Keisuke Miyazawa

We previously reported that macrolide antibiotics, such as clarithromycin (CAM), blocked autophagy flux, and simultaneous proteasome and autophagy inhibition by bortezomib (BTZ) plus CAM resulted in enhanced apoptosis induction in multiple myeloma (MM) cells via increased endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress loading. However, in actual therapeutic settings, cell adhesion-mediated drug resistance between bone marrow stromal cells (BMSC) and MM cells has been known to be a barrier to treatment. To investigate whether CAM could enhance BTZ-induced cytotoxicity in MM cells under direct cell adhesion with BMSC, we established a co-culture system of EGFP-labeled MM cells with BMSC. The cytotoxic effect of BTZ on MM cells was diminished by its interaction with BMSC; however, the attenuated cytotoxicity was recovered by the co-administration of CAM, which upregulates ER stress loading and NOXA expression. Knockout of NOXA in MM cells canceled the enhanced cell death by CAM, indicating that NOXA is a key molecule for cell death induction by the co-administration of CAM. Since NOXA is degraded by autophagy as well as proteasomes, blocking autophagy with CAM resulted in the sustained upregulation of NOXA in MM cells co-cultured with BMSC in the presence of BTZ. Our data suggest that BMSC-associated BTZ resistance is mediated by the attenuation of ER stress loading. However, the addition of CAM overcomes BMSC-associated resistance via upregulation of NOXA by concomitantly blocking autophagy-mediated NOXA degradation and transcriptional activation of NOXA by ER stress loading.

Background: Autophagy plays an important role in tumour cell growth and survival and also promotes resistance to chemotherapy. Hence, autophagy has been targeted for cancer therapy. We previously reported that macrolide antibiotics including azithromycin (AZM) inhibit autophagy in various types of cancer cells in vitro. However, the underlying molecular mechanism for autophagy inhibition remains unclear. Here, we aimed to identify the molecular target of AZM for inhibiting autophagy. Methods: We identified the AZM-binding proteins using AZM-conjugated magnetic nanobeads for high-throughput affinity purification. Autophagy inhibitory mechanism of AZM was analysed by confocal microscopic and transmission electron microscopic observation. The anti-tumour effect with autophagy inhibition by oral AZM administration was assessed in the xenografted mice model. Results: We elucidated that keratin-18 (KRT18) and α/β-tubulin specifically bind to AZM. Treatment of the cells with AZM disrupts intracellular KRT18 dynamics, and KRT18 knockdown resulted in autophagy inhibition. Additionally, AZM treatment suppresses intracellular lysosomal trafficking along the microtubules for blocking autophagic flux. Oral AZM administration suppressed tumour growth while inhibiting autophagy in tumour tissue. Conclusions: As drug-repurposing, our results indicate that AZM is a potent autophagy inhibitor for cancer treatment, which acts by directly interacting with cytoskeletal proteins and perturbing their dynamics.

Following surgery and chemoradiation, ~50% of patients with locally advanced head and neck tumors experience relapse within the first two years, with a poor prognosis. Therefore, a novel therapeutic approach is required. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of combination treatment with the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib (BTZ), and ricolinostat (RCS), a specific inhibitor of histone deacetylase 6 (HDAC6), on CAL27 and Detroit562 head and neck cancer cells. BTZ and RCS exhibited cytotoxicity in a dose‑ and time‑dependent manner. Simultaneous treatment with BTZ and RCS resulted in the synergistic enhancement of non‑apoptotic cell death and autophagy. The receptor‑interacting serine/threonine‑protein kinase 1 (RIPK1) inhibitor, necrostatin, but not the autophagy inhibitor, 3‑methyladenine, attenuated the cytotoxicity of combined BTZ and RCS treatment. Thus, necroptosis [type‑III programmed cell death (PCD)], but not autophagic cell death (type‑II PCD), appeared to contribute to the pronounced cytotoxicity. However, no phosphorylation of RIPK1 or mixed lineage kinase domain‑like protein was detectable in response to BTZ or RCS. Furthermore, RCS induced α‑tubulin acetylation and inhibited BTZ‑induced aggresome formation along with endoplasmic reticulum stress loading. Combined treatment with BTZ and RCS enhanced the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS). The ROS scavenger, N‑acetyl cysteine, abrogated the increase in cytotoxicity. These results suggest the potential therapeutic value of the dual targeting of the proteasome and HDCA6 for head and neck cancers through the induction of necroptosis‑like cell death along with ROS generation.

Cancer cells use autophagy for growth, survival, and cytoprotection from chemotherapy. Therefore, autophagy inhibitors appear to be good candidates for cancer treatment. Our group previously reported that macrolide antibiotics, especially azithromycin (AZM), have potent autophagy inhibitory effects, and combination treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors or proteasome inhibitors enhances their anti–cancer activity. In this study, we evaluated the effect of combination therapy with DNA‐damaging drugs and AZM in non–small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells. We found that the cytotoxic activities of DNA‐damaging drugs, such as doxorubicin (DOX), etoposide, and carboplatin, were enhanced in the presence of AZM in NSCLC cell lines, whereas AZM alone exhibited almost no cytotoxicity. This enhanced cell death was dependent on wild‐type‐p53 status and autophagosome‐forming ability because TP53 knockout (KO) and ATG5‐KO cells attenuated AZM‐enhanced cytotoxicity. DOX treatment upregulated lysosomal biogenesis by activating TFEB and led to lysosomal membrane damage as assessed by galectin 3 puncta assay and cytoplasmic leakage of lysosomal enzymes. In contrast, AZM treatment blocked autophagy, which resulted in the accumulation of lysosomes/autolysosomes. Thus, the effects of DOX and AZM were integrated into the marked increase in damaged lysosomes/autolysosomes, leading to prominent lysosomal membrane permeabilization (LMP) for apoptosis induction. Our data suggest that concomitant treatment with DNA‐damaging drugs and AZM is a promising strategy for NSCLC treatment via pronounced LMP induction.

BRCA1 is a well-studied tumor suppressor involved in the homologous repair of DNA damage, whereas PINK1, a mitochondrial serine/threonine kinase, is known to be involved in mitochondrial quality control. Genetic mutations of PINK1 and Parkin cause autosomal recessive early-onset Parkinson’s disease. We found that in breast cancer cells, the mitochondrial targeting reagents, which all induce mitochondrial depolarization along with PINK1 upregulation, induced proteasomal BRCA1 degradation. This BRCA1 degradation was dependent on PINK1, and BRCA1 downregulation upon mitochondrial damage caused DNA double-strand breaks. BRCA1 degradation was mediated through the direct interaction with the E3 ligase Parkin. Strikingly, BRCA1 and PINK1/Parkin expression were inversely correlated in cancerous mammary glands from breast cancer patients. BRCA1 knockdown repressed cancer cell growth, and high BRCA1 expression predicted poor relapse-free survival in breast cancer patients. These observations indicate a novel mechanism by which mitochondrial damage is transmitted to the nucleus, leading to BRCA1 degradation.

The proton pump inhibitor lansoprazole (LPZ) inhibits the growth of several cancer cell lines, including A549 and CAL 27. We previously reported that macrolide antibiotics such as azithromycin (AZM) and clarithromycin (CAM) potently inhibit autophagic flux and that combining AZM or CAM with the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors enhanced their antitumor effect against various cancer cells. In the present study, we conducted the combination treatment with LPZ and macrolide antibiotics against A549 and CAL 27 cells and evaluated cytotoxicity and morphological changes using cell proliferation and viability assays, flow cytometric analysis, immunoblotting, and morphological assessment. Combination therapy with LPZ and AZM greatly enhanced LPZ‑induced cell death, whereas treatment with AZM alone exhibited negligible cytotoxicity. The observed cytotoxic effect was not mediated through apoptosis or necroptosis. Transmission electron microscopy of A549 cells treated with the LPZ + AZM combination revealed morphological changes associated with necrosis and accumulated autolysosomes with undigested contents. Furthermore, the A549 cell line with ATG5 knockout exhibited complete inhibition of autophagosome formation, which did not affect LPZ + AZM treatment‑induced cytotoxicity, thus excluding the involvement of autophagy‑dependent cell death in LPZ + AZM treatment‑induced cell death. A549 cells treated with LPZ + AZM combination therapy retained the endosomal Alexa‑dextran for extended duration as compared to untreated control cells, thus indicating impairment of lysosomal digestion. Notably, lysosomal galectin‑3 puncta expression induced due to lysosomal membrane permeabilization was increased in cells treated with LPZ + AZM combination as compared to the treatment by either agent alone. Collectively, the present results revealed AZM‑induced autolysosome accumulation, potentiated LPZ‑mediated necrosis, and lysosomal membrane permeabilization, thus suggesting the potential clinical application of LPZ + AZM combination therapy for cancer treatment.

In the cell cycle, the G₁/S transition is controlled by the cyclin‐dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6‐cyclin D complex. Constitutive activation of CDK4/6 dysregulates G₁/S transition, leading to oncogenic transformation. We found that 3 CDK4/6 inhibitors, abemaciclib, ribociclib, and palbociclib, exerted a cytocidal effect as well as a cytostatic effect at the G₁ phase in cancer cell lines, including A549 human non–small cell lung cancer cells. Among these inhibitors, abemaciclib exhibited the most potent cytotoxic effect. The cell‐death phenotype induced by abemaciclib, which entailed formation of multiple cytoplasmic vacuoles, was not consistent with apoptosis or necroptosis. Abemaciclib blocked autophagic flux, resulting in accumulation of autophagosomes, however vacuole formation and cell death induced by abemaciclib were independent of autophagy. In addition, methuosis, a cell‐death phenotype characterized by vacuole formation induced by excessive macropinocytosis, was excluded because the vacuoles did not incorporate fluorescent dextran. Of note, both formation of vacuoles and induction of cell death in response to abemaciclib were inhibited by vacuolar‐type ATPase (V‐ATPase) inhibitors such as bafilomycin A1 and concanamycin A. Live‐cell imaging revealed that the abemaciclib‐induced vacuoles were derived from lysosomes that expanded following acidification. Transmission electron microscopy revealed that these vacuoles contained undigested debris and remnants of organelles. Cycloheximide chase assay revealed that lysosomal turnover was blocked by abemaciclib. Furthermore, mTORC1 inhibition along with partial lysosomal membrane permeabilization occurred after abemaciclib treatment. Together, these results indicate that, in cancer cells, abemaciclib induces a unique form of cell death accompanied by swollen and dysfunctional lysosomes.

Vitamin K₂ (VK2) has been reported to induce apoptosis in many types of cancer cells including leukemia. However, there are no precise reports regarding the breast cancer cells. From the stand point of clinical implications of VK2 including chemoprevention, we investigated the effects of VK2 on breast cancer cell lines.