Raul Embun

Background: Surgical resection remains the standard treatment for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Traditionally, lobectomy has been considered the procedure of choice; however, emerging evidence suggests that trisegmentectomy may offer comparable outcomes. This meta-analysis evaluates whether left upper lobe trisegmentectomy provides non-inferior or superior oncologic outcomes compared to left upper lobectomy, with particular attention to recurrence patterns. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, we included comparative studies evaluating left upper lobectomy versus trisegmentectomy. Outcomes assessed included recurrence (locoregional and distant), morbidity, and the length of hospital stay. A meta-analysis was conducted using the metabin function from the R meta package. Results: Of 14 identified articles, 9 met the inclusion criteria. No significant differences were observed in locoregional recurrence. However, distant recurrence was significantly lower in the trisegmentectomy group (OR 0.58; 95% CI 0.41–0.82). While overall morbidity showed no significant difference (OR 0.95), analysis of matched studies favored trisegmentectomy (OR 0.73; 95% CI 0.56–0.96). Hospital stay was significantly shorter in the trisegmentectomy group (OR –0.94; 95% CI –1.26 to –0.63). Conclusions: Trisegmentectomy and lobectomy exhibit distinct recurrence patterns, with lobectomy associated with a higher rate of distant recurrence. Trisegmentectomy may provide oncologic and perioperative advantages in appropriately selected patients. The systematic review and meta-analysis are registered in PROSPERO (registration number: CRD420251066445).

Background/Objectives: The objective was to compare the results of segmentectomy and lobectomy in the treatment of c-stage IA lung cancer in terms of tumor recurrence and 5-year survival. Methods: An observational study was performed using 3533 patients included in the registry of the Spanish VATS Group (GEVATS) of the Spanish Society of Thoracic Surgery (SECT) between 2016 and 2018. A total of 1004 lobectomies and 83 segmentectomies in c-stage IA were selected. Two comparable groups were selected through 2:1 propensity score matching with patient-, tumor- and surgery-related variables, leaving 166 lobectomies and 83 segmentectomies. Tumor recurrence was analyzed by Fisher’s test and overall, cancer-specific, recurrence-free and disease-free survival by Kaplan-Meier and Log-rank tests. Results: Overall recurrence was 23.7% in both groups, with a predominance of locoregional recurrence in segmentectomy (16.2% vs. 11.2%) and distant recurrence in lobectomy (12.5% vs. 7.5%). There was no difference between the two groups in any of the survival types. Overall survival at 5 years was 73.5% (95% CI: 65.5–82.4%) in the lobectomy group vs. 73.1% (95% CI: 60.1–88.9%) in the segmentectomy group. Conclusions: Anatomic segmentectomy may be a valid option in the treatment of c-stage IA lung cancer since the recurrence and long-term survival outcomes compared to lobectomy are equivalent.

Background: Mediastinal lymph node staging is a key element in the diagnosis of lung cancer. The combination of computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET) has improved staging but some circumstances are known to influence their negative predictive value. The objective of this study was to assess the impact on survival of avoiding invasive mediastinal staging in surgical lung cancer patients with negative mediastinum in CT and PET and intermediate risk of unexpected pN2. Methods: Data were collected from the prospective cohort of the Spanish Group for Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (GEVATS), from December 2016 to March 2018. For this study, patients were selected if they had negative mediastinum in CT and PET findings but tumours >3 cm or located centrally, or with cN1 disease. Patients who did and did not undergo invasive staging [invasive group (IG) and non-invasive group (NIG)] were compared, analysing unexpected pN2 and survival with Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression. Results: A total of 2,826 patients underwent surgery for primary lung cancer. We selected 1,247 patients who had tumours >3 cm, central tumours or cN1. Invasive staging was performed in 275 (22.1%) cases. The unexpected pN2 rate was 9.6% in the NIG and 13.8% in the IG, but half of them were discovered prior to surgery in the IG. Five-year overall survival (OS) was poorer in the IG (52.4% vs. 64%; PConclusions: Invasive staging recommended by guidelines could be reduced with an appropriate selection in mediastinal CT- and PET-negative patients with risk factors for unexpected pN2, because rates of pN2 and survival did not worsen without invasive staging.

The aim of this study was to know the treatment effect of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) on 90-day mortality after anatomical lung resection based on a nationwide cohort. This is a multicentre prospective cohort of 2721 anatomical resections for lung cancer from December 2016 to March 2018. Treatment and intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses were performed after inverse probability score weighting and different propensity score matching algorithms. Covariate balance was assessed by standardized mean differences. The estimators reported were the average treatment effect, the average treatment effect on the treated and odds ratios after conditional logistic models with 95% confidence intervals. The unconfoundedness assumption was evaluated by sensitivity analysis for average treatment effect (c-dependence) and average treatment effect on the treated (Γ). VATS was the initial approach in 1911 patients (70.2%), though 273 cases (14.3%) had to be converted to thoracotomy. Ninety-day mortality rates were: treatment analysis (VATS 1.16% vs open 3.9%, P < 0.001), ITT analysis (VATS 1.78% vs open 3.36%, P = 0.012). After inverse probability score weighting and propensity score matching, in the treatment analysis, VATS meant absolute risk reductions between 2.25% and 2.96% and relative risk reductions between 65% and 70% [OR = 0.34 (95% confidence interval 0.15–0.79), all P-values <0.004). However, all the estimators turned out to be non-significant in the ITT analyses. A high sensitivity to unobservable confounders was proved (c-dependence 0.135, Γ = 1.5). VATS can reduce the risk of 90-day mortality after anatomical lung resection. However, the implications of conversion to thoracotomy, comparing ITT versus treatment analysis, and the potential impact of hidden bias should deserve further attention in the future.

Intraoperative bleeding is the most crucial safety concern of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) for a major pulmonary resection. Despite the advances in surgical techniques and devices, intraoperative bleeding is still not rare and remains the most common and potentially fatal cause of conversion from VATS to open thoracotomy. Therefore, to guide the clinical practice of VATS lung surgery, we proposed the International Interest Group on Bleeding during VATS Lung Surgery with 65 experts from 10 countries in the field to develop this consensus document. The consensus was developed based on the literature reports and expert experience from different countries. The causes and incidence of intraoperative bleeding were summarised first. Seven situations of intraoperative bleeding were collected based on clinical practice, including the bleeding from massive vessel injuries, bronchial arteries, vessel stumps, and bronchial stumps, lung parenchyma, lymph nodes, incisions, and the chest wall. The technical consensus for the management of intraoperative bleeding was achieved on these seven surgical situations by six rounds of repeated revision. Following expert consensus statements were achieved: (I) Bleeding from major vascular injuries: direct compression with suction, retracted lung, or rolled gauze is useful for bleeding control. The size and location of the vascular laceration are evaluated to decide whether the bleeding can be stopped by direct compression or by ligation. If suturing is needed, the suction-compressing angiorrhaphy technique (SCAT) is recommended. Timely conversion to thoracotomy with direct compression is required if the operator lacks experience in thoracoscopic angiorrhaphy. (II) Bronchial artery bleeding: pre-emptive clipping of bronchial artery before bronchial dissection or lymph node dissection can reduce the incidence of bleeding. Bronchial artery bleeding can be stopped by compression with the suction tip, followed by the handling of the vascular stump with energy devices or clips. (III) Bleeding from large vessel stumps and bronchial stumps: bronchial stump bleeding mostly comes from accompanying bronchial artery, which can be clipped for hemostasis. Compression for hemostasis is usually effective for bleeding at the vascular stump. Otherwise, additional use of hemostatic materials, re-staple or a suture may be necessary. (IV) Bleeding from the lung parenchyma: coagulation hemostasis is the first choice. For wounds with visible air leakage or an insufficient hemostatic effect of coagulation, suturing may be necessary. (V) Bleeding during lymph node dissection: non-grasping en-bloc lymph node dissection is recommended for the nourishing vessels of the lymph node are addressed first with this technique. If bleeding occurs at the site of lymph node dissection, energy devices can be used for hemostasis, sometimes in combination with hemostatic materials. (VI) Bleeding from chest wall incisions: the chest wall incision(s) should always be made along the upper edge of the rib(s), with good hemostasis layer by layer. Recheck the incision for hemostasis before closing the chest is recommended. (VII) Internal chest wall bleeding: it can usually be managed with electrocoagulation. For diffuse capillary bleeding with the undefined bleeding site, compression of the wound with gauze may be helpful.