Vania Batista

Background/Objectives: The implementation of tattoo-free radiotherapy (RT) for breast cancer reflects an effort to mitigate the psychological distress of permanent marks through surface-guided techniques, while simultaneously evaluating its utility in meeting setup precision requirements. Methods: In this prospective trial, patients were positioned for breast cancer RT including regional nodal irradiation exclusively using surface-guided RT (SGRT). Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was acquired at each fraction as the ground truth to analyze translational setup deviations. Results: A total of 457 paired SGRT–CBCT data points in 30 patients were acquired. A residual translational setup deviation of ≤6 mm was achieved in 97.6% of all fractions with a median deviation of 2 mm (range: 0–12). Neither age, comorbidities, body mass index, extent of target volumes, choice of breathing technique, nor patient-reported symptoms (pain, dermatitis, anxiety) correlated significantly with setup deviations. The median in-room positioning time was 92 s (range: 20 s–6 min and 37 s) and significantly prolonged in patients with an elevated BMI and higher grades of pain and skin dermatitis, and for chest wall irradiation. Manual assessment of the accuracy of regional nodal CTVs in each CBCT relative to the planning CT showed good-to-minor deviations in 99.7% (Level 1/2), 95.0% (Supra-/infraclavicular), and 90.8% (Internal mammary), respectively, with major deviations in only 0.3% (Level 1/2), 5.0% (Supra-/infraclavicular) and 9.2% (Internal mammary). A forward dose calculation on CBCT geometries (n = 86) revealed high median CTV dose coverage of 100.0% (range: 57.1–107.7%) of the original target dose for all lymph node levels combined. Conclusions: The tattoo-free positioning setup for regional nodal irradiation in breast cancer patients exhibited pronounced robustness, maintaining its accuracy and reliability irrespective of patient-, tumor-, or treatment-specific variables with high clinical efficiency. However, larger cohorts are required to confirm whether these parameters genuinely operate independently of setup accuracy.

Four‐dimensional computed tomography (4DCT), which relies on breathing‐induced motion, requires realistic surrogate information of breathing variations to reconstruct the tumor trajectory and motion variability of normal tissues accurately. Therefore, the SimRT surface‐guided respiratory monitoring system has been installed on a Siemens CT scanner. This work evaluated the temporal and spatial accuracy of SimRT versus our commonly used pressure sensor, AZ‐733 V.A dynamic thorax phantom was used to reproduce regular and irregular breathing patterns acquired by SimRT and Anzai. Various parameters of the recorded breathing patterns, including mean absolute deviations (MAD), Pearson correlations (PC), and tagging precision, were investigated and compared to ground‐truth. Furthermore, 4DCT reconstructions were analyzed to assess the volume discrepancy, shape deformation and tumor trajectory.Compared to the ground‐truth, SimRT more precisely reproduced the breathing patterns with a MAD range of 0.37 ± 0.27 and 0.92 ± 1.02 mm versus Anzai with 1.75 ± 1.54 and 5.85 ± 3.61 mm for regular and irregular breathing patterns, respectively. Additionally, SimRT provided a more robust PC of 0.994 ± 0.009 and 0.936 ± 0.062 for all investigated breathing patterns. Further, the peak and valley recognition were found to be more accurate and stable using SimRT. The comparison of tumor trajectories revealed discrepancies up to 7.2 and 2.3 mm for Anzai and SimRT, respectively. Moreover, volume discrepancies up to 1.71 ± 1.62% and 1.24 ± 2.02% were found for both Anzai and SimRT, respectively.SimRT was validated across various breathing patterns and showed a more precise and stable breathing tracking, (i) independent of the amplitude and period, (ii) and without placing any physical devices on the patient's body. These findings resulted in a more accurate temporal and spatial accuracy, thus leading to a more realistic 4DCT reconstruction and breathing‐adapted treatment planning.

Uncertainties associated with the delivery of treatment to moving organs might compromise the accuracy of treatment. This study explores the impact of intra-fractional anatomical changes in pancreatic patients treated with charged particles delivered using a scanning beam. The aim of this paper is to define the potential source of uncertainties, quantify their effect, and to define clinically feasible strategies to reduce them. The study included 14 patients treated at our facility with charged particles (protons or 12C) using intensity modulated particle therapy (IMPT). Treatment plans were optimized using the Treatment Planning System (TPS) Syngo® RT Planning. The pre-treatment dose distribution under motion (4D) was simulated using the TPS TRiP4D and the dose delivered for some of the treatment fractions was reconstructed. The volume receiving at least 95% of the prescribed dose (V95CTV) and the target dose homogeneity were evaluated. The results from the 4D dose calculations were compared with dose distributions in the static case and its variation correlated with the internal motion amplitude and plan modulation, through the Pearson correlation coefficient, as well the significant p-value. The concept of the modulation index (MI) was introduced to assess the degree of modulation of IMPT plans, through the quantification of intensity gradients between neighboring pencil beams. The induced breathing motion together with dynamic beam delivery results in an interplay effect, which affects the homogeneity and target coverage of the dose distribution. This effect is stronger (∆V95CTV > 10%) for patients with tumor motion amplitude above 5 mm and a highly modulated dose distribution between and within fields. The MI combined with the internal motion amplitude is shown to correlate with the target dose degradation and a lack of plan robustness against range and positioning uncertainties. Under internal motion the use of inhomogeneous plans results in a decrease in the dose homogeneity and target coverage of dose distributions in comparison to the static case. Plan robustness can be improved by using multiple beams and avoiding beam entrance directions susceptible to density changes. 4D dose calculations support the selection of the most suitable plan for the specific patient’s anatomy.

Managing inter-fractional anatomy changes is a challenging task in radiotherapy of pancreatic tumors, especially in scanned carbon-ion delivery. This treatment planning study aims to focus on clinically feasible solutions, such as the beam angle selection and margin design to increase the robustness against inter-fractional uncertainties. This study included 10 patients with weekly 3D-CT imaging and physician-approved Clinical Target Volume (CTV). The study was directed to keep the CTV-coverage using six beam angle configurations in combination with different Internal Target Volume (ITV) concepts. These were: geometric-margin (symmetric 3 and 5 mm margin); range-equivalent margins with an isotropic HU replacement; and to evaluate the need of asymmetric margins the water-equivalent range path (WEPL) was determined per patient from the set of CTs. Plan optimization and forward dose calculation in each week-CT were performed with the research treatment planning system TRiP98 and the plan quality evaluated in terms of CTV coverage (V95CTV) and homogeneity dose (HCTV = D5-D95). The beam geometry had a substantial impact on the target irradiation over the treatment course, with the single posterior or two beams showing the best average coverage of the CTV. The use of geometric margins for the more robust beam geometries showed acceptable results, with a V95CTV of (99.2 ± 1.2)% for the 5 mm-margin. For the non-robust configurations, due to substantial changes in the radiological depth, the use of this margin results in a V95CTV that might be below 80%, only showing improvement when the range changes are included. Selection of adequate beam configurations and treatment margins in ion-beam therapy of pancreatic tumors is of great importance. For a single posterior beam or two beam configurations, application of geometrical margins compensate for dose degradation induced by inter-fractional anatomy changes for the majority of the analyzed treatment fractions.

A promising approach to treating liver cancer with radiotherapy, is using a combination of a conformal technique, such as carbon ion-beam therapy, and beam gating. This study aims to assess the dosimetric implications, in a dose planning and verification study, of the use of gated internal target volume (ITV_gate) when beam gating is used. Patients were immobilised with abdominal compression and a subset of these patients were treated using beam gating. The delivered dose was reconstructed. Significant dose degradation in the clinical target volume (CTV) due to the patient's motion was identified. In addition, new plan optimisations were performed for the PTV_gate, obtained from the geometric union of the phase-CTVs in the gating window. Finally, the concept of CTV expansion, including water equivalent path length variations (PTV_gWEPL), was evaluated. When breathing was regular in amplitude, dose planning to the PTV_gate resulted in a reduction in the dose delivered to healthy liver tissue without compromising the target coverage. In contrast, the use of PTV_gWEPL concept resulted in a delivered plan with minor deviations from the planned treatment. The planned dose for the two concepts was verified in a 3D-motion water phantom. The mean relative deviations between measurements and the reconstructed dose were below 5% and were therefore within the clinically acceptable range for treatment.