Václava Adámková
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Václava Adámková has a total of 199 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Jan Závora
Clinical Microbiology and ATB Centre, General University Hospital, 128 08 Prague, Czech Republic
7 shared publications - Gabriela Kroneislová
Clinical Microbiology and ATB Centre, General University Hospital, 128 08 Prague, Czech Republic
4 shared publications - Helena Žemličková
Department of Clinical Microbiology, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Charles University, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
4 shared publications - Alžběta Studená
Clinical Microbiology and ATB Centre, General University Hospital in Prague, 128 08 Prague, Czech Republic
2 shared publications - Constantinos C. Papagiannitsis
Department of Microbiology, University Hospital of Larissa, 41334 Larissa, Greece
2 shared publications E Chmelařová
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
The Role of Routine Surveillance Cultures in Optimising Sepsis Management in High-Risk Patient Groups
Background: Sepsis remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality, particularly when caused by multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs). Early identification of colonising or infecting pathogens may inform initial antimicrobial selection. Surveillance cultures, providing microbiological data prior to infection onset, could guide timely and targeted therapy. This retrospective study analysed routine surveillance culture results from patients with bloodstream infection (BSI) episodes, assessing pathogen prevalence, resistance phenotypes, and concordance with specimen type in haemato-oncology (HO) and acute care (AC) settings. Methods: Data were retrieved from the institutional Laboratory Information System of the Department of Clinical Microbiology and ATB Centre, General University Hospital in Prague, covering 1 January to 31 December 2024. All positive blood cultures containing ESCAPE pathogens (excluding Clostridioides difficile) were reviewed. Corresponding surveillance culture records were analysed to evaluate concordance with subsequent BSI episodes. Results: In 2024, 6046 AC and 7267 HO surveillance cultures were performed; MDRO prevalence was 5% and 6.56%, respectively. ESBL-producing Enterobacterales predominated (AC 86.9%, HO 81.6%). In HO, BSI-causing Gram-negative and Gram-positive pathogens were frequently detected in rectal swabs, whereas in AC, concordance was higher with upper and lower respiratory tract samples. Rectal screening detected 100% of E. coli and K. pneumoniae BSI episodes in HO. Other specimen types showed limited concordance. Conclusions: Surveillance culture utility varies by specimen type and clinical setting. In both HO and AC units, these cultures provided valuable insights into colonisation and resistance patterns, supporting early risk stratification and guiding initial therapy in high-risk patients.
Open AccessThe Role of Routine Surveillance Cultures in Optimising Sepsis Management in High-Risk Patient Groups
Background: Sepsis remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality, particularly when caused by multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs). Early identification of colonising or infecting pathogens may inform initial antimicrobial selection. Surveillance cultures, providing microbiological data prior to infection onset, could guide timely and targeted therapy. This retrospective study analysed routine surveillance culture results from patients with bloodstream infection (BSI) episodes, assessing pathogen prevalence, resistance phenotypes, and concordance with specimen type in haemato-oncology (HO) and acute care (AC) settings. Methods: Data were retrieved from the institutional Laboratory Information System of the Department of Clinical Microbiology and ATB Centre, General University Hospital in Prague, covering 1 January to 31 December 2024. All positive blood cultures containing ESCAPE pathogens (excluding Clostridioides difficile) were reviewed. Corresponding surveillance culture records were analysed to evaluate concordance with subsequent BSI episodes. Results: In 2024, 6046 AC and 7267 HO surveillance cultures were performed; MDRO prevalence was 5% and 6.56%, respectively. ESBL-producing Enterobacterales predominated (AC 86.9%, HO 81.6%). In HO, BSI-causing Gram-negative and Gram-positive pathogens were frequently detected in rectal swabs, whereas in AC, concordance was higher with upper and lower respiratory tract samples. Rectal screening detected 100% of E. coli and K. pneumoniae BSI episodes in HO. Other specimen types showed limited concordance. Conclusions: Surveillance culture utility varies by specimen type and clinical setting. In both HO and AC units, these cultures provided valuable insights into colonisation and resistance patterns, supporting early risk stratification and guiding initial therapy in high-risk patients.
- Open Access
- 29 July 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Antibiotics
- Vol. 14 (8)
In Vitro Activity of Cefiderocol and Aztreonam/Avibactam Against Gram-Negative Non-Fermenting Bacteria: A New Strategy Against Highly Antibiotic-Resistant Infectious Agents
Background/Objectives: Non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli (NFGNB) represent a significant clinical challenge due to their intrinsic and acquired resistance, particularly in immunocompromised patients. Infections cause by NFGNB are associated with high morbidity and mortality, especially among patients with cystic fibrosis and hematologic malignancies. This study aimed to assess the in vitro susceptibility of clinically relevant NFGNB isolates to two newer antibiotics, cefiderocol and aztreonam/avibactam, and an established antibiotic, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. Methods: This retrospective, monocentric study analysed 94 NFGNB isolates (30 Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 30 Acinetobacter sp., 24 Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, and 10 Burkholderia cepacia complex). Susceptibility testing for cefiderocol, aztreonam/avibactam, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole was conducted using gradient strip method. MIC values were interpreted using EUCAST breakpoints, ECOFFs, or alternative criteria when necessary. Results: All S. maltophilia isolates were susceptible to cefiderocol (FCR) and aztreonam/avibactam (A/A) based on ECOFFs, with one strain resistant to trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole (COT). Burkholderia cepacia complex strains also showed high susceptibility to FCR, with only one isolate exceeding the ECOFF for A/A, and 20% resistant to COT. All Acinetobacter sp. isolates were susceptible to FCR; however, most MIC values clustered at or just below the ECOFF value. In P. aeruginosa, one isolate was resistant to FCR, and three isolates (10%) were resistant to A/A. Interestingly, confirmed carbapenemase producers remained susceptible to both FCR and A/A. Most A/A MIC values for P. aeruginosa were just below the ECOFF. Conclusions: Cefiderocol and aztreonam/avibactam demonstrated promising in vitro activity against clinically relevant NFGNB, including carbapenem-resistant strains. These findings support their potential role as therapeutic options for difficult-to-treat infections, particularly in immunocompromised patients.
- 29 July 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Antibiotics
- Vol. 14 (8)
Open AccessIn Vitro Activity of Cefiderocol and Aztreonam/Avibactam Against Gram-Negative Non-Fermenting Bacteria: A New Strategy Against Highly Antibiotic-Resistant Infectious Agents
Background/Objectives: Non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli (NFGNB) represent a significant clinical challenge due to their intrinsic and acquired resistance, particularly in immunocompromised patients. Infections cause by NFGNB are associated with high morbidity and mortality, especially among patients with cystic fibrosis and hematologic malignancies. This study aimed to assess the in vitro susceptibility of clinically relevant NFGNB isolates to two newer antibiotics, cefiderocol and aztreonam/avibactam, and an established antibiotic, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. Methods: This retrospective, monocentric study analysed 94 NFGNB isolates (30 Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 30 Acinetobacter sp., 24 Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, and 10 Burkholderia cepacia complex). Susceptibility testing for cefiderocol, aztreonam/avibactam, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole was conducted using gradient strip method. MIC values were interpreted using EUCAST breakpoints, ECOFFs, or alternative criteria when necessary. Results: All S. maltophilia isolates were susceptible to cefiderocol (FCR) and aztreonam/avibactam (A/A) based on ECOFFs, with one strain resistant to trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole (COT). Burkholderia cepacia complex strains also showed high susceptibility to FCR, with only one isolate exceeding the ECOFF for A/A, and 20% resistant to COT. All Acinetobacter sp. isolates were susceptible to FCR; however, most MIC values clustered at or just below the ECOFF value. In P. aeruginosa, one isolate was resistant to FCR, and three isolates (10%) were resistant to A/A. Interestingly, confirmed carbapenemase producers remained susceptible to both FCR and A/A. Most A/A MIC values for P. aeruginosa were just below the ECOFF. Conclusions: Cefiderocol and aztreonam/avibactam demonstrated promising in vitro activity against clinically relevant NFGNB, including carbapenem-resistant strains. These findings support their potential role as therapeutic options for difficult-to-treat infections, particularly in immunocompromised patients.
- Open Access
The Role of Stratified Cumulative Antibiograms in the (Choice of Appropriate Antibiotics in Urinary Tract Infection) Management of Urinary Tract Infections
Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are one of the most common bacterial diseases both in communities and in hospitalized patients, and at the same, time they are one of the most common indications for the use of antibiotics. UTI guidelines are generally available nationally or internationally, but they do not address all aspects of UTI treatment for different patient cohorts, age, gender, or comorbidities. The aim of the study was to point out the importance of stratified cumulative antibiograms at the level of individual health care facilities and the significant differences between epidemiological data, not only at the national level, but also at the local level. Our study analyses data from 383 patients with UTIs from a hospital department, General University Hospital (GUH), and 272 patients from an outpatient medical facility, Urocentrum (UC). This analysis focuses on the most common UTI causative agent, Escherichia coli, its representation as the causative agent of UTI in patients with complicated acute cystitis (N30), and its representation in complicated acute cystitis in patients with prostate cancer (C61). In addition to the frequency of occurrence, a sub-analysis of the incidence of resistance of E. coli to commonly used antibiotics by age, gender, diagnosis, and medical facility was performed. Results: The most common causative agent of UTI was E. coli. In patients with N30, it was 70% in GUH and 54% in UC, but in oncological patients with UTI, it was only 39% and 35%, respectively. In patients with UTI in C61, there was a significant difference in susceptibility of E. coli between individual health care facilities. Lower resistance was found in UC opposite to GUH isolates in ampicillin, with 29.8% vs. 65%, p = 0.001; amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, with 8.5% vs. 30%, p = 0.01; with 2.1% vs. 17.5% in pivmecillinam, p = 0.01; with 10.6% vs. 37.5% in co-trimoxazole, p = 0.003; and ciprofloxacin, with 10.6% vs. 30%, p = 0.04. The study shows significant differences in the sensitivity of urinary E. coli isolates in patients in relation to age, gender, medical devices, and the presence of comorbidities.
Open AccessThe Role of Stratified Cumulative Antibiograms in the (Choice of Appropriate Antibiotics in Urinary Tract Infection) Management of Urinary Tract Infections
Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are one of the most common bacterial diseases both in communities and in hospitalized patients, and at the same, time they are one of the most common indications for the use of antibiotics. UTI guidelines are generally available nationally or internationally, but they do not address all aspects of UTI treatment for different patient cohorts, age, gender, or comorbidities. The aim of the study was to point out the importance of stratified cumulative antibiograms at the level of individual health care facilities and the significant differences between epidemiological data, not only at the national level, but also at the local level. Our study analyses data from 383 patients with UTIs from a hospital department, General University Hospital (GUH), and 272 patients from an outpatient medical facility, Urocentrum (UC). This analysis focuses on the most common UTI causative agent, Escherichia coli, its representation as the causative agent of UTI in patients with complicated acute cystitis (N30), and its representation in complicated acute cystitis in patients with prostate cancer (C61). In addition to the frequency of occurrence, a sub-analysis of the incidence of resistance of E. coli to commonly used antibiotics by age, gender, diagnosis, and medical facility was performed. Results: The most common causative agent of UTI was E. coli. In patients with N30, it was 70% in GUH and 54% in UC, but in oncological patients with UTI, it was only 39% and 35%, respectively. In patients with UTI in C61, there was a significant difference in susceptibility of E. coli between individual health care facilities. Lower resistance was found in UC opposite to GUH isolates in ampicillin, with 29.8% vs. 65%, p = 0.001; amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, with 8.5% vs. 30%, p = 0.01; with 2.1% vs. 17.5% in pivmecillinam, p = 0.01; with 10.6% vs. 37.5% in co-trimoxazole, p = 0.003; and ciprofloxacin, with 10.6% vs. 30%, p = 0.04. The study shows significant differences in the sensitivity of urinary E. coli isolates in patients in relation to age, gender, medical devices, and the presence of comorbidities.
- Open Access
- 5 November 2024
- Published by MDPI AG in Antibiotics
- Vol. 13 (11) , 1049
Fosfomycin—Overcoming Problematic In Vitro Susceptibility Testing and Tricky Result Interpretation: Comparison of Three Fosfomycin Susceptibility Testing Methods
Background: Fosfomycin (FOS) is an older antimicrobial agent newly rediscovered as a possible treatment for infections with limited therapeutic options (e.g., Gram-negative bacteria with difficult-to-treat resistance, DTR), especially in intravenous form. However, for correct usage of FOS, it is necessary to have a reliable susceptibility testing method suitable for routine practice and robust interpretation criteria. Results: The results were interpreted according to 2023 interpretation criteria provided by the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). DTR Gram-negatives were more likely to be resistant to FOS (45% in Enterobacterales and 20% in P. aeruginosa) than non-DTR (10% and 6.7%, resp.). All isolates of S. aureus were susceptible to FOS. In Gram-negatives, all agreement values were unacceptable. Etest® performed better in the DTR cohort (categorical agreement, CA, 80%) than in the non-DTR cohort (CA 45.7%). There were no very major errors (VREs) observed in P. aeruginosa. S. aureus had surprisingly low essential agreement (EA) rates (53% for MRSA and 47% for MSSA) for Etest®, but categorical agreement was 100%. Methods: A total of 130 bacterial isolates were tested and compared using the disc diffusion method (DD) and gradient strip method (Etest®) with the reference method (agar dilution, AD). The spectrum of isolates tested was as follows: 40 Enterobacterales (20 DTR vs. 20 non-DTR), 30 Pseudomonas aeruginosa (15 DTR vs. 15 non-DTR), and 60 Staphylococcus aureus (30 methicillin-susceptible, MSSA, vs. 30 methicillin-resistant, MRSA). Conclusions: Neither one of the tested methods was identified as a suitable alternative to AD. It would be beneficial to define more interpretation criteria, at least in some instances.
- 5 November 2024
- Published by MDPI AG in Antibiotics
- Vol. 13 (11) , 1049
Open AccessFosfomycin—Overcoming Problematic In Vitro Susceptibility Testing and Tricky Result Interpretation: Comparison of Three Fosfomycin Susceptibility Testing Methods
Background: Fosfomycin (FOS) is an older antimicrobial agent newly rediscovered as a possible treatment for infections with limited therapeutic options (e.g., Gram-negative bacteria with difficult-to-treat resistance, DTR), especially in intravenous form. However, for correct usage of FOS, it is necessary to have a reliable susceptibility testing method suitable for routine practice and robust interpretation criteria. Results: The results were interpreted according to 2023 interpretation criteria provided by the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). DTR Gram-negatives were more likely to be resistant to FOS (45% in Enterobacterales and 20% in P. aeruginosa) than non-DTR (10% and 6.7%, resp.). All isolates of S. aureus were susceptible to FOS. In Gram-negatives, all agreement values were unacceptable. Etest® performed better in the DTR cohort (categorical agreement, CA, 80%) than in the non-DTR cohort (CA 45.7%). There were no very major errors (VREs) observed in P. aeruginosa. S. aureus had surprisingly low essential agreement (EA) rates (53% for MRSA and 47% for MSSA) for Etest®, but categorical agreement was 100%. Methods: A total of 130 bacterial isolates were tested and compared using the disc diffusion method (DD) and gradient strip method (Etest®) with the reference method (agar dilution, AD). The spectrum of isolates tested was as follows: 40 Enterobacterales (20 DTR vs. 20 non-DTR), 30 Pseudomonas aeruginosa (15 DTR vs. 15 non-DTR), and 60 Staphylococcus aureus (30 methicillin-susceptible, MSSA, vs. 30 methicillin-resistant, MRSA). Conclusions: Neither one of the tested methods was identified as a suitable alternative to AD. It would be beneficial to define more interpretation criteria, at least in some instances.
- Open Access
- 15 May 2024
- Published by MDPI AG in Microorganisms
- Vol. 12 (5) , 995
Increasing Rate of Fatal Streptococcus pyogenes Bacteriemia—A Challenge for Prompt Diagnosis and Appropriate Therapy in Real Praxis
Streptococcus pyogenes, group A streptococci (GAS) bacteriaemia, is a life-threatening infection with high mortality, requiring fast diagnosis together with the use of appropriate antibiotic therapy as soon as possible. Our study analysed data from 93 patients with GAS bacteraemia at the General University Hospital in Prague between January 2006 and March 2024. In the years 2016–2019 there was an increase in GAS bacteraemia. Mortality in the period 2006–2019 was 21.9%; in the period 2020–2024, the mortality increased to 41.4%, p = 0.08. At the same time, in the post-2020 period, the time from hospital admission to death was reduced from 9.5 days to 3 days. A significant predictor of worse outcome in this period was high levels of procalcitonin, >35.1 µg/L (100% sensitivity and 82.35% specificity), and lactate, >5 mmol/L (90.91% sensitivity and 91.67% specificity). Myoglobin was a significant predictor in both compared periods, the AUC was 0.771, p = 0.044, and the AUC was an even 0.889, p ≤ 0.001, respectively. All isolates of S. pyogenes were susceptible to penicillin, and resistance to clindamycin was 20.3% from 2006–2019 and 10.3% in 2020–2024. Appropriate therapy was initiated in 89.1%. and 96.6%, respectively. We hypothesise that the increase in mortality after 2020 might be due to a decrease in the immune status of the population.
- 15 May 2024
- Published by MDPI AG in Microorganisms
- Vol. 12 (5) , 995
Open AccessIncreasing Rate of Fatal Streptococcus pyogenes Bacteriemia—A Challenge for Prompt Diagnosis and Appropriate Therapy in Real Praxis
Streptococcus pyogenes, group A streptococci (GAS) bacteriaemia, is a life-threatening infection with high mortality, requiring fast diagnosis together with the use of appropriate antibiotic therapy as soon as possible. Our study analysed data from 93 patients with GAS bacteraemia at the General University Hospital in Prague between January 2006 and March 2024. In the years 2016–2019 there was an increase in GAS bacteraemia. Mortality in the period 2006–2019 was 21.9%; in the period 2020–2024, the mortality increased to 41.4%, p = 0.08. At the same time, in the post-2020 period, the time from hospital admission to death was reduced from 9.5 days to 3 days. A significant predictor of worse outcome in this period was high levels of procalcitonin, >35.1 µg/L (100% sensitivity and 82.35% specificity), and lactate, >5 mmol/L (90.91% sensitivity and 91.67% specificity). Myoglobin was a significant predictor in both compared periods, the AUC was 0.771, p = 0.044, and the AUC was an even 0.889, p ≤ 0.001, respectively. All isolates of S. pyogenes were susceptible to penicillin, and resistance to clindamycin was 20.3% from 2006–2019 and 10.3% in 2020–2024. Appropriate therapy was initiated in 89.1%. and 96.6%, respectively. We hypothesise that the increase in mortality after 2020 might be due to a decrease in the immune status of the population.
- Open Access
- 26 February 2022
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance
- Vol. 29, 116-119
Genomic characterisation of three GES-producing Enterobacterales isolated in the Czech Republic
- 26 February 2022
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance
- Vol. 29, 116-119
Open AccessGenomic characterisation of three GES-producing Enterobacterales isolated in the Czech Republic
- 1 September 2021
- Vol. 27 (3) , 104-115
[Draft recommendation for preparation of cumulative antibiograms in the Czech Republic].
In today's medicine, one of the main challenges is an extreme increase in bacterial resistance, making antibiotic treatment in both intensive care units and in the community considerably more difficult. To maintain the efficacy of existing antibiotics, close interdisciplinary cooperation is crucial for diagnosing infectious diseases as well as for selecting appropriate antibiotics so that these are only used for treating bacterial infections, not natural bacterial colonization. Antibiotic stewardship has become an ethical imperative, with cumulative antibiograms being one of its core elements. Cumulative antibiograms help with rational choice of antibiotics for initial therapy when the patient's results are still pending. However, preparation of cumulative antibiograms is not clearly defined. Only two American guidelines are available that do not correspond with the needs of clinical microbiology in hospitalized patients. The article aims to present the potential pitfalls of preparing cumulative antibiograms based on the only CLSI guidelines and a draft of recommendation for their preparation in the Czech Republic.
- 1 September 2021
- Vol. 27 (3) , 104-115
[Draft recommendation for preparation of cumulative antibiograms in the Czech Republic].
In today's medicine, one of the main challenges is an extreme increase in bacterial resistance, making antibiotic treatment in both intensive care units and in the community considerably more difficult. To maintain the efficacy of existing antibiotics, close interdisciplinary cooperation is crucial for diagnosing infectious diseases as well as for selecting appropriate antibiotics so that these are only used for treating bacterial infections, not natural bacterial colonization. Antibiotic stewardship has become an ethical imperative, with cumulative antibiograms being one of its core elements. Cumulative antibiograms help with rational choice of antibiotics for initial therapy when the patient's results are still pending. However, preparation of cumulative antibiograms is not clearly defined. Only two American guidelines are available that do not correspond with the needs of clinical microbiology in hospitalized patients. The article aims to present the potential pitfalls of preparing cumulative antibiograms based on the only CLSI guidelines and a draft of recommendation for their preparation in the Czech Republic.
- Open Access
- 1 September 2021
- Published by Elsevier in Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
- Vol. 101 (1) , 115420
In vitro activity of ceftazidime-avibactam and comparators against Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from Central Europe and Israel, 2014–2017 and 2018
- 1 September 2021
- Published by Elsevier in Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
- Vol. 101 (1) , 115420
Open AccessIn vitro activity of ceftazidime-avibactam and comparators against Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from Central Europe and Israel, 2014–2017 and 2018