Jon Charles Gould
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Jon Charles Gould has a total of 206 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Melissa C. Helm
Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
12 shared publications- Rana M. Higgins
Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
11 shared publications Matthew J. Frelich
Medical College of Wisconsin, Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Milwaukee, WI, USA
10 shared publications- Tammy Lyn Kindel
Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
9 shared publications Andrew Kastenmeier
Division of Minimally Invasive and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, USA
8 shared publications- Kathleen Lak
Medical College of Wisconsin
6 shared publications
Latest Publications
- 6 August 2026
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Annals of Surgery
The Debate Goes On—Acid Suppression or Antireflux Surgery for Nondysplastic Barrett’s Esophagus?
Was not provided for this article.
- 6 August 2026
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Annals of Surgery
The Debate Goes On—Acid Suppression or Antireflux Surgery for Nondysplastic Barrett’s Esophagus?
Was not provided for this article.
- 8 December 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
- Vol. 30 (2) , 102298
Invited commentary on “Outcomes of same-day discharge following robotic hiatal hernia repair: a comparative study”
- 8 December 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
- Vol. 30 (2) , 102298
Invited commentary on “Outcomes of same-day discharge following robotic hiatal hernia repair: a comparative study”
- 4 March 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases
- Vol. 21 (8) , 874-881
Distressed community index as a predictor of metabolic and bariatric surgery outcomes
- 4 March 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases
- Vol. 21 (8) , 874-881
Distressed community index as a predictor of metabolic and bariatric surgery outcomes
- 17 September 2024
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 329-341
Organizational Strategic Planning
- 9 August 2024
- Published by Springer Nature in Surgical Endoscopy
- Vol. 38 (10) , 5651-5656
Interval operative management in patients admitted with acute obstruction due to incarcerated paraesophageal hernia
Background Acute incarcerated paraesophageal hernias (PEH) have historically been considered a surgical emergency. Emergent operations have a higher rate of morbidity and mortality compared to elective surgery. Our institution has adopted a strategy of initial conservative management in patients presenting with acute obstruction from an incarcerated PEH who are clinically stable. Patients are given at least 24 h for their symptoms to improve (selective nasogastric decompression). If symptoms resolve, contrast on an upper GI study passes to the small bowel, and liquids are tolerated, patients are discharged with planned interval repair. We sought to characterize the outcomes of this interval surgical strategy for incarcerated PEH. Methods A retrospective chart review was performed to identify patients admitted to a single institution between October 2019 and September 2023 with an incarcerated PEH. Patients taken directly to surgery within 24 h were excluded. Results A total of 45 patients admitted with obstruction from an incarcerated PEH were identified. Ten patients (22%) were taken urgently to surgery due to clinical instability and were excluded. Of the remaining 35 patients, 23 (66%) resolved their obstruction with conservative non-operative management and were offered planned interval PEH repair (successful conservative management). In the successful conservative management cohort, there was one unplanned readmission before interval PEH repair. Average time between discharge and repair was 25 days. Complication rates did not differ in those who failed and in those who had a successful conservative management result. The cumulative length of stay for those who succeeded in conservative management (including days for the interval surgery) was equivalent with those who underwent PEH repair during the index admission. Conclusion A trial of conservative management in clinically stable patients with symptomatic incarcerated PEH appears to be safe and often avoids emergent repair without increasing perioperative complications or total days in the hospital.
- 9 August 2024
- Published by Springer Nature in Surgical Endoscopy
- Vol. 38 (10) , 5651-5656
Interval operative management in patients admitted with acute obstruction due to incarcerated paraesophageal hernia
Background Acute incarcerated paraesophageal hernias (PEH) have historically been considered a surgical emergency. Emergent operations have a higher rate of morbidity and mortality compared to elective surgery. Our institution has adopted a strategy of initial conservative management in patients presenting with acute obstruction from an incarcerated PEH who are clinically stable. Patients are given at least 24 h for their symptoms to improve (selective nasogastric decompression). If symptoms resolve, contrast on an upper GI study passes to the small bowel, and liquids are tolerated, patients are discharged with planned interval repair. We sought to characterize the outcomes of this interval surgical strategy for incarcerated PEH. Methods A retrospective chart review was performed to identify patients admitted to a single institution between October 2019 and September 2023 with an incarcerated PEH. Patients taken directly to surgery within 24 h were excluded. Results A total of 45 patients admitted with obstruction from an incarcerated PEH were identified. Ten patients (22%) were taken urgently to surgery due to clinical instability and were excluded. Of the remaining 35 patients, 23 (66%) resolved their obstruction with conservative non-operative management and were offered planned interval PEH repair (successful conservative management). In the successful conservative management cohort, there was one unplanned readmission before interval PEH repair. Average time between discharge and repair was 25 days. Complication rates did not differ in those who failed and in those who had a successful conservative management result. The cumulative length of stay for those who succeeded in conservative management (including days for the interval surgery) was equivalent with those who underwent PEH repair during the index admission. Conclusion A trial of conservative management in clinically stable patients with symptomatic incarcerated PEH appears to be safe and often avoids emergent repair without increasing perioperative complications or total days in the hospital.
- Open Access
- 19 June 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases
- Vol. 20 (10) , 895-909
American society for metabolic and bariatric surgery: intra-operative care pathway for minimally invasive Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
- 19 June 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases
- Vol. 20 (10) , 895-909
Open AccessAmerican society for metabolic and bariatric surgery: intra-operative care pathway for minimally invasive Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
- 5 June 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases
- Vol. 20 (11) , 1130-1138
Sociodemographic factors leading to preventable emergency department visits after bariatric surgery: a single-institution analysis
- 5 June 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases
- Vol. 20 (11) , 1130-1138
Sociodemographic factors leading to preventable emergency department visits after bariatric surgery: a single-institution analysis