Silvano Esposito
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Silvano Esposito has a total of 257 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Silvana Noviello
Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Salerno, Italy
30 shared publications- Sebastiano Leone
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, San Giuseppe Moscati Hospital, Contrada Amoretta, 83100 Avellino, Italy
20 shared publications S. Noviello
13 shared publicationsFilomena Ianniello
12 shared publicationsF. Ianniello
9 shared publicationsS. Leone
A.O.R.N. “San Giuseppe Moscati
9 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 1 November 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Antibiotics
- Vol. 14 (11) , 1095
Fracture-Related Infections: Current Status and Perspectives from the International Society of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
Fracture-related infections (FRIs) represent a significant complication in orthopedic trauma care, often leading to delayed bone healing, prolonged hospital stays, and increased patient morbidity. Pathogenesis involves microbial contamination during injury or surgery, compounded by patient-related risk factors such as diabetes, smoking, or immunosuppression. Diagnosis of FRI relies on a combination of clinical, radiological, and microbiological criteria. Common signs include persistent pain, swelling, erythema, purulent discharge, and non-union of the fracture. FRIs are classified based on the timing of infection onset into acute, delayed, and chronic forms, each requiring tailored management strategies. Treatment generally involves aggressive surgical debridement, possible hardware removal or retention, and targeted antibiotic therapy. In cases of severe tissue loss, reconstructive procedures may be necessary to restore bone and soft tissue integrity. Treatment strategies include early administration of prophylactic antibiotics, meticulous surgical technique, and timely soft tissue coverage in open fractures. A multidisciplinary approach involving orthopedic surgeons, infectious disease specialists, and microbiologists is essential for successful management. Early recognition and appropriate intervention are crucial to improving outcomes and minimizing long-term disability in patients with fracture-related infections.
- 1 November 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Antibiotics
- Vol. 14 (11) , 1095
Open AccessFracture-Related Infections: Current Status and Perspectives from the International Society of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
Fracture-related infections (FRIs) represent a significant complication in orthopedic trauma care, often leading to delayed bone healing, prolonged hospital stays, and increased patient morbidity. Pathogenesis involves microbial contamination during injury or surgery, compounded by patient-related risk factors such as diabetes, smoking, or immunosuppression. Diagnosis of FRI relies on a combination of clinical, radiological, and microbiological criteria. Common signs include persistent pain, swelling, erythema, purulent discharge, and non-union of the fracture. FRIs are classified based on the timing of infection onset into acute, delayed, and chronic forms, each requiring tailored management strategies. Treatment generally involves aggressive surgical debridement, possible hardware removal or retention, and targeted antibiotic therapy. In cases of severe tissue loss, reconstructive procedures may be necessary to restore bone and soft tissue integrity. Treatment strategies include early administration of prophylactic antibiotics, meticulous surgical technique, and timely soft tissue coverage in open fractures. A multidisciplinary approach involving orthopedic surgeons, infectious disease specialists, and microbiologists is essential for successful management. Early recognition and appropriate intervention are crucial to improving outcomes and minimizing long-term disability in patients with fracture-related infections.
- Open Access
- 7 February 2024
- Published by Springer Nature in Infection
- Vol. 52 (4) , 1297-1306
In-label, off-label prescription, efficacy and tolerability of dalbavancin: report from a National Registry
Purpose: Although dalbavancin is currently approved for the treatment of ABSSIs, several studies suggest its efficacy and tolerance as long-term therapy for other off-label indications requiring prolonged intravenous antibiotic administration. Methods: We conducted a prospective nationwide study of dalbavancin use in real-life settings for both approved and off-label indications analysing for each case the clinical and microbiological characteristics of infection the efficacy and safety of treatments. Results: During the study period (from December 2018 to July 2021), the ID specialists from 14 different centres enrolled 223 patients treated with dalbavancin [141 males (63%) and 82 females (37%); male/female ratio 1.72; mean age 59 (SD 17.2) years, (range 15–96). Most patients in the study population (136/223; 61.0%) came from community rather than health care facilities and most of them were visited in Infectious Diseases wards (93/223; 41.7%) and clinics (55/223; 24.7%) even though some patients were cured in other settings, such as surgery wards (18/223; 8.1%), orthopaedic wards (11/223; 4.9%), Emergency Rooms (7/223; 3.1%) and non-surgical other than ID wards (6/223; 2.7%). The most common ID diagnoses were osteomyelitis (44 cases/223; 19.7%; of which 29 acute and 15 chronic osteomyelitis), cellulitis (28/223; 12.5%), cutaneous abscess (23/223; 10.3%), orthopaedic prosthesis-associated infection (22/223; 9.9%), surgical site infection (20/223; 9.0%) and septic arthritis (15/223; 6.7%). Conclusion: In conclusion, by virtue of its PK/PD properties, dalbavancin represents a valuable option to daily in-hospital intravenous or outpatient antimicrobial regimens also for off-label indications requiring a long-term treatment of Gram-positive infections.
- 7 February 2024
- Published by Springer Nature in Infection
- Vol. 52 (4) , 1297-1306
Open AccessIn-label, off-label prescription, efficacy and tolerability of dalbavancin: report from a National Registry
Purpose: Although dalbavancin is currently approved for the treatment of ABSSIs, several studies suggest its efficacy and tolerance as long-term therapy for other off-label indications requiring prolonged intravenous antibiotic administration. Methods: We conducted a prospective nationwide study of dalbavancin use in real-life settings for both approved and off-label indications analysing for each case the clinical and microbiological characteristics of infection the efficacy and safety of treatments. Results: During the study period (from December 2018 to July 2021), the ID specialists from 14 different centres enrolled 223 patients treated with dalbavancin [141 males (63%) and 82 females (37%); male/female ratio 1.72; mean age 59 (SD 17.2) years, (range 15–96). Most patients in the study population (136/223; 61.0%) came from community rather than health care facilities and most of them were visited in Infectious Diseases wards (93/223; 41.7%) and clinics (55/223; 24.7%) even though some patients were cured in other settings, such as surgery wards (18/223; 8.1%), orthopaedic wards (11/223; 4.9%), Emergency Rooms (7/223; 3.1%) and non-surgical other than ID wards (6/223; 2.7%). The most common ID diagnoses were osteomyelitis (44 cases/223; 19.7%; of which 29 acute and 15 chronic osteomyelitis), cellulitis (28/223; 12.5%), cutaneous abscess (23/223; 10.3%), orthopaedic prosthesis-associated infection (22/223; 9.9%), surgical site infection (20/223; 9.0%) and septic arthritis (15/223; 6.7%). Conclusion: In conclusion, by virtue of its PK/PD properties, dalbavancin represents a valuable option to daily in-hospital intravenous or outpatient antimicrobial regimens also for off-label indications requiring a long-term treatment of Gram-positive infections.
- 14 May 2022
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Chemotherapy
- Vol. 34 (8) , 524-533
Epidemiology, aetiology and treatment of skin and soft tissue infections: final report of a prospective multicentre national registry
Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) represent a heterogenous group of pathological conditions involving the skin or the underlying subcutaneous tissues, fascia and muscle, characterised by a considerable variety of clinical presentations, severity and possible aetiological pathogens. Although previous analyses on restricted types of SSTIs and population have already been published, we conducted a large nationwide surveillance program on behalf of the Italian Society of Infectious and Tropical Diseases to assess the clinical and microbiological characteristics of the whole SSTI spectrum, from mild to severe life-threatening infections, in both inpatients and outpatients and their management. Twenty-nine Infectious Diseases (ID) Centres throughout Italy collected prospectively data concerning both the clinical and microbiological diagnosis of patients affected by SSTIs via an electronic case report form. We included in our database all cases managed by ID specialists participating to the study, independently from their severity or the setting of consultation. Here, we integrated previous preliminary results analysing and reporting data referring to a 3-year period (October 2016–October 2019). During this period, the study population included 478 adult patients with diagnosis of SSTI. The type of infection diagnosed, the aetiological agent involved and some notes on antimicrobial susceptibilities were collected and reported herein. We also analysed the most common co-morbidities, the type and duration of therapy executed, before and after ID intervention and the length of stay. The results of our study provide information to better understand the national epidemiologic data and the current clinical management of SSTIs in Italy.
- 14 May 2022
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Chemotherapy
- Vol. 34 (8) , 524-533
Epidemiology, aetiology and treatment of skin and soft tissue infections: final report of a prospective multicentre national registry
Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) represent a heterogenous group of pathological conditions involving the skin or the underlying subcutaneous tissues, fascia and muscle, characterised by a considerable variety of clinical presentations, severity and possible aetiological pathogens. Although previous analyses on restricted types of SSTIs and population have already been published, we conducted a large nationwide surveillance program on behalf of the Italian Society of Infectious and Tropical Diseases to assess the clinical and microbiological characteristics of the whole SSTI spectrum, from mild to severe life-threatening infections, in both inpatients and outpatients and their management. Twenty-nine Infectious Diseases (ID) Centres throughout Italy collected prospectively data concerning both the clinical and microbiological diagnosis of patients affected by SSTIs via an electronic case report form. We included in our database all cases managed by ID specialists participating to the study, independently from their severity or the setting of consultation. Here, we integrated previous preliminary results analysing and reporting data referring to a 3-year period (October 2016–October 2019). During this period, the study population included 478 adult patients with diagnosis of SSTI. The type of infection diagnosed, the aetiological agent involved and some notes on antimicrobial susceptibilities were collected and reported herein. We also analysed the most common co-morbidities, the type and duration of therapy executed, before and after ID intervention and the length of stay. The results of our study provide information to better understand the national epidemiologic data and the current clinical management of SSTIs in Italy.
- Open Access
- 29 March 2021
- Published by Springer Nature in Infection
- Vol. 49 (4) , 607-616
Characteristics of viral pneumonia in the COVID-19 era: an update
Influenza virus, rhinovirus, and adenovirus frequently cause viral pneumonia, an important cause of morbidity and mortality especially in the extreme ages of life. During the last two decades, three outbreaks of coronavirus-associated pneumonia, namely Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome, Middle-East Respiratory Syndrome, and the ongoing Coronavirus Infectious Disease—2019 (COVID-19) were reported. The rate of diagnosis of viral pneumonia is increasingly approaching 60% among children identified as having community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Clinical presentation ranges from mild to severe pneumonitis complicated by respiratory failure in severe cases. The most vulnerable patients, the elderly and those living with cancer, report a relevant mortality rate. No clinical characteristics can be useful to conclusively distinguish the different etiology of viral pneumonia. However, accessory symptoms, such as anosmia or ageusia together with respiratory symptoms suggest COVID-19. An etiologic-based treatment of viral pneumonia is possible in a small percentage of cases only. Neuraminidase inhibitors have been proven to reduce the need for ventilatory support and mortality rate while only a few data support the large-scale use of other antivirals. A low-middle dose of dexamethasone and heparin seems to be effective in COVID-19 patients, but data regarding their possible efficacy in viral pneumonia caused by other viruses are conflicting. In conclusion, viral pneumonia is a relevant cause of CAP, whose interest is increasing due to the current COVID-19 outbreak. To set up a therapeutic approach is difficult because of the low number of active molecules and the conflicting data bearing supportive treatments such as steroids.
- 29 March 2021
- Published by Springer Nature in Infection
- Vol. 49 (4) , 607-616
Open AccessCharacteristics of viral pneumonia in the COVID-19 era: an update
Influenza virus, rhinovirus, and adenovirus frequently cause viral pneumonia, an important cause of morbidity and mortality especially in the extreme ages of life. During the last two decades, three outbreaks of coronavirus-associated pneumonia, namely Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome, Middle-East Respiratory Syndrome, and the ongoing Coronavirus Infectious Disease—2019 (COVID-19) were reported. The rate of diagnosis of viral pneumonia is increasingly approaching 60% among children identified as having community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Clinical presentation ranges from mild to severe pneumonitis complicated by respiratory failure in severe cases. The most vulnerable patients, the elderly and those living with cancer, report a relevant mortality rate. No clinical characteristics can be useful to conclusively distinguish the different etiology of viral pneumonia. However, accessory symptoms, such as anosmia or ageusia together with respiratory symptoms suggest COVID-19. An etiologic-based treatment of viral pneumonia is possible in a small percentage of cases only. Neuraminidase inhibitors have been proven to reduce the need for ventilatory support and mortality rate while only a few data support the large-scale use of other antivirals. A low-middle dose of dexamethasone and heparin seems to be effective in COVID-19 patients, but data regarding their possible efficacy in viral pneumonia caused by other viruses are conflicting. In conclusion, viral pneumonia is a relevant cause of CAP, whose interest is increasing due to the current COVID-19 outbreak. To set up a therapeutic approach is difficult because of the low number of active molecules and the conflicting data bearing supportive treatments such as steroids.
- 1 September 2020
- Published by Elsevier in Microbial Pathogenesis
- Vol. 146, 104241
Study of combining virtual screening and antiviral treatments of the Sars-CoV-2 (Covid-19)
- 1 September 2020
- Published by Elsevier in Microbial Pathogenesis
- Vol. 146, 104241
Study of combining virtual screening and antiviral treatments of the Sars-CoV-2 (Covid-19)
- 1 May 2020
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Future Microbiology
- Vol. 15 (7) , 469-472
Burden of fungal meningitis
- 1 May 2020
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Future Microbiology
- Vol. 15 (7) , 469-472
Burden of fungal meningitis
- 1 April 2020
- Published by Springer Nature in Infection
- Vol. 48 (3) , 323-332
Infections causing stroke or stroke-like syndromes
Background Stroke has relevant morbidity and mortality despite appropriate treatments and early diagnosis. Beside common risk factors such as diabetes and atrial fibrillation, infections can be involved in stroke pathogenesis, probably causing a systemic release of cytokines and other inflammatory mediators, triggering a latent pro-thrombotic state or damaging the vascular endothelium. In other cases, infections can occur as stroke-like syndromes, requiring a high grade of suspicion to avoid a delay in establishing a correct diagnosis. Results Treatment of stroke or stroke-like syndromes of infectious origin can be difficult. When a previous infective event triggers stroke, Alteplase administration can be associated with a higher incidence of bleeding and the extension of the ischaemic area can be major than expected. On the other hand, when stroke is part of some infectious diseases’ presentation as in endocarditis, bacterial or tuberculous meningitis and meningo-vascular syphilis, a correct diagnosis can be difficult. The management of these stroke-like syndromes is not standardised because common treatments proven to be effective for patients with stroke of vascular origin can worsen the prognosis, as it can be demonstrated after to be incorrect Alteplase administration to patients with endocarditis with septic embolism to the brain is associated with an increase of the risk of haemorrhage. Conclusions Stroke or stroke-like syndrome of infectious origin can be observed in an important proportion of case presenting with sensory-motor deficit of unknown origin; their accurate diagnosis has a considerable impact in terms of treatment choices and outcome.
- 1 April 2020
- Published by Springer Nature in Infection
- Vol. 48 (3) , 323-332
Infections causing stroke or stroke-like syndromes
Background Stroke has relevant morbidity and mortality despite appropriate treatments and early diagnosis. Beside common risk factors such as diabetes and atrial fibrillation, infections can be involved in stroke pathogenesis, probably causing a systemic release of cytokines and other inflammatory mediators, triggering a latent pro-thrombotic state or damaging the vascular endothelium. In other cases, infections can occur as stroke-like syndromes, requiring a high grade of suspicion to avoid a delay in establishing a correct diagnosis. Results Treatment of stroke or stroke-like syndromes of infectious origin can be difficult. When a previous infective event triggers stroke, Alteplase administration can be associated with a higher incidence of bleeding and the extension of the ischaemic area can be major than expected. On the other hand, when stroke is part of some infectious diseases’ presentation as in endocarditis, bacterial or tuberculous meningitis and meningo-vascular syphilis, a correct diagnosis can be difficult. The management of these stroke-like syndromes is not standardised because common treatments proven to be effective for patients with stroke of vascular origin can worsen the prognosis, as it can be demonstrated after to be incorrect Alteplase administration to patients with endocarditis with septic embolism to the brain is associated with an increase of the risk of haemorrhage. Conclusions Stroke or stroke-like syndrome of infectious origin can be observed in an important proportion of case presenting with sensory-motor deficit of unknown origin; their accurate diagnosis has a considerable impact in terms of treatment choices and outcome.
- 7 December 2018
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy
- Vol. 17 (1) , 17-25
Management of bacterial skin and skin structure infections with polymicrobial etiology
Introduction: Skin and Soft Tissue Infections (SSTIs) are some of the most commonly occurring bacterial infections, with a wide range of possible aetiological pathogens and a considerable variety of clinical presentations and severity; from mild to severe life-threatening infections. Several classifications have been proposed based on a specific variable, such as anatomical localization, skin extension, progression rate, clinical presentation, severity and etiological agent. Areas covered: The last criteria allows the differentiation of SSTIs as mono-microbial and poly-microbial. Among them, especially those infections with a long lasting or chronic course can be sustained by multiple microbial aetiology. Most polymicrobial SSTIs can be included in the following: diabetes foot infections (DFIs), pressure ulcers infection, burn infection, and infected chronic ulcers. Expert commentary: The medical management of these infections comprises the administration of wide a spectrum antibiotic, taking into consideration the frequent occurrence of multidrug resistant microorganisms as responsible agents. An appropriate deep tissue specimen for microbiological examination is a very important issue, especially for polymicrobial infections, sometimes permitting the distinction between real pathogens and contaminants avoiding more complex antibiotic treatments. This aspect must be strongly emphasized, as frequently superficial swabs remain the specimen of choice because they are easy to obtain.
- 7 December 2018
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy
- Vol. 17 (1) , 17-25
Management of bacterial skin and skin structure infections with polymicrobial etiology
Introduction: Skin and Soft Tissue Infections (SSTIs) are some of the most commonly occurring bacterial infections, with a wide range of possible aetiological pathogens and a considerable variety of clinical presentations and severity; from mild to severe life-threatening infections. Several classifications have been proposed based on a specific variable, such as anatomical localization, skin extension, progression rate, clinical presentation, severity and etiological agent. Areas covered: The last criteria allows the differentiation of SSTIs as mono-microbial and poly-microbial. Among them, especially those infections with a long lasting or chronic course can be sustained by multiple microbial aetiology. Most polymicrobial SSTIs can be included in the following: diabetes foot infections (DFIs), pressure ulcers infection, burn infection, and infected chronic ulcers. Expert commentary: The medical management of these infections comprises the administration of wide a spectrum antibiotic, taking into consideration the frequent occurrence of multidrug resistant microorganisms as responsible agents. An appropriate deep tissue specimen for microbiological examination is a very important issue, especially for polymicrobial infections, sometimes permitting the distinction between real pathogens and contaminants avoiding more complex antibiotic treatments. This aspect must be strongly emphasized, as frequently superficial swabs remain the specimen of choice because they are easy to obtain.
- 1 March 2018
- Vol. 26 (1) , 3-14
New insights into classification, epidemiology and microbiology of SSTIs, including diabetic foot infections.
Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) involve a heterogeneous group of entities with different clinical presentations classified according to several specific criteria. Because of their great variability, their incidence and prevalence is difficult to accurately determine. Yet it is generally thought that the rate of SSTIs is globally increasing due to an aging population, strictly associated with the increase in the number of critical and immunocompromised patients. The aetiology of SSTIs is also extremely variable, reflecting the noteworthy heterogeneity of their clinical presentations and their epidemiology. Gram-positive are far more prevalently than Gram-negative cocci responsible for STTIs globally considered including both aerobe and anaerobe microorganisms. The emergence of multidrug-resistance bacteria represents a serious public health threat which is making antimicrobial therapy less efficacious and more challenging by the day.
- 1 March 2018
- Vol. 26 (1) , 3-14
New insights into classification, epidemiology and microbiology of SSTIs, including diabetic foot infections.
Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) involve a heterogeneous group of entities with different clinical presentations classified according to several specific criteria. Because of their great variability, their incidence and prevalence is difficult to accurately determine. Yet it is generally thought that the rate of SSTIs is globally increasing due to an aging population, strictly associated with the increase in the number of critical and immunocompromised patients. The aetiology of SSTIs is also extremely variable, reflecting the noteworthy heterogeneity of their clinical presentations and their epidemiology. Gram-positive are far more prevalently than Gram-negative cocci responsible for STTIs globally considered including both aerobe and anaerobe microorganisms. The emergence of multidrug-resistance bacteria represents a serious public health threat which is making antimicrobial therapy less efficacious and more challenging by the day.
- Top Cited Papers
- 1 September 2017
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance
- Vol. 10, 204-212
Sepsis and septic shock: New definitions, new diagnostic and therapeutic approaches
- 1 September 2017
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance
- Vol. 10, 204-212
Top Cited PapersSepsis and septic shock: New definitions, new diagnostic and therapeutic approaches