Caterina Aurilio
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Caterina Aurilio has a total of 109 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Pasquale Sansone
Department of Women, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy
22 shared publications - Maria Caterina Pace
Department of Women, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy
21 shared publications - Vincenzo Pota
Department of Women, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy
20 shared publications - Maria Beatrice Passavanti
Department of Women, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy
18 shared publications - Francesco Coppolino
Department of Women, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy
14 shared publications - Luca Gregorio Giaccari
Service of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Vito Fazzi Hospital, 73100 Lecce, Italy
13 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
Postoperative Pain and Opioid Use Following Lower-Limb Escharectomy and Skin Grafting Under a Standardized Regional Anesthesia Protocol: A Retrospective Study
Background: Pain management in patients with severe burns remains one of the most complex challenges in perioperative care. Burn-related pain is multifactorial, resulting from tissue destruction, intense inflammation, surgical procedures, and repeated dressing changes. Opioids remain the cornerstone of analgesia; however, prolonged use is associated with tolerance, dependence, adverse effects, and prolonged hospitalization. Multimodal and opioid-sparing strategies, including regional anesthesia, may improve postoperative outcomes by enhancing analgesia while reducing systemic drug exposure. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a standardized regional anesthesia protocol in reducing postoperative pain and opioid requirements in burn patients undergoing lower-limb escharectomy and autologous skin grafting. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, single-center analysis of 25 adult patients with deep thermal burns of the lower limbs who underwent escharectomy and split-thickness skin grafting. All patients received a combined ultrasound-guided sciatic popliteal block and adductor canal block on both the burned limb and the donor site. Ropivacaine 0.375% with clonidine was administered without exceeding a total dose of 3.0 mg/kg. Postoperative pain was assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), and opioid consumption was recorded as rescue doses in intravenous morphine equivalents. Secondary outcomes included perioperative complications and 30-day hospital readmission. Results: Regional anesthesia provided effective postoperative pain control. Thirty-two percent of patients reported no pain (NRS 0), 52% reported mild pain (NRS 1–3), and 16% reported moderate pain (NRS 4–6). No patient reported severe pain (NRS 7–10). Only four patients (16%) required rescue opioids. No perioperative complications or block-related adverse events occurred, and no patient required hospital readmission within 30 days. Conclusions: In this cohort, regional anesthesia was associated with satisfactory postoperative analgesia and minimal opioid requirements. By reducing opioid exposure, this approach may help improve patient comfort and potentially limit opioid-related adverse effects. Larger prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings and to assess long-term outcomes.
Open AccessPostoperative Pain and Opioid Use Following Lower-Limb Escharectomy and Skin Grafting Under a Standardized Regional Anesthesia Protocol: A Retrospective Study
Background: Pain management in patients with severe burns remains one of the most complex challenges in perioperative care. Burn-related pain is multifactorial, resulting from tissue destruction, intense inflammation, surgical procedures, and repeated dressing changes. Opioids remain the cornerstone of analgesia; however, prolonged use is associated with tolerance, dependence, adverse effects, and prolonged hospitalization. Multimodal and opioid-sparing strategies, including regional anesthesia, may improve postoperative outcomes by enhancing analgesia while reducing systemic drug exposure. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a standardized regional anesthesia protocol in reducing postoperative pain and opioid requirements in burn patients undergoing lower-limb escharectomy and autologous skin grafting. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, single-center analysis of 25 adult patients with deep thermal burns of the lower limbs who underwent escharectomy and split-thickness skin grafting. All patients received a combined ultrasound-guided sciatic popliteal block and adductor canal block on both the burned limb and the donor site. Ropivacaine 0.375% with clonidine was administered without exceeding a total dose of 3.0 mg/kg. Postoperative pain was assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), and opioid consumption was recorded as rescue doses in intravenous morphine equivalents. Secondary outcomes included perioperative complications and 30-day hospital readmission. Results: Regional anesthesia provided effective postoperative pain control. Thirty-two percent of patients reported no pain (NRS 0), 52% reported mild pain (NRS 1–3), and 16% reported moderate pain (NRS 4–6). No patient reported severe pain (NRS 7–10). Only four patients (16%) required rescue opioids. No perioperative complications or block-related adverse events occurred, and no patient required hospital readmission within 30 days. Conclusions: In this cohort, regional anesthesia was associated with satisfactory postoperative analgesia and minimal opioid requirements. By reducing opioid exposure, this approach may help improve patient comfort and potentially limit opioid-related adverse effects. Larger prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings and to assess long-term outcomes.
- Open Access
High-Flow Nasal Cannula in Weaning Patients from Mechanical Ventilation in Head and Neck Surgery: Retrospective Study
Background: Patients undergoing head and neck surgery with free flap reconstruction are at a high risk for postoperative respiratory complications, including hypoxemia. Conventional oxygen therapy (COT) and non-invasive ventilation (NIV) may be poorly tolerated or contraindicated due to anatomical limitations. High-Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) therapy represents a promising alternative, offering better humidification, comfort, and oxygenation. Methods: This retrospective single-center study included 50 adult patients admitted to the ICU after head and neck oncologic surgery with flap reconstruction from January 2022 to November 2024. All patients received HFNC immediately after extubation. Hypoxemia was defined as a PaO2/FiO2 (P/F) ratio of < 300 mm Hg. The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative hypoxemia. Secondary outcomes included reintubation rates and patient compliance. Data were collected at 1, 6, 12, and 24 h following HFNC initiation. Results: Out of 59 patients screened, 9 were excluded per predefined criteria. Among the 50 included, only 2 patients (4%) developed hypoxemia, with P/F ratios remaining above 250. No patients required reintubation. The respiratory rate–oxygenation index (ROX index) improved steadily during the first 24 h. HFNC was well tolerated; only three patients required minor adjustments due to discomfort. Conclusions: HFNC use in the immediate postoperative period after head and neck surgery was associated with a low incidence of hypoxemia and no reintubations. These findings suggest that HFNC is a safe and effective strategy for postoperative respiratory support in this high-risk population. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm the benefit of HFNC in reducing hypoxemia and preventing reintubation in high-risk surgical populations.
Open AccessHigh-Flow Nasal Cannula in Weaning Patients from Mechanical Ventilation in Head and Neck Surgery: Retrospective Study
Background: Patients undergoing head and neck surgery with free flap reconstruction are at a high risk for postoperative respiratory complications, including hypoxemia. Conventional oxygen therapy (COT) and non-invasive ventilation (NIV) may be poorly tolerated or contraindicated due to anatomical limitations. High-Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) therapy represents a promising alternative, offering better humidification, comfort, and oxygenation. Methods: This retrospective single-center study included 50 adult patients admitted to the ICU after head and neck oncologic surgery with flap reconstruction from January 2022 to November 2024. All patients received HFNC immediately after extubation. Hypoxemia was defined as a PaO2/FiO2 (P/F) ratio of < 300 mm Hg. The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative hypoxemia. Secondary outcomes included reintubation rates and patient compliance. Data were collected at 1, 6, 12, and 24 h following HFNC initiation. Results: Out of 59 patients screened, 9 were excluded per predefined criteria. Among the 50 included, only 2 patients (4%) developed hypoxemia, with P/F ratios remaining above 250. No patients required reintubation. The respiratory rate–oxygenation index (ROX index) improved steadily during the first 24 h. HFNC was well tolerated; only three patients required minor adjustments due to discomfort. Conclusions: HFNC use in the immediate postoperative period after head and neck surgery was associated with a low incidence of hypoxemia and no reintubations. These findings suggest that HFNC is a safe and effective strategy for postoperative respiratory support in this high-risk population. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm the benefit of HFNC in reducing hypoxemia and preventing reintubation in high-risk surgical populations.
- Open Access
The Role of Corticosteroids in Non-Bacterial and Secondary Encephalitis
Encephalitis affects 1.9 to 14.3 people per 100,000 each year, and the mortality rate varies but can be up to 40%. After the identification of a particular microorganism in a patient with encephalitis, appropriate antimicrobial therapy should be initiated. Corticosteroid therapy represents a therapeutic option in the treatment of primary central nervous system diseases due to its ability to reduce the inflammatory commitment of CNS and consequently reduce mortality rates regardless of the causative agent of injury. Corticosteroid therapy represents a therapeutic option in the treatment of primary central nervous system diseases. Their use is also recommended in meningitis with autoimmune etiology. While corticosteroids have repeatedly been used as adjunctive treatment in encephalitis of viral etiology, the scientific evidence supporting their effectiveness remains scarce. The use of standard doses recommended by the guidelines seems reasonable as an initial setting, especially when a definitive diagnosis of the causal agent is still awaited. The subsequent adjustment should be personalized based on the individual clinical response.
Open AccessThe Role of Corticosteroids in Non-Bacterial and Secondary Encephalitis
Encephalitis affects 1.9 to 14.3 people per 100,000 each year, and the mortality rate varies but can be up to 40%. After the identification of a particular microorganism in a patient with encephalitis, appropriate antimicrobial therapy should be initiated. Corticosteroid therapy represents a therapeutic option in the treatment of primary central nervous system diseases due to its ability to reduce the inflammatory commitment of CNS and consequently reduce mortality rates regardless of the causative agent of injury. Corticosteroid therapy represents a therapeutic option in the treatment of primary central nervous system diseases. Their use is also recommended in meningitis with autoimmune etiology. While corticosteroids have repeatedly been used as adjunctive treatment in encephalitis of viral etiology, the scientific evidence supporting their effectiveness remains scarce. The use of standard doses recommended by the guidelines seems reasonable as an initial setting, especially when a definitive diagnosis of the causal agent is still awaited. The subsequent adjustment should be personalized based on the individual clinical response.
- Open Access
Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam for Complicated Infections: A Real-World Evidence
(1) Background: Infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria represent one of the major global public health problems of the 21st century. Beta-lactam antibacterial agents are commonly used to treat infections due to Gram-negative pathogens. New β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations are urgently needed. Combining relebactam (REL) with imipenem (IMI) and cilastatin (CS) can restore its activity against many imipenem-nonsusceptible Gram-negative pathogens. (2) Methods: we performed a systematic review of the studies reporting on the use of in vivo REAL/IPM/CS. (3) Results: A total of eight studies were included in this review. The primary diagnosis was as follows: complicated urinary tract infection (n = 234), complicated intra-abdominal infections (n = 220), hospital-acquired pneumonia (n = 276), and ventilator-associated pneumonia (n = 157). Patients with normal renal function received REL/IPM/CS (250 mg/500 mg/500 mg). The most frequently reported AEs occurring in patients treated with imipenem/cilastatin plus REL/IPM/CS were nausea (11.5%), diarrhea (9.8%), vomiting (9.8%), and infusion site disorders (4.0%). Treatment outcomes in these high-risk patients receiving REL/IPM/CS were generally favorable. A total of 70.6% of patients treated with REL/IPM/CS reported a favorable clinical response at follow-up. (4) Conclusions: this review indicates that REL/IPM/CS is active against important MDR Gram-negative organisms.
Open AccessImipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam for Complicated Infections: A Real-World Evidence
(1) Background: Infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria represent one of the major global public health problems of the 21st century. Beta-lactam antibacterial agents are commonly used to treat infections due to Gram-negative pathogens. New β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations are urgently needed. Combining relebactam (REL) with imipenem (IMI) and cilastatin (CS) can restore its activity against many imipenem-nonsusceptible Gram-negative pathogens. (2) Methods: we performed a systematic review of the studies reporting on the use of in vivo REAL/IPM/CS. (3) Results: A total of eight studies were included in this review. The primary diagnosis was as follows: complicated urinary tract infection (n = 234), complicated intra-abdominal infections (n = 220), hospital-acquired pneumonia (n = 276), and ventilator-associated pneumonia (n = 157). Patients with normal renal function received REL/IPM/CS (250 mg/500 mg/500 mg). The most frequently reported AEs occurring in patients treated with imipenem/cilastatin plus REL/IPM/CS were nausea (11.5%), diarrhea (9.8%), vomiting (9.8%), and infusion site disorders (4.0%). Treatment outcomes in these high-risk patients receiving REL/IPM/CS were generally favorable. A total of 70.6% of patients treated with REL/IPM/CS reported a favorable clinical response at follow-up. (4) Conclusions: this review indicates that REL/IPM/CS is active against important MDR Gram-negative organisms.
- Open Access
- 1 January 2024
- Published by Wiley in Behavioural Neurology
- Vol. 2024 (1) , 1228194
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Pain: A Narrative Review from Pain Assessment to Therapy
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is the most frequent neurodegenerative disease of the motor system that affects upper and lower motor neurons, leading to progressive muscle weakness, spasticity, atrophy, and respiratory failure, with a life expectancy of 2–5 years after symptom onset. In addition to motor symptoms, patients with ALS have a multitude of nonmotor symptoms; in fact, it is currently considered a multisystem disease. The purpose of our narrative review is to evaluate the different types of pain, the correlation between pain and the disease’s stages, the pain assessment tools in ALS patients, and the available therapies focusing above all on the benefits of cannabis use. Pain is an underestimated and undertreated symptom that, in the last few years, has received more attention from research because it has a strong impact on the quality of life of these patients. The prevalence of pain is between 15% and 85% of ALS patients, and the studies on the type and intensity of pain are controversial. The absence of pain assessment tools validated in the ALS population and the dissimilar study designs influence the knowledge of ALS pain and consequently the pharmacological therapy. Several studies suggest that ALS is associated with changes in the endocannabinoid system, and the use of cannabis could slow the disease progression due to its neuroprotective action and act on pain, spasticity, cramps, sialorrhea, and depression. Our research has shown high patients’ satisfaction with the use of cannabis for the treatment of spasticity and related pain. However, especially due to the ethical problems and the lack of interest of pharmaceutical companies, further studies are needed to ensure the most appropriate care for ALS patients.
- 1 January 2024
- Published by Wiley in Behavioural Neurology
- Vol. 2024 (1) , 1228194
Open AccessAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Pain: A Narrative Review from Pain Assessment to Therapy
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is the most frequent neurodegenerative disease of the motor system that affects upper and lower motor neurons, leading to progressive muscle weakness, spasticity, atrophy, and respiratory failure, with a life expectancy of 2–5 years after symptom onset. In addition to motor symptoms, patients with ALS have a multitude of nonmotor symptoms; in fact, it is currently considered a multisystem disease. The purpose of our narrative review is to evaluate the different types of pain, the correlation between pain and the disease’s stages, the pain assessment tools in ALS patients, and the available therapies focusing above all on the benefits of cannabis use. Pain is an underestimated and undertreated symptom that, in the last few years, has received more attention from research because it has a strong impact on the quality of life of these patients. The prevalence of pain is between 15% and 85% of ALS patients, and the studies on the type and intensity of pain are controversial. The absence of pain assessment tools validated in the ALS population and the dissimilar study designs influence the knowledge of ALS pain and consequently the pharmacological therapy. Several studies suggest that ALS is associated with changes in the endocannabinoid system, and the use of cannabis could slow the disease progression due to its neuroprotective action and act on pain, spasticity, cramps, sialorrhea, and depression. Our research has shown high patients’ satisfaction with the use of cannabis for the treatment of spasticity and related pain. However, especially due to the ethical problems and the lack of interest of pharmaceutical companies, further studies are needed to ensure the most appropriate care for ALS patients.
- Open Access
- 24 September 2023
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 12 (19) , 6168
Comparison of McGrath Videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh Laryngoscope in Tracheal Intubation: An Updated Systematic Review
(1) Background: In the last few years, many randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have compared direct Macintosh laryngoscopy with McGrath videolaryngoscopy in order to assess the potential benefits of the latter; the results were sometimes controversial. (2) Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature search to identify our articles according to inclusion and exclusion criteria: to be included, each study had to be a prospective randomized trial or comparison between the McGrath videolaryngoscope and the Macintosh laryngoscope in an adult population. We did not include manikin trials or studies involving double-lumen tubes. (3) Results: 10 studies met the inclusion criteria necessary. In total, 655 patients were intubated with the McGrath and 629 with the Macintosh. In total, 1268 of 1284 patients were successfully intubated, showing equivalent results for the two devices: 648 of 655 patients with the McGrath videolaryngoscope and 620 of 629 patients with the Macintosh laryngoscope. No differences were noted in terms of hemodynamic changes or the incidence of adverse events. (4) Conclusions: We can assert that the McGrath videolaryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope, even if with equivalent tracheal intubation results, supplement each other.
- 24 September 2023
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 12 (19) , 6168
Open AccessComparison of McGrath Videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh Laryngoscope in Tracheal Intubation: An Updated Systematic Review
(1) Background: In the last few years, many randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have compared direct Macintosh laryngoscopy with McGrath videolaryngoscopy in order to assess the potential benefits of the latter; the results were sometimes controversial. (2) Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature search to identify our articles according to inclusion and exclusion criteria: to be included, each study had to be a prospective randomized trial or comparison between the McGrath videolaryngoscope and the Macintosh laryngoscope in an adult population. We did not include manikin trials or studies involving double-lumen tubes. (3) Results: 10 studies met the inclusion criteria necessary. In total, 655 patients were intubated with the McGrath and 629 with the Macintosh. In total, 1268 of 1284 patients were successfully intubated, showing equivalent results for the two devices: 648 of 655 patients with the McGrath videolaryngoscope and 620 of 629 patients with the Macintosh laryngoscope. No differences were noted in terms of hemodynamic changes or the incidence of adverse events. (4) Conclusions: We can assert that the McGrath videolaryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope, even if with equivalent tracheal intubation results, supplement each other.
- Open Access
- 1 September 2023
- Published by AME Publishing Company in Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Anesthesia
- Vol. 2, 22
Controlled hypotension in maxillofacial surgery: a commentary
Controlled hypotension in maxillofacial surgery: a commentary
- 1 September 2023
- Published by AME Publishing Company in Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Anesthesia
- Vol. 2, 22
Open AccessControlled hypotension in maxillofacial surgery: a commentary
Controlled hypotension in maxillofacial surgery: a commentary
- Open Access
Pulsed Radiofrequency and Platelet Rich Plasma in Degenerative Joint Arthritis: Two Case Reports and Literature Analyses
(1) Background: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a debilitating joint disease. The are several therapies available for OA. According to current knowledge, the combination of Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) and Pulsed Radiofrequency (PRF) can be applied in the treatment of pain of nociceptive origin due to peripheral tissue damage. (2) Methods: We performed a narrative review identifying the articles by searching electronic databases. A retrospective analysis of patients with OA treated with PRF and PRP in “Vito Fazzi” Hospital (Lecce, Italy) was performed. (3) Results: A total of four publications on the use of PRP and PRF in degenerative joint arthritis were included in our review. In our experience, two patients with OA were treated with PRP and PRF after unsuccessful conservative treatment. Patient pain score, daily activity ability, active range of activity, and muscle strength improved after treatment. Patients reported a higher level of satisfaction. No major adverse events were reported. (4) Conclusions: The goal of the combined application of the two treatments is to make full use of the analgesic effect of PRF and the repairing effect of PRP. At present, the therapeutic potential of PRP and PRF in OA remains unmet.
Open AccessPulsed Radiofrequency and Platelet Rich Plasma in Degenerative Joint Arthritis: Two Case Reports and Literature Analyses
(1) Background: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a debilitating joint disease. The are several therapies available for OA. According to current knowledge, the combination of Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) and Pulsed Radiofrequency (PRF) can be applied in the treatment of pain of nociceptive origin due to peripheral tissue damage. (2) Methods: We performed a narrative review identifying the articles by searching electronic databases. A retrospective analysis of patients with OA treated with PRF and PRP in “Vito Fazzi” Hospital (Lecce, Italy) was performed. (3) Results: A total of four publications on the use of PRP and PRF in degenerative joint arthritis were included in our review. In our experience, two patients with OA were treated with PRP and PRF after unsuccessful conservative treatment. Patient pain score, daily activity ability, active range of activity, and muscle strength improved after treatment. Patients reported a higher level of satisfaction. No major adverse events were reported. (4) Conclusions: The goal of the combined application of the two treatments is to make full use of the analgesic effect of PRF and the repairing effect of PRP. At present, the therapeutic potential of PRP and PRF in OA remains unmet.
- Open Access
Comparative Efficacy of Tapentadol versus Tapentadol Plus Duloxetine in Patients with Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN): A Randomized Non-Inferiority Clinical Trial
Introduction: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common complication due to treatment with many commonly used anti-cancer agents. CIPN is a mainly sensory neuropathy that can be characterized by the appearance of motor and autonomic alterations. Clinicians may offer duloxetine (DLX) for patients with cancer experiencing CIPN. Our aim was to assess the non-inferiority of the analgesic effect and safety of tapentadol (TP) alone compared to duloxetine plus tapentadol administered to patients with CIPN. Methods: A total of 114 patients were enrolled in the study and randomized to receive tapentadol in a dosage of 50 to 500 mg/day (n = 56) or tapentadol plus duloxetine in a dosage of 60 to 120 mg/day (n = 58) for a period of 4 weeks. We evaluated the analgesia efficacy, defined as a decrease in pain on the NRS between the first administration and 28 days later. Secondary endpoints included analgesia efficacy at 28 and 42 days, defined by a decrease in DN4 and LEPs, decrease in quality of life, and the incidence of any serious or non-serious adverse events after the first administration. Results: In this randomized, double-blind trial comparing TP and TP plus DLX for CIPN management, TP was feasible and non-inferior to the association with DLX as far as the reduction of pain after chemotherapy at 28 days is concerned. Scores on other rating scales evaluating the quality of life, anxiety and depression, and the characteristics of pain revealed similar improvements associated with tapentadol versus duloxetine at these time points. Conclusion: The use of TP is a safe and effective analgesic therapy in patients with CIPN. Positive effects of TP were noted on the patients’ quality-of-life assessments.
Open AccessComparative Efficacy of Tapentadol versus Tapentadol Plus Duloxetine in Patients with Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN): A Randomized Non-Inferiority Clinical Trial
Introduction: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common complication due to treatment with many commonly used anti-cancer agents. CIPN is a mainly sensory neuropathy that can be characterized by the appearance of motor and autonomic alterations. Clinicians may offer duloxetine (DLX) for patients with cancer experiencing CIPN. Our aim was to assess the non-inferiority of the analgesic effect and safety of tapentadol (TP) alone compared to duloxetine plus tapentadol administered to patients with CIPN. Methods: A total of 114 patients were enrolled in the study and randomized to receive tapentadol in a dosage of 50 to 500 mg/day (n = 56) or tapentadol plus duloxetine in a dosage of 60 to 120 mg/day (n = 58) for a period of 4 weeks. We evaluated the analgesia efficacy, defined as a decrease in pain on the NRS between the first administration and 28 days later. Secondary endpoints included analgesia efficacy at 28 and 42 days, defined by a decrease in DN4 and LEPs, decrease in quality of life, and the incidence of any serious or non-serious adverse events after the first administration. Results: In this randomized, double-blind trial comparing TP and TP plus DLX for CIPN management, TP was feasible and non-inferior to the association with DLX as far as the reduction of pain after chemotherapy at 28 days is concerned. Scores on other rating scales evaluating the quality of life, anxiety and depression, and the characteristics of pain revealed similar improvements associated with tapentadol versus duloxetine at these time points. Conclusion: The use of TP is a safe and effective analgesic therapy in patients with CIPN. Positive effects of TP were noted on the patients’ quality-of-life assessments.
- Open Access
- 6 July 2022
- Published by MDPI AG in Antibiotics
- Vol. 11 (7) , 904
Cefiderocol for Carbapenem-Resistant Bacteria: Handle with Care! A Review of the Real-World Evidence
(1) Background: healthcare-associated infections are one of the most frequent adverse events in healthcare delivery worldwide. Several antibiotic resistance mechanisms have been developed, including those to carbapenemase. Cefiderocol (CFD) is a novel siderophore cephalosporin designed to treat carbapenem-resistant bacteria. (2) Methods: we performed a systematic review of all cases reported in the literature to outline the existing evidence. We evaluated real-world evidence studies of CFD in the treatment of carbapenem-resistant (CR) bacteria. (3) Results: a total of 19 publications treating cases of infection by CR bacteria were included. The three most frequent CR pathogens were Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Klebsiella pneumoniae. A regimen of 2 g every 8 h was most frequently adopted for CFD with a mean treatment duration of 25.6 days. CFD was generally well tolerated, with fewer side effects. The success rate of CFD therapy was satisfactory and almost 70% of patients showed clinical recovery; of these, nearly half showed negative blood cultures and infection-free status. (4) Conclusions: This review indicates that CFD is active against important GN organisms including Enterobacteriaceae, P. aeruginosa, and A. baumannii. CFD seems to have a safe profile.
- 6 July 2022
- Published by MDPI AG in Antibiotics
- Vol. 11 (7) , 904
Open AccessCefiderocol for Carbapenem-Resistant Bacteria: Handle with Care! A Review of the Real-World Evidence
(1) Background: healthcare-associated infections are one of the most frequent adverse events in healthcare delivery worldwide. Several antibiotic resistance mechanisms have been developed, including those to carbapenemase. Cefiderocol (CFD) is a novel siderophore cephalosporin designed to treat carbapenem-resistant bacteria. (2) Methods: we performed a systematic review of all cases reported in the literature to outline the existing evidence. We evaluated real-world evidence studies of CFD in the treatment of carbapenem-resistant (CR) bacteria. (3) Results: a total of 19 publications treating cases of infection by CR bacteria were included. The three most frequent CR pathogens were Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Klebsiella pneumoniae. A regimen of 2 g every 8 h was most frequently adopted for CFD with a mean treatment duration of 25.6 days. CFD was generally well tolerated, with fewer side effects. The success rate of CFD therapy was satisfactory and almost 70% of patients showed clinical recovery; of these, nearly half showed negative blood cultures and infection-free status. (4) Conclusions: This review indicates that CFD is active against important GN organisms including Enterobacteriaceae, P. aeruginosa, and A. baumannii. CFD seems to have a safe profile.