Ling Tiah

Background and Objectives: End-of-life care in the emergency department (ED) is gaining importance along with the growth in the ageing population and those with chronic and terminal diseases. To explore key stakeholders’ perspectives and experiences regarding end-of-life care in the ED. Materials and Methods: A descriptive qualitative study was conducted from November 2019 to January 2020. Study participants were recruited from the EDs of three tertiary hospitals and community care settings in Singapore through purposive sampling. Data collection included focus group discussions with 36 ED staff, 16 community healthcare professionals, and one-on-one semi-structured interviews with seven family members. Results: Three main themes and several subthemes emerged from the data analysis. (1) Reasons for ED visits were attributed to patients’ preferences, families’ decisions, limited services and capabilities in the community, and ease of access. (2) Barriers to providing end-of-life management in the ED included: conflicting priorities of staff, cramped environment, low confidence, ineffective communication, and lack of standardised workflows. (3) Discussion about continuity of end-of-life care beyond the ED uncovered issues related to delayed transfer to inpatient wards, challenging coordination of terminal discharge from the ED, and limited resources for end-of-life care in the community. Conclusions: Key stakeholders reported challenges and shared expectations in the provision of end-of-life care in the ED, which could be optimised by multidisciplinary collaborations addressing environmental factors and workflows in the ED. Equipping ED physicians and nurses with the necessary knowledge and skills is important to increase competency and confidence in managing patients attending the ED at the end of their lives.

Administering intravenous thrombolytic therapy within 60 minutes on arrival in any healthcare facility is challenging, especially when done by Emergency Medicine Physicians (EMP) via telemedicine in centres without onsite neurology cover. Prior quality improvement interventions have improved median Door-to-Needle (DTN) timings in our centre; however, it still falls short of the DTN target of 60 minutes. Various quality improvement interventions were implemented over four months by a multi-disciplinary telestroke workgroup led by EMPs to improve DTN timings for patients presenting with acute ischaemic strokes. A retrospective observational study was conducted to review if these interventions resulted in an improvement in DTN timings while keeping the rates of stroke mimics given thrombolytic therapy, haemorrhagic conversions and 30-day mortality rates low. A total of 279 patients were evaluated. Median DTN timings significantly improved from 71.0 minutes pre-intervention to 62.0 minutes post-intervention (p=0.012). Correspondingly, the proportion of patients with DTN ≤ 60 minutes increased from 31.7% pre-intervention to 47.0% post-intervention, giving an odds ratio of 1.91 (95% CI 1.17 - 3.11, p=0.009). There were no significant differences found in the rates of stroke mimics, haemorrhagic conversions and 30-day mortality pre and post-intervention. The implementation of EMP led to systemic quality improvement interventions is associated with improved DTN timings without compromising clinical quality outcome measures like haemorrhagic conversion rates and 30-day mortality rates. EMPs, with a broad knowledge base and familiarity, interacting with various specialities and co-ordinating care, are uniquely suited in this role to drive change. More work in the public health sector would also have to be done to improve the population’s response to acute stroke symptoms.

Objective. To evaluate the performance of Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis (MEDS) score in comparison to biomarkers as a predictor of mortality in adult emergency department (ED) patients with sepsis. Methods. A literature search was performed using PubMed, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, and Ovid databases. Studies were appraised by using the C2010 Consensus Process for Levels of Evidence for prognostic studies. The respective values for area under the curve (AUC) were obtained from the selected articles. Results. Four relevant articles met the selection process. Three studies defined the 1-month mortality as death occurring within 28 days of ED presentation, while the remaining one subcategorised the outcome measure as (5-day) early and (6- to 30-day) late mortality. In all four studies, the MEDS score performed better than the respective comparators (C-reactive protein, lactate, procalcitonin, and interleukin-6) in predicting mortality with an AUC ranging from 0.78 to 0.89 across the studies. Conclusion. The MEDS score has a better prognostic value than the respective comparators in predicting 1-month mortality in adult ED patients with suspected sepsis.