laws that attract SHW migrants and promote safe clinical practice, but do not adequately address their integration concerns or role in health system strengthening. Non-state actors in Australia make donations to African health institutions but rarely promote health workforce equity. African state actors respond to increased SHW migration trends by increasing health worker training and limiting migration, but they lack a comprehensive governance framework for involving citizens and engaging foreign governments. There is limited evidence of a shared community definition of SHW migration governance in many African countries.Conclusion: When stakeholders in both sending and receiving countries recognise the indivisibility of the rights at stake (for example, SHW rights as migrants and the right to health), support for an equity-focused SHW migration governance system may increase. Promoting these rights can result in policies that enhance health system strengthening in destination and source countries. Similarly, growing adoption of these rights in sending countries should help inspire a coordinated plan for strengthening health system and SHW migration governance.

The growing trends for skilled health worker (SHW) migration in Nigeria has led to increased concerns about achieving universal health coverage in the country. While a lot is known about drivers of SHW migration, including national/sub-national government’s inability to address them, not enough is known about its governance. Underpinning good governance systems is a commitment to human rights norms, that is, principles that enshrine non-discrimination, participation, accountability, and transparency. Hence, this study was aimed at deriving a conceptual framework that captures the scope of SHW migration governance in Nigeria and the extent to which it is human rights based. To describe the scope of SHW migration governance, we conducted an exploratory factor analysis and mapped our findings to themes derived from a qualitative analysis. We also did a multivariate analysis, examining how governance items are related to migration intentions of SHWs. The scope of SHW migration governance in Nigeria can be described across three levels: Constitutional—where policies about the economy and the health workforce are made and often poorly implemented; Collective—which responds to the governance vacuum at the constitutional level by promoting SHW migration or trying to mitigate its impact; Operational—individual SHWs who navigate the tension between the right to health, their right to fair remuneration, living/working conditions, and free movement. Examining these levels revealed opportunities for collaboration through stronger commitment to human right norms. In recognising their role as rights holders and duty bearers at various levels, citizens, health advocates, health workers, community groups and policy makers can work collaboratively towards addressing factors related to SHW migration. Further evidence is needed on how human rights norms can play a visible role in Nigeria’s governance system for SHW migration.

BackgroundNigeria provides a good case study for researchers, activists, and governments seeking to understand how social networks can help mitigate the negative impact of skilled health worker (SHW) migration in low and middle-income countries. This study aimed to map the social networks of SHWs and explore how they influence migration intentions. MethodsWe combined semi-structured qualitative interviews with an ego-network analysis of 22 SHWs living in Nigeria, used R-Studio to display and visualise their networks, and NVivo for thematic analysis of transcribed interviews. ResultsThe network size and frequency of interaction were smaller among SHWs seeking to remain in Nigeria, however when compared to SHWs seeking to migrate, they had ties with a diverse group of stakeholders interested in improving health services. The influence of social networks on SHW migration intentions was observed within the following themes: access to information on migration opportunities, modelling of migration behaviour, support for decision making, and opportunities for policy engagement. ConclusionThe social networks of SHWs can aid the diffusion of norms that are relevant for improving SHW migration governance. Through their social networks, SHWs can improve awareness of the challenges associated with SHW migration among state actors and the public.

The African Journal of Primary Health & Family Medicine welcomes submissions that encourage scholarly exchange between family medicine and primary health care researchers and practitioners across Africa and the developing world, whilst providing a contextual and holistic view of family medicine as practiced across the continent.

Background: As a fundamental human right, the right to health (RTH) can influence state actors’ behaviour towards health inequities. Human rights advocates have invoked the RTH in a collective demand for improved access to essential medicines in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Similarly, scholars have used the RTH as a framework for analysing health problems. However, its utility for addressing skilled health worker (SHW) shortages in LMICs has been understudied. Realising that SHW shortages occur due to existing push-and-pull factors within and between LMICs and high-income countries (HICs), we sought to answer the question: "how, why, and under what circumstance does the RTH offer utility for addressing SHW shortages in LMICs?" Methods: We conducted a realist synthesis of evidence identified through a systematic search of peer-reviewed articles in Embase, Global Health, Medline (Ovid), ProQuest – Health & Medical databases, Scopus (Elsevier), Web of Science (Clarivate), CINAHL (EBSCO), APAIS-Health, Health Systems Evidence and PDQ-EVIDENCE; as well as grey literature from Google Scholar. Results: We found that the RTH offers utility for addressing SHW shortages in LMICs through HIC state actors’ concerns for their countries’ reputational risk, recognition of their obligation to support health workforce strengthening in LMICs, and concerns for the cost implication. State actors in LMICs will respond to adopt programs inspired by the RTH when they are convinced that it offers tangible national benefits and are not overly burdened with ensuring its success. The socio-economic and institutional factors that constrain state actors’ response include financial cost and sustainability of rights’-based options. Conclusion: State and non-state actors can use the RTH as a resource for promoting collective action towards addressing SHW shortages in LMICs. It can also inform negotiations between state actors in LMICs and their HIC counterparts.