Ranran Wu
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Ranran Wu has a total of 120 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Johannes Francois Fahrmann
Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
70 shared publications - Jennifer B. Dennison
Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
69 shared publications - Samir Hanash
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
69 shared publications - Ehsan Irajizad
Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston, TX
38 shared publications - Jody V. Vykoukal
Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
32 shared publications - Kim-Anh Do
Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
32 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Figure S3 from Association of Blood Levels of Forever Plastics with Lung Cancer Mortality among Ever Smokers in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cohort Study
Cumulative incidence curves of the PFAP signature stratified by risk categories (Q denotes risk quartiles), comparing lung cancer–specific mortality, mortality from other cancers, and non-cancer–related mortality.
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Figure S3 from Association of Blood Levels of Forever Plastics with Lung Cancer Mortality among Ever Smokers in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cohort Study
Cumulative incidence curves of the PFAP signature stratified by risk categories (Q denotes risk quartiles), comparing lung cancer–specific mortality, mortality from other cancers, and non-cancer–related mortality.
- Open Access
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Figure S1 from Association of Blood Levels of Forever Plastics with Lung Cancer Mortality among Ever Smokers in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cohort Study
Pairwise correlations among quantified forever-plastics and phthalates in entire PLCO cohort.
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Figure S1 from Association of Blood Levels of Forever Plastics with Lung Cancer Mortality among Ever Smokers in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cohort Study
Pairwise correlations among quantified forever-plastics and phthalates in entire PLCO cohort.
- Open Access
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Tables S1-S38 from Association of Blood Levels of Forever Plastics with Lung Cancer Mortality among Ever Smokers in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cohort Study
Supplementary Table 1. Detectable microplastics (MP), per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), and plasticizers (BPA and phthalates) in the internal mass spectrometry database. Supplemental Table S2. Patient characteristics for the Development and Validation Set. Supplementary Table S3. Association between detected PFAS and plasticizers with lung cancer incidence when adjusting for age and smoking as confounding variables. Supplementary Table S4. Association between detected PFAS and plasticizers with lung cancer incidence in the entire PLCO dataset when stratifying samples into quantiles. Supplementary Table S5. Association between detected PFAS and plasticizers with lung cancer incidence stratifying by sex in the entire PLCO dataset. Supplementary Table S6. Association between detected PFAS and plasticizers with lung cancer incidence stratifying by age in the entire PLCO dataset. Supplementary Table S7. Association between detected PFAS and plasticizers with lung cancer incidence stratifying by smoking intensity in the entire PLCO dataset. Supplementary Table S8. Association between detected PFAS and plasticizers with lung cancer incidence stratifying by ethnicity in the entire PLCO dataset. Supplementary Table S9. Association between detected PFAS and plasticizers with lung cancer incidence in the entire PLCO specimen set when stratifying by stage at diagnosis. Supplementary Table S10. Association between detected PFAS and plasticizers with lung cancer incidence in the entire PLCO specimen set when stratifying by lung cancer subtype at the time of clinical diagnosis. Supplementary Table S11: Causes of death for the participants in the PLCO cohort. Supplementary Table S12. Association between detected PFAS and plasticizers with lung cancer mortality in the entire PLCO dataset using cause-specific hazard ratios. Supplementary Table 13. Association between detected PFAS and plasticizers with lung cancer mortality using cause-specific hazard ratio in the entire PLCO dataset when adjusting for age and smoking intensity. Supplementary Table S14. Association between detected PFAS and plasticizers with lung cancer mortality in the entire PLCO dataset using cause-specific hazard ratios stratifying by sex. Supplementary Table S15. Association between detected PFAS and plasticizers with lung cancer mortality in the entire PLCO dataset using cause-specific hazard ratios stratifying by age. Supplementary Table S16. Association between detected PFAS and plasticizers with lung cancer mortality in the entire PLCO dataset using cause-specific hazard ratios stratifying by smoking intensity. Supplementary Table S17. Association between detected PFAS and plasticizers with lung cancer mortality in the entire PLCO dataset using cause-specific hazard ratios stratifying by ethnicity. Supplementary Table S18. Association between detected PFAS and plasticizers with lung cancer mortality in the entire PLCO dataset using cause-specific hazard ratios stratifying by stage at diagnosis. Supplementary Table S19. Association between detected PFAS and plasticizers with lung cancer mortality in the entire PLCO dataset using cause-specific hazard ratios stratifying by lung cancer subtype at the time of clinical diagnosis. Supplementary Table S20. Association between detected PFAS and plasticizers with lung cancer mortality in the entire PLCO dataset using sub-distributional hazard ratio. Supplementary Table 21. Association between detected PFAS and plasticizers with lung cancer mortality using sub-distributional hazard ratio in the entire PLCO dataset when adjusting for age and smoking intensity. Supplementary Table S22. Association between detected PFAS and plasticizers with lung cancer mortality in the entire PLCO dataset using sub-distributional hazard ratio stratifying by sex. Supplementary Table S23. Association between detected PFAS and plasticizers with lung cancer mortality in the entire PLCO dataset using sub-distributional hazard ratio stratifying by age. Supplementary Table S24. Association between detected PFAS and plasticizers with lung cancer mortality in the entire PLCO dataset using sub-distributional hazard ratio stratifying by smoking intensity. Supplementary Table S25. Association between detected and plasticizers with lung cancer mortality in the entire PLCO dataset using sub-distributional hazard ratio stratifying by ethnicity. Supplementary Table S26. Association between detected PFAS and plasticizers with lung cancer mortality in the entire PLCO dataset using sub-distributional hazard ratio stratifying by stage at diagnosis. Supplementary Table S27. Association between detected PFAS and plasticizers with lung cancer mortality in the entire PLCO dataset using sub-distributional hazard ratio stratifying by lung cancer subtype at the time of clinical diagnosis. Supplementary Table S28. Association between the PFAP model with lung cancer mortality using cause-specific and sub-distributional hazard ratio in the PLCO Development and Testing sets. Supplementary Table S29. Variance inflation factors for features included in the PFAP model. Supplementary Table S30. Likelihood ratio test P values comparing linear and cubic spline Cox models for associations with survival. Supplementary Table S31. Continuous hazard ratios for lung cancer–specific mortality using a cause-specific approach for PFAP under different sampling approach. Supplementary Table S32. Association between the PFAP model with lung-cancer mortality using cause-specific and sub-distributional hazard ratio in the entire PLCO dataset when adjusting for age, sex, BMI, smoking status, education, and emphysema. Supplementary Table S33. Association between the PFAP model with lung-cancer mortality using cause-specific and sub-distributional hazard ratio in the entire PLCO dataset when excluding deaths within 1-, 2-, and 5-years after sample collection. Supplementary Table S34. Performance estimates (AUC and C-index) of the PFAP model...
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Tables S1-S38 from Association of Blood Levels of Forever Plastics with Lung Cancer Mortality among Ever Smokers in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cohort Study
Supplementary Table 1. Detectable microplastics (MP), per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), and plasticizers (BPA and phthalates) in the internal mass spectrometry database. Supplemental Table S2. Patient characteristics for the Development and Validation Set. Supplementary Table S3. Association between detected PFAS and plasticizers with lung cancer incidence when adjusting for age and smoking as confounding variables. Supplementary Table S4. Association between detected PFAS and plasticizers with lung cancer incidence in the entire PLCO dataset when stratifying samples into quantiles. Supplementary Table S5. Association between detected PFAS and plasticizers with lung cancer incidence stratifying by sex in the entire PLCO dataset. Supplementary Table S6. Association between detected PFAS and plasticizers with lung cancer incidence stratifying by age in the entire PLCO dataset. Supplementary Table S7. Association between detected PFAS and plasticizers with lung cancer incidence stratifying by smoking intensity in the entire PLCO dataset. Supplementary Table S8. Association between detected PFAS and plasticizers with lung cancer incidence stratifying by ethnicity in the entire PLCO dataset. Supplementary Table S9. Association between detected PFAS and plasticizers with lung cancer incidence in the entire PLCO specimen set when stratifying by stage at diagnosis. Supplementary Table S10. Association between detected PFAS and plasticizers with lung cancer incidence in the entire PLCO specimen set when stratifying by lung cancer subtype at the time of clinical diagnosis. Supplementary Table S11: Causes of death for the participants in the PLCO cohort. Supplementary Table S12. Association between detected PFAS and plasticizers with lung cancer mortality in the entire PLCO dataset using cause-specific hazard ratios. Supplementary Table 13. Association between detected PFAS and plasticizers with lung cancer mortality using cause-specific hazard ratio in the entire PLCO dataset when adjusting for age and smoking intensity. Supplementary Table S14. Association between detected PFAS and plasticizers with lung cancer mortality in the entire PLCO dataset using cause-specific hazard ratios stratifying by sex. Supplementary Table S15. Association between detected PFAS and plasticizers with lung cancer mortality in the entire PLCO dataset using cause-specific hazard ratios stratifying by age. Supplementary Table S16. Association between detected PFAS and plasticizers with lung cancer mortality in the entire PLCO dataset using cause-specific hazard ratios stratifying by smoking intensity. Supplementary Table S17. Association between detected PFAS and plasticizers with lung cancer mortality in the entire PLCO dataset using cause-specific hazard ratios stratifying by ethnicity. Supplementary Table S18. Association between detected PFAS and plasticizers with lung cancer mortality in the entire PLCO dataset using cause-specific hazard ratios stratifying by stage at diagnosis. Supplementary Table S19. Association between detected PFAS and plasticizers with lung cancer mortality in the entire PLCO dataset using cause-specific hazard ratios stratifying by lung cancer subtype at the time of clinical diagnosis. Supplementary Table S20. Association between detected PFAS and plasticizers with lung cancer mortality in the entire PLCO dataset using sub-distributional hazard ratio. Supplementary Table 21. Association between detected PFAS and plasticizers with lung cancer mortality using sub-distributional hazard ratio in the entire PLCO dataset when adjusting for age and smoking intensity. Supplementary Table S22. Association between detected PFAS and plasticizers with lung cancer mortality in the entire PLCO dataset using sub-distributional hazard ratio stratifying by sex. Supplementary Table S23. Association between detected PFAS and plasticizers with lung cancer mortality in the entire PLCO dataset using sub-distributional hazard ratio stratifying by age. Supplementary Table S24. Association between detected PFAS and plasticizers with lung cancer mortality in the entire PLCO dataset using sub-distributional hazard ratio stratifying by smoking intensity. Supplementary Table S25. Association between detected and plasticizers with lung cancer mortality in the entire PLCO dataset using sub-distributional hazard ratio stratifying by ethnicity. Supplementary Table S26. Association between detected PFAS and plasticizers with lung cancer mortality in the entire PLCO dataset using sub-distributional hazard ratio stratifying by stage at diagnosis. Supplementary Table S27. Association between detected PFAS and plasticizers with lung cancer mortality in the entire PLCO dataset using sub-distributional hazard ratio stratifying by lung cancer subtype at the time of clinical diagnosis. Supplementary Table S28. Association between the PFAP model with lung cancer mortality using cause-specific and sub-distributional hazard ratio in the PLCO Development and Testing sets. Supplementary Table S29. Variance inflation factors for features included in the PFAP model. Supplementary Table S30. Likelihood ratio test P values comparing linear and cubic spline Cox models for associations with survival. Supplementary Table S31. Continuous hazard ratios for lung cancer–specific mortality using a cause-specific approach for PFAP under different sampling approach. Supplementary Table S32. Association between the PFAP model with lung-cancer mortality using cause-specific and sub-distributional hazard ratio in the entire PLCO dataset when adjusting for age, sex, BMI, smoking status, education, and emphysema. Supplementary Table S33. Association between the PFAP model with lung-cancer mortality using cause-specific and sub-distributional hazard ratio in the entire PLCO dataset when excluding deaths within 1-, 2-, and 5-years after sample collection. Supplementary Table S34. Performance estimates (AUC and C-index) of the PFAP model...
- Open Access
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Data from Association of Blood Levels of Forever Plastics with Lung Cancer Mortality among Ever Smokers in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cohort Study
Purpose:Recent evidence suggests a significant association between microplastic (MP), forever chemicals, and plasticizers and various diseases, including cancer. In this study, we evaluated circulating levels of plastic-associated chemicals in relation to lung cancer incidence and mortality among smokers in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) study.Experimental Design:Using mass spectrometry, we screened for 29 known MP, forever plastics [per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS)], and plasticizer chemicals in 245 sera collected preceding a lung cancer diagnosis and 1,200 noncase sera from participants in the PLCO study who had a history of smoking. Five PFAS and three plasticizers were detected and quantified in sera. A PFAP model, consisting of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) + perfluorohexanesulfonic acid (PFHA) + mono-iso-nonyl phthalate, was developed for predicting lung cancer mortality and risk strata based on quantiles established.Results:Higher circulating levels of PFOS, PFHA, and mono-iso-nonyl phthalate were associated with increased risk of lung cancer death (P < 0.05) but not incidence. Compared with the lowest quantile (reference), individuals with PFAP scores in the highest quantile were at markedly higher risk of death from lung cancer (P < 0.0001), with respective cause-specific and subdistributional HR of 1.86 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.18–2.93] and 1.82 (95% CI, 1.15–2.88). Substratified analyses confirmed that the PFAP model remained an independent predictor of lung cancer–specific mortality (P < 0.05) across strata defined by age, sex, smoking history, histologic subtype, and stage at diagnosis.Conclusions:In the PLCO cohort, elevated levels of PFOS, PFHA, and mono-iso-nonyl phthalate were associated with increased lung cancer mortality among ever smokers across disease subgroups.
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessData from Association of Blood Levels of Forever Plastics with Lung Cancer Mortality among Ever Smokers in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cohort Study
Purpose:Recent evidence suggests a significant association between microplastic (MP), forever chemicals, and plasticizers and various diseases, including cancer. In this study, we evaluated circulating levels of plastic-associated chemicals in relation to lung cancer incidence and mortality among smokers in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) study.Experimental Design:Using mass spectrometry, we screened for 29 known MP, forever plastics [per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS)], and plasticizer chemicals in 245 sera collected preceding a lung cancer diagnosis and 1,200 noncase sera from participants in the PLCO study who had a history of smoking. Five PFAS and three plasticizers were detected and quantified in sera. A PFAP model, consisting of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) + perfluorohexanesulfonic acid (PFHA) + mono-iso-nonyl phthalate, was developed for predicting lung cancer mortality and risk strata based on quantiles established.Results:Higher circulating levels of PFOS, PFHA, and mono-iso-nonyl phthalate were associated with increased risk of lung cancer death (P < 0.05) but not incidence. Compared with the lowest quantile (reference), individuals with PFAP scores in the highest quantile were at markedly higher risk of death from lung cancer (P < 0.0001), with respective cause-specific and subdistributional HR of 1.86 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.18–2.93] and 1.82 (95% CI, 1.15–2.88). Substratified analyses confirmed that the PFAP model remained an independent predictor of lung cancer–specific mortality (P < 0.05) across strata defined by age, sex, smoking history, histologic subtype, and stage at diagnosis.Conclusions:In the PLCO cohort, elevated levels of PFOS, PFHA, and mono-iso-nonyl phthalate were associated with increased lung cancer mortality among ever smokers across disease subgroups.
- Open Access
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Figure S2 from Association of Blood Levels of Forever Plastics with Lung Cancer Mortality among Ever Smokers in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cohort Study
Calibration plot of the PFAP model comparing predicted and observed lung cancer–specific mortality risk at 5-, 10-, and 15-years following blood collection.
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Figure S2 from Association of Blood Levels of Forever Plastics with Lung Cancer Mortality among Ever Smokers in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cohort Study
Calibration plot of the PFAP model comparing predicted and observed lung cancer–specific mortality risk at 5-, 10-, and 15-years following blood collection.
- 4 March 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) in Clinical Cancer Research
- Vol. 32 (10) , 2071-2078
Association of Blood Levels of Forever Plastics with Lung Cancer Mortality among Ever Smokers in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cohort Study
Purpose: Recent evidence suggests a significant association between microplastic (MP), forever chemicals, and plasticizers and various diseases, including cancer. In this study, we evaluated circulating levels of plastic-associated chemicals in relation to lung cancer incidence and mortality among smokers in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) study. Experimental Design: Using mass spectrometry, we screened for 29 known MP, forever plastics [per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS)], and plasticizer chemicals in 245 sera collected preceding a lung cancer diagnosis and 1,200 noncase sera from participants in the PLCO study who had a history of smoking. Five PFAS and three plasticizers were detected and quantified in sera. A PFAP model, consisting of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) + perfluorohexanesulfonic acid (PFHA) + mono-iso-nonyl phthalate, was developed for predicting lung cancer mortality and risk strata based on quantiles established. Results: Higher circulating levels of PFOS, PFHA, and mono-iso-nonyl phthalate were associated with increased risk of lung cancer death (P < 0.05) but not incidence. Compared with the lowest quantile (reference), individuals with PFAP scores in the highest quantile were at markedly higher risk of death from lung cancer (P < 0.0001), with respective cause-specific and subdistributional HR of 1.86 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.18–2.93] and 1.82 (95% CI, 1.15–2.88). Substratified analyses confirmed that the PFAP model remained an independent predictor of lung cancer–specific mortality (P < 0.05) across strata defined by age, sex, smoking history, histologic subtype, and stage at diagnosis. Conclusions: In the PLCO cohort, elevated levels of PFOS, PFHA, and mono-iso-nonyl phthalate were associated with increased lung cancer mortality among ever smokers across disease subgroups.
- 4 March 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) in Clinical Cancer Research
- Vol. 32 (10) , 2071-2078
Association of Blood Levels of Forever Plastics with Lung Cancer Mortality among Ever Smokers in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cohort Study
Purpose: Recent evidence suggests a significant association between microplastic (MP), forever chemicals, and plasticizers and various diseases, including cancer. In this study, we evaluated circulating levels of plastic-associated chemicals in relation to lung cancer incidence and mortality among smokers in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) study. Experimental Design: Using mass spectrometry, we screened for 29 known MP, forever plastics [per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS)], and plasticizer chemicals in 245 sera collected preceding a lung cancer diagnosis and 1,200 noncase sera from participants in the PLCO study who had a history of smoking. Five PFAS and three plasticizers were detected and quantified in sera. A PFAP model, consisting of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) + perfluorohexanesulfonic acid (PFHA) + mono-iso-nonyl phthalate, was developed for predicting lung cancer mortality and risk strata based on quantiles established. Results: Higher circulating levels of PFOS, PFHA, and mono-iso-nonyl phthalate were associated with increased risk of lung cancer death (P < 0.05) but not incidence. Compared with the lowest quantile (reference), individuals with PFAP scores in the highest quantile were at markedly higher risk of death from lung cancer (P < 0.0001), with respective cause-specific and subdistributional HR of 1.86 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.18–2.93] and 1.82 (95% CI, 1.15–2.88). Substratified analyses confirmed that the PFAP model remained an independent predictor of lung cancer–specific mortality (P < 0.05) across strata defined by age, sex, smoking history, histologic subtype, and stage at diagnosis. Conclusions: In the PLCO cohort, elevated levels of PFOS, PFHA, and mono-iso-nonyl phthalate were associated with increased lung cancer mortality among ever smokers across disease subgroups.
- Open Access
- 25 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Figure S3 from Exercise Training Reduces the Inflammatory Response and Promotes Intestinal Mucosa-Associated Immunity in Lynch Syndrome
Figure S3. (A) Average time that study participants wore the Fitbit throughout the study; (B) Resting heart rate in study participants at baseline; (C) Average total minutes of exercise at heart rate 70-85% of PHR; (D) Average total minutes of exercise at heart rate >85% of PHR. (***, P ≤0.001; ****, P≤0.0001).
- 25 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Figure S3 from Exercise Training Reduces the Inflammatory Response and Promotes Intestinal Mucosa-Associated Immunity in Lynch Syndrome
Figure S3. (A) Average time that study participants wore the Fitbit throughout the study; (B) Resting heart rate in study participants at baseline; (C) Average total minutes of exercise at heart rate 70-85% of PHR; (D) Average total minutes of exercise at heart rate >85% of PHR. (***, P ≤0.001; ****, P≤0.0001).
- Open Access
- 25 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Table S3 from Exercise Training Reduces the Inflammatory Response and Promotes Intestinal Mucosa-Associated Immunity in Lynch Syndrome
Table S3. Number of patients experiencing adverse events. Only those toxicities experienced while on the trial are presented in the table. Toxicities during the pre-study stage of the trial, for example, that were present before participants begin intervention were not included. Should a patient experience an adverse event more than once, the patient is only counted once at the highest grade for that adverse event.
- 25 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Table S3 from Exercise Training Reduces the Inflammatory Response and Promotes Intestinal Mucosa-Associated Immunity in Lynch Syndrome
Table S3. Number of patients experiencing adverse events. Only those toxicities experienced while on the trial are presented in the table. Toxicities during the pre-study stage of the trial, for example, that were present before participants begin intervention were not included. Should a patient experience an adverse event more than once, the patient is only counted once at the highest grade for that adverse event.
- Open Access
- 25 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Figure S2 from Exercise Training Reduces the Inflammatory Response and Promotes Intestinal Mucosa-Associated Immunity in Lynch Syndrome
Figure S2. CYCLE-P trial study visits and follow-up.
- 25 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Figure S2 from Exercise Training Reduces the Inflammatory Response and Promotes Intestinal Mucosa-Associated Immunity in Lynch Syndrome
Figure S2. CYCLE-P trial study visits and follow-up.
- Open Access
- 25 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Figure S8 from Exercise Training Reduces the Inflammatory Response and Promotes Intestinal Mucosa-Associated Immunity in Lynch Syndrome
Figure S8. (A) Volcano plot of statistically significant genes and fold-changes between the usual care and exercise groups in DSP assay. Top significantly differentially expressed genes are labeled; (B) The dot plot presents enriched GSEA HALLMARK pathways. The sizes of the dots represent the count of core enrichment (leading-edge) genes. The colors of the dots represent the BH-adjusted P-values. The order of HALLMARK gene sets is based on the gene ratio (number of significant genes associated with the HALLMARK gene sets / total number of significant genes; (C) Total CD8+ T cell density per mm2 (left) and epithelial (right) in colonic mucosa preand post- intervention from usual care (n=4) and exercise (n=4) participants; (D) Total CD57+ NK cell density per mm2 (left) and epithelial (right) in colonic mucosa pre- and post- intervention from usual care (n=4) and exercise (n=4) participants.
- 25 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Figure S8 from Exercise Training Reduces the Inflammatory Response and Promotes Intestinal Mucosa-Associated Immunity in Lynch Syndrome
Figure S8. (A) Volcano plot of statistically significant genes and fold-changes between the usual care and exercise groups in DSP assay. Top significantly differentially expressed genes are labeled; (B) The dot plot presents enriched GSEA HALLMARK pathways. The sizes of the dots represent the count of core enrichment (leading-edge) genes. The colors of the dots represent the BH-adjusted P-values. The order of HALLMARK gene sets is based on the gene ratio (number of significant genes associated with the HALLMARK gene sets / total number of significant genes; (C) Total CD8+ T cell density per mm2 (left) and epithelial (right) in colonic mucosa preand post- intervention from usual care (n=4) and exercise (n=4) participants; (D) Total CD57+ NK cell density per mm2 (left) and epithelial (right) in colonic mucosa pre- and post- intervention from usual care (n=4) and exercise (n=4) participants.