Yousef Erfanifard

Measuring and mapping vegetation structure is essential for understanding the functioning of terrestrial ecosystems and for informing environmental policies. Recent years have seen a growing demand for high‐resolution data on vegetation structure, driving their prediction at fine resolutions (1–30 m) at state, continental, and global spatial extents by combining satellite data with machine learning. As these initiatives expand, it is crucial to actively discuss the quality and usability of these products. Here, we briefly summarize current efforts to map vegetation structure and show that continental‐to‐global canopy height models (CHMs) exhibit significant errors in canopy heights compared to national airborne laser scanning (ALS) data. We recommend that regions with abundant ALS data, such as Europe, prioritize using ALS‐based canopy height metrics rather than relying on less accurate predictions from satellite products. Despite variations in ALS data characteristics, such as temporal inconsistencies and differences in acquisition characteristics and classification accuracy, the generation of spatially contiguous canopy height products in raster format at fine spatial resolution is necessary and feasible. This requires coordinating efforts for data and survey harmonization, developing standardized processing pipelines and continent‐wide ALS products, and ensuring free access for research and environmental policy. We show that ALS data now cover most of Europe, with newer surveys achieving higher point densities, improving their suitability for vegetation mapping. Beyond numerous applications in forestry, ecology, and conservation, such data sets are crucial for calibrating future Earth Observation missions, making them essential for producing reliable and accurate global, fine‐resolution vegetation structure data.

Forests grow under dynamic conditions influenced by vegetation structure and environmental factors. However, empirical models to enhance growing stock volume GSV) estimation are commonly established based on structural information from airborne laser scanning (ALS) data, raising important questions regarding the models’ performance across time (temporal transferability). This study presents the integration of ALS and microclimate and site-specific data to assess the temporal transferability of GSV models at the plot level in a mixed forest located in Milicz, Poland, between 2007 (t₁) and 2015 (t₂). We compared random forest (RF), multiple linear regression (MLR), and generalized additive models (GAMs) across three modelling scenarios, ALS + site type + climate (sa), ALS only (sb), and ALS + site type (sc), and also performed internal and external validation to assess temporal transferability. Among the three modelling approaches, GAMs outperformed the MLR and RF models in internal validation, improving the R² by 6%–8% and reducing the rRMSE by 6%–12%. We found that climate was significant in GSV prediction when integrated with ALS and site conditions, with a permutation test (p ≤ 0.023) based on the rRMSE confirming climate significance. The direct contribution of climate to model performance was marginal on a broad scale. However, its influence on GSV and temporal transferability seem stronger in homogenous sites. In general, RF was the most stable in both the forward (t₁→t₂) and backward (t₂→t₁) directions in the sa scenario unlike the GAM, which was more stable in the backward direction. This study provides a framework for assessing the reliability of GSV models and addresses a critical gap in forest monitoring.

Remote sensing technologies like airborne laser scanning (ALS) and digital aerial photogrammetry (DAP) have emerged as efficient tools for detecting and analysing canopy gaps (CGs). Comparing these technologies is essential to determine their functionality and applicability in various environments. Thus, this study aimed to assess CG dynamics in the temperate European Białowieża Forest between 2015 and 2022 by comparing ALS data and image-derived point clouds (IPC) from DAP, to evaluate their respective capabilities in describing and analysing forest CG dynamics. Our results demonstrated that ALS-based point clouds provided more detailed and precise spatial information about both the vertical and horizontal structure of forest CGs compared to IPC. ALS detected 27,754 (54%) new CGs between 2015 and 2022, while IPC identified 23,502 (75%) new CGs. Both the average gap area and the total gap area significantly increased over time in both methods. ALS data not only identified a greater number of CGs, particularly smaller ones (below 500 m²), but also produced a more precise representation of CG shape and structure. In conclusion, precise, multi-temporal remote sensing data on the distribution and size of canopy gaps enable effective monitoring of structural changes and disturbances in forest stands, which in turn supports more efficient forest management, e.g., planning of forest regeneration.

The crown area is a critical metric for evaluating tree growth and supporting various ecological and forestry analyses. This study compares three approaches, i.e., unsupervised clustering, region-based, and deep learning, to estimate the crown area of Pinus eldarica Medw. using UAV-acquired RGB imagery (2 cm ground sampling distance) and high-density point clouds (1.27 points/cm³). The first approach applied unsupervised clustering techniques, such as Mean-shift and K-means, to directly estimate crown areas, bypassing tree top detection. The second employed a region-based approach, using Template Matching and Local Maxima (LM) for tree top identification, followed by Marker-Controlled Watershed (MCW) and Seeded Region Growing for crown delineation. The third approach utilized a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) that integrated Digital Surface Model layers with the Visible Atmospheric Resistance Index for enhanced segmentation. The results were compared against field measurements and manual digitization. The findings reveal that CNN and MCW with LM were the most effective, particularly for small and large trees, though performance decreased for medium-sized crowns. CNN provided the most accurate results overall, with a relative root mean square error (RRMSE) of 8.85%, a Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) of 0.97, and a bias score (BS) of 1.00. The CNN crown area estimates showed strong correlations (R² = 0.83, 0.62, and 0.94 for small, medium, and large trees, respectively) with manually digitized references. This study underscores the value of advanced CNN techniques for precise crown area and shape estimation, highlighting the need for future research to refine algorithms for improved handling of crown size variability.

Mobile devices such as smartphones, tablets or similar devices are becoming increasingly important as measurement devices in forestry due to their advanced sensors, including RGB cameras and LiDAR systems. This review examines the current state of applications of mobile devices for measuring biometric characteristics of individual trees and presents technologies, applications, measurement accuracy and implementation barriers. Passive sensors, such as RGB cameras have proven their potential for 3D reconstruction and analysing point clouds that improve single tree-level information collection. Active sensors with LiDAR-equipped smartphones provide precise quantitative measurements but are limited by specific hardware requirements. The combination of passive and active sensing techniques has shown significant potential for comprehensive data collection. The methods of data collection, both physical and digital, significantly affect the accuracy and reproducibility of measurements. Applications such as ForestScanner and TRESTIMA^TM have automated the measurement of tree characteristics and simplified data collection. However, environmental conditions and sensor limitations pose a challenge. There are also computational obstacles, as many methods require significant post-processing. The review highlights the advances in mobile device-based forestry applications and emphasizes the need for standardized protocols and cross-device benchmarking. Future research should focus on developing robust algorithms and cost-effective solutions to improve measurement accuracy and accessibility. While mobile devices offer significant potential for forest surveying, overcoming the above-mentioned challenges is critical to optimizing their application in forest management and protection.