Fabio Massimo Ulivieri

Diabetes mellitus (DM) and osteoporosis are among the most common non-communicable diseases worldwide. Beyond their considerable socio-economic burden, both conditions significantly impair quality of life and reduce life expectancy, representing major causes of disability. DM-induced osteoporosis has recently emerged as a notable and frequent complication. Patients with type 2 DM have a twofold increased risk of fragility fractures, while those with longstanding type 1 DM exhibit a fivefold higher risk of hip, vertebral, and non-vertebral fractures. Bone mineral density (BMD) assessed by Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) often fails to predict fracture risk in this population, as bone mass tends to be normal, slightly reduced, or even elevated. However, DXA-derived indices can offer additional clinical value. The Trabecular Bone Score (TBS), which reflects bone microarchitecture, is frequently reduced in patients with DM and is associated with increased fracture risk, particularly in postmenopausal women. TBS is also linked to glycemic control and microvascular complications and can improve with bone-active medications, thus aiding follow-up assessments. Another useful DXA-based tool is the Bone Strain Index (BSI), which evaluates load resistance and has been shown to be degraded in diabetic patients, offering further predictive value for fractures. Additionally, Hip Structural Analysis (HSA) provides information on the mechanical integrity of the proximal femur, which may be compromised in DM. Based on the available evidence, this review aims to highlight the clinical utility of DXA-derived tools in DM-induced osteoporosis, emphasizing their ability to provide quantitative and qualitative information on bone health and to predict the risk of fragility fractures.

Summary: Bone Strain Index (BSI) is a new dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-based index. We retrospectively evaluated data from 153 postmenopausal women with a history of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Lumbar spine and femoral Bone Strain Index (BSI) were sensitive to skeletal impairment in postmenopausal women suffering from T2DM. Purpose: Bone Strain Index (BSI) is a new dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-based measurement. We evaluated the performance of BSI in predicting the presence of fragility fractures in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) postmenopausal women. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated data from a case–control study of 153 postmenopausal women with a history of at least 5 years of T2DM (age from 40 to 90 years). For each subject, we assessed the personal or familiar history of previous fragility fractures and menopause age, and we collected data about bone mineral density (BMD), BSI, and Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) measurements. Statistical analysis was performed having as outcome the history of fragility fractures. Results: Out of a total of 153 subjects, n = 22 (14.4%) presented at least one major fragility fracture. A negative correlation was found between lumbar BSI and lumbar BMD (r = − 0.49, p < 0.001) and between total femur BSI and total femur BMD (r = − 0.49, p < 0.001). A negative correlation was found between femoral neck BSI and femoral neck BMD (r = − 0.22, p < 0.001). Most DXA-based variables were individually able to discriminate between fractured and non-fractured subjects (p < 0.05), and lumbar BSI was the index with the most relative difference between the two populations, followed by femoral BSI. Conclusion: Lumbar spine and femoral BSI are sensitive to skeletal impairment in postmenopausal women suffering from T2DM. The use of BSI in conjunction with BMD and TBS can improve fracture risk assessment.

Bone Strain Index (BSI), based on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), is a densitometric index of bone strength of the femur and lumbar spine. Higher BSI values indicate a higher strain applied to bone, predisposing to higher fracture risk. This retrospective, multicentric study on Italian women reports the BSI normative age-specific reference curves. A cohort of Caucasian Italian women aged 20 to 90 years was selected from three different clinical centres. Bone mineral density (BMD) and BSI measurements were obtained for the lumbar spine vertebrae (L1–L4) and for the femur (neck, trochanter and intertrochanter) using Hologic densitometers scans. The data were compared with BMD normative values provided by the densitometer manufacturer. Then, the age-specific BSI curve for the femur and lumbar spine was generated. No significant difference was found between the BMD of the subjects in this study and BMD reference data provided by Hologic (p = 0.68 for femur and p = 0.90 for lumbar spine). Spine BSI values (L1–L4) increase by 84% between 20 and 90 years of age. The mean BSI of the total femur increases about 38% in the same age range. The BSI age-specific reference curve could help clinicians improve osteoporosis patient management, allowing an appropriate patient classification according to the bone resistance to the applied loads and fragility fracture risk assessment.

There is a strong rationale for using vitamin D in combination with anti-osteoporotic drugs. Still, available trials do not give clear indications in this setting, presenting a suboptimal and heavily inhomogeneous experimental design. Health authorities should revise requirements for using vitamin D in anti-osteoporotic drug trials to maximise their effect and produce reliable indications for clinical practice in this setting.

Bariatric surgery is associated with a postoperative reduction of 25(OH) vitamin D levels (25(OH)D) and with skeletal complications. Currently, guidelines for 25(OH)D assessment and vitamin D supplementation in bariatric patients, pre- and post-surgery, are still lacking. The aim of this work is to analyse systematically the published experience on 25(OH)D status and vitamin D supplementation, pre- and post-surgery, and to propose, on this basis, recommendations for management. Preoperatively, 18 studies including 2,869 patients were evaluated. Prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency as defined by 25(OH)D < 30 ng/mL (75 nmol/L) was 85%, whereas when defined by 25(OH)D < 20 ng/mL (50 nmol/L) was 57%. The median preoperative 25(OH)D level was 19.75 ng/mL. After surgery, 39 studies including 5,296 patients were analysed and among those undergoing either malabsorptive or restrictive procedures, a lower rate of vitamin D insufficiency and higher 25(OH)D levels postoperatively were observed in patients treated with high-dose oral vitamin D supplementation, defined as ≥ 2,000 IU/daily (mostly D3-formulation), compared with low-doses (< 2,000 IU/daily). Our recommendations based on this systematic review and meta-analysis should help clinical practice in the assessment and management of vitamin D status before and after bariatric surgery. Assessment of vitamin D should be performed pre- and postoperatively in all patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Regardless of the type of procedure, high-dose supplementation is recommended in patients after bariatric surgery.

Summary The trabecular and cortical bone assessed by bone strain index seems not to be significantly affected in NHPT. Introduction The natural history and bone involvement of normocalcemic hyperparathyroidism (NHPT) are not fully clarified yet. The bone strain index (BSI) is a deformation index based on the finite element method and can be applied to DXA scans. In this study, we aim to assess BSI in subjects with NHPT. Method A case–control study included 170 subjects: 40 subjects with NHPT, 50 subjects with primary hypercalcemic hyperparathyroidism (PHPT), and 80 controls (age- and sex-matched with the NPTH group). Results Lumbar spine (LS) bone mineral density (BMD), femoral neck (FN) BMD, total hip (TH) BMD, and TBS were similar between NHPT and both PHPT and controls. FN-BSI was lower in NHPT compared to PHPT (1.52 ± 0.31 vs 1.72 ± 0.42 p = 0.031) while there were no differences between NHPT and controls. TH-BSI was lower in NHPT compared to PHPT (1.36 ± 0.23 vs 1.52 ± 0.34, p = 0.030), while there were no differences between NHPT and controls. LS-BSI was not different between NHPT and both PHPT and controls. Conclusion The trabecular and cortical bones assessed by BSI seem not to be significantly impaired in NHPT. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings and to give an insight into the natural history of NHPT to improve knowledge and management of this condition.

Purpose Bone Strain Index (BSI) is a recently developed dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) software, applying a finite element analysis on lumbar spine and femoral DXA scans. BSI is a parameter of bone deformation, providing information on bone resistance to applied loads. BSI values indicate the average bone strain in the explored site, where a higher strain (higher BSI values) suggests a higher fracture risk. This study reports the distributional characteristics of lumbar BSI (L-BSI) in women with normal bone mass, osteopenia or osteoporosis and their relationships with BMD, weight, height and BMI. Material and methods Two-hundred-fifty-nine consecutive unfractured women who performed DXA were divided into three groups based on BMD T-score: normal bone mass (n = 43, 16.6%), osteopenia (n = 82, 31.7%) and osteoporosis (n = 134, 51.7%). The distribution of L-BSI was evaluated with conventional statistical methods, histograms and by calculating parametric and nonparametric 95% confidence intervals, together with the 90%, 95% and 99% bilateral tolerance limits with a 95% confidence. Results Ninety percent bilateral tolerance limits with 95% confidence for L-BSI distribution are 1.0–2.40, 0.95–2.63 and 0.84–3.15 in the group of patients with normal bone mass, 1.34–2.78, 1.24–2.95 and 1.05–3.32 in the osteopenic group and 1.68–3.79, 1.58–4.15 and 1.40–4.96 in the osteoporotic group. Conclusion In women without vertebral fractures at baseline, L-BSI values from 1.68 (osteoporotic group) and 2.40 (upper of the normal bone mass group) can be tentatively chosen as a lower and upper threshold to stratify postmenopausal women according to their bone resistance to loads.

Bone strain Index (BSI) is an innovative index of bone strength that provides information about skeletal resistance to loads not considered by existing indexes (Bone Mineral Density, BMD. Trabecular Bone Score, TBS. Hip Structural Analysis, HSA. Hip Axis Length, HAL), and, thus, improves the predictability of fragility fractures in osteoporotic patients. This improved predictability of fracture facilitates the possibility of timely intervention with appropriate therapies to reduce the risk of fracture. The development of the index was the result of combining clinical, radiographical and construction-engineering skills. In fact, from a physical point of view, primary and secondary osteoporosis, leading to bone fracture, are determined by an impairment of the physical properties of bone strength: density, internal structure, deformation and fatigue. Dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the gold standard for assessing bone properties, and it allows measurement of the BMD, which is reduced mainly in primary osteoporosis, the structural texture TBS, which can be particularly degraded in secondary osteoporosis, and the bone geometry (HSA, HAL). The authors recently conceived and developed a new bone deformation index named Bone Strain Index (BSI) that assesses the resistance of bone to loads. If the skeletal structure is equated to engineering construction, these three indexes are all considered to determine the load resistance of the construct. In particular, BSI allows clinicians to detect critical information that BMD and TBS cannot explain, and this information is essential for an accurate definition of a patient’s fracture risk. The literature demonstrates that both lumbar and femoral BSI discriminate fractured osteoporotic people, that they predict the first fragility fracture, and further fragility fractures, monitor anabolic treatment efficacy and detect patients affected by secondary osteoporosis. BSI is a new diagnostic tool that offers a unique perspective to clinical medicine to identify patients affected by primary and, specially, secondary osteoporosis. This literature review illustrates BSI’s state of the art and its ratio in clinical medicine.