Eric Mooshagian

Eye–hand coordination (EHC) is central to everyday behavior. This is often described as a sequential process in which the eyes move first to guide the hand. However, converging behavioral and neurophysiological evidence supports a fundamentally different view: Coordination arises from a distributed network that issues parallel commands and aligns effectors through structured interareal communication. Saccade and reach planning are typically initiated concurrently, with apparent timing differences driven largely by effector dynamics. Experimental dissociations reveal that coupling enhances performance but is not obligatory, particularly in bimanual or naturalistic contexts. Here we emphasize the posterior parietal cortex as a key hub integrating sensory and motor signals for planning and coordination through effector-specific subregions and their interareal interactions. Oscillatory dynamics, notably beta-band coherence, consistently associate with coordination between oculomotor and manual circuits, although whether they causally implement routing or instead index structured interactions remains unresolved. Together, these findings point to a distributed, intercommunicating network that flexibly aligns eye and hand control.

Interareal communication is crucial for coordinated brain function. Given the largely contralateral organization of the brain, bimanual coordination likely depends on interactions across the two cerebral hemispheres for motor planning and execution. The parietal reach region (PRR) is an early node in the sensorimotor transformation stream. Here, we examined the contributions of direct callosal connections between left and right PRR to bimanual coordination. Using manganese-enhanced MRI, we traced callosal pathways crossing the midline and found that PRR–PRR connections are restricted to the splenium. We then temporarily blocked these fibers with lidocaine while measuring behavioral performance and interhemispheric coherence. Blockade selectively reduced PRR–PRR coherence during bimanual movements to a common target, but not during movements to separate targets. Behaviorally, blockade sped movement initiation across tasks, consistent with a functionally inhibitory influence of interhemispheric communication, reduced the temporal synchrony of bimanual movements to a common target, and reduced errors for bimanual movements to separate targets. These findings provide causal evidence that posterior callosal communication supports the temporal precision of spatially coordinated bimanual actions, while potentially constraining independent limb control.

Rapid development of memristive elements emulating biological neurons creates new opportunities for brain-like computation at low energy consumption. A first step toward mimicking complex neural computations is the analysis of single neurons and their characteristics. Here we measure and model spiking activity in artificial neurons built using diffusive memristors. We compare activity of these artificial neurons with the spiking activity of biological neurons measured in sensory, pre-motor, and motor cortical areas of the monkey (male) brain. We find that artificial neurons can operate in diverse self-sustained and noise-induced spiking regimes that correspond to the activity of different types of cortical neurons with distinct functions. We demonstrate that artificial neurons can function as trans-functional devices (transneurons) that reconfigure their behaviour to attain instantaneous computational needs, each capable of emulating several biological neurons.

Inter-areal communication is crucial for brain function. Given the largely contralateral organization of the brain, bimanual coordination likely involves interactions across the two cerebral hemispheres for motor planning and execution. The parietal reach region (PRR) is an early node in the sensorimotor transformation stream. Here we examine the contributions of direct callosal connections between left and right PRR to bimanual coordination. Using manganese-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, we traced callosal pathways crossing the midline and found that PRR-PRR connections are restricted to the splenium. We then temporarily blocked these fibers with lidocaine while measuring behavioral performance and interhemispheric coherence. Blockade reduced task-specific PRR-PRR coherence during bimanual movements. Behaviorally, blockade sped movement initiation across tasks, consistent with an inhibitory role of interhemispheric communication, reduced the temporal synchrony of bimanual movements to a common target and reduced errors for bimanual movements to separate targets. These findings provide causal evidence that posterior callosal communication supports spatial coordination of bimanual actions but may also constrain independent limb control. Significance Statement Classic split-brain studies revealed that severing the corpus callosum impairs bimanual coordination, but the specific pathways and mechanisms remain unclear. In macaques, we transiently disrupted the posterior corpus callosum connecting left and right parietal reach regions (PRR), which encode planned contralateral arm movements. This targeted blockade reduced task-specific neural synchrony between PRRs and selectively impaired coordination when both arms reached to a common target, while improving performance when the arms moved to separate targets. Movement initiation was also sped up across tasks, consistent with an inhibitory role of interhemispheric communication. These findings provide causal evidence that posterior callosal communication enables spatially coordinated bimanual movements, extending foundational split-brain insights to defined cortical circuits in a non-human primate model.

Many studies infer the role of neurons by asking what information can be decoded from their activity or by observing the consequences of perturbing their activity. An alternative approach is to consider information flow between neurons. We applied this approach to the Parietal Reach Region (PRR) and the Lateral Intraparietal area (LIP) in posterior parietal cortex. Two complementary methods show that, across a range of reaching tasks, information flows primarily from PRR to LIP but not vice versa. This suggests that PRR determines the spatial goals of coordinated eye and arm movements and instructs LIP of those goals. Based on these findings, we conclude that PRR and LIP operate in a parallel rather than hierarchical manner to plan arm and eye movements, respectively. Similar methodology can be applied to other areas to infer their relative relationships.

The canonical view of motor control is that distal musculature is controlled primarily by the contralateral cerebral hemisphere; unilateral brain lesions typically affect contralateral but not ipsilateral musculature. Contralateral-only limb deficits following a unilateral lesion suggest but do not prove that control is strictly contralateral: the loss of a contribution of the lesioned hemisphere to the control of the ipsilesional limb could be masked by the intact contralateral drive from the nonlesioned hemisphere. To distinguish between these possibilities, we serially inactivated the parietal reach region, comprising the posterior portion of medial intraparietal area, the anterior portion of V6a, and portions of the lateral occipital parietal area, in each hemisphere of 2 monkeys (23 experimental sessions, 46 injections total) to evaluate parietal reach region's contribution to the contralateral reaching deficits observed following lateralized brain lesions. Following unilateral inactivation, reach reaction times with the contralesional limb were slowed compared with matched blocks of control behavioral data; there was no effect of unilateral inactivation on the reaction time of either ipsilesional limb reaches or saccadic eye movements. Following bilateral inactivation, reaching was slowed in both limbs, with an effect size in each no different from that produced by unilateral inactivation. These findings indicate contralateral organization of reach preparation in posterior parietal cortex.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTUnilateral brain lesions typically affect contralateral but not ipsilateral musculature. Contralateral-only limb deficits following a unilateral lesion suggest but do not prove that control is strictly contralateral: the loss of a contribution of the lesioned hemisphere to the control of the ipsilesional limb could be masked by the intact contralateral drive from the nonlesioned hemisphere. Unilateral lesions cannot distinguish between contralateral and bilateral control, but bilateral lesions can. Here we show similar movement initiation deficits after combined unilateral and bilateral inactivation of the parietal reach region, indicating contralateral organization of reach preparation.

Primates use their arms in complex ways that frequently require coordination between the two arms. Yet the planning of bimanual movements has not been well-studied. We recorded spikes and local field potentials (LFP) from the parietal reach region (PRR) in both hemispheres simultaneously while monkeys planned and executed unimanual and bimanual reaches. From analyses of interhemispheric LFP-LFP and spike-LFP coherence, we found that task-specific information is shared across hemispheres in a frequency-specific manner. This shared information could arise from common input or from direct communication. The population average unit activity in PRR, representing PRR output, encodes only planned contralateral arm movements while beta-band LFP power, a putative PRR input, reflects the pattern of planned bimanual movement. A parsimonious interpretation of these data is that PRR integrates information about the movement of the left and right limbs, perhaps in service of bimanual coordination.

The integrity of white matter architecture in the human brain is related to cognitive processing abilities. The corpus callosum is the largest white matter bundle interconnecting the two cerebral hemispheres. “Split-brain” patients in whom all cortical commissures have been severed to alleviate intractable epilepsy demonstrate remarkably intact cognitive abilities despite the lack of this important interhemispheric pathway. While it has often been speculated that there are compensatory alterations in the remaining interhemispheric fibers in split-brain patients several years post-commissurotomy, this has never been directly shown. Here we examined extra-callosal pathways for interhemispheric communication in the brain of a patient who underwent complete cerebral commissurotomy using diffusion weighted imaging tractography. We found that compared with a healthy age-matched comparison group, the split-brain patient exhibited increased fractional anisotropy (FA) of the dorsal and ventral pontine decussations of the cortico-cerebellar interhemispheric pathways. Few differences were observed between the patient and the comparison group with respect to FA of other long-range intrahemispheric fibers. These results point to specific cerebellar anatomical substrates that may account for the spared interhemispheric coordination and intact cognitive abilities that have been extensively documented in this unique patient.