Katharina Lutz
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Katharina Lutz has a total of 29 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Jehuda Soleman
Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
2 shared publications Jonathan Wermelinger
Department of Neurosurgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
2 shared publicationsAndreas Raabe
Department of Neurosurgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
1 shared publicationAndreas Röhrig
Pediatric Neurosurgery, Asklepios Children’s Hospital, Sankt Augustin, Germany
1 shared publicationArsany Hakim
University Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
1 shared publicationCordula Scherer
Department of Pediatric Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 6 December 2024
- Published by Springer Nature in Child's Nervous System
- Vol. 41 (1) , 1-12
Neurophysiological identification and differentiation between the motor and sensory roots in pediatric spinal cord lipoma surgery
Background: Radical resection of spinal cord lipomas reduces the rate of re-tethering. Current conventional neurophysiological mapping techniques are not able to differentiate between crucial motor nerve roots and sensory roots. Enhanced differentiation could contribute to complete resection. We present our experience with a double-train paradigm to differentiate between motor and sensory roots. Methods: In children undergoing spinal cord lipoma resection, the double-train mapping paradigm was used with an inter-train interval of 60 ms. Given the longer recovery time due to the H-reflex, a single muscle response was presumed to be elicited from a sensory root, and a double muscle response from a motor root. The primary endpoint was postoperative neurological outcome and bladder function at discharge. Results: We included 8 children undergoing 10 lipoma resections between 2016 and 2023. Double-train mapping was used in all cases. Motor and sensory roots were clearly differentiated in 6 cases and altered the course of surgery in 4 cases. Post-surgery, no sensory and motor function worsened within 3 months. Bladder function was stable in six and improved in two children. In two patients, bladder function worsened slightly at 3 months and 6 months, at which point one patient was re-operated on for re-tethering. Conclusion: Intraoperative mapping with the double-train paradigm reliably differentiated between motor and sensory nerve roots. Informing the surgeon on the specific function of a tethering root may help to maximize resection without risking major neurological deficits.
- 6 December 2024
- Published by Springer Nature in Child's Nervous System
- Vol. 41 (1) , 1-12
Open AccessNeurophysiological identification and differentiation between the motor and sensory roots in pediatric spinal cord lipoma surgery
Background: Radical resection of spinal cord lipomas reduces the rate of re-tethering. Current conventional neurophysiological mapping techniques are not able to differentiate between crucial motor nerve roots and sensory roots. Enhanced differentiation could contribute to complete resection. We present our experience with a double-train paradigm to differentiate between motor and sensory roots. Methods: In children undergoing spinal cord lipoma resection, the double-train mapping paradigm was used with an inter-train interval of 60 ms. Given the longer recovery time due to the H-reflex, a single muscle response was presumed to be elicited from a sensory root, and a double muscle response from a motor root. The primary endpoint was postoperative neurological outcome and bladder function at discharge. Results: We included 8 children undergoing 10 lipoma resections between 2016 and 2023. Double-train mapping was used in all cases. Motor and sensory roots were clearly differentiated in 6 cases and altered the course of surgery in 4 cases. Post-surgery, no sensory and motor function worsened within 3 months. Bladder function was stable in six and improved in two children. In two patients, bladder function worsened slightly at 3 months and 6 months, at which point one patient was re-operated on for re-tethering. Conclusion: Intraoperative mapping with the double-train paradigm reliably differentiated between motor and sensory nerve roots. Informing the surgeon on the specific function of a tethering root may help to maximize resection without risking major neurological deficits.
- 17 April 2024
- Published by Springer Nature in Neurosurgical Review
- Vol. 47 (1) , 1-11
Long-term results of minimally invasive strip craniectomy without helmet therapy for scaphocephaly – a single-centre experience
Scaphocephaly is the most common type of craniosynostosis and various surgical techniques are used for treatment. Due to late postoperative changes of the head shape, long-term outcome data is important for evaluating any new surgical technique. At our institution, minimally invasive strip craniectomy without regular helmet therapy is the standard treatment in scaphocephalic patients. Between October 2021 and February 2023, we retrospectively examined the skull shape of patients who underwent minimally invasive strip craniectomy for scaphocephaly using a 3D surface scan technique. The cephalic index (CI), the need for helmet therapy and additional cosmetic outcome parameters were investigated. We included 70 patients (72.5% male). The mean follow-up time was 46 (10–125) months and the mean CI was 75.7 (66.7–85.2). In 58 patients, the final cosmetic result was rated as “excellent/good” (mean CI: 76.3; 70.4–85.0), in 11 as “intermediate” (mean CI: 73.3; 66.7–77.6), and in one case as “unsatisfactory” (CI 69.3). The presence of a suboccipital protrusion was associated with a “less than good” outcome. The CI correlated significantly with the overall outcome, the presence of frontal bossing, and the interval between scan and surgery (age at scan). Minimally invasive strip craniectomy is an elegant and safe method to correct scaphocephaly. Our data show good cosmetic results in the long term even without regular postoperative helmet therapy.
- 17 April 2024
- Published by Springer Nature in Neurosurgical Review
- Vol. 47 (1) , 1-11
Long-term results of minimally invasive strip craniectomy without helmet therapy for scaphocephaly – a single-centre experience
Scaphocephaly is the most common type of craniosynostosis and various surgical techniques are used for treatment. Due to late postoperative changes of the head shape, long-term outcome data is important for evaluating any new surgical technique. At our institution, minimally invasive strip craniectomy without regular helmet therapy is the standard treatment in scaphocephalic patients. Between October 2021 and February 2023, we retrospectively examined the skull shape of patients who underwent minimally invasive strip craniectomy for scaphocephaly using a 3D surface scan technique. The cephalic index (CI), the need for helmet therapy and additional cosmetic outcome parameters were investigated. We included 70 patients (72.5% male). The mean follow-up time was 46 (10–125) months and the mean CI was 75.7 (66.7–85.2). In 58 patients, the final cosmetic result was rated as “excellent/good” (mean CI: 76.3; 70.4–85.0), in 11 as “intermediate” (mean CI: 73.3; 66.7–77.6), and in one case as “unsatisfactory” (CI 69.3). The presence of a suboccipital protrusion was associated with a “less than good” outcome. The CI correlated significantly with the overall outcome, the presence of frontal bossing, and the interval between scan and surgery (age at scan). Minimally invasive strip craniectomy is an elegant and safe method to correct scaphocephaly. Our data show good cosmetic results in the long term even without regular postoperative helmet therapy.
- Open Access
Essential Management of Pediatric Brain Tumors
Brain tumors are the most common solid tumors in children and are associated with high mortality. The most common childhood brain tumors are grouped as low-grade gliomas (LGG), high grade gliomas (HGG), ependymomas, and embryonal tumors, according to the World Health Organization (WHO). Advances in molecular genetics have led to a shift from pure histopathological diagnosis to integrated diagnosis. For the first time, these new criteria were included in the WHO classification published in 2016 and has been further updated in the 2021 edition. Integrated diagnosis is based on molecular genomic similarities of the tumor subclasses, and it can better explain the differences in clinical courses of previously histopathologically identical entities. Important advances have also been made in pediatric neuro-oncology. A growing understanding of the molecular-genetic background of tumorigenesis has improved the diagnostic accuracy. Re-stratification of treatment protocols and the development of targeted therapies will significantly affect overall survival and quality of life. For some pediatric tumors, these advances have significantly improved therapeutic management and prognosis in certain tumor subgroups. Some therapeutic approaches also have serious long-term consequences. Therefore, optimized treatments are greatly needed. Here, we discuss the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration and the role of (pediatric) neurosurgery by briefly describing the most common childhood brain tumors and their currently recognized molecular subgroups.
Open AccessEssential Management of Pediatric Brain Tumors
Brain tumors are the most common solid tumors in children and are associated with high mortality. The most common childhood brain tumors are grouped as low-grade gliomas (LGG), high grade gliomas (HGG), ependymomas, and embryonal tumors, according to the World Health Organization (WHO). Advances in molecular genetics have led to a shift from pure histopathological diagnosis to integrated diagnosis. For the first time, these new criteria were included in the WHO classification published in 2016 and has been further updated in the 2021 edition. Integrated diagnosis is based on molecular genomic similarities of the tumor subclasses, and it can better explain the differences in clinical courses of previously histopathologically identical entities. Important advances have also been made in pediatric neuro-oncology. A growing understanding of the molecular-genetic background of tumorigenesis has improved the diagnostic accuracy. Re-stratification of treatment protocols and the development of targeted therapies will significantly affect overall survival and quality of life. For some pediatric tumors, these advances have significantly improved therapeutic management and prognosis in certain tumor subgroups. Some therapeutic approaches also have serious long-term consequences. Therefore, optimized treatments are greatly needed. Here, we discuss the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration and the role of (pediatric) neurosurgery by briefly describing the most common childhood brain tumors and their currently recognized molecular subgroups.
- 1 December 2019
- Published by Elsevier in World Neurosurgery
- Vol. 132, e283-e289
Time to and Possible Risk Factors for Recurrence after Burr-hole Drainage of Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Subanalysis of the cSDH-Drain Randomized Controlled Trial
- 1 December 2019
- Published by Elsevier in World Neurosurgery
- Vol. 132, e283-e289
Time to and Possible Risk Factors for Recurrence after Burr-hole Drainage of Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Subanalysis of the cSDH-Drain Randomized Controlled Trial
- Open Access
- 8 April 2016
- Published by JMIR Publications Inc. in JMIR Research Protocols
- Vol. 5 (2) , e38
Use of Subperiosteal Drain Versus Subdural Drain in Chronic Subdural Hematomas Treated With Burr-Hole Trepanation: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial
Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is one of the most frequent neurosurgical conditions affecting elderly people and is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. The use of a subdural drain (SDD) after burr-hole trepanation for cSDH was proven to reduce recurrence and mortality at 6 months. To date in neurosurgery practice, evidence-based guidelines on whether an SDD or subperiosteal drain (SPD) should be used do not exist. Currently both methods are being practiced depending on the institute and/or the practicing neurosurgeon. The aim of this study is to compare the reoperation rates after burr-hole trepanation and insertion of an SPD or SDD in patients with cSDH. This is a prospective, noninferiority, multicenter, randomized controlled trial designed to include 220 patients over the age of 18 years presenting with a symptomatic cSDH verified on cranial computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging who are to undergo surgical evacuation with burr-hole trepanation. After informed consent is obtained, patients are randomly allocated to an SPD or SDD group. The primary endpoint is recurrence indicating a reoperation within 12 months. This research is investigator-initiated and has received ethics approval. Patient recruitment started in April 2013, and we expect all study-related activities to be completed by the end of 2016 or beginning of 2017. To date, evidence-based recommendations concerning the operative treatment of cSDH are sparse. Results of this research are expected to have applications in evidence-based practice for the increasing number of patients suffering from cSDH and possibly lead to more efficient treatment of this disease with fewer postoperative complications. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01869855; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01869855 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6fNK4Jlxk).
- 8 April 2016
- Published by JMIR Publications Inc. in JMIR Research Protocols
- Vol. 5 (2) , e38
Open AccessUse of Subperiosteal Drain Versus Subdural Drain in Chronic Subdural Hematomas Treated With Burr-Hole Trepanation: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial
Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is one of the most frequent neurosurgical conditions affecting elderly people and is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. The use of a subdural drain (SDD) after burr-hole trepanation for cSDH was proven to reduce recurrence and mortality at 6 months. To date in neurosurgery practice, evidence-based guidelines on whether an SDD or subperiosteal drain (SPD) should be used do not exist. Currently both methods are being practiced depending on the institute and/or the practicing neurosurgeon. The aim of this study is to compare the reoperation rates after burr-hole trepanation and insertion of an SPD or SDD in patients with cSDH. This is a prospective, noninferiority, multicenter, randomized controlled trial designed to include 220 patients over the age of 18 years presenting with a symptomatic cSDH verified on cranial computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging who are to undergo surgical evacuation with burr-hole trepanation. After informed consent is obtained, patients are randomly allocated to an SPD or SDD group. The primary endpoint is recurrence indicating a reoperation within 12 months. This research is investigator-initiated and has received ethics approval. Patient recruitment started in April 2013, and we expect all study-related activities to be completed by the end of 2016 or beginning of 2017. To date, evidence-based recommendations concerning the operative treatment of cSDH are sparse. Results of this research are expected to have applications in evidence-based practice for the increasing number of patients suffering from cSDH and possibly lead to more efficient treatment of this disease with fewer postoperative complications. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01869855; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01869855 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6fNK4Jlxk).