Paul J. Nederkoorn

Background and ObjectivesPoststroke fatigue (PSF) in young adults is a common symptom with devastating consequences. Data on the prevalence, trajectory, and prognostic factors of PSF in young adult...

Background and ObjectivesEnlarged perivascular spaces (EPVSs) in the basal ganglia (BG-EPVS) are an important marker of cerebral small vessel disease (cSVD), and EPVS in the centrum semiovale (CSO-...

Introduction: The Colchicine for prevention of vascular inflammation in Non-CardioEmbolic stroke (CONVINCE) trial showed that recurrent events were significantly reduced among colchicine-adherent non-cardioembolic stroke patients in the on-treatment analysis. This study aimed to validate the SMART-REACH risk score in stroke patients, and to determine whether colchicine’s efficacy varies by baseline atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk. Patients and methods: Patients with non-severe non-cardioembolic ischaemic stroke/transient ischaemic attack (TIA) were randomised to colchicine 0.5 mg plus usual care or usual care alone. Participants were stratified into moderate (10%–19%), high (20%–30%) and very high (≥30%) 10-year ASCVD risk categories using the SMART-REACH model. Model performance was assessed using the C-statistic and calibration plots. The primary endpoint (major adverse cardiovascular events [MACE]) was a composite of fatal or non-fatal recurrent ischaemic stroke, myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest or hospitalisation for unstable angina. Results: Among 3144 patients, MACE incidence significantly increased with ASCVD risk levels: 7.2% (moderate), 8.8% (high) and 13.8% (very high) (P < .01). The C-statistic for 3-year risk of MACE was 0.59 (95% CI, 0.56–0.63). While no statistically significant treatment interaction was found (P = .88), absolute risk reductions (ARRs) were more pronounced in higher-risk groups: moderate risk 7.2% (colchicine) vs 7.2% (usual care) (hazard ratio [HR] 1.01; 95% CI, 0.55–1.83); high risk 7.7% vs 9.8% (ARR 2.1%; HR 0.79; 95% CI, 0.53–1.18); very high risk 12.5% vs 15.2% (ARR 2.7%; HR 0.85; 95% CI, 0.64–1.12). Discussion and Conclusion: We identified an association between very high baseline ASCVD risk (≥30%) assigned by the SMART-REACH score and increased recurrent MACE. Although no significant treatment interaction was observed, patients in higher risk categories may represent a more promising target population for secondary prevention with colchicine. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02898610.

Previous antiplatelet therapy (APT) may influence outcomes in patients undergoing direct endovascular therapy (EVT) for anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke, but evidence on clinical benefits and safety is limited and inconsistent. We aimed to evaluate the effects of previous APT on the outcomes of direct EVT. We conducted a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients treated at 20 high-volume stroke centers across 9 European countries and Israel (EVA-TRISP registry, 2015-2023). We included adults with anterior circulation LVO strokes, without previous use of IV thrombolysis (IVT) or anticoagulants. We compared outcomes of direct EVT patients stratified by previous APT regimen, using propensity score matching based on medical history and multilevel models to address confounders. The primary outcome was the 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. The secondary efficacy outcomes were 90-day independence and the rate of successful reperfusion. The secondary safety outcomes were the rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and mortality. Among 12,950 patients, 2,611 met the criteria and 1,308 were matched: 480 without previous APT and 828 with any previous APT, among whom 764 were on single APT and 64 on dual APT. The overall mean age was 75.8 ± 11.4 years, and 49.4% were female; the mean NIH Stroke Scale score was 13.1 ± 7.2 points, the successful reperfusion rate was 74.7%, and the median mRS score was 3 (interquartile range 2-4), with 38.8% of patients independent at 90 days. When compared with no previous APT, any previous APT was associated with a shift toward lower mRS scores at 90 days (odds ratio [OR] 1.30, CI 1.04-1.61, p = 0.018). Independence at 90 days was associated with any previous APT (OR 1.62, CI 1.22-2.16, p = 0.001). Any previous APT was not associated with successful reperfusion (OR 0.96, CI 0.69-1.35, p = 0.821), sICH (OR 1.06, CI 0.47-2.39, p = 0.880), or mortality (OR 0.89, CI 0.66-1.21, p = 0.821). There was no significant interaction between any previous APT and proximal/distal occlusion location (p = 0.213) or time-to-groin earlier/later than 6 hours (p = 0.743). In patients with anterior circulation LVO stroke treated with direct EVT and no previous anticoagulation, pretreatment with any APT was independently linked to better 90-day functional outcomes and higher independence, without increasing sICH risk. This study provides Class III evidence that, in patients with anterior circulation LVO stroke treated with direct EVT, previous APT is associated with better 90-day functional outcomes compared with no previous APT.

Current international guidelines recommend blood pressure (BP) thresholds for patients eligible for endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). Previous studies have suggested that both low and high admission BPs are associated with poor functional outcome after EVT. However, the association between admission BP and outcomes after EVT remains poorly understood.The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between admission systolic BP (SBP) and outcomes in patients treated with EVT and to assess whether this association is modified by IV thrombolysis (IVT) treatment and recanalization status. In this observational, international, multicenter cohort study, we used data from the EVA-TRISP registry. Consecutive patients treated with EVT with available admission SBP were included. The primary outcome was 90-day functional outcome. Secondary outcomes included 90-day mortality, 24-hour NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS), successful recanalization, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). We used multivariable regression to study the relation between admission SBP and outcomes and to assess effect modification by IVT treatment and recanalization status. We included 10.963 EVT patients. At baseline, the mean age was 72.8 years (SD 13.5), 50.2% were female and the median NIHSS at presentation was 15 (interquartile range 9-19). The association between admission SBP and functional outcome, mortality, and 24-hour NIHSS score was U-shaped, and the nadir was around 150 mm Hg. Below 150 mm Hg, every 10 mm Hg decrease in SBP was associated with higher odds of poor functional outcome (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.07 [95% CI 1.02-1.11]) and mortality (aOR 1.17 [1.12-1.23]). Above 150 mm Hg, every 10 mm Hg increase in SBP was associated with higher odds of poor functional outcome (aOR 1.05 [1.01-1.08]), mortality (aOR 1.04 [1.01-1.09]), and higher 24-hour NIHSS score (β-coefficient 0.28 [0.17-0.40]). We found a positive linear relationship between admission SBP and sICH (1.04 [1.01-1.08]). IVT treatment modified the association between admission SBP and outcomes after EVT. In 5544 EVT-only treated patients, there was no longer a clear association between higher admission SBP values and worse outcome. Lower and higher admission SBP was associated with worse outcomes in the complete cohort. In EVT-only patients, this association was less evident, suggesting that high admission BP alone should not always delay or preclude treatment with EVT in otherwise eligible patients.

Introduction: After positive findings in clinical trials the time window for endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for patients with an acute ischemic stroke has been expanded up to 24 h from symptom onset or last seen well (LSW). We aimed to compare EVT patients’ characteristics and outcomes in the early versus extended time window and to compare outcomes with the DAWN and DEFUSE 3 trial results. Patients and methods: Consecutive EVT patients from 16 mostly European comprehensive stroke centers from the EVA-TRISP cohort were included. We compared rates of 90-day good functional outcomes (Modified Rankin Scale 0–2), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and 90-day mortality between patients treated in the early (<6 h after onset or LSW) versus extended (6–24 h after onset or LSW) time windows. Results: We included 9313 patients, of which 6876 were treated in the early and 2437 in the extended time window. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score at presentation was lower in patients treated in the extended time window (median 13 [IQR 7–18] vs 15 [IQR 9–19], p < 0.001). The percentage of patients with good functional outcome was slightly lower in the extended time window (37.4% vs 42.2%, p < 0.001). However, rates of successful recanalization, sICH, and mortality were similar. Good functional outcome rates after EVT were slightly lower for patients in the extended window in the EVA-TRISP cohort as compared to DAWN and DEFUSE 3. Discussion and conclusion: According to this large multicenter cohort study reflecting daily clinical practice, EVT use in the extended time window appears safe and effective.

Background: Intracranial artery calcification detected on CT imaging is a recognized risk factor for ischemic cerebrovascular diseases, but the underlying etiology of this association remains unclear. Differences in objective morphometric characteristics of these calcifications may partially explain this association, yet these measurements are largely absent in the literature. We investigated intracranial artery calcification morphometry in patients with recent anterior ischemic stroke or TIA, assessing potential differences between calcifications in both intracranial carotid arteries (ICAs) located ipsilateral and contralateral to the cerebral ischemia. Methods: Among 100 patients (mean age 69.6 (SD 8.8) years) presenting to academic neurology departments, 3D reconstructions of both ICAs were based on clinical CT-angiography images. On these reconstructions, a luminal centerline and cross-sections perpendicular to this centerline were created, facilitating the assessment of calcification morphometry, spatial orientation and stenosis severity. Differences in calcification characteristics between ICAs were assessed using two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank and χ² tests. Results: Among 200 arteries, a median of four (IQR 2–6) individual calcifications were counted, with a mean area of 1.8 (IQR 1.2–2.7) mm², a mean arc width of 43.5 (IQR 32.3–53.2) degrees, and median longitudinal extent of 15.4 (IQR 5.9–27.0) mm. Calcifications were most often present in the anatomical C4 section (56.0%), with predominantly posterosuperior orientation (38.5%) and 42.0% had a local stenosis severity > 70%. None of these aspects significantly differed between ICAs, and this remained after restricting analyses to patients with undetermined etiology. Conclusions: We found no differences in morphometrical or spatial aspects of calcifications between ICAs ipsilateral and contralateral to the cerebral ischemia.