Eric Lipp

Background: Nausea and vomiting remain feared cancer treatment-related side effects. Antiemetic guideline trials exclude malignant glioma patients. In patients receiving radiation with concurrent temozolomide, chemoradiation-induced nausea; vomiting (cRINV) rates are 35% and 26%, respectively, which reduce quality of life, treatment adherence, and cancer control. Methods: This randomized phase-II open-label trial, evaluated efficacy, patient preference, and satisfaction of ondansetron (short-acting 5HT3-RA; 3 h-half-life) monotherapy versus rolapitant (long-acting NK1-RA; 180 h-half-life) plus ondansetron in preventing cRINV during 6 weeks of temozolomide (75 mg/m2/day × 42 day) with radiation. Fifty-three eligible patients were randomized to Sequence-A (ondansetron-8 mg days: 1–42, day 22 rolapitant-180 mg) or Sequence-B (rolapitant day 1 plus daily ondansetron). Primary endpoint was percentage achieving cRINV-complete response (no vomiting/antiemetic rescue) during the first 2 weeks of radiation. Secondary endpoints: cRIN/cRIV rates, preference/satisfaction for rolapitant/ondansetron, toxicity, and adherence. Results: Forty-eight (Sequence-A: 25; Sequnce-B: 23) initiated chemoradiation. Mean age = 53, 58% male, 73% Karnofsky performance status (KPS) > 90%, and 73% glioblastoma. During first 2 weeks of radiation, cRINV-CR was 57% with ondansetron and 74% receiving rolapitant/ondansetron (P = .27). Patient-reported 6-week cRINV-CR was 55% for both arms. First 2-week cRIN rates (38% Sequence-A; 32% Sequence-B) were more than cRIV rates (19% Sequence-A; 0% Sequence-B). Patients receiving ondansetron alone vomited more during the first 2 weeks and overall (26%) than with rolapitant/ondansetron (11%). Among 35 completers, 20% preferred rolapitant/ondansetron, 60% preferred ondansetron, and 20% had no preference (P = .0004). Adverse-events attributable to antiemetics were grade 1–2. Conclusions: No difference was found in cRINV-CRs between the first 2-week treatments or overall satisfaction. Although not a positive study, less vomiting occurred with rolapitant/ondansetron. While patients prefer ondansetron monotherapy, most perceived better effectiveness with rolapitant/ondansetron.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a life-threating condition that is common in patients with adult-type diffuse gliomas, yet thromboprophylaxis is controversial because of possible intracerebral hemorrhage. Effective VTE prediction models exist for other cancers, but not glioma. Our objective was to develop a VTE prediction tool to improve glioma patient care, incorporating clinical, blood-based, histologic, and molecular markers. We analyzed preoperative arterial blood, tumor tissue, and clinical-pathologic data (including next-generation sequencing data) from 258 patients with newly diagnosed World Health Organization (WHO) grade 2 to 4 adult-type diffuse gliomas. Forty-six (17.8%) experienced VTE. Tumor expression of tissue factor (TF) and podoplanin (PDPN) each positively correlated with VTE, although only circulating TF and D-dimers, not circulating PDPN, correlated with VTE risk. Gliomas with mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) or IDH2 (IDHmut) caused fewer VTEs; multivariable analysis suggested that this is due to IDHmut suppression of TF, not PDPN. In a predictive time-to-event model, the following predicted increased VTE risk in newly diagnosed patients with glioma: (1) history of VTE; (2) hypertension; (3) asthma; (4) white blood cell count; (5) WHO tumor grade; (6) patient age; and (7) body mass index. Conversely, IDHmut, hypothyroidism, and MGMT promoter methylation predicted reduced VTE risk. These 10 variables were used to create a web-based VTE prediction tool that was validated in 2 separate cohorts of patients with adult-type diffuse glioma from other institutions. This study extends our understanding of the VTE landscape in these tumors and provides evidence-based guidance for clinicians to mitigate VTE risk in patients with glioma.

For three years, COVID-19 has circulated among our communities and around the world, fundamentally changing social interactions, health care systems, and service delivery. For people living with (and receiving treatment for) cancer, pandemic conditions presented significant additional hurdles in an already unstable and shifting environment, including disrupted personal contact with care providers, interrupted access to clinical trials, distanced therapeutic encounters, multiple immune vulnerabilities, and new forms of financial precarity. In a 2020 perspective in this journal, we examined how COVID-19 was reshaping cancer care in the early stages of the pandemic and how these changes might endure into the future. Three years later, and in light of a series of interviews with patients and their caregivers from the United States and Australia conducted during the pandemic, we return to consider the potential legacy effects of the pandemic on cancer care. While some challenges to care provision and survivorship were unforeseen, others accentuated and amplified existing problems experienced by patients, caregivers, and health care providers. Both are likely to have enduring effects in the “post-pandemic” world, raising the importance of focusing on lessons that can be learned for the future.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common paraneoplastic complication in patients with adult-type diffuse gliomas. VTE greatly diminishes quality-of-life, and can even be life-threatening. While effective VTE prediction models exist for other cancers, those models do not work for gliomas. Thus, there are no standard guidelines for thromboprophylaxis in glioma patients. To address this deficiency, arterial blood, tumor tissue, and comprehensive clinical-pathologic data (including next generation sequencing) were obtained from 258 newly diagnosed WHO grade 2-4 adult-type diffuse glioma patients at Northwestern Memorial Hospital. Forty-six out of 258 grade 2-4 glioma patients (17.8%) experienced a subsequent VTE. Intratumoral expression of two proteins that have been associated with VTE risk in other cancers, thromboplastin and podoplanin, was higher in IDH wild-type than IDH mutant gliomas. Tissue expression of both markers was associated with increased VTE risk, but in the circulation, only thromboplastin positively correlated with VTE. LASSO time-to-event analysis showed that older patient age, elevated body mass index, elevated WBC count, hypertension, a preoperative history of VTE, asthma, and higher WHO grade predicted increased postoperative VTE risk, whereas hypothyroidism, IDH mutation, and MGMT promoter methylation were negative risk factors. Together, these 10 variables generated a receiver operating characteristic curve for 3, 6, 9, and 12 months from original surgery resulting in estimated AUC value of 0.82 in the Northwestern discovery cohort, 0.72 in the UCLA validation cohort (N=68), and 0.68 in the Duke validation cohort (N=157). We created an online prediction tool based on this model, which estimates VTE risk up to 1 year from original surgery. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first externally validated VTE risk prediction tool designed specifically for adult-type diffuse glioma patients. This tool, based on readily obtainable information, provides treating physicians with more objective risk estimates on which to base thromboprophylaxis decision-making.

Several immunotherapy clinical trials in recurrent glioblastoma have reported long-term survival benefits in 10–20% of patients. Here we perform genomic analysis of tumor tissue from recurrent WHO grade IV glioblastoma patients acquired prior to immunotherapy intervention. We report that very low tumor mutation burden is associated with longer survival after recombinant polio virotherapy or after immune checkpoint blockade in recurrent glioblastoma patients. A relationship between tumor mutation burden and survival is not observed in cohorts of immunotherapy naïve newly diagnosed or recurrent glioblastoma patients. Transcriptomic analyses reveal an inverse relationship between tumor mutation burden and enrichment of inflammatory gene signatures in cohorts of recurrent, but not newly diagnosed glioblastoma tumors, implying that a relationship between tumor mutation burden and tumor-intrinsic inflammation evolves upon recurrence.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has fundamentally disrupted the practice of oncology, shifting care onto virtual platforms, rearranging the logistics and economics of running a successful clinical practice and research, and in some contexts, redefining what treatments patients with cancer should and can receive. Since the start of the pandemic in early 2020, there has been considerable emphasis placed on the implications for patients with cancer in terms of their vulnerability to the virus and potential exposure in healthcare settings. But little emphasis has been placed on the significant, and potentially enduring, consequences of COVID-19 for how cancer care is delivered. In this article, we outline the importance of a focus on the effects of COVID-19 for oncology practice during and potentially after the pandemic, focusing on key shifts that are already evident, including: the pivot to online consultations, shifts in access to clinical trial and definitions of “essential care,” the changing economics of practice, and the potential legacy effects of rapidly implemented changes in cancer care. COVID-19 is reshaping oncology practice, clinical trials, and delivery of cancer care broadly, and these changes might endure well beyond the short- to mid-term of the active pandemic. Therefore, shifts in practice brought about by the pandemic must be accompanied by improved training and awareness, enhanced infrastructure, and evidence-based support if they are to harness the positives and offset the potential negative consequences of the impacts of COVID-19 on cancer care.

Glioma therapeutic resistance to alkylating chemotherapy is mediated via O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT). We hypothesized that a CD45/HAM56/MGMT double-stained cocktail would improve MGMT discrimination in tumor cells versus inflammatory and endothelial cells (IEC). Total MGMT protein was quantified by IHC on 982 glioblastomas (GBM) and 199 anaplastic astrocytomas. Correcting for IEC was done by a CD45/HAM56/MGMT 2-color cocktail. Lowest IEC infiltrates (IEC “cold spots”) were identified to quantitate MGMT as well as the percentage of IEC% in the IEC cold spots. MGMT promoter methylation (PM) was also determined. Among the GBM biopsies, mean uncorrected and corrected MGMT% were 19.87 (range 0–90) and 16.67; mean IEC% was 18.65 (range 1–80). Four hundred and fifty one (45.9%) GBM biopsies were positive MGMT PM. Both uncorrected and corrected MGMT% positivity correlated with PM. All 3 MGMT scores correlated with overall survival (OS) in GBM’s. Cold spot IEC% was also positively associated with OS. These effects remained in a multivariate model after adjusting for age and disease status. Prognosis determined by correcting MGMT% score for IEC% is not improved in this analysis. However, IEC COLD SPOT score does provide additional prognostic information that can be gained from this correction method.