Joshua Lee Denson

Analysis of PCORnet electronic health record data from 1.26 million outpatient influenza patients (2022–2025) found antiviral treatment prescribing was 41% overall and 44% among those at higher risk for complications. Lower prescribing may reflect multiple factors, including delayed care-seeking, suggesting opportunities to support more timely treatment and potentially reduce influenza-related complications.

This study analyzed COVID-19 disease severity distributions among different age, racial, and ethnic groups for pre-Omicron and Omicron variant periods from May 2020 to October 2022. Disease severity categories were defined by ICD-10-CM diagnostic codes recorded in the electronic health record in the 7 days preceding and 13 days following the SARS-CoV-2 positive laboratory record (index date) and were grouped into 4 mutually exclusive categories: severe complications, high, moderate, and low disease severity. Low severity was defined as the absence of codes for any of the other categories. Among 1,613,706 included patients, there was a lower prevalence of disease severity during the Omicron variant period across all race and ethnicity groups ( P P P _t P _t <0.0001). These findings provide valuable insight into patterns of COVID-19 disease severity, especially for marginalized populations, and highlight the need for targeted public health strategies as variant-specific trends evolve over time.

Rationale: Effective interventions to prevent burnout among intensive care unit (ICU) clinicians are urgently needed. Death cafés, group discussions about death, build a sense of community and create a space for reflection on distressing events. Objective: To assess whether participation in regular death cafés can prevent burnout in ICU clinicians (physicians, nurses, pharmacists, therapists). Methods: A randomized clinical trial was conducted from July 2020 to December 2022 in 10 ICUs in Louisiana. Subjects were randomized to attend four psychotherapist-facilitated virtual death cafés or to a control arm. The primary outcome was burnout defined by the Maslach Burnout Inventory–Human Services Survey at 6 months. Depression and anxiety scores were measured, as were qualitative data on stressors, coping, and death café experience. Results: Among 340 clinicians who were screened and gave consent (171 physicians, 169 nonphysicians), 251 participated (mean age, 31.0 ± 6.8 years; 63% female; 72% White; 37% nurses, 27% residents, 25% interns, 11% other). Burnout prevalence was 19% at baseline. Of 136 participants who completed the 6-month follow-up, no significant differences were found between intervention and control for the primary outcome (18% vs. 25%; unadjusted odds ratio, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.26–1.57; P = 0.33). There were no differences in anxiety or depression. Notably, the study was limited by an inability to achieve target enrollment and a high attrition rate (46%). Conclusions: Virtual death cafés were unable to reduce burnout, although the study was underpowered to detect differences between groups. Clinical trial registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04347811).

Introduction Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a life-threatening condition commonly seen in the intensive care unit. COVID-19 has dramatically increased the incidence of ARDS—with this rise in cases comes the ability to detect predisposing factors perhaps not recognised before, such as metabolic syndrome (MetS) and its associated conditions (hypertension, obesity, dyslipidaemia and type 2 diabetes mellitus). In this systematic review, we seek to describe the complex relationship between MetS, its associated conditions and ARDS (including COVID-19 ARDS). Methods and analysis A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL and Web of Science will be conducted. The population of interest is adults with ARDS and MetS (as defined according to the study author recognising that MetS definitions vary) or any MetS-associated condition. The control group will be adult patients with ARDS without MetS or any individual MetS-associated condition. We will search studies published in English, with a date restriction from the year 2000 to June 2023 and employ the search phrases ‘metabolic syndrome’, ‘acute respiratory distress syndrome’ and related terms. Search terms including ‘dyslipidaemia’, ‘hypertension’, ‘diabetes mellitus’ and ‘obesity’ will also be utilised. Outcomes of interest will include mortality (in-hospital, ICU, 28-day, 60-day and 90-day), days requiring mechanical ventilation and hospital and/or ICU length of stay. Study bias will be assessed using the NIH Bias Scale. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval is not required because this study includes previously published and publicly accessible data. Findings from this review will be disseminated via publication in a peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO registration number CRD42023405816.

Background: Hypertension and diabetes are associated with increased COVID‐19 severity. The association between level of control of these conditions and COVID‐19 severity is less well understood. Methods and Results: This retrospective cohort study identified adults with COVID‐19, March 2020 to February 2022, in 43 US health systems in the National Patient‐Centered Clinical Research Network. Hypertension control was categorized as blood pressure (BP) <130/80, 130 to 139/80 to 89, 140 to 159/90 to 99, or ≥160/100 mm Hg, and diabetes control as glycated hemoglobin <7%, 7% to <9%, ≥9%. Adjusted, pooled logistic regression assessed associations between hypertension and diabetes control and severe COVID‐19 outcomes. Among 1 494 837 adults with COVID‐19, 43% had hypertension and 12% had diabetes. Among patients with hypertension, the highest baseline BP was associated with greater odds of hospitalization (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.30 [95% CI, 1.23–1.37] for BP ≥160/100 versus BP <130/80), critical care (aOR, 1.30 [95% CI, 1.21–1.40]), and mechanical ventilation (aOR, 1.32 [95% CI, 1.17–1.50]) but not mortality (aOR, 1.08 [95% CI, 0.98–1.12]). Among patients with diabetes, the highest glycated hemoglobin was associated with greater odds of hospitalization (aOR, 1.61 [95% CI, 1.47–1.76] for glycated hemoglobin ≥9% versus <7%), critical care (aOR, 1.42 [95% CI, 1.31–1.54]), mechanical ventilation (aOR, 1.12 [95% CI, 1.02–1.23]), and mortality (aOR, 1.18 [95% CI, 1.09–1.27]). Black and Hispanic adults were more likely than White adults to experience severe COVID‐19 outcomes, independent of comorbidity score and control of hypertension or diabetes. Conclusions: Among 1.5 million patients with COVID‐19, higher BP and glycated hemoglobin were associated with more severe COVID‐19 outcomes. Findings suggest that adults with poorest control of hypertension or diabetes might benefit from efforts to prevent and initiate early treatment of COVID‐19.

OBJECTIVES: Metabolic syndrome is known to predict outcomes in COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) but has never been studied in non-COVID-19 ARDS. We therefore aimed to determine the association of metabolic syndrome with mortality among ARDS trial subjects. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of ARDS trials’ data. SETTING: An ancillary analysis was conducted using data from seven ARDS Network and Prevention and Early Treatment of Acute Lung Injury Network randomized trials within the Biologic Specimen and Data Repository Information Coordinating Center database. PATIENTS: Hospitalized patients with ARDS and metabolic syndrome (defined by obesity, diabetes, and hypertension) were compared with similar patients without metabolic syndrome (those with less than three criteria). INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. Among 4288 ARDS trial participants, 454 (10.6%) with metabolic syndrome were compared with 3834 controls (89.4%). In adjusted analyses, the metabolic syndrome group was associated with lower 28-day and 90-day mortality when compared with control (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.70 [95% CI, 0.55–0.89] and 0.75 [95% CI, 0.60–0.95], respectively). With each additional metabolic criterion from 0 to 3, adjusted 28-day mortality was reduced by 18%, 22%, and 40%, respectively. In subgroup analyses stratifying by ARDS etiology, mortality was lower for metabolic syndrome vs. control in ARDS caused by sepsis or pneumonia (at 28 d, aOR 0.64 [95% CI, 0.48–0.84] and 90 d, aOR 0.69 [95% CI, 0.53–0.89]), but not in ARDS from noninfectious causes (at 28 d, aOR 1.18 [95% CI, 0.70–1.99] and 90 d, aOR 1.26 [95% CI, 0.77–2.06]). Interaction p = 0.04 and p = 0.02 for 28- and 90-day comparisons, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Metabolic syndrome in ARDS was associated with a lower risk of mortality in non-COVID-19 ARDS. The relationship between metabolic inflammation and ARDS may provide a novel biological pathway to be explored in precision medicine-based trials.

Background: Producing scholarship in education is essential to the career development of a clinician-educator. Challenges to scholarly production include a lack of resources, time, expertise, and collaborators. Objective: To develop communities of practice for education scholarship through an international society to increase community and academic productivity. Methods: We developed multi-institutional scholarship pods within the American Thoracic Society through the creation of a working group (2017–2019). Pods met virtually, and meetings were goal focused to advance education scholarship within their area of interest. To understand the impact of these scholarship pods, we surveyed pod leaders and members in 2021 and analyzed the academic productivity of each pod via a survey of pod leaders and a review of the PubMed index. Results: Nine pods were created, each with an assigned educational topic. The survey had a response rate of 76.6%. The perceived benefits were the opportunity to meet colleagues with similar interests at other institutions, production of scholarly work, and engagement in new experiences. The main challenges were difficulty finding times to meet because of competing clinical demands and aligning times among pod members. Regarding academic productivity, eight publications, four conference presentations, and one webinar/podcast were produced by six of the nine pods. Conclusion: The development of communities of practice resulted in increased multi-site collaboration, with boosted academic productivity as well as an enhanced sense of belonging. Multiple challenges remain but can likely be overcome with accountability, early discussion of roles and expectations, and clear delegation of tasks and authorship.