Lynh Nguyen

Myeloid neoplasms (MNs) with germline predisposition represent a distinct, increasingly recognized category in the WHO classification, encompassing myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) arising in the context of an inherited genetic alteration or mutation. While often presenting at a younger age or with characteristic cytopenias with or without organ dysfunction, some can manifest in adulthood, highlighting the need for vigilance regardless of age or family history. Key predisposing genes include transcription factors (e.g., RUNX1, CEBPA) and genes involved in RNA splicing and telomere biology disorders. Identification of these germline mutations is critical as MNs with germline predisposition dictate specific therapeutic strategies—particularly for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT)—and require genetic counseling and surveillance for at-risk relatives. Accurate diagnosis often requires non-hematopoietic germline DNA testing, which provides important biological insights into the development of different myeloid neoplasms and directs personalized patient care.

Hypereosinophilia (HE) presents with an elevated peripheral eosinophilic count of >1.5 × 10⁹/L and is composed of a broad spectrum of secondary non-hematologic disorders and a minority of primary hematologic processes with heterogenous clinical presentations, ranging from mild symptoms to potentially lethal outcome secondary to end-organ damage. Following the introduction of advanced molecular diagnostics (genomic studies, RNA sequencing, and targeted gene mutation profile, etc.) in the last 1–2 decades, there have been deep insights into the etiology and molecular mechanisms involved in the development of HE. The classification of HE has been updated and refined following to the discovery of clinically novel markers and targets in the 2022 WHO classification and ICOG-EO 2021 Working Conference on Eosinophil Disorder and Syndromes. However, the diagnosis and management of HE is challenging given its heterogeneity and variable clinical outcome. It is critical to have a diagnostic algorithm for accurate subclassification of HE and hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) (e.g., reactive, familial, idiopathic, myeloid/lymphoid neoplasm, organ restricted, or with unknown significance) and to follow established treatment guidelines for patients based on its clinical findings and risk stratification.

C-MYC is one of the most essential transcriptional factors, regulating a diverse array of cellular functions, including proliferation, growth, and apoptosis. Dysregulation of c-MYC is essential in the pathogenesis of a number of B-cell lymphomas, but is rarely reported in T-cell lymphomas. c-MYC dysregulation induces lymphomagenesis by loss of the tight control of c-MYC expression, leading to overexpression of intact c-MYC protein, in contrast to the somatic mutations or fusion proteins seen in many other oncogenes. Dysregulation of c-MYC in B-cell lymphomas occurs either as a primary event in Burkitt lymphoma, or secondarily in aggressive lymphomas such as diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, plasmablastic lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, or double-hit lymphoma. Secondary c-MYC changes include gene translocation and gene amplification, occurring against a background of complex karyotype, and most often confer aggressive clinical behavior, as evidenced in the double-hit lymphomas. In low-grade B-cell lymphomas, acquisition of c-MYC rearrangement usually results in transformation into highly aggressive lymphomas, with some exceptions. In this review, we discuss the role that c-MYC plays in the pathogenesis of B-cell lymphomas, the molecular alterations that lead to c-MYC dysregulation, and their effect on prognosis and diagnosis in specific types of B-cell lymphoma.