Carolyn Hastie
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Carolyn Hastie has a total of 82 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Kathleen Fahy
University of Southern Queensland
9 shared publications - Jenny Anne Parratt
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Southern Cross University, Australia
5 shared publications Anne Saxton
University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, 2308, Australia
4 shared publicationsKathleen M. Fahy
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Southern Cross University, Lismore, New South Wales, 2480, Australia; School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, 4069, Australia
4 shared publications- Roslyn Donnellan-Fernandez
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Logan Campus, Queensland, Australia
3 shared publications - A. Saxton
Southern Cross University, School of Health and Human Sciences, Southern Cross Drive, Bilinga, Queensland 4225, Australia
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 17 June 2026
- Published by SAGE Publications in Women's Health
- Vol. 22
Overcoming barriers and harnessing facilitators: Respectful maternity care in least-developed countries - a systematic review
Background: Disrespectful care violates women’s rights, delays care-seeking and contributes to preventable adverse birth outcomes. Although Respectful Maternity Care (RMC) is a key strategy for improving maternal and neonatal health, evidence on factors affecting its implementation in least-developed countries remains poorly synthesised. Objective: To assess the barriers and facilitators of RMC in low-income countries. Design: Systematic review synthesising evidence from qualitative and mixed-methods studies was conducted. Data sources and methods: A systematic search was conducted across major databases, including Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, CINAHL, and Embase. Eligibility criteria were defined using the SPIDER framework. Studies published between 2015 and 2025 were included. Methodological quality was assessed using JBI SUMARI for qualitative studies and the QATSDD tool for mixed-methods studies. SPIDER framework was applied to support eligibility criteria. The review followed PRISMA guidelines. The data were synthesised using thematic analysis and applied to the Socio-Ecological Model. Results: Forty-eight studies conducted in least-developed countries were analysed, consisting of 36 qualitative studies and 12 mixed-methods studies. Barriers and facilitators to RMC were identified at individual (knowledge, attitude, skills), interpersonal, organizational (resources, infrastructures), policy (guidelines, education), and socio-cultural level (norms, cultures). Conclusion: Strengthening RMC is crucial for reducing maternal and neonatal mortality. The review highlights the need for supportive policies, improved infrastructure, and targeted provider training. Future research should develop and validate context-specific RMC principles and indicators to strengthen providers’ understanding and skills for practice in least-developed countries. Registration: The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023443998).
- 17 June 2026
- Published by SAGE Publications in Women's Health
- Vol. 22
Open AccessOvercoming barriers and harnessing facilitators: Respectful maternity care in least-developed countries - a systematic review
Background: Disrespectful care violates women’s rights, delays care-seeking and contributes to preventable adverse birth outcomes. Although Respectful Maternity Care (RMC) is a key strategy for improving maternal and neonatal health, evidence on factors affecting its implementation in least-developed countries remains poorly synthesised. Objective: To assess the barriers and facilitators of RMC in low-income countries. Design: Systematic review synthesising evidence from qualitative and mixed-methods studies was conducted. Data sources and methods: A systematic search was conducted across major databases, including Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, CINAHL, and Embase. Eligibility criteria were defined using the SPIDER framework. Studies published between 2015 and 2025 were included. Methodological quality was assessed using JBI SUMARI for qualitative studies and the QATSDD tool for mixed-methods studies. SPIDER framework was applied to support eligibility criteria. The review followed PRISMA guidelines. The data were synthesised using thematic analysis and applied to the Socio-Ecological Model. Results: Forty-eight studies conducted in least-developed countries were analysed, consisting of 36 qualitative studies and 12 mixed-methods studies. Barriers and facilitators to RMC were identified at individual (knowledge, attitude, skills), interpersonal, organizational (resources, infrastructures), policy (guidelines, education), and socio-cultural level (norms, cultures). Conclusion: Strengthening RMC is crucial for reducing maternal and neonatal mortality. The review highlights the need for supportive policies, improved infrastructure, and targeted provider training. Future research should develop and validate context-specific RMC principles and indicators to strengthen providers’ understanding and skills for practice in least-developed countries. Registration: The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023443998).
- Open Access
- 29 March 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Public Health
- Vol. 26 (1)
Women’s reported experience of respectful maternity care measures worldwide: a systematic review
Measuring women’s experiences of Respectful Maternity Care (RMC) requires valid and reliable tools. Although several RMC tools exist, their methodolo
- 29 March 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Public Health
- Vol. 26 (1)
Open AccessWomen’s reported experience of respectful maternity care measures worldwide: a systematic review
Measuring women’s experiences of Respectful Maternity Care (RMC) requires valid and reliable tools. Although several RMC tools exist, their methodolo
- Open Access
- 31 December 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Women and Birth
- Vol. 39 (1) , 102159
“I trust the evidence”: Why Australian midwives practice homebirth without professional indemnity insurance
- 31 December 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Women and Birth
- Vol. 39 (1) , 102159
Open Access“I trust the evidence”: Why Australian midwives practice homebirth without professional indemnity insurance
- Open Access
- 30 December 2025
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 20 (12) , e0338606
Determinants of non-utilization of health facilities for childbirth in Papua New Guinea: Evidence from the demographic and health survey
Background: Health facility-based childbirth services are essential for reducing maternal and neonatal mortality. Yet, these services remain underutilized in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), including Papua New Guinea (PNG), where birthing at home or in village settings continue to predominate. This study investigated the determinants of non-utilization of health facilities for childbirth among women in PNG. Methods: Data from a weighted sample of 6,432 women using the 2016–2018 PNG Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) were analyzed. Descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine the factors associated with the non-utilization of health facilities for childbirth. The adjusted odds ratios (AOR) with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were computed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences, version 30.0. Results: Overall, 58.3% (95% CI: 57.0–59.5) of women did not give birth in a health facility. Women were more likely to give birth at home or in the village if they had no formal education (AOR: 1.48; 95% CI: 1.11–2.09), lived in rural areas (AOR: 1.31; 95% CI: 1.11–1.75), were from the Southern (AOR: 1.05; 95% CI: 1.01–1.54), or Momase (AOR: 1.06; 95% CI: 1.02–1.83) regions, made their own healthcare decisions (AOR: 1.21; 95% CI: 1.10–4.14), had these decisions made by their husbands (AOR: 1.69; 95% CI: 1.13–2.63), walked to a health facility (AOR: 1.01; 95% CI: 1.00–1.67), or traveled more than 24 hours to access care (AOR: 1.02; 95% CI: 1.39–2.70), and had no antenatal care visits during pregnancy (AOR: 1.08; 95% CI: 1.04–1.51). Conclusions: Over half of the women in this study did not utilize health facilities for childbirth. Demographic and health service-related factors influenced the non-utilization of facility-based childbirth, highlighting the need to scale up maternal health services. Increasing uptake of facility-based childbirth requires coordinated system-level efforts and incentive-based interventions that promote antenatal care and skilled birth attendance, especially for rural women. Male-inclusive strategies in maternal health decision-making are critical for improving women’s access to and utilization of facility-based childbirth services.
- 30 December 2025
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 20 (12) , e0338606
Open AccessDeterminants of non-utilization of health facilities for childbirth in Papua New Guinea: Evidence from the demographic and health survey
Background: Health facility-based childbirth services are essential for reducing maternal and neonatal mortality. Yet, these services remain underutilized in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), including Papua New Guinea (PNG), where birthing at home or in village settings continue to predominate. This study investigated the determinants of non-utilization of health facilities for childbirth among women in PNG. Methods: Data from a weighted sample of 6,432 women using the 2016–2018 PNG Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) were analyzed. Descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine the factors associated with the non-utilization of health facilities for childbirth. The adjusted odds ratios (AOR) with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were computed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences, version 30.0. Results: Overall, 58.3% (95% CI: 57.0–59.5) of women did not give birth in a health facility. Women were more likely to give birth at home or in the village if they had no formal education (AOR: 1.48; 95% CI: 1.11–2.09), lived in rural areas (AOR: 1.31; 95% CI: 1.11–1.75), were from the Southern (AOR: 1.05; 95% CI: 1.01–1.54), or Momase (AOR: 1.06; 95% CI: 1.02–1.83) regions, made their own healthcare decisions (AOR: 1.21; 95% CI: 1.10–4.14), had these decisions made by their husbands (AOR: 1.69; 95% CI: 1.13–2.63), walked to a health facility (AOR: 1.01; 95% CI: 1.00–1.67), or traveled more than 24 hours to access care (AOR: 1.02; 95% CI: 1.39–2.70), and had no antenatal care visits during pregnancy (AOR: 1.08; 95% CI: 1.04–1.51). Conclusions: Over half of the women in this study did not utilize health facilities for childbirth. Demographic and health service-related factors influenced the non-utilization of facility-based childbirth, highlighting the need to scale up maternal health services. Increasing uptake of facility-based childbirth requires coordinated system-level efforts and incentive-based interventions that promote antenatal care and skilled birth attendance, especially for rural women. Male-inclusive strategies in maternal health decision-making are critical for improving women’s access to and utilization of facility-based childbirth services.
- 29 September 2025
- Published by Wiley in BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Continuity, Not Sector, Drives Maternity Outcomes
- 29 September 2025
- Published by Wiley in BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Continuity, Not Sector, Drives Maternity Outcomes
- Open Access
- 24 September 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Women and Birth
- Vol. 38 (6) , 102108
Midwives' perceptions of support for new graduates: A survey that compared support from midwives who provide continuity of care with midwives from other models of care
- 24 September 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Women and Birth
- Vol. 38 (6) , 102108
Open AccessMidwives' perceptions of support for new graduates: A survey that compared support from midwives who provide continuity of care with midwives from other models of care
- Open Access
Enhancing midwifery course curricula: validating knowledge and skills in climate change and planetary health
- Open Access
- 1 June 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare
- Vol. 45, 101115
Women’s experiences of the transition phase of physiological labour during freebirth: A qualitative study
- 1 June 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare
- Vol. 45, 101115
Open AccessWomen’s experiences of the transition phase of physiological labour during freebirth: A qualitative study
- Open Access
- 21 April 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Women and Birth
- Vol. 38 (3) , 101913
Midwives’ perceptions of the support they provide to new graduates and the role of the health service in Australia: A survey of midwives
- 21 April 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Women and Birth
- Vol. 38 (3) , 101913
Open AccessMidwives’ perceptions of the support they provide to new graduates and the role of the health service in Australia: A survey of midwives