Anja Mottok

Supplementary table 1. Per-patient mfIHC MYC, BCL2 and BCL6 single oncogene and subpopulation scores for normal tonsil tissue and reactive lymph node tissue. Supplementary table 2. Per-patient mfIHC MYC, BCL2 and BCL6 single oncogene and subpopulation scores for DLBCL tissue (NUH, CMMC, SGH, MDA, BCA and UP). Supplementary table 6. Inferred percentage extents of MYC, BCL2, BCL6 and sub-population metrics in GEP cohorts. Supplementary table 11. Correlation of M+2+6- metric with gene expression in GEP cohorts. Supplementary table 12. Differential gene expression analysis of primary germinal center (GC) B-cells with M+2+ and M+2+6+ overexpression. Supplementary table 13. Differentially expressed genes between M+2+6- and all other malignant cells in scRNA-seq samples of DLBCL. Dichotomized non-parametric comparison, Wilcoxon rank sum test. Supplementary table 14. Analysis of positive enrichment of Wikipathways terms between M+2+6- and all other malignant cells in scRNA-seq samples of DLBCL by gprofiler2.

Supplementary methods. Supplementary Figure 1. Phenotyping of B-cells in non-malignant tissues. A, Quantitation of marker positivity across ten tonsil and two reactive lymph node samples (rLN). Analysis is spatially resolved between the GC and extra-GC zones. B, Spatial map of cellular coordinates based on cell segmentation of images in Figure 1B. Marker-positivity is indicated, and a total proportion of positive and negative cells is depicted as a pie chart. These maps were used to derive sub-population phenotypes depicted in Figure 1C. Scale bar is 100μm. C, Proliferation analysis (i.e., Ki67-positivity) among sub-populations in five tonsil samples. Median with interquartile range, whiskers denote 10th and 90th percentile. Supplementary figure 2. Example pseudo-colored mfIHC images for MYC, BCL2, BCL6 cases in DLBCL. Images of a range of mean fluorescent intensities are shown with equal scaling for reference. Supplementary figure 3. Global distribution of MYC, BCL2 and BCL6 sub-populations within DLBCL cohorts. Heat-maps displaying the percentage extent of individual markers and each sub-population within the DLBCL NUH, CMMC, SGH and MDA cohorts. Hierarchical k-means clustering of patients according to sub-population extent is applied. Positivity shading for single markers ranges between 0-100% positivity, whereas shading for sub-populations reflects 0-50% positivity and remains fully saturated until 100%. IPI Risk Group - International Prognostic Index Risk Group, FISH - fluorescence in situ hybridization. Supplementary figure 4. Intra-tumor heterogeneity of sub-populations. A, Correlation of sub-population extent quantification between two biopsies of the same patient for which at least two tissue microarray (TMA) biopsies are available. Correlation is shown separately for lymph node and extranodal biopsies. Spearman rho is indicated for each correlation. Axes are in exponential and equivalent in all panels. B, Sub-population percentage extent quantification across multiple TMA cores (columns) of the same patient (rows). Pie charts are ordered according to decreasing cell numbers evaluated per core. All patients from the NUH cohort with at least five cores are evaluated. A heterogenous cluster is highlighted by the red box. Supplementary figure 5. Spatial heterogeneity of sub-population interactions. A, Conceptual schematic of pair correlation function (PCF) plots depicting a clustered distribution (left, green) and a random distribution (right, grey). Representative counterpart spatial maps are above each plot. B, PCF analysis for sub-populations to investigate spatial clustering (top). Mean results for two independent cohorts (shading is cohort standard deviation). An example tissue microarray core is shown as physical distance reference for spatial analyses (bottom left). Absolute number of neighboring cells expected within a given radius (data from 3500 randomly selected cells across all images, mean with standard deviation) (bottom right). C, Actual spatial map of sub-populations of an example DLBCL case (top). Extent of all sub-populations within the sample is shown on the left. Simulated, hypothetical random distribution of cells for the same case (middle). PCF analysis for the shown sample and its matched simulated random distribution (bottom). Scale bars in B and C are 100µm. D, Mean deviations from expected neighbor abundance (Δ%) summarizing cell-cell interactions between sub-populations for the sample shown in (C). E, Sub-population interaction matrices from spatially distinct biopsies (cores in tissue microarray) for example DLBCL patients. Biopsies of stable, spatially homogenous, sub-population interaction profiles are grouped (top), whereas biopsies of a differing, heterogenous, interaction profile are grouped separately (bottom). Supplementary figure 6. Global deviations from expected spatial neighbor abundance (Δ%). Hierarchical clustering (minimum variance method) of measured Δ% for all cases in the SGH and MDA cohorts. Extents of sub-populations are indicated for reference (top). For the MDA cohort, multiple biopsies (n = 1-3) from the same patient were included in the analysis to determine spatial interaction similarity across spatially distinct regions (bottom). Supplementary figure 7. Correlation of predicted MYC, BCL2 and BCL6 sub-population percentage extent based on single oncogene positivity and observed percentage extent in DLBCL cohorts. Spearman rho, axes are equivalent in all panels. Supplementary figure 8. Variance of M+2+6- percentage extent in the context of positivity calling across a 15% cut-off. A, M+2+6- scoring variance across multiple pathological imaging fields. All whole-tissue DLBCL sections from University of Palermo (UP), and samples from the NUH TMA with at least four fields scored per patient and a mean M+2+6- score above 5% are shown. Mean with SD. Ordinates between 50-100% are compressed for clarity. Dashed line denotes M+2+6- 15% positivity. B, Stability of M+2+6- case positivity calling across scoring increasing number of imaging fields. All cases from panel A with at least five fields scored in this study are shown. Only one case is called M+2+6- Low (<15%) at the first image scored, and subsequently called M+2+6- High (≥15%) after two or more fields scored. Supplementary figure 9. Mapping of mRNA expression data into percentage extent data. A, Cumulative histogram of MYC, BCL2 and BCL6 protein percentage extent positivity in DLBCL cohorts (data transformed from Figure 4A) (top). B, Aggregated single oncogene cumulative distribution of MYC, BCL2 and BCL6 protein percentage extent positivity across all measured protein cohorts and its smoothed empirical cumulative distribution function (eCDF).C, Distribution of inferred single oncogene percentage extent in GEP cohorts. (see Supplementary table 6 for all values). Supplementary figure 10. Analysis of the GOYA clinical trial. A, Correlation of MYC...

Multivariate analysis of continuous M+2+6− percentage extent at 5% increments as a predictor of OS in the NUH, SGH, and MDA cohorts of DLBCL (Cox proportional hazards model)

Supplementary methods. Supplementary Figure 1. Phenotyping of B-cells in non-malignant tissues. A, Quantitation of marker positivity across ten tonsil and two reactive lymph node samples (rLN). Analysis is spatially resolved between the GC and extra-GC zones. B, Spatial map of cellular coordinates based on cell segmentation of images in Figure 1B. Marker-positivity is indicated, and a total proportion of positive and negative cells is depicted as a pie chart. These maps were used to derive sub-population phenotypes depicted in Figure 1C. Scale bar is 100μm. C, Proliferation analysis (i.e., Ki67-positivity) among sub-populations in five tonsil samples. Median with interquartile range, whiskers denote 10th and 90th percentile. Supplementary figure 2. Example pseudo-colored mfIHC images for MYC, BCL2, BCL6 cases in DLBCL. Images of a range of mean fluorescent intensities are shown with equal scaling for reference. Supplementary figure 3. Global distribution of MYC, BCL2 and BCL6 sub-populations within DLBCL cohorts. Heat-maps displaying the percentage extent of individual markers and each sub-population within the DLBCL NUH, CMMC, SGH and MDA cohorts. Hierarchical k-means clustering of patients according to sub-population extent is applied. Positivity shading for single markers ranges between 0-100% positivity, whereas shading for sub-populations reflects 0-50% positivity and remains fully saturated until 100%. IPI Risk Group - International Prognostic Index Risk Group, FISH - fluorescence in situ hybridization. Supplementary figure 4. Intra-tumor heterogeneity of sub-populations. A, Correlation of sub-population extent quantification between two biopsies of the same patient for which at least two tissue microarray (TMA) biopsies are available. Correlation is shown separately for lymph node and extranodal biopsies. Spearman rho is indicated for each correlation. Axes are in exponential and equivalent in all panels. B, Sub-population percentage extent quantification across multiple TMA cores (columns) of the same patient (rows). Pie charts are ordered according to decreasing cell numbers evaluated per core. All patients from the NUH cohort with at least five cores are evaluated. A heterogenous cluster is highlighted by the red box. Supplementary figure 5. Spatial heterogeneity of sub-population interactions. A, Conceptual schematic of pair correlation function (PCF) plots depicting a clustered distribution (left, green) and a random distribution (right, grey). Representative counterpart spatial maps are above each plot. B, PCF analysis for sub-populations to investigate spatial clustering (top). Mean results for two independent cohorts (shading is cohort standard deviation). An example tissue microarray core is shown as physical distance reference for spatial analyses (bottom left). Absolute number of neighboring cells expected within a given radius (data from 3500 randomly selected cells across all images, mean with standard deviation) (bottom right). C, Actual spatial map of sub-populations of an example DLBCL case (top). Extent of all sub-populations within the sample is shown on the left. Simulated, hypothetical random distribution of cells for the same case (middle). PCF analysis for the shown sample and its matched simulated random distribution (bottom). Scale bars in B and C are 100µm. D, Mean deviations from expected neighbor abundance (Δ%) summarizing cell-cell interactions between sub-populations for the sample shown in (C). E, Sub-population interaction matrices from spatially distinct biopsies (cores in tissue microarray) for example DLBCL patients. Biopsies of stable, spatially homogenous, sub-population interaction profiles are grouped (top), whereas biopsies of a differing, heterogenous, interaction profile are grouped separately (bottom). Supplementary figure 6. Global deviations from expected spatial neighbor abundance (Δ%). Hierarchical clustering (minimum variance method) of measured Δ% for all cases in the SGH and MDA cohorts. Extents of sub-populations are indicated for reference (top). For the MDA cohort, multiple biopsies (n = 1-3) from the same patient were included in the analysis to determine spatial interaction similarity across spatially distinct regions (bottom). Supplementary figure 7. Correlation of predicted MYC, BCL2 and BCL6 sub-population percentage extent based on single oncogene positivity and observed percentage extent in DLBCL cohorts. Spearman rho, axes are equivalent in all panels. Supplementary figure 8. Variance of M+2+6- percentage extent in the context of positivity calling across a 15% cut-off. A, M+2+6- scoring variance across multiple pathological imaging fields. All whole-tissue DLBCL sections from University of Palermo (UP), and samples from the NUH TMA with at least four fields scored per patient and a mean M+2+6- score above 5% are shown. Mean with SD. Ordinates between 50-100% are compressed for clarity. Dashed line denotes M+2+6- 15% positivity. B, Stability of M+2+6- case positivity calling across scoring increasing number of imaging fields. All cases from panel A with at least five fields scored in this study are shown. Only one case is called M+2+6- Low (<15%) at the first image scored, and subsequently called M+2+6- High (≥15%) after two or more fields scored. Supplementary figure 9. Mapping of mRNA expression data into percentage extent data. A, Cumulative histogram of MYC, BCL2 and BCL6 protein percentage extent positivity in DLBCL cohorts (data transformed from Figure 4A) (top). B, Aggregated single oncogene cumulative distribution of MYC, BCL2 and BCL6 protein percentage extent positivity across all measured protein cohorts and its smoothed empirical cumulative distribution function (eCDF).C, Distribution of inferred single oncogene percentage extent in GEP cohorts. (see Supplementary table 6 for all values). Supplementary figure 10. Analysis of the GOYA clinical trial. A, Correlation of MYC...

Supplementary table 1. Per-patient mfIHC MYC, BCL2 and BCL6 single oncogene and subpopulation scores for normal tonsil tissue and reactive lymph node tissue. Supplementary table 2. Per-patient mfIHC MYC, BCL2 and BCL6 single oncogene and subpopulation scores for DLBCL tissue (NUH, CMMC, SGH, MDA, BCA and UP). Supplementary table 6. Inferred percentage extents of MYC, BCL2, BCL6 and sub-population metrics in GEP cohorts. Supplementary table 11. Correlation of M+2+6- metric with gene expression in GEP cohorts. Supplementary table 12. Differential gene expression analysis of primary germinal center (GC) B-cells with M+2+ and M+2+6+ overexpression. Supplementary table 13. Differentially expressed genes between M+2+6- and all other malignant cells in scRNA-seq samples of DLBCL. Dichotomized non-parametric comparison, Wilcoxon rank sum test. Supplementary table 14. Analysis of positive enrichment of Wikipathways terms between M+2+6- and all other malignant cells in scRNA-seq samples of DLBCL by gprofiler2.

Transcriptomic analysis of M+2+6− high cases and potential role of CCND2. A, Correlation of observed M+2+6− percentage extent in the BCA cohort with the cell-of-origin (COO) DLBCL90-COO signature. Bonferroni corrected Kruskal–Wallis test for ABC vs. others. B, Correlation of M+2+6− metric in GEP cohorts with COO signatures. Mean M+2+6− metric value per group per cohort is shown. Bonferroni corrected paired-samples t test. C, Correlation of the M+2+6− percentage extent and metric evaluated by mfIHC and mRNA inference, respectively, with genetic subtypes (LymphGen classification). D, Sankey plot of M+2+6− dichotomized grouping matched with molecular features. E, Volcano plot of pooled direct correlation of gene mRNA expression and M+2+6− metric across seven GEP cohorts. Genes highly correlated with M+2+6− metric across datasets at absolute Spearman rho ≥0.2 and FDR≤0.001 are shown (see also Supplementary Table S11). The abscissa is scaled exponentially. F, Differential gene expression between primary GC B cells overexpressing M+2+ and M+2+6+ (see also Supplementary Table S12). Analysis is generated from 4 biological replicates from each condition, from cells of independent donors. G, Genes highly enriched in M+2+6− cells: correlation of results from E and F. H,CCDN2 gene expression in GEP cohorts in patients dichotomized by M+2+6− 15% metric (left) and in primary B cells (right). Paired t test (left); mean with standard deviation and FDR (FDR as per Supplementary Table S12) for t test (right). I, Single-cell RNA-seq of GC primary B cells transduced either with BCL2 and MYC (MYC-transduced) or BCL2 and BCL6 (BCL6-transduced). Untransduced GC primary B cells are also included. Expression of CCND2 is indicated in color. J, Proliferation analysis of M+2+6+ primary GC B cells overexpressing cyclin D2 (CCND2) compared with M+2+6+ primary GC B cells transduced with an empty vector (EV). Analysis performed with 3 biological replicates for each condition, using cells from 3 independent patients; mean with standard deviation; t test. UMAP, Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection.

Quantitative single-cell analysis of MYC, BCL2, and BCL6 protein expression in B cells in nonmalignant tissues and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. A, Schematic workflow of a quantitative digital pathology experiment. B, Spectrally unmixed multiplexed fluorescent images for CD20, MYC, BCL2, and BCL6 and nuclear counterstaining in tonsil tissue. The germinal center (GC) and extragerminal center (extra-GC) zones are indicated. C, Spatial map of MYC/BCL2/BCL6 subpopulations, i.e., possible permutations of MYC/BCL2/BCL6-positivity and -negativity within the CD20-positive cell population in a tonsil image. D, Quantitation of subpopulation extent within CD20-positive cells in tonsils and reactive lymph nodes resolved spatially between the GC and extra-GC zones. E, Example of pseudocolored MYC/BCL2/BCL6/CD20 mfIHC staining in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL; left). Cell segmentation and single oncogene positivity masks are shown within the CD20-positive cell population (right). F, Summary of percentage extent of subpopulations across patients from National University Hospital (NUH), Chi-Mei Medical Center (CMMC), MD Anderson (MDA), and Singapore General Hospital (SGH). Relevant clinicopathologic features are indicated; see also Supplementary Fig. S3. Patients were ordered arbitrarily according to extent of the triple-positive M+2+6+ subpopulation extent. IPI Risk Group, International Prognostic Index Risk Group; FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization. G, Intrapatient spatial stability of subpopulations – proportion of subpopulations measured across four spatially distinct biopsies from the same patient (rows). Biopsy comparison overview is shown across 11 representative example DLBCL patients (columns). See also Supplementary Fig. S4A and S4B for a correlation analysis for all patients with multiple biopsies available. H, Proliferation analysis (i.e., Ki-67-positivity) among subpopulations in DLBCL samples. Proliferative BCL6-positive subpopulations are grouped. Median with interquartile range, whiskers denote 10th and 90th percentile. Mann–Whitney test (BCL6-positive vs. -negative subpopulations). All scale bars, 100 μm.

Supplementary table 1. Per-patient mfIHC MYC, BCL2 and BCL6 single oncogene and subpopulation scores for normal tonsil tissue and reactive lymph node tissue. Supplementary table 2. Per-patient mfIHC MYC, BCL2 and BCL6 single oncogene and subpopulation scores for DLBCL tissue (NUH, CMMC, SGH, MDA, BCA and UP). Supplementary table 6. Inferred percentage extents of MYC, BCL2, BCL6 and sub-population metrics in GEP cohorts. Supplementary table 11. Correlation of M+2+6- metric with gene expression in GEP cohorts. Supplementary table 12. Differential gene expression analysis of primary germinal center (GC) B-cells with M+2+ and M+2+6+ overexpression. Supplementary table 13. Differentially expressed genes between M+2+6- and all other malignant cells in scRNA-seq samples of DLBCL. Dichotomized non-parametric comparison, Wilcoxon rank sum test. Supplementary table 14. Analysis of positive enrichment of Wikipathways terms between M+2+6- and all other malignant cells in scRNA-seq samples of DLBCL by gprofiler2.

MYC, BCL2, and BCL6 protein coexpression in DLBCL can be inferred from individual marker data. A, Schematic of possible relationships between expression of three oncogenes in a population of cells. The distribution of these oncogenes can either reflect interdependent expression, independent/stochastic expression, or mutually exclusive expression. These relationships result in the percentage extent of oncogenes in the tumor being either strongly positively correlated, not correlated, or strongly negatively correlated, respectively. Created with BioRender.com. B, Correlation of MYC, BCL2, and BCL6 percentage extent across patients in DLBCL cohorts. Spearman correlation; axes are equivalent in all panels. C, Good correlation between probabilistically predicted subpopulation percentage extent based on single oncogene positivity and observed percentage extent in the NUH cohort. Cases of double-hit lymphoma (DHL, MYC+BCL2+ translocations or MYC+BCL6+ translocations) or triple-hit lymphoma (THL) are highlighted. Spearman rho for each correlation is shown; axes are equivalent in all panels. Correlation for other cohorts can be found in Supplementary Fig. S7. D, Prospective evaluation of an optimal dichotomization cutoff for M+2+6− percentage extent in the BCA cohort. Univariate Cox PH model at 1% extent positivity increment, HR for death with 95% CI. HR scale is exponential. Optimal dichotomization cutoff is highlighted in blue. E, Kaplan–Meier OS analysis of the chromogenic IHC BCA cohort evaluation stratified into M+2+6− metric high and low groups across an absolute value of 15% M+2+6−metric. Log-rank test, shading denotes 95% confidence interval. CMMC, Chi-Mei Medical Center.