Christian Koenecke

This multicenter real-world study identifies critical determinants of outcome for tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) in treating post-HSCT relapse in 220 children/young adults with B-ALL from 31 European centers. Median follow-up was 30.0 months, with a 43.6% 2-year event-free survival (EFS), 67.2% overall-survival (OS), and 57.1% incidence of CAR-T failure. CAR-T for relapse after transplant from a matched sibling donor (MSD) compared to alternative donors was associated with lower 2-year-OS (MSD 59.1%, mismatched donor MMD 80.2%, matched family/unrelated donor MFD/MUD 68.3%, p = 0.046). Two-year incidence of CAR-T failure was highest for MSD (MSD 73.8%, MFD/MUD 49.7%, MMD 52.2%, p = 0.006). Patients who had relapsed early (< 6 months post HSCT) showed inferior 2-year-EFS (23.7%) and OS (47.2%) compared to patients with late relapse, ≥ 6 months after HSCT (EFS 49.8%, p  = 0.001; OS 73.9%, p  < 0.001). Early relapse was associated with a higher incidence of CAR-T failure and relapse after tisa-cel, particularly CD19+ relapses. Outcomes correlated with disease burden at lymphodepletion: 2-year-OS was 81.7% for MRD–, 69.2% for MRD+, and 55.2% for patients in non-remission ( p  = 0.003), with incidence of CAR-T failure highest in non-remission. Prior transplant from an MSD, early post-HSCT relapse, and disease burden at lymphodepletion identify patients at increased risk of CAR-T failure after HSCT.

Objectives: To determine the incidence of delayed methotrexate elimination (DME) and acute kidney injury (AKI) and their associations with clinical outcomes in patients receiving high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) for cancer treatment. Methods: The HDMTX European Registry collected medical records data from 12 institutions in 5 European countries to investigate the clinical practice patterns of healthcare providers utilizing HDMTX for cancer treatment. Cancer types included were acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), osteosarcoma, and other CNS cancers. Primary endpoints were the incidence of DME and AKI; secondary endpoints were clinical outcomes, including hospital length of stay (LOS), delay in the subsequent course of treatment, methotrexate dose reduction, and omission of next course of treatment. Associations between the primary and secondary endpoints were analyzed with Chi-square and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Results: Among the 2501 total HDMTX courses analyzed, DME occurred in 302 courses (12.1%), and AKI in 384 courses (15.4%). DME incidence was highest in courses for PCNSL (18.2%) and NHL (17.2%); AKI incidence was highest in ALL courses (21.0%). Incidence of DME and AKI varied by age and methotrexate infusion duration among the different cancer types. Occurrence of DME was associated with longer delays prior to the next course of treatment, longer hospital LOS, and more frequent methotrexate dose reductions and dose omissions. Conclusions: While HDMTX is a very effective and safe treatment, administration of efficacious doses of methotrexate can lead to AKI and DME, and no single or combination of patient or treatment factors was found to reliably predict their occurrence. Thus, diligent monitoring of methotrexate levels is imperative for early detection and prompt management of nephrotoxicity in all settings where HDMTX treatment is administered.

We assessed whether the incidence and outcomes of chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease (cGvHD) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) have changed over 30 years. We studied 102,275 adults with hematological malignancies receiving a first alloHSCT from identical siblings or unrelated donors. We compared 3 decades: (I) 1990–1999 vs. (II) 2000–2009 vs. (III) 2010–2019. Over time, patients were older at transplantation, received more PBSC, unrelated donor transplants, reduced intensity conditioning, in vivo T-cell depletion and an ATG prophylaxis, and less TBI. cGvHD incidence at 48 months was 37.3% [36.2–38.4] in I decade vs. 44.9% [44.3–45.5] in II decade vs. 39.1% [38.7–39.5] in III decade, and incidence of extensive cGvHD at 48 months was 18.1% [17.3–19] vs. 22.2% [21.7–22.6] vs. 19.2% [18.9–19.5] over decades. In multivariate analysis, more cGvHD developed in II than in I decade (HR 1.14, 95% CI 1.09–1.21), but no difference was found between III and I decade (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.96–1.06). Among patients with cGvHD, NRM at 48 months decreased over decades (21.3% [19.8–22.8] vs. 21% [20.3–21.7] vs. 19.7% [19.1–20.2], p < 0.001). Our data show unchanged cGvHD incidences over time and a high NRM in patients after cGvHD diagnosis.

Glofitamab, a bispecific antibody targeting CD20 and CD3, is approved for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (r/r DLBCL) after at least 2 prior treatment lines, but real-world data are scarce. In this retrospective, multicenter, multinational study, we evaluated the outcomes of 70 patients with r/r DLBCL treated with glofitamab as part of the compassionate use patient program in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. The median number of prior treatment lines was 4, with 71% of patients refractory to their last treatment. Cytokine release syndrome was observed in 40% of patients (grade 3-4 in 2%), immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome in 10% (grade 3 in 1%), and infections in 31% (grade 5 in 3%). The overall response rate was 46%, with 27% achieving complete responses (CR) and 19% partial responses. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.6 months, whereas the median overall survival was 5.7 months. Notably, 13 patients (19%) were in CR 6 months after initiating glofitamab and exhibited durable responses. Elevated lactate dehydrogenase is the most robust predictor of inferior outcome. Patients pretreated with bendamustine within 6 months prior to glofitamab initiation exhibited significantly reduced PFS, suggesting that bendamustine may impair T-cell fitness and hence glofitamab efficacy. In summary, glofitamab demonstrates promising efficacy and a manageable safety profile in heavily pretreated patients with r/r DLBCL in a real-world scenario and the optimal sequence of treatments should use T-cell–depleting agents before glofitamab with caution.

In patients diagnosed with B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) or B-non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (B-NHL) relapsing after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT), it is a standard practice to perform anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. When collected from the patient after allo-HCT, the produced CAR-T cells are likely to be donor T-cell-derived, creating unknown safety risks due to their potential allo-reactivity. We therefore performed an EBMT registry-based study on the incidence of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) in this setting. We included 257 allo-HCT patients (n = 172 ≥ 18 years) with B-ALL or B-NHL, treated with anti-CD19 CAR T-cells (tisagenlecleucel n = 184, brexucabtagene autoleucel n = 43 and axicabtagene ciloleucel n = 30), between 2018 and 2022. Three patients developed aGvHD, whereas 6 patients developed cGvHD after CAR T-cell. The 100-day cumulative incidence (CI) of new aGvHD was 1.6% and the 12-month CI of new cGvHD was 2.8%. The 1-year GvHD relapse-free survival and non-relapse mortality were 52.1% and 4.7%, respectively. Last, with a median follow up of 18.8 months, the 1-year overall survival was 76.8%. In summary, the GvHD rate in allo-HCT patients treated with CAR T-cell therapy is relatively low. Our data support the view that GvHD is not a major safety issue in this setting.

Although most patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) show initial response to first-line therapy, long-term clinically meaningful success of first-line treatment remains rare. In a prospective multicentre phase II trial in 6 German centers, patients with newly diagnosed moderate or severe cGVHD received prednisone and everolimus for 12 months followed by a 1-year follow-up period. Primary endpoint was treatment success (TS) at 6 months defined as patient being alive, achieving PR or CR of cGVHD, having no relapse of underlying disease and requiring no secondary treatment for cGVHD. Of the 34 patients evaluable for efficacy, 19 (56%) had TS at 6 months with 22 and 52% of the patients in a CR and PR respectively. Overall 30 patients (88%) had a CR or PR as best response, nearly all responses (29/30) occurring within the first 6 weeks of treatment. The cumulative incidence of treatment failure at 1 year was 63%, corresponding to 37% TS. Predefined safety endpoint (thrombotic microangiopathy, pneumonitis, and avascular necrosis) were not observed in any patient. Addition of everolimus to prednisolone is well tolerated and may improve long-term treatment success. Larger studies are necessary to ascertain the possible role of everolimus in first-line treatment of cGVHD.