Jason S. Gold
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Jason S. Gold has a total of 320 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Edward E. Whang
Surgical Service, VA Boston Healthcare System, West Roxbury, USA
14 shared publicationsBisweswar Nandi
Department of Surgery
10 shared publicationsQin Huang
Pathology, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts 02132
10 shared publications- Qin Huang
Department of Pathology Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA
9 shared publications Richard D. Urman
Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
8 shared publicationsJiong Shi
Departments of Pathology, the Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing, China
7 shared publications
Latest Publications
- 1 April 2025
- Published by Harborside Press, LLC in Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network
- Vol. 23 (4)
Assessing Equity in Quality Care for Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
Of all the forms of inequality, injustice
- 1 April 2025
- Published by Harborside Press, LLC in Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network
- Vol. 23 (4)
Assessing Equity in Quality Care for Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
Of all the forms of inequality, injustice
- Top Cited Papers
- 20 October 2023
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 41 (30) , 4794-4820
Systemic Therapy for Melanoma: ASCO Guideline Update
PURPOSE: To provide guidance to clinicians regarding the use of systemic therapy for melanoma. METHODS: American Society of Clinical Oncology convened an Expert Panel and conducted an updated systematic review of the literature. RESULTS: The updated review identified 21 additional randomized trials. UPDATED RECOMMENDATIONS: Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab was newly recommended for patients with resectable stage IIIB to IV cutaneous melanoma. For patients with resected cutaneous melanoma, adjuvant nivolumab or pembrolizumab was newly recommended for stage IIB-C disease and adjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab was added as a potential option for stage IV disease. For patients with unresectable or metastatic cutaneous melanoma, nivolumab plus relatlimab was added as a potential option regardless of BRAF mutation status and nivolumab plus ipilimumab followed by nivolumab was preferred over BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy. Talimogene laherparepvec is no longer recommended as an option for patients with BRAF wild-type disease who have progressed on anti–PD-1 therapy. Ipilimumab- and ipilimumab-containing regimens are no longer recommended for patients with BRAF-mutated disease after progression on other therapies. This full update incorporates the new recommendations for uveal melanoma published in the 2022 Rapid Recommendation Update. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/melanoma-guidelines .
- 20 October 2023
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 41 (30) , 4794-4820
Top Cited PapersSystemic Therapy for Melanoma: ASCO Guideline Update
PURPOSE: To provide guidance to clinicians regarding the use of systemic therapy for melanoma. METHODS: American Society of Clinical Oncology convened an Expert Panel and conducted an updated systematic review of the literature. RESULTS: The updated review identified 21 additional randomized trials. UPDATED RECOMMENDATIONS: Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab was newly recommended for patients with resectable stage IIIB to IV cutaneous melanoma. For patients with resected cutaneous melanoma, adjuvant nivolumab or pembrolizumab was newly recommended for stage IIB-C disease and adjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab was added as a potential option for stage IV disease. For patients with unresectable or metastatic cutaneous melanoma, nivolumab plus relatlimab was added as a potential option regardless of BRAF mutation status and nivolumab plus ipilimumab followed by nivolumab was preferred over BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy. Talimogene laherparepvec is no longer recommended as an option for patients with BRAF wild-type disease who have progressed on anti–PD-1 therapy. Ipilimumab- and ipilimumab-containing regimens are no longer recommended for patients with BRAF-mutated disease after progression on other therapies. This full update incorporates the new recommendations for uveal melanoma published in the 2022 Rapid Recommendation Update. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/melanoma-guidelines .
- 1 June 2023
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA Surgery
- Vol. 158 (6) , 632-633
The Optimal Treatment for Acute Appendicitis—Is Age Just a Number?
The debate over operative vs nonoperative management for acute appendicitis has garnered significant attention and yielded high-quality investigations, notably
- 1 June 2023
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA Surgery
- Vol. 158 (6) , 632-633
The Optimal Treatment for Acute Appendicitis—Is Age Just a Number?
The debate over operative vs nonoperative management for acute appendicitis has garnered significant attention and yielded high-quality investigations, notably
- 7 February 2022
- Published by Springer Nature in Annals of Surgical Oncology
- Vol. 29 (5) , 3205
ASO Visual Abstract: Socioeconomic Disparities in Pancreas Cancer Resection and Survival in the Veterans Health Administration
- 7 February 2022
- Published by Springer Nature in Annals of Surgical Oncology
- Vol. 29 (5) , 3205
ASO Visual Abstract: Socioeconomic Disparities in Pancreas Cancer Resection and Survival in the Veterans Health Administration
- 11 January 2022
- Published by Springer Nature in Annals of Surgical Oncology
- Vol. 29 (5) , 3203-3204
ASO Author Reflections: Socioeconomic Disparities in Pancreas Cancer Resection and Survival in the Veterans Health Administration
- 11 January 2022
- Published by Springer Nature in Annals of Surgical Oncology
- Vol. 29 (5) , 3203-3204
ASO Author Reflections: Socioeconomic Disparities in Pancreas Cancer Resection and Survival in the Veterans Health Administration
- 10 January 2022
- Published by Springer Nature in Annals of Surgical Oncology
- Vol. 29 (5) , 3194-3202
Socioeconomic Disparities in Pancreas Cancer Resection and Survival in the Veterans Health Administration
Disparities based on socioeconomic factors such as race, ethnicity, marital status, and insurance status are associated with pancreatic cancer resection, b
- 10 January 2022
- Published by Springer Nature in Annals of Surgical Oncology
- Vol. 29 (5) , 3194-3202
Socioeconomic Disparities in Pancreas Cancer Resection and Survival in the Veterans Health Administration
Disparities based on socioeconomic factors such as race, ethnicity, marital status, and insurance status are associated with pancreatic cancer resection, b
- 16 November 2021
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Surgical Oncology
- Vol. 125 (4) , 646-657
Associations of gender, race, and ethnicity with disparities in short‐term adverse outcomes after pancreatic resection for cancer
Background: Several studies have identified disparities in pancreatic cancer treatment associated with gender, race, and ethnicity. There are limited data examining disparities in short‐term adverse outcomes after pancreatic resection for cancer. The aim of this study is to evaluate associations of gender, race, and ethnicity with morbidity and mortality after pancreatic resection for malignancy.Methods: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement database was retrospectively reviewed. The χ2 test and Student's t‐test were used for univariable analysis and hierarchical logistic regression for multivariable analysis.Results: Morbidity and major morbidity after pancreaticoduodenectomy are associated with male gender, Asian race, and Hispanic ethnicity, whereas 30‐day mortality is associated with the male gender. Morbidity and major morbidity after distal pancreatectomy are associated with the male gender. Morbidity after pancreaticoduodenectomy is independently associated with male gender, Asian race, and Hispanic ethnicity; major morbidity is independently associated with male gender and Asian race, and mortality is independently associated with Hispanic ethnicity.Conclusions: Gender, race, and ethnicity are independently associated with morbidity after pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer; gender and race are independently associated with major morbidity; and ethnicity is independently associated with mortality. Further studies are warranted to determine the basis of these associations.
- 16 November 2021
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Surgical Oncology
- Vol. 125 (4) , 646-657
Associations of gender, race, and ethnicity with disparities in short‐term adverse outcomes after pancreatic resection for cancer
Background: Several studies have identified disparities in pancreatic cancer treatment associated with gender, race, and ethnicity. There are limited data examining disparities in short‐term adverse outcomes after pancreatic resection for cancer. The aim of this study is to evaluate associations of gender, race, and ethnicity with morbidity and mortality after pancreatic resection for malignancy.Methods: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement database was retrospectively reviewed. The χ2 test and Student's t‐test were used for univariable analysis and hierarchical logistic regression for multivariable analysis.Results: Morbidity and major morbidity after pancreaticoduodenectomy are associated with male gender, Asian race, and Hispanic ethnicity, whereas 30‐day mortality is associated with the male gender. Morbidity and major morbidity after distal pancreatectomy are associated with the male gender. Morbidity after pancreaticoduodenectomy is independently associated with male gender, Asian race, and Hispanic ethnicity; major morbidity is independently associated with male gender and Asian race, and mortality is independently associated with Hispanic ethnicity.Conclusions: Gender, race, and ethnicity are independently associated with morbidity after pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer; gender and race are independently associated with major morbidity; and ethnicity is independently associated with mortality. Further studies are warranted to determine the basis of these associations.
- Top Cited Papers
- 20 November 2020
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 38 (33) , 3947-3970
Systemic Therapy for Melanoma: ASCO Guideline
PURPOSE: To provide guidance to clinicians regarding the use of systemic therapy for melanoma. METHODS: ASCO convened an Expert Panel and conducted a systematic review of the literature. RESULTS: A systematic review, one meta-analysis, and 34 additional randomized trials were identified. The published studies included a wide range of systemic therapies in cutaneous and noncutaneous melanoma. RECOMMENDATIONS: In the adjuvant setting, nivolumab or pembrolizumab should be offered to patients with resected stage IIIA/B/C/D BRAF wild-type cutaneous melanoma, while either of those two agents or the combination of dabrafenib and trametinib should be offered in BRAF-mutant disease. No recommendation could be made for or against the use of neoadjuvant therapy in cutaneous melanoma. In the unresectable/metastatic setting, ipilimumab plus nivolumab, nivolumab alone, or pembrolizumab alone should be offered to patients with BRAF wild-type cutaneous melanoma, while those three regimens or combination BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy with dabrafenib/trametinib, encorafenib/binimetinib, or vemurafenib/cobimetinib should be offered in BRAF-mutant disease. Patients with mucosal melanoma may be offered the same therapies recommended for cutaneous melanoma. No recommendation could be made for or against specific therapy for uveal melanoma. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/melanoma-guidelines .
- 20 November 2020
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 38 (33) , 3947-3970
Top Cited PapersSystemic Therapy for Melanoma: ASCO Guideline
PURPOSE: To provide guidance to clinicians regarding the use of systemic therapy for melanoma. METHODS: ASCO convened an Expert Panel and conducted a systematic review of the literature. RESULTS: A systematic review, one meta-analysis, and 34 additional randomized trials were identified. The published studies included a wide range of systemic therapies in cutaneous and noncutaneous melanoma. RECOMMENDATIONS: In the adjuvant setting, nivolumab or pembrolizumab should be offered to patients with resected stage IIIA/B/C/D BRAF wild-type cutaneous melanoma, while either of those two agents or the combination of dabrafenib and trametinib should be offered in BRAF-mutant disease. No recommendation could be made for or against the use of neoadjuvant therapy in cutaneous melanoma. In the unresectable/metastatic setting, ipilimumab plus nivolumab, nivolumab alone, or pembrolizumab alone should be offered to patients with BRAF wild-type cutaneous melanoma, while those three regimens or combination BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy with dabrafenib/trametinib, encorafenib/binimetinib, or vemurafenib/cobimetinib should be offered in BRAF-mutant disease. Patients with mucosal melanoma may be offered the same therapies recommended for cutaneous melanoma. No recommendation could be made for or against specific therapy for uveal melanoma. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/melanoma-guidelines .