Signe Lovise Thingnes
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Signe Lovise Thingnes has a total of 22 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
E. Sandberg
Department of Chemistry, Biotechnology and Food Science, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, 1430 Ås, Norway
3 shared publicationsT. Framstad
Department of Production Animal Clinical Sciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, 0454 Oslo, Norway
3 shared publicationsTore Framstad
Norwegian School of Veterinary Science, Department of Production Animal Clinical Sciences, Ullevaalsveien 72, 0454 Oslo, Norway
2 shared publicationsA. H. Gaustad
Norsvin, Storhamargata 44, 2317 Hamar, Norway
1 shared publicationA.H. Gaustad
1 shared publicationAnn Helen Gaustad
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
Welfare and Performance of Finishing Pigs Kept at Two Group Sizes on Ad Libitum vs. Restricted Feeding
This 2 × 2 factorial study examined the welfare and performance of finishing pigs at two group sizes (9 or 18 pigs) over 12 weeks. For each set of groups of either 9 or 18 pigs, half of the pigs in each group size were fed ad libitum, while the others received a mildly restricted ration. Treatments were assigned to 16 partially slatted floor pens in a randomized block design, with a floor space of 1.15 m2/pig. Except in Week 1, there were proportionally fewer pigs with ear (p = 0.020) and tail (p < 0.0001) bite marks in groups of 18 than in groups of 9. Ear bite marks declined over time in both group sizes (p < 0.0001). There was also a significant interaction between group size and week regarding severe bite marks on the ears (p < 0.0002). Tail bite mark prevalence increased over time in the smaller groups but decreased in the larger groups (interaction: p < 0.001). A higher proportion of pigs in smaller groups sought human contact in Weeks 1 and 6, but this measurement equalized by Week 10 (interaction: p = 0.008). There were proportionally more pigs with tucked tails in the smaller groups in Week 1 but not in later weeks (interaction: p < 0.0001). Group size did not influence pig cleanliness or locomotion disorders. Ad libitum (vs. restricted) feeding increased average daily gain (p < 0.001), feed intake (p = 0.002), and slaughter weight (p = 0.030). Results suggest better welfare in the larger than in the smaller groups.
Open AccessWelfare and Performance of Finishing Pigs Kept at Two Group Sizes on Ad Libitum vs. Restricted Feeding
This 2 × 2 factorial study examined the welfare and performance of finishing pigs at two group sizes (9 or 18 pigs) over 12 weeks. For each set of groups of either 9 or 18 pigs, half of the pigs in each group size were fed ad libitum, while the others received a mildly restricted ration. Treatments were assigned to 16 partially slatted floor pens in a randomized block design, with a floor space of 1.15 m2/pig. Except in Week 1, there were proportionally fewer pigs with ear (p = 0.020) and tail (p < 0.0001) bite marks in groups of 18 than in groups of 9. Ear bite marks declined over time in both group sizes (p < 0.0001). There was also a significant interaction between group size and week regarding severe bite marks on the ears (p < 0.0002). Tail bite mark prevalence increased over time in the smaller groups but decreased in the larger groups (interaction: p < 0.001). A higher proportion of pigs in smaller groups sought human contact in Weeks 1 and 6, but this measurement equalized by Week 10 (interaction: p = 0.008). There were proportionally more pigs with tucked tails in the smaller groups in Week 1 but not in later weeks (interaction: p < 0.0001). Group size did not influence pig cleanliness or locomotion disorders. Ad libitum (vs. restricted) feeding increased average daily gain (p < 0.001), feed intake (p = 0.002), and slaughter weight (p = 0.030). Results suggest better welfare in the larger than in the smaller groups.
- 2 October 2015
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A — Animal Science
- Vol. 65 (3-4) , 148-157
The effect of different dietary energy levels during rearing and mid-gestation on sow lifetime performance and longevity
The presented study investigated the long-term effects of four different gilt development strategies on sow lifetime performance and longevity. Five hundred Norwegian Landrace x Yorkshire animals were offered two dietary energy levels during rearing: 13.2–29.0 MJ NE/d (High) or 10.6–22.9 MJ NE/d (Norm), and two dietary energy levels during mid-gestation (day 42–94); 27.3 MJ NE/d (High) or 22.3 MJ NE/d (Norm). Dietary treatments were only imposed in parity one. While no clear long-term effect was found on lifetime weight and backfat development, the survivability in lower parities was higher among sows offered the highest dietary energy levels during parity one. These sows also had the numerically highest number of produced piglets per sow lifetime. This study provides insight into how different gilt development strategies influence development and lifetime performance of a modern genotype sow, in a commercial setting.
- 2 October 2015
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A — Animal Science
- Vol. 65 (3-4) , 148-157
The effect of different dietary energy levels during rearing and mid-gestation on sow lifetime performance and longevity
The presented study investigated the long-term effects of four different gilt development strategies on sow lifetime performance and longevity. Five hundred Norwegian Landrace x Yorkshire animals were offered two dietary energy levels during rearing: 13.2–29.0 MJ NE/d (High) or 10.6–22.9 MJ NE/d (Norm), and two dietary energy levels during mid-gestation (day 42–94); 27.3 MJ NE/d (High) or 22.3 MJ NE/d (Norm). Dietary treatments were only imposed in parity one. While no clear long-term effect was found on lifetime weight and backfat development, the survivability in lower parities was higher among sows offered the highest dietary energy levels during parity one. These sows also had the numerically highest number of produced piglets per sow lifetime. This study provides insight into how different gilt development strategies influence development and lifetime performance of a modern genotype sow, in a commercial setting.
- 1 February 2015
- Published by Elsevier in Livestock Science
- Vol. 172, 33-42
The effect of different dietary energy levels during rearing and mid-gestation on gilt performance and culling rate
- 1 February 2015
- Published by Elsevier in Livestock Science
- Vol. 172, 33-42
The effect of different dietary energy levels during rearing and mid-gestation on gilt performance and culling rate
- 28 November 2014
- Published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- p. 341
The effect of different dietary energy levels during rearing and mid-gestation on gilt performance
"The effect of different dietary energy levels during rearing and mid-gestation on gilt performance" published on 28 Nov 2014 by Wageningen Academic.
- 28 November 2014
- Published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- p. 341
The effect of different dietary energy levels during rearing and mid-gestation on gilt performance
"The effect of different dietary energy levels during rearing and mid-gestation on gilt performance" published on 28 Nov 2014 by Wageningen Academic.
- 28 November 2014
- Published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- p. 342
The effect of dietary energy levels during rearing and first gestation on sow lifetime performance
"The effect of dietary energy levels during rearing and first gestation on sow lifetime performance" published on 28 Nov 2014 by Wageningen Academic.
- 28 November 2014
- Published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- p. 342
The effect of dietary energy levels during rearing and first gestation on sow lifetime performance
"The effect of dietary energy levels during rearing and first gestation on sow lifetime performance" published on 28 Nov 2014 by Wageningen Academic.
- 1 October 2013
- Published by Elsevier in Livestock Science
- Vol. 157 (1) , 210-217
Pea starch meal as a substitute for cereal grain in diets for lactating sows: The effect on sow and litter performance
- 1 October 2013
- Published by Elsevier in Livestock Science
- Vol. 157 (1) , 210-217
Pea starch meal as a substitute for cereal grain in diets for lactating sows: The effect on sow and litter performance
- 30 November 2012
- Published by Elsevier in Livestock Science
- Vol. 149 (3) , 250-259
Ad libitum versus step-up feeding during late lactation: The effect on feed consumption, body composition and production performance in dry fed loose housed sows
- 30 November 2012
- Published by Elsevier in Livestock Science
- Vol. 149 (3) , 250-259
Ad libitum versus step-up feeding during late lactation: The effect on feed consumption, body composition and production performance in dry fed loose housed sows