Célestin Ndosimao Nsibu

Malaria remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among children in sub-Saharan Africa. Acute kidney injury (AKI) is increasingly recognized as a frequent and severe complication of pediatric severe malaria, yet it remains largely underdiagnosed. This under-recognition is driven by important limitations in current diagnostic approaches. The World Health Organization (WHO) criteria rely on fixed serum creatinine (SCr) thresholds that are poorly adapted to children, whereas Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria require baseline SCr (bSCr) values that are rarely available in low-resource settings. The estimation of bSCr using back-calculation methods is further complicated by population-specific factors, particularly malnutrition, which reduces creatinine generation and may mask kidney injury. In addition, urine output (UO) monitoring is often underutilized despite its diagnostic value, and access to laboratory testing remains limited. Emerging biomarkers such as neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), cystatin C, and kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1) show promise for early detection and risk stratification but remain insufficiently validated in African pediatric populations. In this narrative review, we highlight key challenges in diagnosing malaria-associated AKI (MAKI) in children and discuss potential strategies to improve early detection in resource-limited settings, with the aim of reducing morbidity and mortality.

Background: This paper presents learnings from the Re-Imagining Technical Assistance for Maternal, Neonatal, and Child Health and Health Systems Strengthening (RTA) project implemented in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Nigeria from April 2018 to September 2020 by JSI Research & Training Institute, Inc. and Sonder Collective and managed by the Child Health Task Force. The first of RTA’s two phases involved multiple design research activities, such as human-centered design and co-creation, while the second phase focused on secondary analysis of interviews and reports from the design research. This paper explores the limitations of current technical assistance (TA) approaches and maps opportunities to improve how TA is planned and delivered in the health sector. Methods: We analyzed project reports and 68 interviews with TA funders, providers, and consumers to explore in greater detail their perspectives on TA, its characteristics and drawbacks as well as opportunities for improvement. We used qualitative content analysis techniques for this study. Results: The issues surrounding TA included the focus on donor-driven agendas over country priorities, poor accountability between and within TA actors, inadequate skill transfer from TA providers to government TA consumers, an emphasis on quick fixes and short-term thinking, and inadequate governance mechanisms to oversee and manage TA. Consequently, health systems do not achieve the highest levels of resilience and autonomy. Conclusions: Participants in project workshops and interviews called for a transformation in TA centered on a redistribution of power enabling governments to establish their health agendas in keeping with the issues that are of greatest importance to them, followed by collaboration with donors to develop TA interventions. Recommended improvements to the TA landscape in this paper include nine critical shifts, four domains of change, and 20 new guiding principles.