Rossella Bertulli
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Rossella Bertulli has a total of 415 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Paolo Giovanni Casali
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Department of Medical Oncology, Via Giacomo Venezian n1, Milano, 20133
31 shared publications - Alessandro Gronchi
Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
17 shared publications - Paola Collini
Soft Tissue Tumor Pathology Unit, Department of Advanced Diagnostics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
11 shared publications - Silvia Stacchiotti
Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
9 shared publications - Marco Fiore
Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
8 shared publications - Laura Lozza
Radiotherapy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
6 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 20 January 2025
- Published by Wiley in Pediatric Blood & Cancer
- Vol. 72 (4) , e31551
Intensified Induction Therapy for Newly Diagnosed, Localized Skeletal Ewing Sarcoma (ISG/AIEOP EW‐1): A Randomized, Open‐Label, Phase 3, Non‐Inferiority Trial
Background: Several studies have shown that the intensity of treatment in Ewing sarcoma has an impact on outcome. The present trial tested the non‐inferiority of intensive, shorter, induction chemotherapy (25 weeks total treatment time) compared to the standard treatment (37 weeks) in non‐metastatic Ewing sarcoma (ES) at onset.Procedure: This national, multicenter, parallel, randomized, controlled, open‐label, non‐inferiority, phase III trial was conducted in 14 specialized hospitals in Italy. Patients aged 2‐40 years with newly diagnosed localized ES were randomized to receive four courses of induction therapy (one every 21 days) either with a standard arm (Arm A) or with an intensive arm (Arm B). For consolidation therapy, good responders (GRs) in Arm A received nine courses (37 weeks), while Arm B patients received five courses (25 weeks). Poor responders for both arms received four courses followed by high‐dose busulfan/melphalan + autologous stem cell rescue. Follow‐up was 5 years.Results: In the study period 2009–2018, 274 patients with ES at onset were screened, 248 were eligible, 15 refused randomization, and 233 were randomized (Arm A: 113; Arm B: 120). Median age was 14 years. Arm B was not inferior to Arm A: 5‐year EFS was 77.5% and 71.6%, respectively (HR vs. Arm A: 0.74, 90% CI: 0.49–1.14). GRs were 54.9% in Arm A and 62.5% in Arm B. Hematological, gastrointestinal, and cardiovascular Grade ≥3 toxicities had higher frequencies in Arm B.Conclusions: Intensive induction therapy showed non‐inferiority in 5‐year EFS when compared with the standard induction therapy. Higher toxicity was reported in Arm B with similar outcome, counterbalanced in GRs with a shorter treatment plan. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02063022.
- 20 January 2025
- Published by Wiley in Pediatric Blood & Cancer
- Vol. 72 (4) , e31551
Open AccessIntensified Induction Therapy for Newly Diagnosed, Localized Skeletal Ewing Sarcoma (ISG/AIEOP EW‐1): A Randomized, Open‐Label, Phase 3, Non‐Inferiority Trial
Background: Several studies have shown that the intensity of treatment in Ewing sarcoma has an impact on outcome. The present trial tested the non‐inferiority of intensive, shorter, induction chemotherapy (25 weeks total treatment time) compared to the standard treatment (37 weeks) in non‐metastatic Ewing sarcoma (ES) at onset.Procedure: This national, multicenter, parallel, randomized, controlled, open‐label, non‐inferiority, phase III trial was conducted in 14 specialized hospitals in Italy. Patients aged 2‐40 years with newly diagnosed localized ES were randomized to receive four courses of induction therapy (one every 21 days) either with a standard arm (Arm A) or with an intensive arm (Arm B). For consolidation therapy, good responders (GRs) in Arm A received nine courses (37 weeks), while Arm B patients received five courses (25 weeks). Poor responders for both arms received four courses followed by high‐dose busulfan/melphalan + autologous stem cell rescue. Follow‐up was 5 years.Results: In the study period 2009–2018, 274 patients with ES at onset were screened, 248 were eligible, 15 refused randomization, and 233 were randomized (Arm A: 113; Arm B: 120). Median age was 14 years. Arm B was not inferior to Arm A: 5‐year EFS was 77.5% and 71.6%, respectively (HR vs. Arm A: 0.74, 90% CI: 0.49–1.14). GRs were 54.9% in Arm A and 62.5% in Arm B. Hematological, gastrointestinal, and cardiovascular Grade ≥3 toxicities had higher frequencies in Arm B.Conclusions: Intensive induction therapy showed non‐inferiority in 5‐year EFS when compared with the standard induction therapy. Higher toxicity was reported in Arm B with similar outcome, counterbalanced in GRs with a shorter treatment plan. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02063022.
- Open Access
- 1 July 2021
- Published by Elsevier in European Journal of Cancer
- Vol. 151, 150-158
Outcome in dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma for patients treated with multimodal therapy: Results from the EUROpean Bone Over 40 Sarcoma Study
- 1 July 2021
- Published by Elsevier in European Journal of Cancer
- Vol. 151, 150-158
Open AccessOutcome in dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma for patients treated with multimodal therapy: Results from the EUROpean Bone Over 40 Sarcoma Study
- Top Cited Papers
- 1 January 2021
- Published by Elsevier in European Journal of Surgical Oncology
- Vol. 47 (1) , 36-59
Peritoneal mesothelioma: PSOGI/EURACAN clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up
- 1 January 2021
- Published by Elsevier in European Journal of Surgical Oncology
- Vol. 47 (1) , 36-59
Top Cited PapersPeritoneal mesothelioma: PSOGI/EURACAN clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up
- Top Cited Papers
- 1 January 2021
- Published by Elsevier in European Journal of Surgical Oncology
- Vol. 47 (1) , 11-35
Appendiceal tumours and pseudomyxoma peritonei: Literature review with PSOGI/EURACAN clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis and treatment
- 1 January 2021
- Published by Elsevier in European Journal of Surgical Oncology
- Vol. 47 (1) , 11-35
Top Cited PapersAppendiceal tumours and pseudomyxoma peritonei: Literature review with PSOGI/EURACAN clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis and treatment
- 1 January 2021
- Published by Elsevier in European Journal of Surgical Oncology
- Vol. 47 (1) , 4-10
The Delphi and GRADE methodology used in the PSOGI 2018 consensus statement on Pseudomyxoma Peritonei and Peritoneal Mesothelioma
- 1 January 2021
- Published by Elsevier in European Journal of Surgical Oncology
- Vol. 47 (1) , 4-10
The Delphi and GRADE methodology used in the PSOGI 2018 consensus statement on Pseudomyxoma Peritonei and Peritoneal Mesothelioma
- Open Access
- 1 January 2020
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Anti-Cancer Drugs
- Vol. 31 (1) , 80-84
Multiple systemic treatment options in a patient with malignant tenosynovial giant cell tumour
Tenosynovial giant cell tumour (TGCT) is a group of rare soft tissues neoplasia affecting synovial joints, bursae and tendon sheaths and is classified as localized type or diffuse type. The diffuse type (TGCT-D), also known as ‘pigmented villonodular (teno)synovitis’ is characterized by local aggressivity, with invasion and destruction of adjacent soft-tissue structures, and high local recurrence rate. Radical surgery remains the standard therapy while adjuvant radiotherapy may help to control local spread. Malignant TGCT is characterized by high rate of local recurrences and distant metastasis. Few cases of malignant TGCT and very few evidences on systemic therapies are described in the literature, so, to date, no systemic treatment is approved for this rare disease. We report the case of a malignant TGCT patient treated with many different systemic therapies, including chemotherapy and tyrosine-kinase inhibitors, and performed a review of the literature on the systemic treatment options of this rare tumour.
- 1 January 2020
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Anti-Cancer Drugs
- Vol. 31 (1) , 80-84
Open AccessMultiple systemic treatment options in a patient with malignant tenosynovial giant cell tumour
Tenosynovial giant cell tumour (TGCT) is a group of rare soft tissues neoplasia affecting synovial joints, bursae and tendon sheaths and is classified as localized type or diffuse type. The diffuse type (TGCT-D), also known as ‘pigmented villonodular (teno)synovitis’ is characterized by local aggressivity, with invasion and destruction of adjacent soft-tissue structures, and high local recurrence rate. Radical surgery remains the standard therapy while adjuvant radiotherapy may help to control local spread. Malignant TGCT is characterized by high rate of local recurrences and distant metastasis. Few cases of malignant TGCT and very few evidences on systemic therapies are described in the literature, so, to date, no systemic treatment is approved for this rare disease. We report the case of a malignant TGCT patient treated with many different systemic therapies, including chemotherapy and tyrosine-kinase inhibitors, and performed a review of the literature on the systemic treatment options of this rare tumour.
- Top Cited Papers
- 1 September 2019
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) in Clinical Cancer Research
- Vol. 25 (17) , 5295-5300
Role of Chemotherapy, VEGFR Inhibitors, and mTOR Inhibitors in Advanced Perivascular Epithelioid Cell Tumors (PEComas)
Purpose: Perivascular epitheliod cell tumors (PEComas) are rare mesenchymal neoplasms for which the role of systemic treatments is not established as there are no published prospective clinical trials or sufficiently large retrospective case series. The aim of this study is to clarify the activity of conventional chemotherapy and biological agents in advanced/metastatic PEComas. Experimental Design: This was an observational, retrospective, international study that included patients with advanced/metastatic PEComa treated with systemic therapy at 5 European sarcoma reference centers and within the Italian Rare Cancer Network. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan–Meier method and the Cox hazards regression models. Results: A total of 53 patients were included. Cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens were active only in a small proportion of PEComas. Gemcitabine-based regimens [objective response rate (ORR): 20%, median progression-free survival (PFS): 3.4 months] seemed to have the same activity of anthracycline-based regimens (ORR: 13%, median PFS: 3.2 months). Antiangiogenic agents resulted in disease stabilization in some patients, with a number having density changes/tissue response on imaging, with an ORR of 8.3% and a median PFS of 5.4 months. mTOR inhibitors were the most active agents, with an ORR of 41% and a median PFS of 9 months. Conclusions: Our study provides data for the selection of systemic therapy in patients with advanced/metastatic PEComa: mTOR inhibitors are the most active agents. Antiangiogenics and chemotherapy with gemcitabine-based regimens or anthracycline-based regimens are options in further line, but with a lower response rate and PFS.
- 1 September 2019
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) in Clinical Cancer Research
- Vol. 25 (17) , 5295-5300
Top Cited PapersRole of Chemotherapy, VEGFR Inhibitors, and mTOR Inhibitors in Advanced Perivascular Epithelioid Cell Tumors (PEComas)
Purpose: Perivascular epitheliod cell tumors (PEComas) are rare mesenchymal neoplasms for which the role of systemic treatments is not established as there are no published prospective clinical trials or sufficiently large retrospective case series. The aim of this study is to clarify the activity of conventional chemotherapy and biological agents in advanced/metastatic PEComas. Experimental Design: This was an observational, retrospective, international study that included patients with advanced/metastatic PEComa treated with systemic therapy at 5 European sarcoma reference centers and within the Italian Rare Cancer Network. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan–Meier method and the Cox hazards regression models. Results: A total of 53 patients were included. Cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens were active only in a small proportion of PEComas. Gemcitabine-based regimens [objective response rate (ORR): 20%, median progression-free survival (PFS): 3.4 months] seemed to have the same activity of anthracycline-based regimens (ORR: 13%, median PFS: 3.2 months). Antiangiogenic agents resulted in disease stabilization in some patients, with a number having density changes/tissue response on imaging, with an ORR of 8.3% and a median PFS of 5.4 months. mTOR inhibitors were the most active agents, with an ORR of 41% and a median PFS of 9 months. Conclusions: Our study provides data for the selection of systemic therapy in patients with advanced/metastatic PEComa: mTOR inhibitors are the most active agents. Antiangiogenics and chemotherapy with gemcitabine-based regimens or anthracycline-based regimens are options in further line, but with a lower response rate and PFS.
- 18 May 2019
- Published by Springer Nature in Medical Oncology
- Vol. 36 (7) , 59
Rhabdomyosarcoma in adults: analysis of treatment modalities in a prospective single-center series
Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is rare in adults and it is generally characterized by poor outcome. In a previous retrospective study, we demonstrated a better prognosis in adults treated with multimodality approach resembling pediatric protocols. Thereafter, we developed specific recommendations based on the principles adopted in pediatric oncology. The present analysis reports the results in a subsequent prospective series. The study included 95 consecutive patients (age 18–77 years) treated from 2002 to 2015 for embryonal and alveolar RMS. As in the previous series, patients were stratified by the appropriateness of their treatment according to therapeutic guidelines for childhood RMS. The 5-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 33.6% and 40.3%, respectively. The 5-year EFS was 40.8% for patients with the highest treatment score, and 15% for those with lower score, while OS was 44.4% and 24.5%, respectively. The developing of specific recommendations enabled an increase in the number of patients treated with intensive multimodal treatment resembling pediatric strategy (69.7% vs. 39.1% in the retrospective series). This study reinforced the idea that adherence to the principles of pediatric protocols, improves adult RMS outcomes. However, treating adults with pediatric-type strategy is not enough to achieve the results obtained in children. Issues in compliance and a more aggressive biology of adult RMS might have a role in the different outcome according to age. Improving the collaboration between pediatric and adult oncologists in promoting specific clinical and biological research is crucial to improve the outcome for this patient population.
- 18 May 2019
- Published by Springer Nature in Medical Oncology
- Vol. 36 (7) , 59
Rhabdomyosarcoma in adults: analysis of treatment modalities in a prospective single-center series
Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is rare in adults and it is generally characterized by poor outcome. In a previous retrospective study, we demonstrated a better prognosis in adults treated with multimodality approach resembling pediatric protocols. Thereafter, we developed specific recommendations based on the principles adopted in pediatric oncology. The present analysis reports the results in a subsequent prospective series. The study included 95 consecutive patients (age 18–77 years) treated from 2002 to 2015 for embryonal and alveolar RMS. As in the previous series, patients were stratified by the appropriateness of their treatment according to therapeutic guidelines for childhood RMS. The 5-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 33.6% and 40.3%, respectively. The 5-year EFS was 40.8% for patients with the highest treatment score, and 15% for those with lower score, while OS was 44.4% and 24.5%, respectively. The developing of specific recommendations enabled an increase in the number of patients treated with intensive multimodal treatment resembling pediatric strategy (69.7% vs. 39.1% in the retrospective series). This study reinforced the idea that adherence to the principles of pediatric protocols, improves adult RMS outcomes. However, treating adults with pediatric-type strategy is not enough to achieve the results obtained in children. Issues in compliance and a more aggressive biology of adult RMS might have a role in the different outcome according to age. Improving the collaboration between pediatric and adult oncologists in promoting specific clinical and biological research is crucial to improve the outcome for this patient population.
- 3 January 2019
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Expert Opinion on Emerging Drugs
- Vol. 24 (1) , 43-53
Standard treatment and emerging drugs for managing synovial sarcoma: adult’s and pediatric oncologist perspective
Introduction: in this review we discuss the standard of care for both pediatric and adult synovial sarcoma (SS), the prognostic differences between them, and the treatments available for localized and advanced diseases. We also overview the biology and the recent drugs under consideration in clinical trials on SS. Areas covered: we focus on new targeted therapies being investigated for advanced SS, especially anti-angiogenic drugs, and immunotherapy. We review all the published data and ongoing trials dedicated to SS or to soft tissue sarcoma in general, paying particular attention to the results obtained in SS patients. Expert opinion: we expect new treatment strategies to become available for SS in the near future. The ongoing and published trials on targeted therapies and immunotherapy mainly concern adult patients, but the somatic biology of pediatric SS has some similarities as in adult disease. A stronger cooperation between adult and pediatric oncologists in recent years has led to a more shared effort to find new treatment strategies for advanced SS patients, regardless of their age.
- 3 January 2019
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Expert Opinion on Emerging Drugs
- Vol. 24 (1) , 43-53
Standard treatment and emerging drugs for managing synovial sarcoma: adult’s and pediatric oncologist perspective
Introduction: in this review we discuss the standard of care for both pediatric and adult synovial sarcoma (SS), the prognostic differences between them, and the treatments available for localized and advanced diseases. We also overview the biology and the recent drugs under consideration in clinical trials on SS. Areas covered: we focus on new targeted therapies being investigated for advanced SS, especially anti-angiogenic drugs, and immunotherapy. We review all the published data and ongoing trials dedicated to SS or to soft tissue sarcoma in general, paying particular attention to the results obtained in SS patients. Expert opinion: we expect new treatment strategies to become available for SS in the near future. The ongoing and published trials on targeted therapies and immunotherapy mainly concern adult patients, but the somatic biology of pediatric SS has some similarities as in adult disease. A stronger cooperation between adult and pediatric oncologists in recent years has led to a more shared effort to find new treatment strategies for advanced SS patients, regardless of their age.
- Open Access
- 23 October 2018
- Published by Elsevier in Annals of Oncology
- Vol. 29 (suppl_8) , viii581
mTOR inhibitors in uterine and extra-uterine malignant PEComas: A multicenter international case series retrospective analysis
Background: Perivascular epithelioid cell tumors (PEComa) are exceedingly rare mesenchymal neoplasms arising from a broad variety of anatomic sites. Within the female genital tract, most frequently PEComas affect the uterus. Over the last few years, the activity of mTOR inhibitors in these neoplasms has been convincingly shown. The aim of this multicenter retrospective analysis was to compare the activity of mTOR inhibitors in uterine versus extra-uterine malignant PEComas.
- 23 October 2018
- Published by Elsevier in Annals of Oncology
- Vol. 29 (suppl_8) , viii581
Open AccessmTOR inhibitors in uterine and extra-uterine malignant PEComas: A multicenter international case series retrospective analysis
Background: Perivascular epithelioid cell tumors (PEComa) are exceedingly rare mesenchymal neoplasms arising from a broad variety of anatomic sites. Within the female genital tract, most frequently PEComas affect the uterus. Over the last few years, the activity of mTOR inhibitors in these neoplasms has been convincingly shown. The aim of this multicenter retrospective analysis was to compare the activity of mTOR inhibitors in uterine versus extra-uterine malignant PEComas.