Janet R. Wade

Sym004 is an equimolar mixture of two monoclonal antibodies, futuximab and modotuximab, which non-competitively block the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Sym004 has been clinically tested for treatment of solid tumors. The present work characterizes the non-linear pharmacokinetics (PK) of Sym004 and its constituent antibodies and investigates two types of covariate models for interpreting the interindividual variability of Sym004 exposure. Sym004 serum concentration data from 330 cancer patients participating in four Phase 1 and 2 trials (n = 247 metastatic colorectal cancer, n = 87 various types advanced solid tumors) were pooled for non-linear mixed effects modeling. Dose regimens of 0.4–18 mg/kg Sym004 dosed by i.v. infusion weekly or every 2nd week were explored. The PK profiles for futuximab and modotuximab were parallel, and the parameter values for their population PK models were similar. The PK of Sym004 using the sum of the serum concentrations of futuximab and modotuximab was well captured by a 2-compartment model with parallel linear and saturable, Michaelis–Menten-type elimination. The full covariate model including all plausible covariates included in a single step showed no impact on Sym004 exposure of age, Asian race, renal and hepatic function, tumor type and previous anti-EGFR treatments. The reduced covariate model contained statistically and potentially clinically significant influences of body weight, albumin, sex and baseline tumor size. Population PK modeling and covariate analysis of Sym004 were feasible using the sum of the serum concentrations of the two constituent antibodies. Full and reduced covariate models provided insights into which covariates may be clinically relevant for dose modifications and thus may need further exploration.

Prediction of brivaracetam effects in children was obtained by scaling an existing adult pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model for brivaracetam to children, using an existing population PK model for brivaracetam in children. The scaling was supported by estimating the change from adults to children in the concentration–effect relationship parameters for levetiracetam, a compound interacting with the same target protein (synaptic vesicle protein SV2A).

Purpose The aims of the study were to develop a population pharmacokinetic model of orally administered brivaracetam in paediatric patients and to provide dosing suggestions. Methods Analysis included 600 brivaracetam plasma concentrations from a phase 2a study (NCT00422422; N01263) in 96 paediatric patients with epilepsy aged 1 month to 16 years, taking one to three concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using non-linear mixed effects modelling, and a stepwise covariate search was used to determine factors influencing brivaracetam clearance. Simulations were performed to investigate dosing regimens. Results The final model consisted of first-order absorption, single compartment distribution and first-order elimination components with allometric scaling of clearance and volume using lean body weight and fixed allometric exponents. Co-administration with phenobarbital or carbamazepine was associated with a 29% (95%CI 17%/39%) and 32% (22%/42%) decrease in exposure, respectively. Co-administration with valproate was associated with an 11% (1%/23%) increase in exposure. Simulations demonstrated that the majority of children were predicted to have an exposure similar to that in adults, using an age-independent dosing regimen of 2.0 mg/kg bid with a maximum of 100 mg bid for body weight >50 kg. Conclusions A paediatric dose adaptation of 2.0 mg/kg twice daily with a maximum of 100 mg twice daily for body weight >50 kg is predicted to ensure steady-state plasma concentrations in the same range as in adult patients receiving 100 mg twice daily (highest recommended dose). Data suggest no need to change brivaracetam dosing when used concomitantly with carbamazepine, phenobarbital or valproate.

Brivaracetam is a selective high‐affinity ligand for synaptic vesicle protein 2A, recently approved as adjunctive therapy in the treatment of partial‐onset (focal) seizures in patients 16 years of age and older with epilepsy. A population pharmacokinetic (PK) model and a population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PKPD) model were developed describing brivaracetam plasma concentration and the relationship with daily seizure counts in adequate well‐controlled efficacy trials. The effect of body weight on clearance and volume was implemented using allometric scaling, and a range of covariates were investigated for their influence on brivaracetam clearance. The PKPD model described daily seizure counts using a negative binomial distribution, taking previous day seizures into account, and using a mixture model to separate “placebo‐like” and “response” subpopulations. The PK and PKPD models provided a good description of the data, documented using visual predictive checks. Coadministration with carbamazepine, phenytoin, and phenobarbital decreased brivaracetam exposure by 26%, 21%, and 19%, respectively, without significant effects on PD response. Covariate analysis indicated that levetiracetam coadministration reduced the fraction of subjects in the mixture model response population to 4% and identified baseline seizure frequency as a strong predictor for being assigned to the mixture model response population. Simulation allowed characterization of the dose‐response curve, suggesting maximum response is obtained at brivaracetam 150–200 mg/day.

The purpose of this work was to present a consolidated set of guidelines for the analysis of uncontrolled concomitant medications (ConMed) as a covariate and potential perpetrator in population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) analyses. This white paper is the result of an industry-academia-regulatory collaboration. It is the recommendation of the working group that greater focus be given to the analysis of uncontrolled ConMeds as part of a PopPK analysis of Phase 2/3 data to ensure that the resulting outcome in the PopPK analysis can be viewed as reliable. Other recommendations include: (1) collection of start and stop date and clock time, as well as dose and frequency, in Case Report Forms regarding ConMed administration schedule; (2) prespecification of goals and the methods of analysis, (3) consideration of alternate models, other than the binary covariate model, that might more fully characterize the interaction between perpetrator and victim drug, (4) analysts should consider whether the sample size, not the percent of subjects taking a ConMed, is sufficient to detect a ConMed effect if one is present and to consider the correlation with other covariates when the analysis is conducted, (5) grouping of ConMeds should be based on mechanism (e.g., PGP-inhibitor) and not drug class (e.g., beta-blocker), and (6) when reporting the results in a publication, all details related to the ConMed analysis should be presented allowing the reader to understand the methods and be able to appropriately interpret the results.

Lomitapide is a microsomal triglyceride transfer protein inhibitor approved as an adjunctive treatment for adult patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Lomitapide is extensively metabolized via cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) and is a weak CYP3A inhibitor. Two phase 1 open-label, randomized (1:1), 2-arm drug interaction studies in healthy subjects assessed the effects of atorvastatin and ethinyl estradiol (EE)/norgestimate, both weak CYP3A inhibitors, on lomitapide pharmacokinetics with staggered (separated by 12 hours) or simultaneous administration. All subjects received a single dose of lomitapide (20 mg) in the evening on day 1. Atorvastatin (80 mg once daily, n = 32) or EE/norgestimate (0.035/0.25 mg once daily, n = 32) dosing was initiated on days 11 or 8, respectively, with evening (arm 1) or morning (arm 2) dosing; at steady state (days 15 or 22), a single lomitapide dose was administered; CYP3A inhibitor dosing continued for 6 days. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were taken until 168 hours postdose. With atorvastatin, lomitapide exposure was increased by approximately 2-fold and 1.3-fold, respectively, with simultaneous and staggered administration, respectively. Simultaneous and staggered EE/norgestimate and lomitapide administration resulted in an approximately 1.3-fold increase in lomitapide exposure. Reductions in lomitapide dose may be required for some patients when administered concomitantly with a weak CYP3A inhibitor.

Certolizumab pegol (CZP), an anti–tumor necrosis factor α agent, is an effective therapy for Crohn's disease (CD). A population pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis of subcutaneously administered CZP was performed using data from 2157 CD patients from 9 separate studies. The aim was to determine which covariates influence the disposition of CZP. The final CZP population PK model consisted of a baseline, first-order absorption, and 1-compartment disposition. CZP antibodies were treated as a structural model covariate and caused apparent clearance (CL/F) to increase from 0.685 to 2.74 L/day. Body surface area (BSA) influenced both CL/F and apparent volume of distribution (V/F) in a linear fashion; both parameters increased by more than 53% and 49%, respectively, across the range of BSA measurements in the data. Albumin influenced CZP CL/F in a nonlinear fashion; CL/F decreased from 1.05 to 0.613 L/day with increasing albumin concentrations in antibody-negative patients. C-reactive protein (CRP) had a borderline influence and CL/F increased by more than 20% across the range of CRP measurements in the data set. Race had a minor influence on V/F. The determined covariates' impact on CZP disposition may be of clinical utility in CZP therapy of CD patients when the PK/pharmacodynamic relationship becomes available.

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the antiretroviral agent etravirine were evaluated in two phase III clinical trials. Pharmacokinetic data were available in 577 patients randomized to rec...