TNTimothy J. Norman

Timothy J. Norman

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article

Previous Organizations / Institutes

The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years


Timothy J. Norman has a total of 194 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Learning safe behaviour via justified human preferences and hypothetical queries

    by Ilias Kazantzidis, Timothy J. Norman, Yali Du, Christopher T. Freeman

    Although reinforcement learning is a powerful paradigm for agent sequential decision-making, it cannot be used in its traditional form in most safety-critical environments. Human feedback can enable an agent to learn a good policy while avoiding unsafe states, but at the cost of human time. We present JPAL-HA, a model for safe learning in safety-critical environments that is grounded on two novel ideas: (i) human preferences over a choice of actions are augmented with justifications such as one action is preferred because the other is unsafe; and (ii) we use these justifications to guide the generation of future queries over hypothetical actions to enable the agent to more effectively map out unsafe regions. We evaluate JPAL-HA using modified configurations of the Island Navigation environment from the AI Safety Gridworlds. We empirically show that it significantly improves safety compared to existing approaches for safe learning from human preferences and outperforms other safe human-in-the-loop algorithms in terms of sample efficiency. We also include an analysis of safety/human burden trade-off. Additionally, we evaluate our method with people training a mobile robot, demonstrating that a diverse group of people can complete training in only a few minutes and that hypothetical actions not only further improve safety, but also slightly decrease the training time and keep it to admissible levels.

  • It’s About Time: Temporal References in Emergent Communication

    by Olaf Lipinski, Adam Sobey, Federico Cerutti, Timothy Norman

    Emergent communication enables agents to develop bespoke languages that improve communication efficiency. Despite the known importance of temporal structure in natural language, there is no existing evidence of temporal references in emergent communication. This paper addresses this gap, by exploring how agents communicate about temporal relationships. We analyse three potential factors for the emergence of temporal references: environmental, external, and architectural. Our experiments demonstrate that altering the loss function is insufficient for temporal references to emerge; rather, architectural changes are necessary. A minimal change in agent architecture, using a different batching method, allows the emergence of temporal references. This modified design is compared with the standard architecture in a temporal referential games environment, which emphasises temporal relationships. The analysis shows that over 95% of the agents with the modified batching method develop temporal references, without changes to their loss function. We consider temporal referencing necessary for future improvements to the agents’ communication efficiency, enabling future agents to use a closer to optimal coding as compared to purely compositional languages. These insights provide the basis for incorporation of temporal references into other emergent communication settings, and investigation of other aspects of language.

  • Open Access

    What’s Informing Trust and Adoption? Can Current Cognitive Models Support Expert Adoption of AI?

    by Shaun C. Lamb, Maire Byrne, Timothy J. Norman, Sarvapali D. Ramchurn, Mohammad Naiseh

    Defence often uses rationalistic approaches for the adoption of AI, but we question whether this is appropriate. By studying adoption using naturalistic approaches in the work environment where AI is actually employed, we better can capture situated issues around trust and adoption. We conducted a longitudinal study of expert intelligence analysts adopting a machine-vision Object Detection and Recognition Overlay (ODRO) within their mission teams and tooling, premised on improving analyst functions. We employ and adapt naturalistic decision-making models to identify key situational challenges, showing that naturalistic approaches can better inform Defence’s AI adoption. Specifically, we find that organisational rewards for accuracy influence analysts’ willingness to adopt and rely on imperfect tools, and that analysts develop a non-uniform relationship with ODRO over time, which we translate into design implications. Crucially, our results support a model of interdependence over prevalent task-allocation paradigms that assume human and AI as functionally divided, rational entities.

  • Open Access

    Client–Master Multiagent Deep Reinforcement Learning for Task Offloading in Mobile Edge Computing

    by Tesfay Zemuy Gebrekidan, Sebastian Stein, Timothy Norman

    As mobile applications grow in complexity, there is an increasing need to perform computationally intensive tasks. However, User Devices (UDs), such as tablets and smartphones, have limited capacity to carry out the required computations. Task offloading in Mobile Edge Computing (MEC) is a strategy that meets this demand by distributing tasks between UDs and servers. Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) is a promising solution for this strategy because it can adapt to dynamic changes and minimize online computational complexity. However, the combination of continuous-valued soft constraints and discrete-valued hard constraints on UDs and MEC servers poses significant challenges for designing efficient DRL algorithms. Existing DRL-based task-offloading algorithms focus on the constraints of the UDs, assuming the availability of enough resources on the server. Moreover, existing Multiagent DRL (MADRL)-based task-offloading algorithms are homogeneous agents and consider homogeneous constraints as a penalty in their reward function. We propose a novel Client–Master MADRL (CMMADRL) algorithm for task offloading in MEC that uses client agents at the UDs to decide on their resource requirements and a master agent at the server to make a combinatorial action selection based on the decision of the UDs. CMMADRL is shown to achieve up to 59% improvement in performance over existing benchmark and heuristic algorithms.


  • Open Access

    HAVA: Hybrid Approach to Value-Alignment through Reward Weighing for Reinforcement Learning

    by Kryspin Varys, Federico Cerutti, Adam Sobey, Timothy J. Norman

    Our society is governed by a set of norms which together bring about the values we cherish such as safety, fairness or trustworthiness. The goal of value-alignment is to create agents that not only do their tasks but through their behaviours also promote these values. Many of the norms are written as laws or rules (legal / safety norms) but even more remain unwritten (social norms). Furthermore, the techniques used to represent these norms also differ. Safety / legal norms are often represented explicitly, for example, in some logical language while social norms are typically learned and remain hidden in the parameter space of a neural network. There is a lack of approaches in the literature that could combine these various norm representations into a single algorithm. We propose a novel method that integrates these norms into the reinforcement learning process. Our method monitors the agent's compliance with the given norms and summarizes it in a quantity we call the agent's reputation. This quantity is used to weigh the received rewards to motivate the agent to become value-aligned. We carry out a series of experiments including a continuous state space traffic problem to demonstrate the importance of the written and unwritten norms and show how our method can find the value-aligned policies. Furthermore, we carry out ablations to demonstrate why it is better to combine these two groups of norms rather than using either separately.

  • Open Access

    Optimising Spatial Teamwork Under Uncertainty

    by Gregory Everett, Ryan J. Beal, Tim Matthews, Timothy J. Norman, Sarvapali D. Ramchurn

    We introduce a novel method for assessing agent teamwork based on their spatial coordination. Our approach models the influence of spatial proximity on team formation and sustained spatial dominance over adversaries using a Multi-agent Markov Decision Process. We develop an algorithm to derive efficient teamwork strategies by combining Monte Carlo Tree Search and linear programming. When applied to team defence in football (soccer) using real-world data, our approach reduces opponent threat by 21%, outperforming optimised individual behaviour by 6%. Additionally, our model enhances the predictive accuracy of future attack locations and provides deeper insights compared to existing teamwork models that do not explicitly consider the spatial dynamics of teamwork.


  • Ethical Alignment in Citizen-Centric AI

    by Jayati Deshmukh, Vahid Yazdanpanah, Sebastian Stein, Timothy J. Norman


  • Open Access

    Explaining an Agent’s Future Beliefs Through Temporally Decomposing Future Reward Estimators

    by Mark Towers, Yali Du, Christopher Freeman, Timothy J. Norman

    Future reward estimation is a core component of reinforcement learning agents; i.e., Q-value and state-value functions, predicting an agent’s sum of future rewards. Their scalar output, however, obfuscates when or what individual future rewards an agent may expect to receive. We address this by modifying an agent’s future reward estimator to predict their next N expected rewards, referred to as Temporal Reward Decomposition (TRD). This unlocks novel explanations of agent behaviour. Through TRD we can: estimate when an agent may expect to receive a reward, the value of the reward and the agent’s confidence in receiving it; measure an input feature’s temporal importance to the agent’s action decisions; and predict the influence of different actions on future rewards. Furthermore, we show that DQN agents trained on Atari environments can be efficiently retrained to incorporate TRD with minimal impact on performance.