SUSean E. Urban

Sean E. Urban

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Sean E. Urban has a total of 145 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • HISTORICAL REFLECTIONS ON THE WORK OF COMMISSION 4

    by Catherine Hohenkerk, Jean-Eudes Arlot, George Kaplan, John A. Bangert, Steven A. Bell, Jose M. Ferrandiz, Agnes Fienga, William Folkner, Marina Lukashova, Elena V. Pitjeva, et al.

    Commission 4 was among the first set of commissions formed within the IAU at its founding in 1919. (Commissions were originally called “Standing Committees.”) During its 96 years of service to the IAU and astronomical community in general, the commission has been fortunate to have been led by many distinguished scientists — see the list of presidents below.


  • CHAPTER VI: REPORTS on DIVISION, COMMISSION, and WORKING GROUP MEETINGS

    by George Kaplan, Catherine Hohenkerk, Toshio Fukushima, Jean-Eudes Arlot, John A. Bangert, Steven A. Bell, William Folkner, Martin Lara, Elena V. Pitjeva, Sean E. Urban, et al.

    The triennial meeting of Commission 4 was attended by 16 people. All of the presentations from the meeting are provided on the commission website at http://www.iaucom4.org/c4docs.html, so this report provides only summaries.

  • COMMISSION 4: EPHEMERIDES

    by George H. Kaplan, Catherine Y. Hohenkerk, Toshio Fukushima, Jean-Eudes Arlot, John A. Bangert, Steven A. Bell, William M. Folkner, Martin Lara, Elena V. Pitjeva, Sean E. Urban, et al.

    The Commission 4 Organizing Committee began its work for the 2009-2012 triennium by revising the commission's terms of reference, which serve as our “mission statement.” The new terms of reference are: (a) Maintain cooperation and collaboration between the national offices providing ephemerides, prediction of phenomena, astronomical reference data, and navigational almanacs. (b) Encourage agreement on the bases (reference systems, time scales, models, and constants) of astronomical ephemerides and reference data in the various countries. Promote improvements to the usability and accuracy of astronomical ephemerides, and provide information comparing computational methods, models, and results to ensure the accuracy of data provided. (c) Maintain databases, available on the Internet to the national ephemeris offices and qualified researchers, containing observations of all types on which the ephemerides are based. Promote the continued importance of observations needed to improve the ephemerides, and encourage prompt availability of these observations, especially those from space missions, to the science community. (d) Encourage the development of software and web sites that provide astronomical ephemerides, prediction of phenomena, and astronomical reference data to the scientific community and public. Promote the development of explanatory material that fosters better understanding of the use and bases of ephemerides and related data.

  • COMMISSION 4: EPHEMERIDES

    by Toshio Fukushima, George H. Kaplan, George A. Krasinsky, Jean-Eudes Arlot, John A. Bangert, Catherine Hohenkerk, Martin Lara, Elena V. Pitjeva, Sean E. Urban, Jan Vondrak

    Dr. George Kaplan, the current Vice-President of the Commission was nominated to be the new President. Dr. Catherine Hohenkerk was elected to be the next Vice-President of the Commission. As for the Membership of the Organizing Committee, Dr. Vondrak stepped down and Drs William Folkner of JPL and Steve Bell of HMNAO have been added. In the below, we present summaries of the reports from various institutions presented at the business session.


  • THE THIRD US NAVAL OBSERVATORY CCD ASTROGRAPH CATALOG (UCAC3)

    by N. Zacharias, C. Finch, T. Girard, N. Hambly, G. Wycoff, M. I. Zacharias, D. Castillo, T. Corbin, M. DiVittorio, S. Dutta, et al.


  • DIVISION I / COMMISSION 8 / WORKING GROUP DENSIFICATION OF THE OPTICAL REFERENCE FRAME

    by Norbert Zacharias, Imants Platais, William F. van Altena, Beatrice Bucciarelli, Thomas E. Corbin, Christine Ducourant, Dafydd Wyn Evans, Ralph A. Gaume, Irina I. Kumkova, Brian D. Mason, et al.

    A continuation of this WG was voted for at the IAU GA 2006 in Prague. The International Celestial Reference Frame (ICRF) is defined by the positions of 212 distant quasars at radio wavelengths. The primary, optical reference frame is the Hipparcos Celestial Reference Frame (HCRF), which is the Hipparcos Catalog without astrometric ‘problem’ stars (in: H. Rickman (ed.) 2001, Proceedings IAU XXIV General Assembly, Transactions IAU XXIVB (San Francisco: ASP), Resolution B1.2). The Tycho-2 catalog with its 2.5 million brightest stars forms the first step in the densification of the optical reference frame. However, the limiting magnitude of about V = 12 of the Tycho-2 catalog is not sufficient for most applications in astronomy and the goal of this IAU Working Group is to further extend the grid of highly accurate positions and motions toward more and fainter stars. The web site of this WG is at .

  • COMMISSION 4: EPHEMERIDES

    by Toshio Fukushima, George H. Kaplan, George A. Krasinsky, Jean Eudes Arlot, John A. Bangert, Catherine Y. Hohenkerk, Martin Lara, Elena V. Pitjeva, Sean E. Urban, Jan Vondrák

    JPL planetary ephemeris development has been very active assimilating measurements from current planetary missions and supporting future missions. The NASA Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) mission with launch in 2009 requires knowledge of the Earth and Mars ephemerides with 30m accuracy. By comparison, the accuracy of the Mars ephemeris in the widely used DE405 ephemeris was about 3 km. Meeting the MSL needs requires an ongoing program of range and very-long baseline interferometry measurements of Mars orbiting spacecraft. The JPL ephemeris DE421 was released three months before the landing of the Phoenix mission on Mars, and has met the 300m requirement. Continued measurements are planned to support the MSL landing.

  • DIVISION XII / COMMISSION 5 / WORKING GROUP DESIGNATIONS

    by Marion Schmitz, Heinz J. Andernach, Suzanne Borde, Kirk D. Borne, Anne P. Cowley, Helene R. Dickel, Pascal Dubois, John S. Gallagher, Françoise Genova, Paul W. Hodge, et al.

    At the 2003 Sydney IAU meeting, Marion Schmitz (Caltech, USA) took over the chair of the Commission 5 Working Group Designations, succeeding Helene Dickel. The Working Group Designations of IAU Commission 5 clarifies existing astronomical nomenclature and helps astronomers avoid potential problems when designating their sources. The most important function of WG Designations during the period 2003-2005 was overseeing the IAU REGISTRY FOR ACRONYMS (for newly discovered astronomical sources of radiation: see the website ) which is sponsored by the WG and operated by the Centre de Données de Strasbourg (CDS). The Clearing House, a subgroup of the WG, screens the submissions for accuracy and conformity to the IAU Recommendations for Nomenclature (). From its beginning in 1997 through August 2006, there have been 132 submissions and 111 acceptances. Attempts to register asterisms, common star names, and suspected variable stars were rejected. The past three years saw 61 acronyms submitted with 50 of them being accepted. (GIRL - yes; WOMEN - no).


  • COMMISSION 4: EPHEMERIDES

    by George A. Krasinsky, Toshio Fukushima, Jean Chapront, John A. Bangert, Catherine Y. Hohenkerk, George H. Kaplan, P. Kenneth Seidelmann, E. Myles Standish, Sean E. Urban, Jan Vondrák

    This business meeting was held from 16:00 to 17:30. Toshio Fukushima and George Kaplan were welcomed as the next president and vice-president, respectively. The following, in no particular order, are the summary reports from the various offices. The full versions will be made available on the Commission 4 website at .

  • Data Mining for Double Stars in Astrometric Catalogs

    by Gary L. Wycoff, Brian D. Mason, Sean E. Urban