Michael Roost Clausen

First‐line (1L) bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) leads to high response rates in follicular lymphoma (FL), but maintaining durable remissions remains challenging. We report the 3‐year follow‐up from arm 3 of the phase 1b/2 EPCORE NHL‐2 trial (NCT04663347) of epcoritamab, a subcutaneously administered CD3×CD20 bispecific antibody, combined with BR in patients with newly diagnosed FL. Twenty‐five patients received epcoritamab plus BR, followed by epcoritamab monotherapy for up to 2 years. At a median follow‐up of 41.3 months, the best overall response and CR rates were both 96%. The median time to CR was 1.5 (range 1–6) months. At 3 years, 87% of responders maintained CR. High CR rates were observed across subgroups, including 100% of patients with bulky disease (≥7 cm), 93% with Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index score ≥3, and 100% with bone marrow involvement. The three‐year progression‐free survival and overall survival rates were 83% and 96%, respectively. Three patients progressed within 24 months of initiating treatment. Long‐term data were consistent with prior reports and the known safety profiles of the individual agents, with no high‐grade cytokine release syndrome or immune effector cell‐associated neurotoxicity syndrome events. Infections occurred in 92% of patients; COVID‐19 was the most common (84%). Overall, 1L FL treatment with epcoritamab plus BR resulted in deep, durable responses beyond 3 years with a consistent safety profile. These results compare favorably with BR alone, although they require confirmation in further studies, and highlight the versatility of epcoritamab in combination with various standards of care and in improving outcomes in FL.

A short diagnosis-to-treatment interval independently predicts inferior outcomes in follicular lymphoma. Using international discovery and validation cohorts, we demonstrate its prognostic value beyond established prognostic indices, with implications for risk stratification, clinical trial design, and interpretation.

Chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy and CD20xCD3 bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) have shown impressive results in the third-line treatment of diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) [1–4]....

PURPOSE: Although most patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) can expect an indolent course, progressive lymphoma remains the primary cause of death during the first decade after diagnosis. Progression of disease within 24 months (POD24) of starting first-line (1L) immunochemotherapy defines a high-risk population with poor survival, but better risk stratification at diagnosis is needed. METHODS: The FLIPI24 model was developed and internally validated to predict 24-month event rates using individual data from 4,485 patients treated with 1L immunochemotherapy from 10 observational cohorts of FL. Overall and cause-specific survival was further evaluated in FLIPI24 risk groups. External validation in the 1L immunochemotherapy setting was performed using the prospective observational Lymphoma Epidemiology of Outcomes (LEO) cohort (N = 565) and three randomized phase III trials (N = 3,192); extension to all patients with FL (any 1L therapy) was performed in the LEO cohort (N = 1,445) and its Molecular Epidemiology Resource subcohort (N = 1,074). RESULTS: The FLIPI24 model uses age and four blood-based variables (hemoglobin, lactate dehydrogenase, beta-2 microglobulin, and WBC count). FLIPI24 showed consistent performance across validation and extension data sets, which was superior to existing prognostic tools. Across the four external immunochemotherapy validation data sets, patients with high-risk FLIPI24 (23%-32% of patients) had significantly higher 24-month event rates (22%-35%) and inferior 5-year overall survival (77%-83%) compared with patients with low-risk FLIPI24 (29%-31% of patients, 24-month event rates: 10%-12%; 5-year OS: 96%-97%). Results were consistent when evaluating lymphoma-related death and when extended to all patients with FL. CONCLUSION: The FLIPI24 model robustly stratifies, at diagnosis, patients with FL at increased risk of lymphoma-related death versus patients with very low lymphoma-related mortality during the first decade after diagnosis. FLIPI24 can be used to enrich future clinical trial designs in newly diagnosed FL.

Secondary central nervous system lymphoma (SCNSL) is a rare manifestation of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with a poor prognosis. We present updated data from a nationwide study on the incidence and clinical characteristics of SCNSL. The incidence of SCNSL was calculated considering death or relapse without SCNSL as competing risks. Risk factors associated with SCNSL were identified using a cause-specific Cox proportional hazards model. A total of 1972 patients with DLBCL were included, of which 68 (3.4%) experienced SCNSL at the first relapse. The crude 1- and 2-year cumulative incidence of SCNSL was 2.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-2.7) and 2.6% (95% CI, 2.0-3.4), respectively. For patients with a high-risk central nervous system international prognostic index (CNS-IPI) score, the 1- and 2-year cumulative incidence was 6.4% and 7.5%, respectively. The number and location of extranodal (EN) sites were the most significant predictors of SCNSL. Specific EN sites associated with an increased risk were the bone marrow, heart, kidneys/adrenal glands, ovaries, testes, and uterus. The median overall survival (OS) after SCNSL was 3.2 months. SCNSL within 6 months after the end of treatment (EOT) was associated with a higher baseline CNS-IPI score and worse OS than SCNSL >6 months after EOT. Patients with a combination of low-risk CNS-IPI and late-onset SCNSL had the most favorable prognosis. In conclusion, updated real-world population-based data on SCNSL at first relapse, adjusted for competing risks, demonstrated a lower incidence of SCNSL than previously reported, with the number and location of EN sites being the most significant predictors of SCNSL.

The development of new first‐line treatments for patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) is becoming increasingly challenging due to already excellent survival outcomes. The present study investigated the outcomes of patients with FL who underwent contemporary first‐line therapies but would not have been eligible for inclusion in recent trials and explored how commonly used in/exclusion criteria impacted their survival outcomes. This study included adult patients diagnosed with FL in the period 2000–2018 registered in the Danish Lymphoma Registry. Through searches on ClinicalTrials.gov, four recent 1st line phase 3 randomized controlled trials with R‐Bendamustine, R‐CVP, and/or R‐CHOP as control or experimental arms were included. Inclusion and exclusion criteria for each trial were retrieved and categorized. Patients were then divided into trial‐eligible and ineligible groups according to blood test results correlated to organ function and ECOG performance score (PS). Survival outcomes were significantly worse among trial‐ineligible patients, with adjusted differences between trial‐eligible and ineligible patients of 12%–20% in five‐year overall survival (OS) overall. Inclusion criteria based on PS and renal function were the main drivers of OS differences. More inclusive trials will lead to faster recruitment and secure focus on developing medicines for the group of patients with the worst outcomes.

Purpose: This nationwide Danish cohort study compared overall survival (OS) between non-Western immigrant patients and Danish-born patients with lymphoma in Denmark. Furthermore, differences in clinical and socioeconomic variables were compared, and mediators of OS differences were explored to explain possible outcome differences. Patients and Methods: The study included a total of 540 non-Western patients and 16,294 Danish-born patients diagnosed with lymphoma in the period 2000– 2020. Inverse probability weighting and mediation analysis using a natural effects Cox model were used to investigate the causal relationship between immigration status and OS. Results: Indirect effects mediated through differences in performance status and income indicated a trend towards inferior OS for non-Western immigrant patients with HRs of 1.06 (0.99– 1.14) and 1.06 (0.99– 1.14). However, no total causal effect of immigration status on OS was observed overall (HR: 0.94 [0.79– 1.12]) and within subtype-specific analyses, except for classical Hodgkin lymphoma. Conclusion: No significant differences in OS between non-Western immigrant patients and Danish-born patients were discovered. Plain Language Summary: Non-Western immigrant lymphoma patients in Western countries may face multiple challenges, including lower socioeconomic status and insufficient language proficiency, which can make navigating the complexity of modern lymphoma treatment difficult. This study investigated whether the Danish tax-based healthcare system has overcome these challenges and delivered non-Western immigrant patients quality care on the same levels as that of the Danish-born patients. Therefore, using available population based Danish registries, survival between these groups were compared, while adjusting for important clinical differences, and no significant effect of immigration status on survival was found even though non-Western immigrant patients generally had lower socioeconomic status.

Objectives: Recent front‐line clinical trials used the International Prognostic Index (IPI) to identify trial‐eligible patients with newly diagnosed diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, many IPI‐like variants with improved accuracy have been developed over the years for rituximab‐treated patients.Methods: We assessed the impact of International Prognostic Indices on patient enrolment in clinical trials, aiming to exclude low‐risk IPI patients based on POLARIX/EPCORE DLBCL‐2 trial criteria.Results: We identified 2877 patients in the Danish Lymphoma Registry who would have been eligible for the POLARIX trial if patients with IPI 0–1 scores were included. IPI and NCCN‐IPI assigned 33.3% and 11.9% of patients to the low‐risk group, respectively. Shorter 5‐year overall survival (91.4% vs. 97.5%), higher relapse rate (9.9% vs. 4.4%), and more deaths (16.1% vs. 4.4%) occurred in the low‐risk IPI group compared with low‐risk NCCN‐IPI group. Analyzed models failed to identify true high‐risk patients with poor prognosis. Similar results were found in the confirmatory cohort developed based on EPCORE DLBCL‐2 trial eligibility criteria.Conclusion: True low‐risk patients are more optimal identified by NCCN‐IPI and should be excluded from front‐line clinical trials due to their excellent prognosis. However, additional high‐risk factors besides clinical prognostic models need to be considered when selecting trial‐eligible patients.