Bruce E. Shaw

Bruce E. Shaw

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article

Previous Organizations / Institutes

The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years


Bruce E. Shaw has a total of 116 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    A Scientific Vision and Roadmap for Earthquake Rupture Forecast Developments, A USGS Perspective

    by Edward H. Field, Alexandra E. Hatem, Bruce E. Shaw, Morgan T. Page, P. Martin Mai, Kevin R. Milner, Andrea L. Llenos, Andrew J. Michael, Fred F. Pollitz, Jessica Thompson Jobe, et al.

    We articulate a scientific vision and roadmap for the development of improved Earthquake Rupture Forecast (ERF) models, which are one of the two main modeling components used in modern seismic hazard and risk analysis. One primary future objective is to provide fully time-dependent models that include both elastic rebound and spatiotemporal clustering nationwide, which can be particularly important for shorter-term hazard and risk considerations (e.g., earthquake insurance products). We also discuss the importance and perennial challenges associated with quantifying epistemic uncertainties, including those associated with deformation-model slip rates, unquantified sampling errors with respect to off-fault seismicity, and any spatial covariances. The need for more physics-based approaches is also emphasized, as is the benefit of adding model valuation (quantifying usefulness) to our verification and validation protocols. Given the multidisciplinary and system-level nature of this activity, modular design is critical. Future updates will also draw from best-available science by both the U.S. Geological Survey and the external community. The primary goal of this article is to highlight plans that guide research and facilitate community engagement with model development, especially with respect to lowering the entry barrier for early-career scientists and engineers. The article is written so readers can focus on the sections that interest them most (see Manuscript Organization section), with the Introduction and the Discussion section providing a stand-alone overview and summary, respectively.


  • Deterministic Physics-Based Earthquake Sequence Simulators Match Empirical Ground-Motion Models and Enable Extrapolation to Data-Poor Regimes: Application to Multifault Multimechanism Ruptures

    by Bruce E. Shaw, Kevin R. Milner, Christine A. Goulet

    We use the deterministic earthquake simulator RSQSim to generate complex sequences of ruptures on fault systems used for hazard assessment. We show that the source motions combined with a wave propagation code create surface ground motions that fall within the range of epistemic uncertainties for the Next Generation Attenuation-West2 set of empirical models. We show the model is well calibrated where there are good data constraints, and has good correspondence in regions with fewer data constraints. We show magnitude, distance, and mechanism dependence all arising naturally from the same underlying friction. The deterministic physics-based approach provides an opportunity for better understanding the physical origins of ground motions. For example, we find that reduced stress drops in shallow layers relative to constant stress drop with depth lead to peak ground velocities in the near field that better match empirical models. The simulators may also provide better extrapolations into regimes that are poorly empirically constrained by data because physics, rather than surface shaking data parameterizations, is underlying the extrapolations. Having shown the model is credible, we apply it to a problem where observations are lacking. We examine the case of crustal faults above a shallow subduction interface seen to break coseismically in simulations of the New Zealand fault system. These types of events were left out of consideration in the most recent New Zealand national seismic hazard model due to the modeling complexity and lack of observational data to constrain ground-motion models (GMMs). Here, we show that in the model, by breaking up the coseismic crustal and interface rupturing fault motions into two separate subevents, and then recombining the resulting ground-motion measures in a square-root-of-sum-of-squares incoherent manner, we reproduce well the ground-motion measures from the full event rupture. This provides a new method for extrapolating GMMs to more complex multifault ruptures.


  • Top Cited Papers

    The Seismicity Rate Model for the 2022 Aotearoa New Zealand National Seismic Hazard Model

    by Matthew C. Gerstenberger, Russ Van Dissen, Chris Rollins, Chris DiCaprio, Kiran K. S. Thingbaijim, Sanjay Bora, Chris Chamberlain, Annemarie Christophersen, Genevieve L. Coffey, Susan M. Ellis, et al.

    A seismicity rate model (SRM) has been developed as part of the 2022 Aotearoa New Zealand National Seismic Hazard Model revision. The SRM consists of many component models, each of which falls into one of two classes: (1) inversion fault model (IFM); or (2) distributed seismicity model (DSM). Here we provide an overview of the SRM and a brief description of each of the component models. The upper plate IFM forecasts the occurrence rate for hundreds of thousands of potential ruptures derived from the New Zealand Community Fault Model version 1.0 and utilizing either geologic‐ or geodetic‐based fault‐slip rates. These ruptures are typically less than a couple of hundred kilometers long, but can exceed 1500 km and extend along most of the length of the country (albeit with very low probabilities of exceedance [PoE]). We have also applied the IFM method to the two subduction zones of New Zealand and forecast earthquake magnitudes of up to ∼ Mw 9.4, again with very low PoE. The DSM combines a hybrid model developed using multiple datasets with a non‐Poisson uniform rate zone model for lower seismicity regions of New Zealand. Forecasts for 100 yr are derived that account for overdispersion of the rate variability when compared with Poisson. Finally, the epistemic uncertainty has been modeled via the range of models and parameters implemented in an SRM logic tree. Results are presented, which indicate the sensitivity of hazard results to the logic tree branches and that were used to reduce the overall complexity of the logic tree.


  • The USGS 2023 Conterminous U.S. Time-Independent Earthquake Rupture Forecast

    by Edward H. Field, Kevin R. Milner, Alexandra E. Hatem, Peter M. Powers, Fred F. Pollitz, Andrea L. Llenos, Yuehua Zeng, Kaj M. Johnson, Bruce E. Shaw, Devin McPhillips, et al.

    We present the 2023 U.S. Geological Survey time-independent earthquake rupture forecast for the conterminous United States, which gives authoritative estimates of the magnitude, location, and time-averaged frequency of potentially damaging earthquakes throughout the region. In addition to updating virtually all model components, a major focus has been to provide a better representation of epistemic uncertainties. For example, we have improved the representation of multifault ruptures, both in terms of allowing more and less fault connectivity than in the previous models, and in sweeping over a broader range of viable models. An unprecedented level of diagnostic information has been provided for assessing the model, and the development was overseen by a 19-member participatory review panel. Although we believe the new model embodies significant improvements and represents the best available science, we also discuss potential model limitations, including the applicability of logic tree branch weights with respect different types of hazard and risk metrics. Future improvements are also discussed, with deformation model enhancements being particularly worthy of pursuit, as well as better representation of sampling errors in the gridded seismicity components. We also plan to add time-dependent components, and assess implications with a wider range of hazard and risk metrics.


  • Top Cited Papers

    The 2022 Aotearoa New Zealand National Seismic Hazard Model: Process, Overview, and Results

    by Matthew C. Gerstenberger, Sanjay Bora, Brendon A. Bradley, Chris DiCaprio, Anna Kaiser, Elena F. Manea, Andy Nicol, Chris Rollins, Mark W. Stirling, Kiran K. S. Thingbaijam, et al.

    The 2022 revision of Aotearoa New Zealand National Seismic Hazard Model (NZ NSHM 2022) has involved significant revision of all datasets and model components. In this article, we present a subset of many results from the model as well as an overview of the governance, scientific, and review processes followed by the NZ NSHM team. The calculated hazard from the NZ NSHM 2022 has increased for most of New Zealand when compared with the previous models. The NZ NSHM 2022 models and results are available online.


  • New Magnitude–Area Scaling Relations for the New Zealand National Seismic Hazard Model 2022

    by Mark Stirling, Michelle Fitzgerald, Bruce Shaw, Clarissa Ross

    We develop new magnitude–area scaling relations for application in the New Zealand National Seismic Hazard Model 2022 (NZ NSHM 2022) and future applications. A total of 18 published relations are selected, comprising the following tectonic and slip types: crustal strike‐slip (seven relations), reverse (two relations), normal (two relations), subduction interface (five relations), and two dip‐slip relations to augment the small number of available reverse and normal relations. The scaling relations are evaluated against an instrumental earthquake database flatfile, and scores are provided for each relation. Equations of the form Mw=logA+C are then used to develop mean and bounding relations for the suite of scaling relations. The final set of relations used in NZ NSHM 2022 is adjusted to be consistent with observations of major historical New Zealand earthquakes and U.S. Geological Survey practice. We also provide a second set of Mw=logA+C relations that are absent of these adjustments and so more directly reflect the results of our scoring of the published relations.


  • Open Access

    A Novel Method to Determine Probabilistic Tsunami Hazard Using a Physics‐Based Synthetic Earthquake Catalog: A New Zealand Case Study

    by Laura Hughes, William Power, Emily M. Lane, Martha K. Savage, Richard Arnold, Andrew Howell, Bruce Shaw, Bill Fry, Andrew Nicol

    Tsunamis can have devastating consequences for coastal communities. Yet hazards from future tsunamis are difficult to quantify due to their rarity in the instrumental record. Statistical earthquake catalogs have previously been used to quantify tsunami hazards. For the first time, we use a physics‐based synthetic earthquake catalog to assess probabilistic tsunami hazard in a local region. We analyze a 30,000‐year catalog to capture a wide range of the source complexity evident in tsunamigenic earthquakes. We produce models of land‐surface displacements and subsequent tsunamis from 2,585 earthquakes with magnitude > MW 7.0. Modeled slip of the Hikurangi and Tonga‐Kermadec subduction thrusts generated maximum wave heights at the coast of up to 28 m and these earthquakes pose the greatest tsunami hazard along New Zealand's coastline. The results provide a “proof of concept” for using earthquake simulators for probabilistic tsunami hazard models. They further present a platform upon which next‐generation probabilistic tsunami inundation models may be constructed.


  • Comparison of Ground-Shaking Hazard for Segmented versus Multifault Earthquake-Rupture Models in Aotearoa New Zealand

    by Andy Howell, Andrew Nicol, Sanjay Bora, Matt Gerstenberger, Russ Van Dissen, Chris Chamberlain, Christopher J. DiCaprio, Chris Rollins, Mark Stirling, Oakley Jurgens, et al.

    Multifault ruptures are common for historical earthquakes, and here we consider their impact on seismic hazard. We compare ground‐shaking hazard forecasts from the 2022 Aotearoa New Zealand National Seismic Hazard Model (NZ NSHM 2022), which incorporates many multifault ruptures (referred to as the multifault model) with modeled hazard from a simpler model of characteristic earthquakes on individual faults or fault segments (referred to as the segmented model). The multifault model includes very‐low‐probability rupture lengths of up to ∼1100 km and a mean of 221–234 km, whereas the segmented model primarily comprises rupture lengths of <200 km (mean, 43–51 km) and the maximum of 414 km. The annual rates of Mw 6.9–7.5 earthquakes are more than an order of magnitude higher for the segmented model (0.132–0.24/yr; recurrence times ∼4–7 yr) than the multifault model (0.027/yr; recurrence times 37 yr). Conversely, the rates of earthquakes are similar for segmented and multifault models at Mw>7.5 (0.018–0.031/yr; recurrence times 32–56 yr). Despite differences in rupture lengths and annual rates of earthquakes, the calculated ground‐shaking hazard at 10% probability of exceedance (PoE) in 50 yr for the segmented model differs by <55% compared with the multifault model for 95% of sites across Aotearoa New Zealand. For 50% of sites, the modeled hazard differs by <20% between the two models. If a distributed seismicity model (DSM) is included in the hazard calculations, 95% of sites differ in modeled hazard by <18%, and 50% of sites differ by <2.2%. In most areas, seismic hazard at 10% PoE in 50 yr is greater for the segmented model than the multifault model, with notable exceptions along the central Alpine fault in the western South Island and the Taupō volcanic zone in the central North Island.


  • Open Access

    Impact of Variable Fault Geometries and Slip Rates on Earthquake Catalogs From Physics‐Based Simulations of a Normal Fault

    by Efstratios Delogkos, Andrew Howell, Hannu Seebeck, Bruce E. Shaw, Andrew Nicol, Yi‐Wun Mika Liao, John J. Walsh

    Physics‐based earthquake simulators have been developed to overcome the relatively short duration and incompleteness of historical earthquake and paleoseismic records, respectively. These simulators have the potential to be a useful addition to seismic hazard assessment as they produce millions of synthetic earthquakes over thousands to millions of years using predefined fault geometries and slip rates. Due to the sparsity of fault data and the computational expense of the modeling, it is common to simplify earthquake simulator input parameters. Fault surfaces are typically characterized by simplified mapped traces and constant dip with depth, with slip rates that are often assumed to be uniform over the fault plane. This study uses the well‐defined 3D geometry of an active normal fault in offshore Aotearoa New Zealand, the Cape Egmont Fault, to demonstrate the impact of using nonuniform slip rates and nonplanar fault geometries on the resulting synthetic earthquakes from the earthquake simulator RSQSim. Adopting variable slip rates that decrease to zero along the fault tipline (rather than uniform slip rates) reduces unrealistically high nucleation rates of seismicity along fault edges. Introduction of complex 3D fault geometries, including fault segmentation and bends on kilometer scales, and variable slip rates produces less characteristic earthquake populations, increasing the number of M6‐7 moderate‐large magnitude events. Incorporation of variable fault geometries and slip rates in physics‐based simulators may modify the seismic hazards estimated from synthetic earthquake catalogs.