Tomislav Žic
Research Subjects
Tomislav Žic has a total of 89 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Bojan Vršnak
Hvar Observatory, Faculty of Geodesy, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
12 shared publications - Astrid M. Veronig
University of Graz, Institute of Physics
10 shared publications - Manuela Temmer
Institute of Physics University of Graz Graz Austria
10 shared publications B. Vršnak
4 shared publications- S. Lulić
Karlovac University of Applied Sciences
4 shared publications Bojan Vršnak
Hvar Observatory, Faculty of Geodesy, Kačićeva 26, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia
3 shared publications
Latest Publications
- 20 November 2017
- Published by American Astronomical Society in The Astrophysical Journal
- Vol. 850 (1) , 88
A Numerical Simulation of Coronal Waves Interacting with Coronal Holes. I. Basic Features
We have developed a new numerical code that is able to perform 2.5D simulations of a magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) wave propagation in the corona, and its interaction with a low-density region, such as a coronal hole (CH). We show that the impact of the wave on the CH leads to different effects, such as reflection and transmission of the incoming wave, stationary features at the CH boundary, or formation of a density depletion. We present a comprehensive analysis of the morphology and kinematics of primary and secondary waves, i.e., we describe in detail the temporal evolution of density, magnetic field, plasma flow velocity, phase speed, and position of the wave amplitude. Effects like reflection, refraction, and transmission of the wave strongly support the theory that large-scale disturbances in the corona are fast MHD waves and distinguish that theory from the competing pseudo-wave theory. The formation of stationary bright fronts was one of the main reasons for the development of pseudo-waves. Here, we show that stationary bright fronts can be produced by interactions of an MHD wave with a CH. We find secondary waves that are traversing through the CH and we show that one part of these traversing waves leaves the CH again, while another part is being reflected at the CH boundary inside the CH. We observe a density depletion that is moving in the opposite direction of the primary wave propagation. We show that the primary wave pushes the CH boundary to the right, caused by the wave front exerting dynamic pressure on the CH.
- 20 November 2017
- Published by American Astronomical Society in The Astrophysical Journal
- Vol. 850 (1) , 88
A Numerical Simulation of Coronal Waves Interacting with Coronal Holes. I. Basic Features
We have developed a new numerical code that is able to perform 2.5D simulations of a magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) wave propagation in the corona, and its interaction with a low-density region, such as a coronal hole (CH). We show that the impact of the wave on the CH leads to different effects, such as reflection and transmission of the incoming wave, stationary features at the CH boundary, or formation of a density depletion. We present a comprehensive analysis of the morphology and kinematics of primary and secondary waves, i.e., we describe in detail the temporal evolution of density, magnetic field, plasma flow velocity, phase speed, and position of the wave amplitude. Effects like reflection, refraction, and transmission of the wave strongly support the theory that large-scale disturbances in the corona are fast MHD waves and distinguish that theory from the competing pseudo-wave theory. The formation of stationary bright fronts was one of the main reasons for the development of pseudo-waves. Here, we show that stationary bright fronts can be produced by interactions of an MHD wave with a CH. We find secondary waves that are traversing through the CH and we show that one part of these traversing waves leaves the CH again, while another part is being reflected at the CH boundary inside the CH. We observe a density depletion that is moving in the opposite direction of the primary wave propagation. We show that the primary wave pushes the CH boundary to the right, caused by the wave front exerting dynamic pressure on the CH.
- Open Access
- 12 December 2016
- Published by Springer Nature in Solar Physics
- Vol. 292 (1) , 1-24
Understanding the Physical Nature of Coronal “EIT Waves”
For almost 20 years the physical nature of globally propagating waves in the solar corona (commonly called “EIT waves”) has been controversial and subject to debate. Additional theories have been proposed over the years to explain observations that did not agree with the originally proposed fast-mode wave interpretation. However, the incompatibility of observations made using the Extreme-ultraviolet Imaging Telescope (EIT) onboard the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory with the fast-mode wave interpretation was challenged by differing viewpoints from the twin Solar Terrestrial Relations Observatory spacecraft and data with higher spatial and temporal resolution from the Solar Dynamics Observatory. In this article, we reexamine the theories proposed to explain EIT waves to identify measurable properties and behaviours that can be compared to current and future observations. Most of us conclude that the so-called EIT waves are best described as fast-mode large-amplitude waves or shocks that are initially driven by the impulsive expansion of an erupting coronal mass ejection in the low corona.
- 12 December 2016
- Published by Springer Nature in Solar Physics
- Vol. 292 (1) , 1-24
Open AccessUnderstanding the Physical Nature of Coronal “EIT Waves”
For almost 20 years the physical nature of globally propagating waves in the solar corona (commonly called “EIT waves”) has been controversial and subject to debate. Additional theories have been proposed over the years to explain observations that did not agree with the originally proposed fast-mode wave interpretation. However, the incompatibility of observations made using the Extreme-ultraviolet Imaging Telescope (EIT) onboard the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory with the fast-mode wave interpretation was challenged by differing viewpoints from the twin Solar Terrestrial Relations Observatory spacecraft and data with higher spatial and temporal resolution from the Solar Dynamics Observatory. In this article, we reexamine the theories proposed to explain EIT waves to identify measurable properties and behaviours that can be compared to current and future observations. Most of us conclude that the so-called EIT waves are best described as fast-mode large-amplitude waves or shocks that are initially driven by the impulsive expansion of an erupting coronal mass ejection in the low corona.
- Open Access
- 29 July 2016
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
- Vol. 121 (8) , 7423-7434
On the propagation of a geoeffective coronal mass ejection during 15–17 March 2015
The largest geomagnetic storm so far, called 2015 St. Patrick's Day event, in the solar cycle 24 was produced by a fast coronal mass ejection (CME) originating on 15 March 2015. It was an initially west‐oriented CME and expected to only cause a weak geomagnetic disturbance. Why did this CME finally cause such a large geomagnetic storm? We try to find some clues by investigating its propagation from the Sun to 1 AU. First, we reconstruct the CME's kinematic properties in the corona from the SOHO and Solar Dynamics Observatory imaging data with the aid of the graduated cylindrical shell model. It is suggested that the CME propagated to the west ∼33°±10° away from the Sun‐Earth line with a speed of about 817 km s−1 before leaving the field of view of the SOHO/Large Angle and Spectrometric Coronagraph (LASCO) C3 camera. A magnetic cloud (MC) corresponding to this CME was measured in situ by the Wind spacecraft 2 days after the CME left LASCO's field of view. By applying two MC reconstruction methods, we infer the configuration of the MC as well as some kinematic information, which implies that the CME possibly experienced an eastward deflection on its way to 1 AU. However, due to the lack of observations from the STEREO spacecraft, the CME's kinematic evolution in interplanetary space is not clear. In order to fill this gap, we utilize numerical MHD simulation, drag‐based CME propagation model (DBM) and the model for CME deflection in interplanetary space (DIPS) to recover the propagation process, especially the trajectory, of the CME from 30RS to 1 AU under the constraints of the derived CME's kinematics near the Sun and at 1 AU. It is suggested that the trajectory of the CME was deflected toward the Earth by about 12°, consistent with the implication from the MC reconstruction at 1 AU. This eastward deflection probably contributed to the CME's unexpected geoeffectiveness by pushing the center of the initially west‐oriented CME closer to the Earth.
- 29 July 2016
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
- Vol. 121 (8) , 7423-7434
Open AccessOn the propagation of a geoeffective coronal mass ejection during 15–17 March 2015
The largest geomagnetic storm so far, called 2015 St. Patrick's Day event, in the solar cycle 24 was produced by a fast coronal mass ejection (CME) originating on 15 March 2015. It was an initially west‐oriented CME and expected to only cause a weak geomagnetic disturbance. Why did this CME finally cause such a large geomagnetic storm? We try to find some clues by investigating its propagation from the Sun to 1 AU. First, we reconstruct the CME's kinematic properties in the corona from the SOHO and Solar Dynamics Observatory imaging data with the aid of the graduated cylindrical shell model. It is suggested that the CME propagated to the west ∼33°±10° away from the Sun‐Earth line with a speed of about 817 km s−1 before leaving the field of view of the SOHO/Large Angle and Spectrometric Coronagraph (LASCO) C3 camera. A magnetic cloud (MC) corresponding to this CME was measured in situ by the Wind spacecraft 2 days after the CME left LASCO's field of view. By applying two MC reconstruction methods, we infer the configuration of the MC as well as some kinematic information, which implies that the CME possibly experienced an eastward deflection on its way to 1 AU. However, due to the lack of observations from the STEREO spacecraft, the CME's kinematic evolution in interplanetary space is not clear. In order to fill this gap, we utilize numerical MHD simulation, drag‐based CME propagation model (DBM) and the model for CME deflection in interplanetary space (DIPS) to recover the propagation process, especially the trajectory, of the CME from 30RS to 1 AU under the constraints of the derived CME's kinematics near the Sun and at 1 AU. It is suggested that the trajectory of the CME was deflected toward the Earth by about 12°, consistent with the implication from the MC reconstruction at 1 AU. This eastward deflection probably contributed to the CME's unexpected geoeffectiveness by pushing the center of the initially west‐oriented CME closer to the Earth.
- 9 December 2015
- Published by Springer Nature in Solar Physics
- Vol. 291 (1) , 89-115
Formation of Coronal Large-Amplitude Waves and the Chromospheric Response
- 9 December 2015
- Published by Springer Nature in Solar Physics
- Vol. 291 (1) , 89-115
Formation of Coronal Large-Amplitude Waves and the Chromospheric Response
- Open Access
Heliospheric Propagation of Coronal Mass Ejections: Drag-Based Model Fitting
The so-called drag-based model (DBM) simulates analytically the propagation of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) in interplanetary space and allows the prediction of their arrival times and impact speeds at any point in the heliosphere ("target"). The DBM is based on the assumption that beyond a distance of about 20 solar radii from the Sun, the dominant force acting on CMEs is the "aerodynamic" drag force. In the standard form of DBM, the user provisionally chooses values for the model input parameters, by which the kinematics of the CME over the entire Sun--"target" distance range is defined. The choice of model input parameters is usually based on several previously undertaken statistical studies. In other words, the model is used by ad hoc implementation of statistics-based values of the input parameters, which are not necessarily appropriate for the CME under study. Furthermore, such a procedure lacks quantitative information on how well the simulation reproduces the coronagraphically observed kinematics of the CME, and thus does not provide an estimate of the reliability of the arrival prediction. In this paper we advance the DBM by adopting it in a form that employs the CME observations over a given distance range to evaluate the most suitable model input parameters for a given CME by means of the least-squares fitting. Furthermore, the new version of the model automatically responds to any significant change of the conditions in the ambient medium (solar wind speed, density, CME--CME interactions, etc.) by changing the model input parameters according to changes in the CME kinematics. The advanced DBM is shaped in a form that can be readily employed in an operational system for real-time space-weather forecasting by promptly adjusting to a successively expanding observational dataset, thus providing a successively improving prediction of the CME arrival.
Open AccessHeliospheric Propagation of Coronal Mass Ejections: Drag-Based Model Fitting
The so-called drag-based model (DBM) simulates analytically the propagation of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) in interplanetary space and allows the prediction of their arrival times and impact speeds at any point in the heliosphere ("target"). The DBM is based on the assumption that beyond a distance of about 20 solar radii from the Sun, the dominant force acting on CMEs is the "aerodynamic" drag force. In the standard form of DBM, the user provisionally chooses values for the model input parameters, by which the kinematics of the CME over the entire Sun--"target" distance range is defined. The choice of model input parameters is usually based on several previously undertaken statistical studies. In other words, the model is used by ad hoc implementation of statistics-based values of the input parameters, which are not necessarily appropriate for the CME under study. Furthermore, such a procedure lacks quantitative information on how well the simulation reproduces the coronagraphically observed kinematics of the CME, and thus does not provide an estimate of the reliability of the arrival prediction. In this paper we advance the DBM by adopting it in a form that employs the CME observations over a given distance range to evaluate the most suitable model input parameters for a given CME by means of the least-squares fitting. Furthermore, the new version of the model automatically responds to any significant change of the conditions in the ambient medium (solar wind speed, density, CME--CME interactions, etc.) by changing the model input parameters according to changes in the CME kinematics. The advanced DBM is shaped in a form that can be readily employed in an operational system for real-time space-weather forecasting by promptly adjusting to a successively expanding observational dataset, thus providing a successively improving prediction of the CME arrival.
- 22 June 2015
- Published by American Astronomical Society in The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
- Vol. 218 (2) , 32
HELIOSPHERIC PROPAGATION OF CORONAL MASS EJECTIONS: DRAG-BASED MODEL FITTING
- 22 June 2015
- Published by American Astronomical Society in The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
- Vol. 218 (2) , 32
HELIOSPHERIC PROPAGATION OF CORONAL MASS EJECTIONS: DRAG-BASED MODEL FITTING
- 7 July 2014
- Published by American Astronomical Society in The Astrophysical Journal Letters
- Vol. 790 (1) , L6
COMBINED MULTIPOINT REMOTE AND IN SITU OBSERVATIONS OF THE ASYMMETRIC EVOLUTION OF A FAST SOLAR CORONAL MASS EJECTION
- 7 July 2014
- Published by American Astronomical Society in The Astrophysical Journal Letters
- Vol. 790 (1) , L6
COMBINED MULTIPOINT REMOTE AND IN SITU OBSERVATIONS OF THE ASYMMETRIC EVOLUTION OF A FAST SOLAR CORONAL MASS EJECTION
- 7 June 2013
- Published by Springer Nature in Solar Physics
- Vol. 289 (1) , 351-368
Kinematics of Interacting ICMEs and Related Forbush Decrease: Case Study
- 7 June 2013
- Published by Springer Nature in Solar Physics
- Vol. 289 (1) , 351-368
Kinematics of Interacting ICMEs and Related Forbush Decrease: Case Study
- 1 June 2013
- Published by Springer Nature in Solar Physics
- Vol. 289 (1) , 251-261
Investigation of the Coronal Magnetic Field Using a Type II Solar Radio Burst
- 1 June 2013
- Published by Springer Nature in Solar Physics
- Vol. 289 (1) , 251-261
Investigation of the Coronal Magnetic Field Using a Type II Solar Radio Burst