Benito Arruñada
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Benito Arruñada has a total of 103 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Alberto Fernández
6 shared publicationsLuis Vázquez
University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
6 shared publicationsLuis Garicano
IE Business School; Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR)
5 shared publicationsManuel González Díaz
Universidad de Oviedo - Facultad de Economicas
5 shared publications- Manuel González-Díaz
University of Oviedo
5 shared publications - Veneta Andonova
School of Management, Universidad de los Andes, Bogota, Colombia
4 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 29 January 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization
- Vol. 243
Mendicant orders and the foundations of impersonal exchange
- 29 January 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization
- Vol. 243
Open AccessMendicant orders and the foundations of impersonal exchange
- 24 March 2021
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 1-8
Titling Systems
- Open Access
- 28 August 2020
- Published by Ministerio de Economía, Comercio y Empresa (MINECO) in ICE, Revista de Economía
- No. 915
Malas leyes
Este artículo explora la correspondencia entre las preferencias dominantes en la ciudadanía y varios atributos característicos del Derecho español. En relación con países europeos de similar tamaño, los españoles mostramos en promedio unas marcadas preferencias estatistas y contrarias a la competencia, las cuales favorecerían una concepción finalista de las leyes; así como una tendencia a imponer excesivas reglas imperativas sobre la libertad contractual. En la medida en que las disfunciones estructurales de nuestro marco normativo corresponden a las preferencias ciudadanas, estas podrían explicar la proliferación de las reformas y su reiterado fracaso.
- 28 August 2020
- Published by Ministerio de Economía, Comercio y Empresa (MINECO) in ICE, Revista de Economía
- No. 915
Open AccessMalas leyes
Este artículo explora la correspondencia entre las preferencias dominantes en la ciudadanía y varios atributos característicos del Derecho español. En relación con países europeos de similar tamaño, los españoles mostramos en promedio unas marcadas preferencias estatistas y contrarias a la competencia, las cuales favorecerían una concepción finalista de las leyes; así como una tendencia a imponer excesivas reglas imperativas sobre la libertad contractual. En la medida en que las disfunciones estructurales de nuestro marco normativo corresponden a las preferencias ciudadanas, estas podrían explicar la proliferación de las reformas y su reiterado fracaso.
- 12 May 2020
- Published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH in European Property Law Journal
- Vol. 8 (3) , 231-259
Prospects of Blockchain in Contract and Property
Recurrent difficulties are delaying what for the time being are still modest applications of blockchain. This paper identifies what value this new technology adds to the contractual and property processes, exploring its potential and analyzing the main difficulties it is facing. Paying particular attention to the distinction between contract (personal or in personam) rights and property (real or in rem) rights, it first examines the difficulties for trading contract rights through blockchain-based applications, mainly those to complete contracts ex ante without relying on third-party enforcers. Second, it explores the difficulties faced by blockchain to enable trade in property rights.
- 12 May 2020
- Published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH in European Property Law Journal
- Vol. 8 (3) , 231-259
Prospects of Blockchain in Contract and Property
Recurrent difficulties are delaying what for the time being are still modest applications of blockchain. This paper identifies what value this new technology adds to the contractual and property processes, exploring its potential and analyzing the main difficulties it is facing. Paying particular attention to the distinction between contract (personal or in personam) rights and property (real or in rem) rights, it first examines the difficulties for trading contract rights through blockchain-based applications, mainly those to complete contracts ex ante without relying on third-party enforcers. Second, it explores the difficulties faced by blockchain to enable trade in property rights.
- Open Access
- 23 February 2020
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Prospects of Blockchain in Contract and Property
Recurrent difficulties are delaying what for the time being are still modest applications of blockchain. This paper identifies what value this new technology adds to the contractual and property processes, exploring its potential and analyzing the main difficulties it is facing. Paying particular attention to the distinction between contract (personal or in personam) rights and property (real or in rem) rights, it first examines the difficulties for trading contract rights through blockchain-based applications, mainly those to complete contracts ex ante without relying on third-party enforcers. Second, it explores the difficulties faced by blockchain to enable trade in property rights.
- 23 February 2020
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Open AccessProspects of Blockchain in Contract and Property
Recurrent difficulties are delaying what for the time being are still modest applications of blockchain. This paper identifies what value this new technology adds to the contractual and property processes, exploring its potential and analyzing the main difficulties it is facing. Paying particular attention to the distinction between contract (personal or in personam) rights and property (real or in rem) rights, it first examines the difficulties for trading contract rights through blockchain-based applications, mainly those to complete contracts ex ante without relying on third-party enforcers. Second, it explores the difficulties faced by blockchain to enable trade in property rights.
- 14 January 2020
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Journal of Institutional Economics
- Vol. 16 (3) , 251-269
The impact of experience on how we perceive the rule of law
Experience is a major source of knowledge. Could institutions be improved by eliciting the additional knowledge held by experienced individuals? I show here that in several areas of the law experienced individuals are more critical of institutional quality than inexperienced individuals. Moreover, performance indexes built with experienced subsamples substantially alter country rankings. Assuming no unmeasured confounders, more knowledge arguably leads experienced individuals to revise the more benign view held by the general population, composed mostly of inexperienced individuals. Moreover, experience is a stronger driver than alternative sources of knowledge, including education, which might therefore be reinforcing milder and, arguably, incorrect assessments of institutional quality. After observing how this ‘experience effect’ varies systematically across countries, I conclude by proposing that evaluations of institutional quality pay greater attention to experienced individuals and cautioning against basing inferences on assessments made by the general population.
- 14 January 2020
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Journal of Institutional Economics
- Vol. 16 (3) , 251-269
The impact of experience on how we perceive the rule of law
Experience is a major source of knowledge. Could institutions be improved by eliciting the additional knowledge held by experienced individuals? I show here that in several areas of the law experienced individuals are more critical of institutional quality than inexperienced individuals. Moreover, performance indexes built with experienced subsamples substantially alter country rankings. Assuming no unmeasured confounders, more knowledge arguably leads experienced individuals to revise the more benign view held by the general population, composed mostly of inexperienced individuals. Moreover, experience is a stronger driver than alternative sources of knowledge, including education, which might therefore be reinforcing milder and, arguably, incorrect assessments of institutional quality. After observing how this ‘experience effect’ varies systematically across countries, I conclude by proposing that evaluations of institutional quality pay greater attention to experienced individuals and cautioning against basing inferences on assessments made by the general population.
- Open Access
- 29 November 2019
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
The Impact of Experience on How We Perceive the Rule of Law
Experience is a major source of knowledge. Could institutions be improved by eliciting the additional knowledge held by experienced individuals? I show here that in several areas of the law experienced individuals are more critical of institutional quality than inexperienced individuals. Moreover, performance indexes built with experienced subsamples substantially alter country rankings. Assuming no unmeasured confounders, more knowledge arguably leads experienced individuals to revise the more benign view held by the general population, composed mostly of inexperienced individuals. Moreover, experience is a stronger driver than alternative sources of knowledge, including education, which might therefore be reinforcing milder and, arguably, incorrect assessments of institutional quality. After observing how this “experience effect” varies systematically across countries, I conclude by proposing that evaluations of institutional quality pay greater attention to experienced individuals and cautioning against basing inferences on assessments made by the general population.
- 29 November 2019
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Open AccessThe Impact of Experience on How We Perceive the Rule of Law
Experience is a major source of knowledge. Could institutions be improved by eliciting the additional knowledge held by experienced individuals? I show here that in several areas of the law experienced individuals are more critical of institutional quality than inexperienced individuals. Moreover, performance indexes built with experienced subsamples substantially alter country rankings. Assuming no unmeasured confounders, more knowledge arguably leads experienced individuals to revise the more benign view held by the general population, composed mostly of inexperienced individuals. Moreover, experience is a stronger driver than alternative sources of knowledge, including education, which might therefore be reinforcing milder and, arguably, incorrect assessments of institutional quality. After observing how this “experience effect” varies systematically across countries, I conclude by proposing that evaluations of institutional quality pay greater attention to experienced individuals and cautioning against basing inferences on assessments made by the general population.
- 12 April 2019
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 2036-2043
Titling Systems