Elena Galli

Background: Current stroke prevention strategies in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) rely on the detection of atrial fibrillation (AF), although thromboembolic events may occur before arrhythmia is documented. These observations support atrial cardiomyopathy as the substrate for thrombogenesis and highlight the need for imaging-guided risk stratification. Left atrial reservoir strain (LARS), derived from speckle-tracking echocardiography, detects atrial dysfunction earlier than left atrial enlargement and has been associated with AF and thromboembolic events. The LA-HCM trial evaluates whether rivaroxaban reduces thromboembolic events in patients with HCM, sinus rhythm, no documented AF, and impaired LARS. LA-HCM is a prospective, multicentre, randomized, open-label trial with blinded endpoint adjudication (PROBE design), sponsored by Rennes University Hospital and conducted in 17 French centres. A total of 532 adults with HCM, sinus rhythm, no documented AF, and core-laboratory-confirmed LARS ≤20% are randomized 1:1 to rivaroxaban or standard care. Participants are followed for 24 months. The primary endpoint is the composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke—including newly detected silent cerebral infarction on paired baseline and 24-month brain MRI—and systemic embolism at 24 months. LA-HCM tests whether rivaroxaban improves outcomes in a population with HCM, no documented AF, and impaired LARS. It evaluates a LARS-based treatment-allocation strategy but is not designed to validate the predictive utility or optimal threshold of LARS.

Background: Posterior mitral leaflet hypoplasia is a rare condition, generally diagnosed in children. This paper presents three adult cases of posterior leaflet hypoplasia and comprehensively reviews the existing literature. Methods and Results: All patients presented with severe mitral regurgitation necessitating hospitalization. Transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography were performed to determine the underlying etiology, revealing pronounced posterior mitral leaflet hypoplasia. Each case was evaluated by a multidisciplinary heart team. Surgical mitral valve intervention was feasible in two patients. In one high-risk patient, percutaneous treatment options for MR were explored but ultimately deemed unsuitable due to the anatomical characteristics of the valve. The patient was consequently managed conservatively with medical therapy. Conclusions: These cases demonstrate that posterior mitral leaflet hypoplasia may constitute an underrecognized cause of severe primary mitral regurgitation in adults. The management of such cases can be particularly challenging due to the atypical valvular morphology.

Background The best management of symptomatic patients with low-gradient (LG) severe aortic stenosis (AS) and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) has not been established. The Randomised study for the Optimal Treatment of symptomatic patients with low-gradient severe Aortic valve Stenosis (ROTAS) trial aimed to assess the superiority of aortic valve replacement (AVR) versus medical treatment (MT) in this specific group of AS patients. Methods Patients with symptomatic LG severe AS and preserved LVEF (>50%) underwent dobutamine stress echocardiography and/or CT-aortic calcium score to confirm AS severity and were then randomised 1:1 to AVR or MT. The primary endpoint was a composite of overall death and/or cardiovascular hospitalisation. Results The ROTAS study was stopped early because of insufficient recruitment. In the end, only 52 patients (age 79±7 years; women 54%; NYHA III-IV 27%; median STS score 3.3%) were included in the study. During follow-up (mean: 14±7 months), the primary endpoint occurred in 12 (23%) patients. Compared with MT, AVR was not associated with a significant prognostic benefit (events: 5/26 (19%) vs 7/26 (27%) (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.24 to 2.39, p=0.63). During follow-up, 11 (42%) patients in the MT group developed class I criteria for AVR or severe symptoms justifying a cross-over to the AVR group. Conclusions Because of the small number of included patients and short follow-up the ROTAS trial was underpowered and unable to demonstrate a difference in the study endpoint between treatment arms. In patients in the MT arm, a regular echocardiographic and clinical assessment might be useful to disclose those developing class I indications of AVR or severe AS-related symptoms. Trial registration number NCT01835028.

Cancer and heart failure (HF) are increasingly relevant worldwide, both from an epidemiologic and clinical point of view. This review aims to explore the relationship between cancer and HF by underscoring risk factors and disclosing the cardiotoxic effects of the current chemotherapy agents. We also deal with the current evidence on the diagnosis and management of HF related to cancer therapy. Finally, we will address the main gaps in knowledge and future perspectives in this field.

Aims: The European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) Scientific Initiatives Committee performed a global survey on radiation exposure in interventional echocardiography. The survey aimed to collect data on local practices for radioprotection in interventional echocardiography and to assess the awareness of echocardiography operators about radiation-related risks. Methods and results: A total of 258 interventional echocardiographers from 52 different countries (48% European) responded to the survey. One hundred twenty-two (47%) participants were women. Two-thirds (76%) of interventional echocardiographers worked in tertiary care/university hospitals. Interventional echocardiography was the main clinical activity for 34% of the survey participants. The median time spent in the cath-lab for the echocardiographic monitoring of structural heart procedures was 10 (5–20) hours/month. Despite this, only 28% of interventional echocardiographers received periodic training and certification in radioprotection and 72% of them did not know their annual radiation dose. The main adopted personal protection devices were lead aprons and thyroid collars (95% and 92% of use, respectively). Dedicated architectural protective shielding was not available for 33% of interventional echocardiographers. Nearly two-thirds of responders thought that the radiation exposure of interventional echocardiographers was higher than that of interventional cardiologists and 72% claimed for an improvement in the radioprotection measures. Conclusion: Radioprotection measures for interventional echocardiographers are widely variable across centres. Radioprotection devices are often underused by interventional echocardiographers, portending an increased radiation-related risk. International scientific societies working in the field should collaborate to endorse radioprotection training, promote reliable radiation dose assessment, and support the adoption of radioprotection shielding dedicated to interventional echocardiographers.

Background: The response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) depends on septal viability and correction of abnormal septal motion. This study investigates if cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) as a single modality can identify CRT responders with combined imaging of pathological septal motion (septal flash) and septal scar. Methods: In a prospective, multicenter, observational study of 136 CRT recipients, septal scar was assessed using late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) (n = 127) and septal flash visually from cine CMR sequences. The primary endpoint was CRT response, defined as ≥15% reduction in LV end-systolic volume with echocardiography after 6 months. The secondary endpoint was heart transplantation or death of any cause assessed after 39 ± 13 months. Results: Septal scar and septal flash were independent predictors of CRT response in multivariable analysis (both p < 0.001), while QRS duration and morphology were not. The combined approach of septal scar and septal flash predicted CRT response with an area under the curve of 0.86 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.78–0.94) and was a strong predictor of long-term survival without heart transplantation (hazard ratio 0.27, 95% CI: 0.10–0.79). The accuracy of the approach was similar in the subgroup with intermediate (130–150 ms) QRS duration. The combined approach was superior to septal scar and septal flash alone (p < 0.01). Conclusions: The combined assessment of septal scar and septal flash using CMR as a single-image modality identifies CRT responders with high accuracy and predicts long-term survival.

Background and aim: The presence of mechanical dyssynchrony on echocardiography is associated with reverse remodelling and decreased mortality after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Contrarily, myocardial scar reduces the effect of CRT. This study investigated how well a combined assessment of different markers of mechanical dyssynchrony and scarring identifies CRT responders. Methods: In a prospective multicentre study of 170 CRT recipients, septal flash (SF), apical rocking (ApRock), systolic stretch index (SSI), and lateral-to-septal (LW-S) work differences were assessed using echocardiography. Myocardial scarring was quantified using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) or excluded based on a coronary angiogram and clinical history. The primary endpoint was a CRT response, defined as a ≥15% reduction in LV end-systolic volume 12 months after implantation. The secondary endpoint was time-to-death. Results: The combined assessment of mechanical dyssynchrony and septal scarring showed AUCs ranging between 0.81 (95%CI: 0.74–0.88) and 0.86 (95%CI: 0.79–0.91) for predicting a CRT response, without significant differences between the markers, but significantly higher than mechanical dyssynchrony alone. QRS morphology, QRS duration, and LV ejection fraction were not superior in their prediction. Predictive power was similar in the subgroups of patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. The combined assessments significantly predicted all-cause mortality at 44 ± 13 months after CRT with a hazard ratio ranging from 0.28 (95%CI: 0.12–0.67) to 0.20 (95%CI: 0.08–0.49). Conclusions: The combined assessment of mechanical dyssynchrony and septal scarring identified CRT responders with high predictive power. Both visual and quantitative markers were highly feasible and demonstrated similar results. This work demonstrates the value of imaging LV mechanics and scarring in CRT candidates, which can already be achieved in a clinical routine.

Background: The noninvasive assessment of myocardial work (MW) allows for the evaluation of left ventricular (LV) performance by considering the effect of LV afterload. This study aims to evaluate the acute and chronic impact of transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) on MW parameters and LV remodeling in patients with severe primary mitral regurgitation (PMR). Methods: A total of 71 patients (age: 77 ± 9 years, females: 44%) with moderate–to-severe or severe PMR (effective regurgitant orifice: 0.57 ± 0.31 cm²; regurgitant volume: 80 ± 34 mL; LV end-systolic diameter: 42 ± 12 mm) underwent TEER after a global assessment by the heart team. MW indices were evaluated before the procedure, at hospital discharge, and at 1-year follow-up. LV remodeling was described as the percentage variation in LVEDV between baseline and 1-year follow-up. Results: TEER caused an acute reduction in LVEF, global longitudinal strain (GLS), global MW index (GWI), work efficiency (GWE), and mechanical dispersion (MD) and a significant increase in wasted work (GWW). One year after the procedure, GLS, GWI, GWE, and MD recovered, whereas GWW remained significantly impaired. Baseline GWW (β = −0.29, p = 0.03) was an independent predictor of LV reverse remodeling at 1-year follow-up. Conclusions: In patients with severe PMR undergoing TEER, the acute reduction in LV preload causes significant impairment to all the parameters of LV performance. Baseline GWW was the only independent predictor of LV reverse remodeling, suggesting that a lower myocardial energetic efficiency in the context of chronic preload increase might impact the left ventricular response to mitral regurgitation correction.