WBWerner Brack

Werner Brack

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article

Previous Organizations / Institutes

The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years


Werner Brack has a total of 997 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:

  • Tobias Schulze

    Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ, Leipzig, Germany

    38 shared publications
  • Martin Krauss

    Department of Exposure Science, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Permoserstraße 15, Leipzig 04318, Germany

    36 shared publications
  • Martin Krauss

    Department of Exposure Science, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, 04318 Leipzig, Germany

    25 shared publications
  • Henner Hollert

    Department Evolutionary Ecology & Environmental Toxicology, Institute of Ecology, Evolution and Diversity-Goethe University, Max-von-Laue-Straße 13, Frankfurt am Main, Germany

    24 shared publications
  • Rolf Altenburger

    Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Leipzig, Germany

    23 shared publications
  • Leo Posthuma

    Centre for Sustainability, Environment and Health, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands

    17 shared publications

Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Towards understanding PFAS prevalence in a Pan-European study using influent wastewater

    by Dalia Elabbadi, Harry Elliss, Ben Faill, Eva Hawkins, Azziz Assoumani, Frederic Béen, Anna Białk-Bielińska, Werner Brack, Tim Boogaerts, Sara Castiglioni, et al.

    Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are widely used in industrial and consumer applications. Although increasing evidence of their negative impacts on environmental and human health exists, a comprehensive large-scale understanding of their occurrence and effects is still lacking. This Pan-European study investigates the occurrence and potential impacts of 32 PFAS representing multiple classes and chain lengths. Influent wastewater from 30 wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) in fifteen European countries, representing >8 million inhabitants, was analysed. Fourteen PFAS were consistently quantified, with the highest population-normalised daily loads (PNDLs) seen for PFBS, followed by PFBA, 6:2 FTS, PFNA, PFOA and PFOS, showing pronounced spatial variability. Total PFAS daily loads ranged from ∑PFAS 0.1 ± 0 g 72 hr-1 (Slovenia site 2) to ∑PFAS 133 ± 12 g 72 hr-1 (Belgium site 2), and population-normalised daily loads (PNDLs) ranged from ∑PFAS 5.0 ± 0.3 mg 72 hr-1 1000 inh-1 (Slovenia site 2) to ∑PFAS 2197 ± 186 mg 72 hr-1 1000 inh-1 (Austria site 2).PFBS had the highest PNDL, whereas 8:2 FTS showed the lowest, indicating distinct spatial patterns, suggesting localised sources and exposure hotspots, likely linked to industrial activities such as textile scouring agents or production of consumer goods. Environmental risk assessment using EU water-framework directive guidelines, in the event of a combined sewer overflow was carried out. PFDA, PFNA, PFUnDA, PFDoDA, PFBA, PFOS and PFTrDA exceeded these guidelines. However, current assessments likely underestimate total risk, as bioaccumulation, mixture effects, and long-term exposure has yet to be evaluated.

  • Open Access

    Aromatic amine fingerprints of human activities from indoor environments – Insights from textile analysis

    by Anna Goellner, Tomisin I. Babalola, Özge Edebali, Lisa Melymuk, Martin Krauss, Werner Brack, Branislav Vrana, Melis Muz

  • Open Access

    When the rubber hits the road in Europe — A European risk perspective of 6PPD-quinone

    by Markus Schmitz, Markus Hecker, Khaled Zoroufchi Benis, Werner Brack, Ulrike Braun, Markus Brinkmann, Ingo Ebersberger, Omowunmi H. Fred-Ahmadu, Felix Langschied, Volker Linnemann, et al.

    6PPD-quinone (6PPD-Q), a transformation product of the tire antioxidant 6PPD, is among the most acutely toxic chemicals to certain salmonids. Since its 2020 identification, it has been implicated in coho die-offs in the U.S. Pacific Northwest and prompted regulatory responses in North America. In Europe, however, awareness, monitoring, and risk assessment remain limited despite dense road networks, urban runoff, and sensitive fish communities. This Perspective synthesizes current knowledge and key gaps in occurrence, exposure, and species-specific toxicity, and outlines a tiered response: harmonized water screening, targeted tests in native taxa, interim stormwater mitigation, and innovation toward safer tire additives.

  • Open Access

    Gestational Polyphenol Levels and Risk of Atopic and Respiratory Outcomes in Early‐Life: Insights From the LiNA Study

    by Sergio Gómez‐Olarte, Carolin Huber, Stefan Röder, Ulrich Sack, Michael Borte, Martin Krauss, Werner Brack, Ana C. Zenclussen, Gunda Herberth

  • Open Access

    Aromatic Amine Fingerprints of Human Activities from Indoor Environments – Insights from Textile Analysis

    by Anna Goellner, Tomisin Ifeoluwa Babalola, Özge Edebali, Lisa Melymuk, Martin Krauss, Werner Brack, Branislav Vrana, Melis Muz

    Aromatic amines (AAs), many of which are suspected/known mutagens, are generated in indoor environments by human activities such as smoking tobacco, meat frying and hair dying. Through sorption to textiles followed by desorption during laundry washing they may reach the water cycle and adjacent surface waters, where they contribute to the observed mutagenicity. In this study, we obtained chemical fingerprints of AAs from textiles linked with different indoor activities. Three different types of fabrics (cotton, polyester and wool) were exposed in smoking pubs, hair salons, and restaurant kitchens. In order to obtain background contamination, households of non-smokers that did not prepare or consume meat were sampled. We analysed the textile samples with a newly developed multitarget extraction and LC-HRMS method. 22 out of 52 target AAs could be detected. Large differences in AA concentrations were observed between the different indoor environments, but also among the three sites per environment type, as well as the three different fabrics per site, where wool accumulated the highest concentrations of AAs. Generally, the AA concentrations were highest in the smoking pubs, followed by restaurant kitchens, while hair salons and homes showed similar concentrations. Compounds that were predominantly observed were 4-aminodiphenylamine and the mutagens 2,4-diaminotoluene, 5‑amino‑o‑cresol, o-anisidine, 2-aminopyridine, and the co-mutagenic carboline harman, showing the potential of a pathway for AAs of reaching surface waters through adsorption to textiles. Additionally, mutagenic AAs that are unique to specific locations could be observed, 4-chloro-o-toluidine in hair salon samples and 4-aminobiphenyl in smoking pub samples.

  • Open Access

    Double trouble: The synergistic threat of environmental stressors and pesticide mixtures

    by Naeem Shahid, Ayesha Siddique, Martin Krauss, Alexander Böhme, Werner Brack, Annika Jahnke, Matthias Liess


  • Open Access

    Chemical mixture risk drivers and their heterogeneity in European freshwaters

    by Jana Schor, Tobias Schulze, Nadin Ulrich, İlHan Mutlu, Martin Krauss, Werner Brack, Triet Doan, Sven Bingert, Jan Bumberger, Wibke Busch, et al.


  • Open Access

    Current emission vs. legacy organic pollutants: Assessing the extent to which the eco-exposome of caged fish reflects external exposure

    by Janek P. Dann, Gerald T. Ankley, Brett R. Blackwell, Beate I. Escher, Annika Jahnke, Kathleen M. Jensen, Correne Jenson, Martin Krauss, Stefan Scholz, Theo Wernicke, et al.


  • Open Access

    Assessment of chemical footprints of hydrophobic pesticide/biocide contamination in western Kenya using polydimethylsiloxane silicone passive samplers

    by Isaac Cheruiyot Tanui, Faith Kandie, Ruth Chepchirchir, Rashid Mwalimu, Ambrose Kiprop, Naeem Shahid, Matthias Liess, Martin Krauss, Kilian E.C. Smith, Werner Brack

  • Open Access

    Non-Target Screening of Fluorinated Ionic Liquids and PFAS in European Wastewaters Using Supercritical Fluid Chromatography

    by Selina Tisler, Jonathan Zweigle, Maria Kregler Gotil, Saskia Finckh, Werner Brack, Eva-Maria Braxmaier, Corina Meyer, Juliane Hollender, Tina Kosjek, Emma L. Schymanski, et al.

    Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and fluorinated ionic liquids are increasingly recognized as persistent environmental contaminants. In this study, municipal effluent samples from 30 wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) across 15 European countries were analyzed using supercritical fluid chromatography–high-resolution mass spectrometry (SFC-HRMS) for non-target screening of fluorinated compounds. The bis-perfluoroalkyl sulfonimide (bis-FASI) class of ionic liquids was widely detected, including bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (NTf₂⁻), two rarely reported homologues (±2 CF₂, namely FSI- and BETI-), and two previously unreported homologues (±1 CF₂, namely FTFSI- and FTNTf2-). Bis-FASIs were present in 85% of samples and were more abundant in effluents from larger WWTPs. The fluorinated anion PF₆⁻, commonly used in ionic liquids, was found in all samples at concentrations up to 3 µg/L. Hexafluoroarsenate (AsF₆⁻), reported here for the first time in municipal wastewater, was detected in 32% of samples in eight countries. PF₆⁻ and AsF₆⁻ concentrations (when present) exceeded those of traditional PFSAs and PFCAs in 97% of samples. Polyfluorinated compounds showed partial removal during treatment, while perfluorinated compounds, inorganic fluorinated anions, and low-fluorinated pharmaceuticals and pesticides showed no removal. Low-fluorinated substances exceeded 100 ng/L in 90% of samples, yet PF₆⁻ alone surpassed the combined concentration of all low-fluorinated substances in 27 out of 30 samples. These results reveal a significant contribution of unconventional fluorinated substances to the overall fluorine load in wastewater. The dominant contributor, PF₆⁻, falls outside current PFAS regulatory definitions, underscoring the urgent need to expand monitoring strategies beyond legacy PFAS to include both inorganic and low-fluorinated contaminants.