Massimo Raffaele Mannarino

Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) regulates lipid metabolism contributing to cardiovascular (CV) risk in the general population. The relationship between PCSK9 and CV risk in systemic autoimmune diseases has been poorly explored. We investigated the association between plasma PCSK9, measures of immune–inflammatory status and markers of atherosclerosis in 52 consecutive patients with primary Sjögren’s syndrome (pSS) in comparison to healthy controls (HCs). Median plasma PCSK9 levels were significantly higher in pSS patients versus HCs (162 (79–255) vs. 53 (39–99) ng/mL). Significantly higher prevalence of subclinical atherosclerosis and lower of dyslipidaemia (61% vs. 85%, p = 0.042) characterized pSS patients versus HCs. In pSS, no significant correlation emerged between PCSK9 and disease activity, atherosclerosis and lipid levels. In HCs, PCSK9 significantly correlated with lipid levels and atherosclerosis. Interestingly, significantly higher PCSK9 levels were found in HCs with high-to-very-high as compared to low-to-moderate CV risk (p = 0.018) while a non-significant trend towards higher PCSK9 levels was detected in pSS patients with low-to-moderate as compared to high-to-very-high CV risk (p = 0.060). This is the first demonstration that pSS patients, despite lower prevalence of dyslipidaemia and higher CV risk profile, are characterized by a 3-fold increase in PCSK9 levels in comparison to HCs. As PCSK9 does not correlate with measures of CV risk, its role in CV morbidity in pSS needs further investigation.

The prothrombotic and proinflammatory properties of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) have been hypothesized to play a role in the pathogenesis of severe COVID-19; however, the prognostic impact of Lp(a) on the clinical course of COVID-19 remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate whether Lp(a) may be associated with biomarkers of thrombo-inflammation and the occurrence of thrombotic events or adverse clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized for COVID-19. We consecutively enrolled a cohort of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 and collected blood samples for Lp(a) assessment at hospital admission. A prothrombotic state was evaluated through D-dimer levels, whereas a proinflammatory state was evaluated through C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin, and white blood cell (WBC) levels. Thrombotic events were marked by the diagnosis of deep or superficial vein thrombosis (DVT or SVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and critical limb ischemia (CLI). The composite clinical end point of intensive care unit (ICU) admission/in-hospital death was used to evaluate adverse clinical outcomes. Among 564 patients (290 (51%) men, mean age of 74 ± 17 years) the median Lp(a) value at hospital admission was 13 (10–27) mg/dL. During hospitalization, 64 (11%) patients were diagnosed with at least one thrombotic event and 83 (15%) patients met the composite clinical end point. Lp(a), as either a continuous or categorical variable, was not associated with D-dimer, CRP, procalcitonin, and WBC levels (p > 0.05 for all correlation analyses). In addition, Lp(a) was not associated with a risk of thrombotic events (p > 0.05 for multi-adjusted odds ratios) nor with a risk of adverse clinical outcomes (p > 0.05 for multi-adjusted hazard ratios). In conclusion, Lp(a) does not influence biomarkers of plasma thrombotic activity and systemic inflammation nor has any impact on thrombotic events and adverse clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized for COVID-19.

La lipoproteina(a) [Lp(a)] è una lipoproteina plasmatica a bassa densità strutturalmente simile ad una particella LDL, ma legata ad una molecola di apolipoproteina(a) tramite un ponte disolfuro. Da studi epidemiologici e genetici è emersa un’associazione diretta lineare tra i livelli circolanti di Lp(a) ed il rischio di malattia cardiovascolare su base aterosclerotica (ASCVD). Pertanto, la misurazione di Lp(a) è considerata rilevante ai fini della stratificazione del rischio cardiovascolare (CV). Più incerte sono invece le evidenze circa il possibile ruolo di Lp(a) come determinante di eventi trombotici venosi. Sulla base di queste premesse, la riduzione dei livelli circolanti di Lp(a) potrebbe rappresentare un elemento cruciale nell’ambito delle strategie di prevenzione CV. Tuttavia, sebbene varie strategie farmacologiche e non siano state proposte a tal fine, nessuna di esse ha mostrato un buon profilo di efficacia, sicurezza, e tollerabilità tale da giustificarne l’esteso impiego nella comune pratica clinica. Inoltre, non vi sono ad oggi studi clinici randomizzati controllati di fase 3 che abbiano dimostrato l’efficacia della riduzione dei livelli circolanti di Lp(a) in termini di riduzione del rischio CV. Lo sviluppo di terapie mirate per la riduzione dei livelli circolanti di Lp(a) rappresenta quindi una sfida attuale nell’ambito delle strategie di prevenzione CV.

Highly stressful situations, such as the current COVID-19 pandemic, induce constant changes in the mental state of people who experience them. In the present study, we analyzed the prevalence of some psychological symptoms and their determinants in four different categories of healthcare workers during the second year of the pandemic. A total of 265 physicians, 176 nurses, 184 other healthcare professionals, and 48 administrative employees, working in different Italian healthcare contexts, answered a questionnaire including variables about their mental status and experience with the pandemic. The mean scores for anxiety and depressive symptoms measured more than one year after the onset of the pandemic did not reach the pathological threshold. In contrast, post-traumatic and burnout symptoms tended toward the critical threshold, especially in physicians. The main determinant of psychological distress was perceived stress, followed by job satisfaction, the impact of COVID-19 on daily work, and a lack of recreational activities. These results increase the knowledge of which determinants of mental distress would be important to act on when particularly stressful conditions exist in the workplace that persist over time. If well-implemented, specific interventions focused on these determinants could lead to an improvement in employee well-being and in the quality of care provided.

Elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is unanimously recognized as a major modifiable risk factor related to the development of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Consistent evidence confirms that reducing LDL-C is associated with reduction of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), with benefits proportionally related to initial individual CV risk and absolute reduction of LDL-C levels. The recent European guidelines on cardiovascular prevention have proposed a revised approach in cardiovascular risk evaluation, taking into account a renewed consideration of the interaction between risk factors and possible confounding factors (e.g., age). Although for patients considered to be at high and very high cardiovascular risk the need for stringent risk factors treatment is clearly stated, for those who are at low-to-moderate cardiovascular risk the issue is more debated. For those latter subjects, current guidelines indicate that risk factor treatment is generally not necessary, unless the impact of CV risk modifiers, lifetime CV risk and treatment benefit may be substantial. In addition, despite the estimated low-to-moderate short-term CV risk, the early appearance of even mild LDL-C level elevations may contribute to impair long-term CV prognosis. Therefore, encouraging the achievement of desired LDL-C goals through tailored conservative lifestyle changes and, if necessary, pharmacologic strategies should not be excluded categorically in all low-to-moderate risk individuals. In this review, we summarize the most recent evidence that may influence the choice to treat or not to treat LDL-C elevations in subjects at low-to-moderate risk and the suggested therapeutic tools aimed at achieving the recommended LDL-C goals.

Non-invasive respiratory support (NIRS) is widely used in COVID-19 patients, although high rates of NIRS failure are reported. Early detection of NIRS failure and promptly defining the need for intubation are crucial for the management of patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF). We tested the ability of the HACOR score¸ a scale based on clinical and laboratory parameters, to predict adverse outcomes in hospitalized COVID-19 patients with ARF. Four hundred patients were categorized according to high (>5) or low (≤5) HACOR scores measured at baseline and 1 h after the start of NIRS treatment. The association between a high HACOR score and either in-hospital death or the need for intubation was evaluated. NIRS was employed in 161 patients. Forty patients (10%) underwent intubation and 98 (25%) patients died. A baseline HACOR score > 5 was associated with the need for intubation or in-hospital death in the whole population (HR 4.3; p < 0.001), in the subgroup of patients who underwent NIRS (HR 5.2; p < 0.001) and in no-NIRS subgroup (HR 7.9; p < 0.001). In the NIRS subgroup, along with the baseline HACOR score, also 1-h HACOR score predicted NIRS failure (HR 2.6; p = 0.039). In conclusion, the HACOR score is a significant predictor of adverse clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19-related ARF.

A complex dysregulation of lipid metabolism occurs in COVID-19, leading to reduced total cholesterol (TC), LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C), and HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C) levels, along with a derangement of thyroid function, leading to reduced thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) levels. This study aimed to explore the association between TSH levels during COVID-19 and the variation (Δ) of lipid profile parameters in the period preceding (from 1 month up to 1 year) hospital admission due to COVID-19. Clinical data of 324 patients (mean age 76 ± 15 years, 54% males) hospitalized due to COVID-19 between March 2020 and March 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The association between TSH levels at hospital admission and either Δ-TC, Δ-LDL-C, or Δ-HDL-C over the selected time frame was assessed through univariable and multivariable analyses. TSH levels were below the lower reference limit of 0.340 μUI/mL in 14% of COVID-19 patients. A significant reduction of plasma TC, LDL-C, and HDL-C was recorded between the two time points (p < 0.001 for all the comparisons). TSH was directly associated with Δ-TC (rho = 0.193, p = 0.001), Δ-LDL-C (rho = 0.201, p = 0.001), and Δ-HDL-C (rho = 0.160, p = 0.008), and inversely associated with C-reactive protein (CRP) (rho = −0.175, p = 0.004). Moreover, TSH decreased with increasing COVID-19 severity (p < 0.001). CRP and COVID-19 severity were inversely associated with Δ-TC, Δ-LDL-C, and Δ-HDL-C (p < 0.05 for all associations). A significant independent association was found between TSH and either Δ-TC (β = 0.125, p = 0.044) or Δ-LDL-C (β = 0.131, p = 0.036) after adjusting for multiple confounders including CRP and COVID-19 severity. In conclusion, lower levels of TSH may contribute to explain TC and LDL-C reduction in the acute phase of COVID-19.

Acute viral infections, including coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), are characterized by the dysregulation of iron metabolism, resulting in high serum ferritin and low iron levels.This study was...

Background: Endothelial injury can be induced by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and seems to exert a crucial pathogenic role in its most severe clinical manifestations. We aimed to investigate the association between brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (bFMD), a potential clinical and non-invasive measure of endothelial function, and in-hospital prognosis of COVID-19 patients. Methods: Brachial artery flow-mediated dilation was assessed in hospitalized COVID-19 patients within 48 h of hospital admission. The association between bFMD and either intensive care unit (ICU) admission or in-hospital death was explored using univariable and multivariable analyses. Results: Four hundred and eight patients were enrolled. Significantly lower bFMD values emerged in COVID-19 patients with either radiographic signs of pneumonia, respiratory distress, or the need for non-invasive ventilation compared with patients without these signs (p < 0.001, p = 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively). Forty-two (10%) patients were admitted to the ICU, 76 (19%) patients died, and 118 (29%) patients met the composite endpoint of ICU admission/in-hospital death. At unadjusted Cox regression analysis showed that low bFMD (p = 0.007). Multi-adjusted Cox regression analyses showed that low bFMD was independently associated with a 1.519- to 1.658-fold increased risk for the composite endpoint of ICU admission/in-hospital death. Conclusions: Low bFMD predicts an unfavorable in-hospital prognosis in COVID-19 patients. The measurement of bFMD may be clinically useful in the prognostic stratification of COVID-19 patients upon hospital admission.