Viola Heinzelmann-Schwarz

In women with high-grade serous ovarian cancer, chemotherapy remains the primary standard treatment, despite growing recognition of the disease as highly heterogeneous. Here, we examine the feasibility and clinical utility of comprehensive multimodal molecular profiling to inform treatment decisions. We analyze blood, single-cell and bulk tumor tissue, and malignant ascites using up to eleven technologies (DNA, RNA, protein, and functional assays) within a four-week turnaround time. Hypothetical treatment recommendations are altered for 76% of patients, and multi-omics-guided maintenance therapy is associated with prolonged overall survival in a subset of patients. Subsequent cohort analysis reveals distinct cellular and molecular profiles in ascites-derived single-cells compared to solid tumor tissue, unique per-patient ex vivo drug responses, and a marked increase in cancer cell heterogeneity following chemotherapy exposure. This coincides with genomic signature alterations in whole-genome-amplified patients. Our data suggest that molecularly guided treatments should be tested as adjuvant therapies prior to chemotherapy in the future.

Background: Long-term survivors (LTS) after gynecological cancer may be cured but still face physical and psychological challenges. This multicenter study aimed to assess the long-term side effects, the received follow-up care, and the personal perspectives of survivors. Methods: Between 2019 and 2025, LTS from four European countries within the ENGOT (European Network of Gynecological Oncological Trial Groups) and GCIG (Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup) networks were recruited. Long-term survival was defined as surviving at least five years after the first diagnosis. LTS completed a questionnaire with 81 questions (patient’s characteristics, oncological history, current health status, lifestyle factors). Analyses were mainly descriptive. Results: A total of 677 LTS were enrolled, with a median age of 64.0 years (range: 26–92) and a median survival time of 7 years (range: 5–38). A total of 46.6% were diagnosed with cervical cancer, 32.9% with endometrial cancer, 4.4% with ovarian cancer, and 16.1% with other types of gynecological cancer. Moreover, 36.9% still suffer from physical and psychological symptoms, most frequently being lymphedema (36.2%), hot flashes (22.4%), difficulties with concentration (21.1%), fatigue (20.9%), vaginal dryness (20.1%), and urinary incontinence (18.9%). Median overall health status was ranked (scale 1–5; 1 = very good, 5 = very poor) as 2, while 13.5% rated their health as poor/very poor. Current symptoms were associated with poorer health status (p < 0.001) and a history of recurrent disease (p = 0.001). In addition, 13.6% reported not receiving follow-up care. CA-125 was determined in 80.8% of ovarian LTS, as well as in 30.7% of cervical and 28.9% of endometrial LTS. Pap smear follow-up was reported by 50.5% of endometrial LTS. A total of 33.7% did not exercise at all or exercised less than an hour per week, 13.4% smoke tobacco, and 51.2% drink alcohol more often than once a month. Conclusions: Our findings highlight the need for patient-centered follow-up care, addressing both long-term side effects and education on lifestyle and prevention. Follow-up procedures that do not follow guidelines should be avoided.

Background/Objectives: Ovarian cancer is typically diagnosed in postmenopausal women, so there are limited data available for young adult cancer survivors (YACS). The aim was to assess the patient perspective of YACS. Methods: In this international and multicenter cross-sectional survey study, patient history, long-term side effects, and patient perspective were assessed. Long-term survival was defined as survival of at least five years after cancer diagnosis. Two groups were defined: (1) 18–40 years and (2) ≥41 years. Results: Altogether, 1833 long-term survivors (LTS) have been recruited, with 1771 patients ≥41 years and 62 patients 18–40 years at recruitment. FIGO stages were similar; among the patients, 99.0% had received primary surgery followed by chemotherapy in 90.3%. Almost 50% still experienced long-term side effects. Patients ≤ 40 years reported more frequently not only gastrointestinal symptoms such as nausea/vomiting (44.4%, p = 0.01), bloating (59.3%, p = 0.038), and constipation (60%, p = 0.015) but also depression (31.4%, p = 0.02), lymphedema (45.3%, p = 0.026), and concentration difficulties (30.6%, p = 0.002). Distress levels were also higher in YACS, especially concerning insurance/finances, work/school, child care, worries, and sadness. Polyneuropathy and secondary cancer were the only side effects that were more frequent in the elder cohort (polyneuropathy: 20.3% vs. 4.3%, p = 0.002, and secondary cancer: 8.4% vs. 0%, p = 0.014). YACS were more physically active (p = 0.003) and interested in studies about long-term cancer survivorship in 87.2%. Conclusions: Long-term side effects are equally common in YACS after ovarian cancer, but with a focus on practical problems, mental health, gastrointestinal problems, and sexuality. This knowledge should be incorporated into follow-up care of ovarian cancer patients in order to improve quality of life.

Background/Objectives: Sister Mary Joseph’s nodule (SMJN) is classified as FIGO stage IVb in ovarian cancer. While traditionally considered an indicator of poor prognosis, emerging evidence suggests variable outcomes. This study aimed to describe overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) in ovarian cancer patients presenting with SMJN and to explore outcome patterns relative to other FIGO IVb presentations. Methods: We conducted a retrospective multicenter cohort study including patients with epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal carcinoma diagnosed between 2010 and 2023 at four academic centers in Switzerland, Italy, and Israel. Eligible patients had FIGO IV disease at diagnosis and complete clinical data. Patients were grouped according to metastatic pattern: SMJN or other distant sites. Survival outcomes were analyzed using Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models. Results: Eighty-seven patients met inclusion criteria, including 23 (26.4%) with SMJN and 64 (73.6%) with other FIGO IV metastases. Median age and histologic subtype distribution were similar between groups. Complete cytoreduction was achieved in 65.2% of SMJN patients. Median OS was not reached in the SMJN group versus 47.2 months in controls (HR 0.44; 95% CI 0.17–1.12; p = 0.084). Median RFS was 42.6 vs. 23.2 months, respectively (HR 0.68; 95% CI 0.35–1.32; p = 0.25). Conclusions: Patients presenting with SMJN may represent a potentially resectable manifestation within the heterogeneous spectrum of FIGO stage IV ovarian cancer, with a non-significant trend toward more favorable survival outcomes compared with other stage IV presentations.

Plasmid sequences used in this project.