Junhan Cho
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Junhan Cho has a total of 163 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Adam M. Leventhal
Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
17 shared publications - Bodour Salhia
Department of Translational Genomics, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA
13 shared publications - Chanita Hughes Halbert
Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90032, USA
13 shared publications - Fatimata Sanogo
University of Southern California 1 Department of Population and Public Health Sciences Los Angeles, California
13 shared publications - Kelsie Campbell
Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
13 shared publications - Mariana C. Stern
Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, USA
13 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 14 October 2026
- Published by Elsevier in The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
- Vol. 65
Nicotine and tobacco product use among US youth in 10th and 12th grade, 2023–2025: a repeated cross-sectional study
- 14 October 2026
- Published by Elsevier in The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
- Vol. 65
Open AccessNicotine and tobacco product use among US youth in 10th and 12th grade, 2023–2025: a repeated cross-sectional study
- Open Access
- 1 July 2026
- Published by BMJ in Tobacco Control
Flavour and brand of nicotine pouches used most often among US adolescents, 2025
Background ZYN brand and non-tobacco-flavoured products capture most of the US nicotine pouch market. Evidence of which nicotine pouch flavours and brands US youth use is critical for informing youth regulatory protections, but currently lacking. Methods We analysed data from adolescents reporting lifetime nicotine pouch use in the 2025 Monitoring the Future study, a nationally representative, in-school, cross-sectional annual survey of US 8th-grade, 10th-grade and 12th-grade students. Prevalences of nicotine pouch flavours and brands adolescents reported using most often were estimated in the overall sample and stratified by demographic characteristics and past-30-day pouch use patterns. Results Among 472 youth who used nicotine pouches in their lifetime, 97.0% (95% CI 94.6% to 98.4%) reported using nicotine pouches with a non-tobacco flavour most often; non-tobacco flavoured pouch use prevalence exceeded 93% across all demographic and past-30-day pouch use-frequency categories studied. Mint was the most commonly reported flavour used (58.6%), followed by fruit (16.0%); use of original/unflavoured pouches was rare (3.0%). ZYN was the most common brand used, reported by 79.7% (95% CI 74.1% to 84.4%) of youth. Use prevalence of ZYN versus other pouch brands was lower among non-Hispanic Black versus non-Hispanic White, but did not vary by sex, grade, population density or pouch use frequency. Conclusions Among US adolescents reporting lifetime use of nicotine pouches in 2025, use of non-tobacco flavoured pouch products was nearly universal and ZYN was the predominant brand used. Prioritising regulatory policies on flavoured pouches, especially ZYN brand products, merits consideration to reduce youth nicotine pouch use.
- 1 July 2026
- Published by BMJ in Tobacco Control
Open AccessFlavour and brand of nicotine pouches used most often among US adolescents, 2025
Background ZYN brand and non-tobacco-flavoured products capture most of the US nicotine pouch market. Evidence of which nicotine pouch flavours and brands US youth use is critical for informing youth regulatory protections, but currently lacking. Methods We analysed data from adolescents reporting lifetime nicotine pouch use in the 2025 Monitoring the Future study, a nationally representative, in-school, cross-sectional annual survey of US 8th-grade, 10th-grade and 12th-grade students. Prevalences of nicotine pouch flavours and brands adolescents reported using most often were estimated in the overall sample and stratified by demographic characteristics and past-30-day pouch use patterns. Results Among 472 youth who used nicotine pouches in their lifetime, 97.0% (95% CI 94.6% to 98.4%) reported using nicotine pouches with a non-tobacco flavour most often; non-tobacco flavoured pouch use prevalence exceeded 93% across all demographic and past-30-day pouch use-frequency categories studied. Mint was the most commonly reported flavour used (58.6%), followed by fruit (16.0%); use of original/unflavoured pouches was rare (3.0%). ZYN was the most common brand used, reported by 79.7% (95% CI 74.1% to 84.4%) of youth. Use prevalence of ZYN versus other pouch brands was lower among non-Hispanic Black versus non-Hispanic White, but did not vary by sex, grade, population density or pouch use frequency. Conclusions Among US adolescents reporting lifetime use of nicotine pouches in 2025, use of non-tobacco flavoured pouch products was nearly universal and ZYN was the predominant brand used. Prioritising regulatory policies on flavoured pouches, especially ZYN brand products, merits consideration to reduce youth nicotine pouch use.
- Open Access
- 18 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Data from Examining the Intersection between Drivers of Disparities: Social Determinants and Stress Reactivity in African American Breast Cancer Survivors
Responses to social stressors are important drivers of cancer risk and outcomes; however, current studies focus on neighborhood-level social determinants of health (SDOH). We evaluated within-subject trajectories in stress reactivity (i.e., change in salivary cortisol) among 60 African American patients with breast cancer and examined the moderating effects of social stressors on cortisol responses. SDOHs were obtained by self-report and were included in linear mixed-effects regression models that were generated for cortisol levels, including time (primary regressor) adjusting for time-invariant covariates. Significant increases in cortisol levels were observed at 12- and 24-minute post-Trier Social Stress Test tasks. Significant interactions between time and SDOHs on cortisol were identified. Higher and escalating stress reactivity was observed in patients with greater financial strain, social isolation, negative life events, and perceived stress. Social risk factors moderated stress reactivity; however, additional research is needed to understand the effects of physiologic stress reactivity on tumor etiology and progression, especially among patients who have greater exposure to social stressors.Significance:Chronic stress exposure promotes breast cancer initiation and progression; however, current studies focus on neighborhood-level deprivation even though individual variability in stress reactivity is an important driver of cancer risk and outcomes, especially among those who experience the greatest burden of disease. Self-reported data on social risk factors can be used to enhance the precision of cancer care by identifying patients who should be prioritized for referral to socially informed care and who are likely to experience dysregulated cortisol response to SDOHs.
- 18 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessData from Examining the Intersection between Drivers of Disparities: Social Determinants and Stress Reactivity in African American Breast Cancer Survivors
Responses to social stressors are important drivers of cancer risk and outcomes; however, current studies focus on neighborhood-level social determinants of health (SDOH). We evaluated within-subject trajectories in stress reactivity (i.e., change in salivary cortisol) among 60 African American patients with breast cancer and examined the moderating effects of social stressors on cortisol responses. SDOHs were obtained by self-report and were included in linear mixed-effects regression models that were generated for cortisol levels, including time (primary regressor) adjusting for time-invariant covariates. Significant increases in cortisol levels were observed at 12- and 24-minute post-Trier Social Stress Test tasks. Significant interactions between time and SDOHs on cortisol were identified. Higher and escalating stress reactivity was observed in patients with greater financial strain, social isolation, negative life events, and perceived stress. Social risk factors moderated stress reactivity; however, additional research is needed to understand the effects of physiologic stress reactivity on tumor etiology and progression, especially among patients who have greater exposure to social stressors.Significance:Chronic stress exposure promotes breast cancer initiation and progression; however, current studies focus on neighborhood-level deprivation even though individual variability in stress reactivity is an important driver of cancer risk and outcomes, especially among those who experience the greatest burden of disease. Self-reported data on social risk factors can be used to enhance the precision of cancer care by identifying patients who should be prioritized for referral to socially informed care and who are likely to experience dysregulated cortisol response to SDOHs.
- Open Access
- 18 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Table 1 from Examining the Intersection between Drivers of Disparities: Social Determinants and Stress Reactivity in African American Breast Cancer Survivors
Characteristics of study participantsa.
- 18 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessTable 1 from Examining the Intersection between Drivers of Disparities: Social Determinants and Stress Reactivity in African American Breast Cancer Survivors
Characteristics of study participantsa.
- Open Access
- 18 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Table 2 from Examining the Intersection between Drivers of Disparities: Social Determinants and Stress Reactivity in African American Breast Cancer Survivors
Associations between assessment time points and cortisol levelsa.
- 18 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessTable 2 from Examining the Intersection between Drivers of Disparities: Social Determinants and Stress Reactivity in African American Breast Cancer Survivors
Associations between assessment time points and cortisol levelsa.
- Open Access
- 18 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Table 3 from Examining the Intersection between Drivers of Disparities: Social Determinants and Stress Reactivity in African American Breast Cancer Survivors
Table 3 from Examining the Intersection between Drivers of Disparities: Social Determinants and Stress Reactivity in African American Breast Cancer Survivors
- 18 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessTable 3 from Examining the Intersection between Drivers of Disparities: Social Determinants and Stress Reactivity in African American Breast Cancer Survivors
Table 3 from Examining the Intersection between Drivers of Disparities: Social Determinants and Stress Reactivity in African American Breast Cancer Survivors
- Open Access
- 18 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Table S2 from Examining the Intersection between Drivers of Disparities: Social Determinants and Stress Reactivity in African American Breast Cancer Survivors
Summary of supplemental cortisol reactivity indices (AUCi, Peak cortisol, and ΔCortisol) by chronic stress exposures
- 18 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessTable S2 from Examining the Intersection between Drivers of Disparities: Social Determinants and Stress Reactivity in African American Breast Cancer Survivors
Summary of supplemental cortisol reactivity indices (AUCi, Peak cortisol, and ΔCortisol) by chronic stress exposures
- Open Access
- 18 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Figure S1 from Examining the Intersection between Drivers of Disparities: Social Determinants and Stress Reactivity in African American Breast Cancer Survivors
Process model of study procedures
- 18 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessFigure S1 from Examining the Intersection between Drivers of Disparities: Social Determinants and Stress Reactivity in African American Breast Cancer Survivors
Process model of study procedures
- Open Access
- 18 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Table S4 from Examining the Intersection between Drivers of Disparities: Social Determinants and Stress Reactivity in African American Breast Cancer Survivors
Interaction effects test for log-transformed cortisol levels
- 18 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessTable S4 from Examining the Intersection between Drivers of Disparities: Social Determinants and Stress Reactivity in African American Breast Cancer Survivors
Interaction effects test for log-transformed cortisol levels
- Open Access
- 18 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Table S1 from Examining the Intersection between Drivers of Disparities: Social Determinants and Stress Reactivity in African American Breast Cancer Survivors
Associations between covariates and cortisol levels
- 18 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessTable S1 from Examining the Intersection between Drivers of Disparities: Social Determinants and Stress Reactivity in African American Breast Cancer Survivors
Associations between covariates and cortisol levels