Sangeeta Sharma
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Sangeeta Sharma has a total of 177 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Kiran Bala
Institute of Human Behavior and Allied Sciences (IHBAS), New Delhi, India
11 shared publications- Sandeep Grover
Centre for Genetic Epidemiology, Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Applied Biometry, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
8 shared publications Ruchi Baghel
Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology (IGIB), New Delhi, India
7 shared publications- Puneet Talwar
GIGA-CRC Human Imaging, University of Liège
6 shared publications Harpreet Kaur
Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology (IGIB), Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), Delhi, India
5 shared publications- Renu Gupta
Microbiology, Institute of Human Behaviour and Allied Sciences, Delhi, IND
5 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 8 October 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in Discover Public Health
- Vol. 23 (1) , 1611
Gamified learning improves antimicrobial resistance knowledge and engagement among university students
- 8 October 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in Discover Public Health
- Vol. 23 (1) , 1611
Open AccessGamified learning improves antimicrobial resistance knowledge and engagement among university students
- 18 August 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in Pharmaceutical Medicine
- Vol. 40 (5) , 373-398
Medication Safety in India and Southeast Asia: A SWOT Analysis of Policies and Practices
Medication safety is a critical component of patient care, yet fragmented regulations, under-reporting of adverse events, and resource constraints continue to pose risks in India and Southeast Asia. Addressing these challenges requires system-level interventions supported by robust policies and technology-driven solutions. This review analyzes medication safety frameworks in India and World Health Organization South-East Asia Region countries using a Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) approach, identifying internal strengths and weaknesses alongside external opportunities and threats. The goal is to propose strategic actions that enhance regulatory oversight, capacity building, health-system resilience, and hospital-level practices. A comparative narrative review of national regulations, World Health Organization and Association of Southeast Asian Nations frameworks, policy documents, and published literature was conducted. Recurring themes were consolidated into four domains such as regulatory systems, health-system strengthening, workforce capacity building, and hospital-level strategies and synthesized using a SWOT-based analytical approach to identify shared gaps, contextual differences, and strategic priorities across India and South-East Asia Region countries. The SWOT analysis across four domains revealed shared patterns between India and World Health Organization South-East Asia Region countries. Regulatory frameworks show strong institutional structures in India and Association of Southeast Asian Nations Good Manufacturing Practices harmonization, but both lack centralized drug registries and face under-reporting of adverse events. Capacity building benefits from professional networks, yet rural workforce shortages and inconsistent training persist region wide. Health systems leverage multi-tiered structures and national programs, but fragmentation and weak digital infrastructure hinder medication error reporting. At the hospital level, limited resources, staff resistance, and complex policies restrict adoption of electronic health records and safety technologies. Opportunities include harmonizing Good Manufacturing Practice standards, scaling accreditation, and deploying digital tools, while threats such as counterfeit medicines, antimicrobial resistance, and punitive reporting cultures remain significant. Strategic priorities include establishing centralized drug registries, enforcing prescription-only rules, implementing QR codes for high-risk medicines, and promoting blame-free reporting. Medium-term actions involve expanding digital health solutions, integrating medication safety into curricula, and scaling accreditation. Long-term goals focus on regional harmonization, collaborative research, and cultural transformation toward safety. Leveraging India’s regulatory strengths and lessons learned can accelerate medication safety improvements across Southeast
- 18 August 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in Pharmaceutical Medicine
- Vol. 40 (5) , 373-398
Medication Safety in India and Southeast Asia: A SWOT Analysis of Policies and Practices
Medication safety is a critical component of patient care, yet fragmented regulations, under-reporting of adverse events, and resource constraints continue to pose risks in India and Southeast Asia. Addressing these challenges requires system-level interventions supported by robust policies and technology-driven solutions. This review analyzes medication safety frameworks in India and World Health Organization South-East Asia Region countries using a Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) approach, identifying internal strengths and weaknesses alongside external opportunities and threats. The goal is to propose strategic actions that enhance regulatory oversight, capacity building, health-system resilience, and hospital-level practices. A comparative narrative review of national regulations, World Health Organization and Association of Southeast Asian Nations frameworks, policy documents, and published literature was conducted. Recurring themes were consolidated into four domains such as regulatory systems, health-system strengthening, workforce capacity building, and hospital-level strategies and synthesized using a SWOT-based analytical approach to identify shared gaps, contextual differences, and strategic priorities across India and South-East Asia Region countries. The SWOT analysis across four domains revealed shared patterns between India and World Health Organization South-East Asia Region countries. Regulatory frameworks show strong institutional structures in India and Association of Southeast Asian Nations Good Manufacturing Practices harmonization, but both lack centralized drug registries and face under-reporting of adverse events. Capacity building benefits from professional networks, yet rural workforce shortages and inconsistent training persist region wide. Health systems leverage multi-tiered structures and national programs, but fragmentation and weak digital infrastructure hinder medication error reporting. At the hospital level, limited resources, staff resistance, and complex policies restrict adoption of electronic health records and safety technologies. Opportunities include harmonizing Good Manufacturing Practice standards, scaling accreditation, and deploying digital tools, while threats such as counterfeit medicines, antimicrobial resistance, and punitive reporting cultures remain significant. Strategic priorities include establishing centralized drug registries, enforcing prescription-only rules, implementing QR codes for high-risk medicines, and promoting blame-free reporting. Medium-term actions involve expanding digital health solutions, integrating medication safety into curricula, and scaling accreditation. Long-term goals focus on regional harmonization, collaborative research, and cultural transformation toward safety. Leveraging India’s regulatory strengths and lessons learned can accelerate medication safety improvements across Southeast
- Open Access
- 5 February 2026
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in IJQHC Communications
- Vol. 6 (1)
A prospective multicentric development and validation study of a Patient-Reported Experience Measures (PREMs) tool to assess medication administration safety in Indian hospitals
Background: Medication errors remain a leading cause of preventable harm worldwide. Existing safety assessments rely mainly on audits and staff reports, which often overlook patients’ perspectives. Patient-Reported Experience Measures (PREMs) offer a structured way to capture patients’ views on medication administration safety. However, no PREM tool has been developed in India. Objective: To develop, validate, and apply a patient-centred PREM tool for assessing medication administration safety in Indian hospitals. Methods: This prospective, multicentre study was conducted across 16 hospitals (September 2023–April 2024). Tool development followed standard questionnaire design processes, including expert focus groups, face/content validation, and piloting. The final 15-item checklist used binary (yes/no) responses. Reliability was assessed using Kuder–Richardson Formula 20 (KR-20). A total of 614 adult inpatients (>24 h stay) completed the questionnaire. Results: Content validity indices showed excellent agreement (S-CVI/Ave = 0.96). Internal consistency was acceptable for an early-phase validation study (KR-20 = 0.66). High adherence was reported for safety practices such as identity verification (95.0%) and allergy history documentation (94.8%). Areas for improvement included cost communication (68.6%) and disclosure of side effects (67.4%). Missed or skipped doses were reported by 17.3% (95% CI, 14.5%–20.5%) of patients. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first multicentre study in India to develop and undertake early-phase validation of a Patient-Reported Experience Measures (PREMs) tool for medication administration safety. The tool demonstrated feasibility and patient acceptability, while highlighting key safety gaps. Future work will focus on psychometric refinement and wider application, including integration into national quality assurance frameworks.
- 5 February 2026
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in IJQHC Communications
- Vol. 6 (1)
Open AccessA prospective multicentric development and validation study of a Patient-Reported Experience Measures (PREMs) tool to assess medication administration safety in Indian hospitals
Background: Medication errors remain a leading cause of preventable harm worldwide. Existing safety assessments rely mainly on audits and staff reports, which often overlook patients’ perspectives. Patient-Reported Experience Measures (PREMs) offer a structured way to capture patients’ views on medication administration safety. However, no PREM tool has been developed in India. Objective: To develop, validate, and apply a patient-centred PREM tool for assessing medication administration safety in Indian hospitals. Methods: This prospective, multicentre study was conducted across 16 hospitals (September 2023–April 2024). Tool development followed standard questionnaire design processes, including expert focus groups, face/content validation, and piloting. The final 15-item checklist used binary (yes/no) responses. Reliability was assessed using Kuder–Richardson Formula 20 (KR-20). A total of 614 adult inpatients (>24 h stay) completed the questionnaire. Results: Content validity indices showed excellent agreement (S-CVI/Ave = 0.96). Internal consistency was acceptable for an early-phase validation study (KR-20 = 0.66). High adherence was reported for safety practices such as identity verification (95.0%) and allergy history documentation (94.8%). Areas for improvement included cost communication (68.6%) and disclosure of side effects (67.4%). Missed or skipped doses were reported by 17.3% (95% CI, 14.5%–20.5%) of patients. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first multicentre study in India to develop and undertake early-phase validation of a Patient-Reported Experience Measures (PREMs) tool for medication administration safety. The tool demonstrated feasibility and patient acceptability, while highlighting key safety gaps. Future work will focus on psychometric refinement and wider application, including integration into national quality assurance frameworks.
- Open Access
- 25 November 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Health Services Research
- Vol. 25 (1) , 1522
Bridging the gap between evidence and practice: a national level initiative to implement Standard Treatment Guidelines (STGs) in clinical practice
Health outcomes in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) have improved, but poor-quality care, driven by inconsistent clinical practices due to differen
- 25 November 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Health Services Research
- Vol. 25 (1) , 1522
Open AccessBridging the gap between evidence and practice: a national level initiative to implement Standard Treatment Guidelines (STGs) in clinical practice
Health outcomes in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) have improved, but poor-quality care, driven by inconsistent clinical practices due to differen
- Open Access
- 8 September 2025
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Preventive Medicine: Research & Reviews
- Vol. 2 (6) , 255-256
Call for Submissions: Primary Care and Standard Treatment Guidelines: Bridging Evidence to Practice Gaps for Safer and Smarter Health Systems
- 8 September 2025
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Preventive Medicine: Research & Reviews
- Vol. 2 (6) , 255-256
Open AccessCall for Submissions: Primary Care and Standard Treatment Guidelines: Bridging Evidence to Practice Gaps for Safer and Smarter Health Systems
- 11 July 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Pharmaceutical Medicine
- p. 1-31
Combating Antimicrobial Resistance: Role of Key Stakeholders with Focus on the Pharmaceutical Sector
Antimicrobial resistance is a pressing global health threat fueled by a complex interplay of biological, social, and economic factors. Despite widespread recognition of its impact, the antimicrobial resistance crisis continues to deepen because of inadequate innovation, poor access to effective treatments, and irrational antimicrobial use. Effectively combating antimicrobial resistance requires a multisectoral, multistakeholder, and multidimensional approach, with the pharmaceutical industry playing a pivotal role in new antimicrobial discovery along with diagnostic and other stakeholders. This review critically examines the central role of the pharmaceutical industry in addressing antimicrobial resistance, focusing on drug discovery, manufacturing practices, and stewardship efforts. While the industry has made notable contributions through the development of new antimicrobials and alternative approaches such as drug repurposing, artificial intelligence-driven discovery, and improved diagnostics, major challenges persist—including a declining antibiotic pipeline, limited access in low- and middle-income countries, antimicrobial pollution, irrational fixed-dose combinations, and the prevalence of substandard or falsified drugs. To overcome these barriers, this review explores strategic directions, including public-private partnerships, delinked incentive models, small-molecule innovation, ethical marketing, and equitable access strategies. It also underscores the industry’s responsibility in promoting antimicrobial stewardship, participating in global surveillance systems, and educating prescribers and the public on responsible use. Future directions highlight the need for diversified funding, global collaboration, and the adoption of the “triple shield” approach—integrating infection prevention and control, antimicrobial stewardship, and robust surveillance to combat antimicrobial resistance. This review presents an integrated analysis of pharmaceutical accountability, highlighting actionable pathways that align innovation with equitable access, environmental safety, and ethical governance. By bridging gaps between discovery and delivery, the pharmaceutical sector can become a driving force in the global response to antimicrobial resistance.
- 11 July 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Pharmaceutical Medicine
- p. 1-31
Combating Antimicrobial Resistance: Role of Key Stakeholders with Focus on the Pharmaceutical Sector
Antimicrobial resistance is a pressing global health threat fueled by a complex interplay of biological, social, and economic factors. Despite widespread recognition of its impact, the antimicrobial resistance crisis continues to deepen because of inadequate innovation, poor access to effective treatments, and irrational antimicrobial use. Effectively combating antimicrobial resistance requires a multisectoral, multistakeholder, and multidimensional approach, with the pharmaceutical industry playing a pivotal role in new antimicrobial discovery along with diagnostic and other stakeholders. This review critically examines the central role of the pharmaceutical industry in addressing antimicrobial resistance, focusing on drug discovery, manufacturing practices, and stewardship efforts. While the industry has made notable contributions through the development of new antimicrobials and alternative approaches such as drug repurposing, artificial intelligence-driven discovery, and improved diagnostics, major challenges persist—including a declining antibiotic pipeline, limited access in low- and middle-income countries, antimicrobial pollution, irrational fixed-dose combinations, and the prevalence of substandard or falsified drugs. To overcome these barriers, this review explores strategic directions, including public-private partnerships, delinked incentive models, small-molecule innovation, ethical marketing, and equitable access strategies. It also underscores the industry’s responsibility in promoting antimicrobial stewardship, participating in global surveillance systems, and educating prescribers and the public on responsible use. Future directions highlight the need for diversified funding, global collaboration, and the adoption of the “triple shield” approach—integrating infection prevention and control, antimicrobial stewardship, and robust surveillance to combat antimicrobial resistance. This review presents an integrated analysis of pharmaceutical accountability, highlighting actionable pathways that align innovation with equitable access, environmental safety, and ethical governance. By bridging gaps between discovery and delivery, the pharmaceutical sector can become a driving force in the global response to antimicrobial resistance.
- Open Access
- 20 May 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Discover Health Systems
- Vol. 4 (1) , 1-13
Closing the quality gap from awareness to adoption of standard treatment guidelines in clinical practice in India
- 20 May 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Discover Health Systems
- Vol. 4 (1) , 1-13
Open AccessClosing the quality gap from awareness to adoption of standard treatment guidelines in clinical practice in India
- 5 December 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Nurse Education in Practice
- Vol. 82, 104223
Empowering nurses for effective diagnostic stewardship: An initiative to address anti-microbial resistance
- 5 December 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Nurse Education in Practice
- Vol. 82, 104223
Empowering nurses for effective diagnostic stewardship: An initiative to address anti-microbial resistance
- 19 July 2023
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 763-787
Antimicrobial Stewardship in India: Success and Challenges
- 19 July 2023
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 763-787
Antimicrobial Stewardship in India: Success and Challenges
- 19 July 2023
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 217-235
Antimicrobial Use in Humans