CLChun-Lin Liu

Chun-Lin Liu

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article

Previous Organizations / Institutes

The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years


Chun-Lin Liu has a total of 13 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Counter-Based Scatter Matrix Estimation for One-Bit Centered Bivariate Cauchy Signals

    by Yi-Heng Lin, Chun-Lin Liu

    Scatter matrix or covariance matrix estimation under data with outliers is crucial to signal processing applications. These data can be modeled as Cauchy or elliptically symmetric (ES) distributions, under which many estimators have been developed. However, these estimators primarily assume continuous-valued data. For implementation purposes, these data are quantized into discrete levels, which can be represented by finite bits. The complexity of the estimators is also restricted. These hardware constraints degrade the performance of existing scatter matrix estimators. This paper proposes the Cauchy onebit scatter matrix estimator (COSME). The COSME is founded on the proposed integral expressions of the marginal and joint probability for one-bit centered bivariate ES (CB-ES) data. These probabilities are simplified in closed forms for one-bit centered bivariate Cauchy (CB-Cauchy) data. For equal normalized quantization thresholds, these forms admit the COSME with lowcomplexity steps. In particular, these steps involve counting the occurrences of the events in the one-bit CB-Cauchy data and evaluating trigonometric functions. The minimum number of snapshots and the multivariate extension of the COSME are also investigated. Numerical examples demonstrate that the COSME exhibits shorter CPU time under the same number of snapshots and improved estimation performance under the same number of bits, compared to several existing estimators. Empirical results show the robustness of the COSME to Student’s t distributions and parameter variations.


  • Half-Inverted Array Design Scheme for Large Hole-Free Fourth-Order Difference Co-Arrays

    by Yuan-Pon Chen, Chun-Lin Liu

    Linear sparse arrays with fourth-order cumulant processing can resolve $\mathcal{O}(N^4)$ directions-of-arrival (DOAs) using $N$ physical sensors, provided that the fourth-order difference co-array $\Delta_4$ contains a contiguous segment of size $\mathcal{O}(N^4)$ . Furthermore, if $\Delta_4$ has no holes, then the received data can be fully exploited in subspace-based DOA estimators. However, few existing arrays attain large hole-free $\Delta_4$ . Many existing arrays designed for $\Delta_4$ are constructed from two smaller arrays, called the basis arrays. Nevertheless, such arrays either restrict the basis arrays to certain types or have no guarantee of hole-free $\Delta_4$ . This paper proposes the half-inverted (HI) arrays, parameterized by two basis arrays $\mathbb{S}^{(1)}$ and $\mathbb{S}^{(2)}$ , the shifting parameter $M$ , and the scaling parameter $\sigma$ . An HI array consists of $\mathbb{S}^{(1)}$ and an inverted, scaled, and shifted version of $\mathbb{S}^{(2)}$ . HI arrays are guaranteed with hole-free $\Delta_4$ over a range of $(M,\sigma)$ pairs. This property unifies several existing arrays with hole-free $\Delta_4$ and admits an optimization problem over $(M,\sigma)$ . The half-inverted general hole-free (HIGH) scheme is defined as the HI array with a closed-form and optimized $(M,\sigma)$ pair determined by the second-order co-arrays of the basis arrays. The HIGH scheme enjoys a large hole-free $\Delta_4$ . The shift-scale representation (SSR) is presented to study $\Delta_4$ of HI arrays visually. From these results, the half-inverted array based on second-order optimization and extended shift (HI-SOES) is proposed. For a fixed $N$ , HI-SOES synthesizes a hole-free $\Delta_4$ larger than an existing array. Numerical examples demonstrate the DOA estimation performance of HI arrays and existing arrays.


  • Optimal Coarray Combinations Robust to Sensor Failures on Sparse Arrays

    by Chun-Lin Liu

    Sparse arrays can resolve more source direction-of-arrivals (DOAs) than sensors in array processing. This property is achieved with DOA estimators based on the difference coarray. However, sensor failures on sparse arrays could make these DOA estimators inapplicable. In the literature, array processing under sensor failures can be coped with array diagnosis. The failed sensors are detected first in array diagnosis, and the data on these detected failed sensors are removed next. However, errors in detecting the failure patterns degrade the performance. This letter presents coarray combinations for sparse arrays under sensor failures. In converting array data from the physical array to the difference coarray, coarray combination matrices (CCMs) aim to preserve the structures of the difference coarray under sensor failures. This condition corresponds to a system of equations with the CCMs. With prior knowledge about the failure patterns, a convex optimization problem is cast for this system of equations. The optimal CCM is pre-computed with closed-form expressions, avoids array diagnosis, and applies to coarray-based DOA estimators. Furthermore, numerical examples demonstrate that the proposed method reduces the errors in DOA estimation in comparison with other methods where the data on the detected failed sensors are removed.


  • On the Size and Redundancy of the Fourth-Order Difference Co-Array

    by Yuan-Pon Chen, Chun-Lin Liu

    In array processing, the fourth-order difference co-array of sparse arrays with $N$ sensors admits to resolve $\mathcal {O}(N^4)$ source directions with proper assumptions. This $\mathcal {O}(N^4)$ property is relevant to the size of the central uniform linear array (ULA) segment of the fourth-order difference co-array. However, among the existing sparse arrays, the fundamental limits for the sizes of the fourth-order difference co-array remain a topic for further study. This paper characterizes the lower and upper bounds of the size of the fourth-order difference co-array. It is proved that the ULA and the exponential array achieve the lower and upper bounds, respectively. We also propose the fourth-order redundancy to quantify the efficiency of the ULA segment in the fourth-order difference co-array. The fourth-order redundancy owns a provable lower bound depending only on $N$ , providing further insights into the size of the central ULA segment of the fourth-order difference co-array. These bounds are validated through numerical examples.


  • Closed-Form Output Response of Discrete-Time Linear Time-Invariant Systems Using Intermediate Auxiliary Functions [Lecture Notes]

    by Chun-Lin Liu, Soo-Chang Pei

    Linear time-invariant (LTI) systems find ubiquitous applications in digital signal processing [1], image processing [2], communication [3], and array processing [4], to name a few. An LTI system can be characterized by its impulse response, which is defined as the output response to an impulse input. For an arbitrary input signal, the output signal of an LTI system is obtained by the convolution of the input signal with the impulse response. This property is closely related to transform-based methods in signal processing, such as discrete-time Fourier transforms, z-transforms, and discrete Fourier transforms. Interested readers are referred to [1] and the references therein.


  • Robustness of Difference Coarrays of Sparse Arrays to Sensor Failures—Part II: Array Geometries

    by Chun-Lin Liu, Palghat P. Vaidyanathan

    In array processing, sparse arrays are capable of resolving $\mathcal{O}(N^2)$ uncorrelated sources with $N$ sensors. Sparse arrays have this property because they possess uniform linear array (ULA) segments of size $\mathcal{O}(N^2)$ in the difference coarray, defined as the differences between sensor locations. However, the coarray structure of sparse arrays is susceptible to sensor failures and the reliability of sparse arrays remains a significant but challenging topic for investigation. In the companion paper, a theory of the $k$ -essential family, the $k$ -fragility, and the $k$ -essential Sperner family were presented not only to characterize the patterns of $k$ faulty sensors that shrink the difference coarray, but also to provide a number of insights into the robustness of arrays. This paper derives closed-form characterizations of the $k$ -essential Sperner family for several commonly used array geometries, such as ULA, minimum redundancy arrays (MRA), minimum holes arrays (MHA), Cantor arrays, nested arrays, and coprime arrays. These results lead to many insights into the relative importance of each sensor, the robustness of these arrays, and the DOA estimation performance in the presence of sensor failure. Broadly speaking, ULAs are more robust than coprime arrays, while coprime arrays are more robust than maximally economic sparse arrays, such as MRA, MHA, Cantor arrays, and nested arrays.


  • Robustness of Difference Coarrays of Sparse Arrays to Sensor Failures—Part I: A Theory Motivated by Coarray MUSIC

    by Chun-Lin Liu, Palghat P. Vaidyanathan

    In array processing, sparse arrays are capable of resolving $\mathcal{O}(N^2)$ uncorrelated sources with $N$ sensors. Sparse arrays have this property because they possess uniform linear array (ULA) segments of size $\mathcal{O}(N^2)$ in the difference coarray, defined as the differences between sensor locations. However, the coarray structure of sparse arrays is susceptible to sensor failures, and the reliability of sparse arrays remains a significant but challenging topic for investigation. Broadly speaking, ULAs whose difference coarrays only have $\mathcal{O}(N)$ elements, are more robust than sparse arrays with $\mathcal{O}(N^2)$ coarray sizes. This paper advances a theory for quantifying such robustness by introducing the $k$ -essentialness of sensors and the $k$ -essential family of arrays. The proposed theory is motivated by the coarray MUSIC algorithm, which estimates source directions based on difference coarrays. Furthermore, the concept of essentialness not only characterizes the patterns of $k$ faulty sensors that shrink the difference coarray, but also leads to the notion of $k$ -fragility, which assesses the robustness of array geometries quantitatively. However, the large size of the $k$ -essential family usually complicates the theory. It will be shown that the $k$ -essential family can be compactly represented by the so-called $k$ -essential Sperner family. Finally the proposed theory is used to provide insights into the probability of change of the difference coarray, as a function of the sensor failure probability and array geometry. In a companion paper, the $k$ -essential Sperner family for several commonly used array geometries will be derived in closed-form, resulting in a quantitative comparison of the robustness of these arrays.


  • Maximally economic sparse arrays and cantor arrays

    by Chun-Lin Liu, P. P. Vaidyanathan

    Sparse arrays, where the sensors are properly placed with nonuniform spacing, are able to resolve more uncorrelated sources than sensors. This ability arises from the property that the difference coarray, defined as the differences between sensor locations, has many more consecutive integers (hole-free) than the number of sensors. In some implementations, it might be preferable that a) the arrays be symmetric, b) that the arrays be maximally economic, that is, each sensor be essential, and c) that the coarray be hole-free. The essentialness property of a sensor means that if it is deleted, then the difference coarray changes. Existing sparse arrays, such as minimum redundancy arrays (MRA), nested arrays, and coprime arrays do not satisfy these three criteria simultaneously. It will be shown in this paper that Cantor arrays meet all the desired properties mentioned above, based on a comprehensive study on the structure of the difference coarray. Even though Cantor arrays were previously proposed in fractal array design, their coarray properties have not been studied earlier. It will also be shown that the Cantor array has a hole-free difference coarray of size N log2 3 ≈ N 1585 where N is the number of sensors. This is unlike the sizes of difference coarrays of the MRA, nested array, coprime array (all O(N 2 )), and uniform linear arrays (O(N)) 1 .


  • The role of difference coarrays in correlation subspaces

    by Chun-Lin Liu, P. P. Vaidyanathan

    The concept of correlation subspaces was recently introduced in array processing literature by Rahmani and Atia. Given a sensor array, its geometry determines the correlation subspace completely, and the covariance matrix of the array output is constrained in a certain way by the correlation subspace. It has been shown by Rahmani and Atia that this knowledge about the covariance constraint can be exploited to improve the performance of DOA estimators. In this paper, it is shown that there is a simple closed form expression for the basis vectors of the correlation subspace. Thus, computation of this subspace is greatly simplified. Another fundamental observation is that, this expression is closely related to the difference coarray. Thirdly, the paper also shows an interesting logical connection between correlation subspaces, redundancy averaging, and rectification, which are popularly used in DOA estimation1.