Marlous Toren-Wielema
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Marlous Toren-Wielema has a total of 27 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
A. H. E. Roukens
Department of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Centre of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
1 shared publication- Andor W. J. M. Glaudemans
Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
1 shared publication - Anke H. W. Bruns
Department of Internal Medicine, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
1 shared publication Ben R. Saleem
Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
1 shared publicationClark J. Zeebregts
Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
1 shared publicationEric van Roon
Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 11 November 2022
- Published by Elsevier in International Journal of Infectious Diseases
- Vol. 126, 22-27
Diagnosis and treatment of vascular graft and endograft infections: a structured clinical approach
- 11 November 2022
- Published by Elsevier in International Journal of Infectious Diseases
- Vol. 126, 22-27
Open AccessDiagnosis and treatment of vascular graft and endograft infections: a structured clinical approach
- Open Access
- 14 October 2022
- Published by Springer Nature in Infectious Diseases and Therapy
- Vol. 11 (6) , 2063-2098
The Dutch Working Party on Antibiotic Policy (SWAB) Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Management of Febrile Neutropenia in Patients with Cancer
Introduction This guideline was written by a multidisciplinary committee with mandated members of the Dutch Society for Infectious Diseases, Dutch Society for Hematology, Dutch Society for Medical Oncology, Dutch Association of Hospital Pharmacists, Dutch Society for Medical Microbiology, and Dutch Society for Pediatrics. The guideline is written for adults and pediatric patients. Method The recommendations are based on the answers to nine questions formulated by the guideline committee. To provide evidence-based recommendations we used all relevant clinical guidelines published since 2010 as a source, supplemented with systematic searches and evaluation of the recent literature (2010–2020) and, where necessary, supplemented by expert-based advice. Results For adults the guideline distinguishes between high- and standard-risk neutropenia based on expected duration of neutropenia (> 7 days versus ≤ 7 days). Where possible a distinction has been made between pediatric and adult patients. Conclusion This guideline was written to aid diagnosis and management of patients with febrile neutropenia due to chemotherapy in the Netherlands. The guideline provides recommendation for children and adults. Adults patient are subdivided as having a standard- or high-risk neutropenic episode based on estimated duration of neutropenia. The most important recommendations are as follows. In adults with high-risk neutropenia (duration of neutropenia > 7 days) and in children with neutropenia, ceftazidime, cefepime, and piperacillin–tazobactam are all first-choice options for empirical antibiotic therapy in case of fever. In adults with standard-risk neutropenia (duration of neutropenia ≤ 7 days) the MASCC score can be used to assess the individual risk of infectious complications. For patients with a low risk of infectious complications (high MASCC score) oral antibiotic therapy in an outpatient setting is recommended. For patients with a high risk of infectious complications (low MASCC score) antibiotic therapy per protocol sepsis of unknown origin is recommended.
- 14 October 2022
- Published by Springer Nature in Infectious Diseases and Therapy
- Vol. 11 (6) , 2063-2098
Open AccessThe Dutch Working Party on Antibiotic Policy (SWAB) Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Management of Febrile Neutropenia in Patients with Cancer
Introduction This guideline was written by a multidisciplinary committee with mandated members of the Dutch Society for Infectious Diseases, Dutch Society for Hematology, Dutch Society for Medical Oncology, Dutch Association of Hospital Pharmacists, Dutch Society for Medical Microbiology, and Dutch Society for Pediatrics. The guideline is written for adults and pediatric patients. Method The recommendations are based on the answers to nine questions formulated by the guideline committee. To provide evidence-based recommendations we used all relevant clinical guidelines published since 2010 as a source, supplemented with systematic searches and evaluation of the recent literature (2010–2020) and, where necessary, supplemented by expert-based advice. Results For adults the guideline distinguishes between high- and standard-risk neutropenia based on expected duration of neutropenia (> 7 days versus ≤ 7 days). Where possible a distinction has been made between pediatric and adult patients. Conclusion This guideline was written to aid diagnosis and management of patients with febrile neutropenia due to chemotherapy in the Netherlands. The guideline provides recommendation for children and adults. Adults patient are subdivided as having a standard- or high-risk neutropenic episode based on estimated duration of neutropenia. The most important recommendations are as follows. In adults with high-risk neutropenia (duration of neutropenia > 7 days) and in children with neutropenia, ceftazidime, cefepime, and piperacillin–tazobactam are all first-choice options for empirical antibiotic therapy in case of fever. In adults with standard-risk neutropenia (duration of neutropenia ≤ 7 days) the MASCC score can be used to assess the individual risk of infectious complications. For patients with a low risk of infectious complications (high MASCC score) oral antibiotic therapy in an outpatient setting is recommended. For patients with a high risk of infectious complications (low MASCC score) antibiotic therapy per protocol sepsis of unknown origin is recommended.
- 22 October 2018
- Published by Springer Nature in Drugs & Aging
- Vol. 35 (12) , 1079-1087
Efficacy of a Standardized Oral Vitamin D Dosing Regimen in Nursing Home Residents
The prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in nursing home residents ranges from 79% to 98%.
- 22 October 2018
- Published by Springer Nature in Drugs & Aging
- Vol. 35 (12) , 1079-1087
Efficacy of a Standardized Oral Vitamin D Dosing Regimen in Nursing Home Residents
The prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in nursing home residents ranges from 79% to 98%.