Mikael Lefebvre Soucisse

BACKGROUND Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare subtype of malignant mesothelioma (MM) that arises from mesothelial/serosal surfaces of the peritoneal lining and carries a poor prognosis. Given the rarity of this disease, many expert groups such as the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI) and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) have developed recommendations to guide the optimal treatment for MPM. Currently, the standard of care for resectable MPM is a combination of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). There are no clear guidelines for treatment of inoperable malignant mesothelioma, but several studies have demonstrated a benefit of incorporating immunotherapy in the treatment plan. CASE REPORT We present a case of a 63-year-old woman who sought medical attention for several months of persistent vague abdominal discomfort, weight loss, and night sweats. Laboratory workup and diagnostic imaging led to the diagnosis of borderline/unresectable MPM. A multidisciplinary tumor board discussion based on the published literature and guidelines on malignant mesothelioma (MM) was undertaken, and the decision was made to treat the patient with nivolumab-ipilimumab in the perioperative period. The patient had a positive clinical response allowing for subsequent CRS and HIPEC. She remains disease free 30 months following her surgery, with the intention to continue the immunotherapy. CONCLUSIONS This case report contributes to the current literature demonstrating a potential role for perioperative immunotherapy in the treatment of aggressive subtype or borderline resectable/unresectable MPM and a bridge to consolidative CRS/HIPEC.

Combining interval cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) improves survival in advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC). Although limited, growing evidence regarding carboplatin-based HIPEC highlights its potential. This retrospective study included all patients with advanced primary high-grade serous ovarian cancer who underwent interval CRS combined with carboplatin-based HIPEC at our Canadian tertiary care center between 2014 and 2020. We identified 40 patients with a median age of 61 years. The median peritoneal cancer index was 13 and complete cytoreduction was achieved in 38 patients (95%). Median hospital stay was 13 days and there were four admissions to the intensive care unit (10%) and six readmissions (15%). Severe adverse events occurred in eight patients (20%) and there was no perioperative death. Recurrence was seen in 33 patients (82%) with a median DFS of 18.0 months and a median overall survival of 36.4 months. Multivariate analyses showed that age, peritoneal cancer index, completeness of cytoreduction, occurrence of severe complications, and bowel resection did not significantly impact DFS or OS in our cohort. Interval CRS combined with carboplatin-based HIPEC for advanced primary EOC is associated with acceptable morbidity and oncological outcomes. Larger studies are required to determine the long-term outcomes.

Introduction: Historically, surgical resection for patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) had been reserved for those without metastatic disease. ‘Selective’ patients with limited oligometastatic disease (OMD) (involving the liver and/or lung) are now increasingly being considered for resection, with favourable five-year survival rates. Methods: A retrospective analysis of consecutive patients undergoing multi-visceral pelvic resection of LRRC with their oligometastatic disease between 1 January 2015 and 31 August 2021 across four centres worldwide was performed. The data collected included disease characteristics, neoadjuvant therapy details, perioperative and oncological outcomes. Results: Fourteen participants with a mean age of 59 years were included. There was a female preponderance (n = 9). Nine patients had liver metastases, four had lung metastases and one had both lung and liver disease. The mean number of metastatic tumours was 1.5 +/− 0.85. R0 margins were obtained in 71.4% (n = 10) and 100% (n = 14) of pelvic exenteration and oligometastatic disease surgeries, respectively. Mean lymph node yield was 11.6 +/− 6.9 nodes, with positive nodes being found in 28.6% (n = 4) of cases. A single major morbidity was reported, with no perioperative deaths. At follow-up, the median disease-free survival and overall survival were 12.3 months (IQR 4.5–17.5 months) and 25.9 months (IQR 6.2–39.7 months), respectively. Conclusions: Performing radical multi-visceral surgery for LRRC and distant oligometastatic disease appears to be feasible in appropriately selected patients that underwent good perioperative counselling.

Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) is a treatment option for peritoneal metastases (PM) but is associated with significant postoperative morbidity. The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic value of computed tomographic (CT)-measured sarcopenia on postoperative outcomes and survival in patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC for PM from various origins. A retrospective cohort study was conducted between 2012 and 2020. Three-hundred and twelve patients (mean age 57.6 ± 10.3, 34.3% male) were included, of which 88 (28.2%) were sarcopenic. PM from a colorectal origin was the most common in both groups. The proportion of major postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ III) was not higher in the sarcopenic group (15.9% in sarcopenic patients vs. 23.2% in nonsarcopenic patients, p = 0.17). The mean Comprehensive Complication Index scores, HIPEC-related toxicities, length of hospital stay, and duration of parenteral nutrition were comparable regardless of sarcopenia status. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis of severe complications, only peritoneal carcinomatosis index reached statistical significance (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.08, p = 0.007). Sarcopenia did not impact origin-specific overall survival on Cox regression analysis. Sarcopenia was not associated with worse rates of postoperative severe complications or worse survival rates. Future prospective studies are required before considering sarcopenia as part of preoperative risk assessment.