Rafael Bocanegra
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Interests
Rafael Bocanegra has a total of 18 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Kevin Fernández-Cosials
Universidad Politecnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
6 shared publications - Gonzalo Jimenez
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
5 shared publications Gonzalo Jiménez
3 shared publicationsCarlos Vázquez-Rodríguez
2 shared publicationsCésar Queral
2 shared publicationsAraceli Domínguez-Bugarín
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 3 December 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Nuclear Engineering and Design
- Vol. 432
The Preventive Methodology: A priori modification of the containment geometry to boost the computational efficiency of GOTHIC 3D models
- 3 December 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Nuclear Engineering and Design
- Vol. 432
Open AccessThe Preventive Methodology: A priori modification of the containment geometry to boost the computational efficiency of GOTHIC 3D models
- 1 November 2019
- Published by Elsevier in Annals of Nuclear Energy
- Vol. 133, 387-399
3D containment modeling of PWR-KWU Trillo NPP with the GOTHIC code
- 1 November 2019
- Published by Elsevier in Annals of Nuclear Energy
- Vol. 133, 387-399
3D containment modeling of PWR-KWU Trillo NPP with the GOTHIC code
- Open Access
- 26 June 2019
- Published by Universidad Politecnica de Madrid - University Library
Towards a BEPU Methodology for Containment Safety Analyses
- 26 June 2019
- Published by Universidad Politecnica de Madrid - University Library
Open AccessTowards a BEPU Methodology for Containment Safety Analyses
- 5 March 2018
- Published by ASME International in Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science
- Vol. 4 (2)
Fukushima Unit 2 Accident Simulation With MELCOR 2.1
A VTT Fukushima Daiichi Unit 3 (1F3) method for estimation of liquids and consequences of releases (MELCOR) model was modified to simulate the Fukushima Daiichi Unit 2 (1F2) accident. Five simulations were performed using different modeling approaches. The model 1F2 v1 includes only the basic modifications to reproduce the 1F2 accident. The model 1F2 v2 includes the same modifications used in 1F2 v1 plus the wet well (WW) improvement. In the 1F2 v3 model, the reactor core isolation cooling (RCIC) system logic was modified to avoid the use of tabular functions for the mass flow inlet and outlet. Because of this analysis, it is concluded that there is a strong dependency on parameters that still have many uncertainties, such as the RCIC two-phase flow operation, the alternative water injection, the suppression pool (SP) behavior, the rupture disk behavior and the containment failure modes, which affect the final state of the reactor core.
- 5 March 2018
- Published by ASME International in Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science
- Vol. 4 (2)
Fukushima Unit 2 Accident Simulation With MELCOR 2.1
A VTT Fukushima Daiichi Unit 3 (1F3) method for estimation of liquids and consequences of releases (MELCOR) model was modified to simulate the Fukushima Daiichi Unit 2 (1F2) accident. Five simulations were performed using different modeling approaches. The model 1F2 v1 includes only the basic modifications to reproduce the 1F2 accident. The model 1F2 v2 includes the same modifications used in 1F2 v1 plus the wet well (WW) improvement. In the 1F2 v3 model, the reactor core isolation cooling (RCIC) system logic was modified to avoid the use of tabular functions for the mass flow inlet and outlet. Because of this analysis, it is concluded that there is a strong dependency on parameters that still have many uncertainties, such as the RCIC two-phase flow operation, the alternative water injection, the suppression pool (SP) behavior, the rupture disk behavior and the containment failure modes, which affect the final state of the reactor core.
- Open Access
- 1 December 2017
- Published by Elsevier in Nuclear Engineering and Design
- Vol. 325, 164-177
Study of hydrogen risk in a PWR-W containment during a SBO scenario; Tau parameter definition and application on venting strategy analysis
- 1 December 2017
- Published by Elsevier in Nuclear Engineering and Design
- Vol. 325, 164-177
Open AccessStudy of hydrogen risk in a PWR-W containment during a SBO scenario; Tau parameter definition and application on venting strategy analysis
- Open Access
- 1 November 2017
- Published by Elsevier in Nuclear Engineering and Design
- Vol. 323, 28-38
Analysis of the equipment and instrumentation qualification criteria using 3D containment models
- 1 November 2017
- Published by Elsevier in Nuclear Engineering and Design
- Vol. 323, 28-38
Open AccessAnalysis of the equipment and instrumentation qualification criteria using 3D containment models
- 26 June 2016
- Published by ASME International
Fukushima Unit 2 Accident Simulation With MELCOR 2.1
A Fukushima Daiichi Unit 3 MELCOR model from Technical Research Centre of Finland (VTT) was modified to simulate the Fukushima Daiichi Unit 2 accident. Several simulations were performed using three different modeling approaches. The base model (1F2 v1) includes only the basic modifications to reproduce the accident. The intermediate model (1F2 v2) includes an improved model of the Wet Well. In the advanced model (1F2 v3), the reactor core isolation cooling system logic was modified to avoid the use of tabular functions for the mass flow inlet and outlet. As a result of this analysis it is concluded that there is a strong dependency on parameters which still have many uncertainties, such as the reactor core isolation cooling system two-phase flow operation, the alternative water injection, the suppression pool behavior, the rupture disk behavior and the containment failure modes which affect the final state of the reactor core.
- 26 June 2016
- Published by ASME International
Fukushima Unit 2 Accident Simulation With MELCOR 2.1
A Fukushima Daiichi Unit 3 MELCOR model from Technical Research Centre of Finland (VTT) was modified to simulate the Fukushima Daiichi Unit 2 accident. Several simulations were performed using three different modeling approaches. The base model (1F2 v1) includes only the basic modifications to reproduce the accident. The intermediate model (1F2 v2) includes an improved model of the Wet Well. In the advanced model (1F2 v3), the reactor core isolation cooling system logic was modified to avoid the use of tabular functions for the mass flow inlet and outlet. As a result of this analysis it is concluded that there is a strong dependency on parameters which still have many uncertainties, such as the reactor core isolation cooling system two-phase flow operation, the alternative water injection, the suppression pool behavior, the rupture disk behavior and the containment failure modes which affect the final state of the reactor core.
- 1 January 2016
- Published by Elsevier in Annals of Nuclear Energy
- Vol. 87, 547-560
Development of a PWR-W GOTHIC 3D model for containment accident analysis
- 1 January 2016
- Published by Elsevier in Annals of Nuclear Energy
- Vol. 87, 547-560
Development of a PWR-W GOTHIC 3D model for containment accident analysis
- 7 July 2014
- Published by ASME International
Development of a PWR-W and an AP1000® Containment Building 3D Model With a CFD Code for Best-Estimate Thermal-Hydraulic Analysis
The simulation of design basis accidents in a containment building is usually conducted with a lumped parameter model. The codes normally used by Westinghouse Electric Company (WEC) for that license analysis are WGOTHIC or COCO, which are suitable to provide an adequate estimation of the overall peak temperature and pressure of the containment. However, for the detailed study of the thermal-hydraulic behavior in every room and compartment of the containment building, it could be more convenient to model the containment with a more detailed 3D representation of the geometry of the whole building. The main objective of this project is to obtain a standard PWR Westinghouse as well as an AP1000® containment model for a CFD code to analyze the thermal-hydraulic detailed behavior during a design basis accident. In this paper the development and testing of both containment models is presented.
- 7 July 2014
- Published by ASME International
Development of a PWR-W and an AP1000® Containment Building 3D Model With a CFD Code for Best-Estimate Thermal-Hydraulic Analysis
The simulation of design basis accidents in a containment building is usually conducted with a lumped parameter model. The codes normally used by Westinghouse Electric Company (WEC) for that license analysis are WGOTHIC or COCO, which are suitable to provide an adequate estimation of the overall peak temperature and pressure of the containment. However, for the detailed study of the thermal-hydraulic behavior in every room and compartment of the containment building, it could be more convenient to model the containment with a more detailed 3D representation of the geometry of the whole building. The main objective of this project is to obtain a standard PWR Westinghouse as well as an AP1000® containment model for a CFD code to analyze the thermal-hydraulic detailed behavior during a design basis accident. In this paper the development and testing of both containment models is presented.