Liz Green
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Liz Green has a total of 107 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Margaret Douglas
Maastricht University
7 shared publications - Kathryn Ashton
Wales Health Impact Assessment Support Unit (WHIASU), Policy and International Health Directorate, Public Health Wales NHS Trust, Cardiff, UK
6 shared publications Kathryn Ashton
Public Health Wales, Cardiff, UK
5 shared publications- Timo Clemens
Department of International Health, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University
5 shared publications M Dyakova
WHO Collaborating Centre, Public Health Wales , Cardiff, UK
4 shared publicationsNerys Edmonds
Public Health Wales NHS Trust, Cardiff, United Kingdom
4 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 12 May 2026
- Published by Edward Elgar Publishing
- p. 223-239
Competence and the development of competency frameworks in the field of Health Impact Assessment
This chapter explores competence in Health Impact Assessment (HIA), placing it within legal, regulatory and professional contexts. Competency frameworks guide training, quality assurance and accreditation across disciplines, particularly in public health. The chapter presents examples of existing models that define the skills and knowledge required for effective HIA practice. It emphasises the overlap between public health and HIA competencies, showing how expertise in one can enhance the other. The chapter also examines global efforts to develop competency frameworks and identifies opportunities for cross-disciplinary learning. It has a focus on the work of the Wales Health Impact Assessment Support Unit, Public Health Wales and the work in Wales to date as a leading example. It concludes by discussing future challenges and opportunities, encouraging action from a range of stakeholders to strengthen HIA practice through competency development.
- 12 May 2026
- Published by Edward Elgar Publishing
- p. 223-239
Open AccessCompetence and the development of competency frameworks in the field of Health Impact Assessment
This chapter explores competence in Health Impact Assessment (HIA), placing it within legal, regulatory and professional contexts. Competency frameworks guide training, quality assurance and accreditation across disciplines, particularly in public health. The chapter presents examples of existing models that define the skills and knowledge required for effective HIA practice. It emphasises the overlap between public health and HIA competencies, showing how expertise in one can enhance the other. The chapter also examines global efforts to develop competency frameworks and identifies opportunities for cross-disciplinary learning. It has a focus on the work of the Wales Health Impact Assessment Support Unit, Public Health Wales and the work in Wales to date as a leading example. It concludes by discussing future challenges and opportunities, encouraging action from a range of stakeholders to strengthen HIA practice through competency development.
- Open Access
- 4 March 2026
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal
- Vol. 44 (2) , 161-176
Institutionalisation of health impact assessment. A systematic scoping review and development of a descriptive conceptual framework
Health impact assessment (HIA) is a flexible process which considers the health and equity impacts of a decision, policy, plan or proposal (European Centre for Health Policy 1999). It came to the f...
- 4 March 2026
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal
- Vol. 44 (2) , 161-176
Open AccessInstitutionalisation of health impact assessment. A systematic scoping review and development of a descriptive conceptual framework
Health impact assessment (HIA) is a flexible process which considers the health and equity impacts of a decision, policy, plan or proposal (European Centre for Health Policy 1999). It came to the f...
- 2 November 2025
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal
- Vol. 43 (6) , 456-464
Undertaking the first health impact assessment on a city development plan in Ireland: a case study
- 2 November 2025
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal
- Vol. 43 (6) , 456-464
Undertaking the first health impact assessment on a city development plan in Ireland: a case study
- Open Access
- 16 September 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Health Policy
- Vol. 162, 105436
Health impact assessments should be mandatory for all relevant government policies
- 16 September 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Health Policy
- Vol. 162, 105436
Open AccessHealth impact assessments should be mandatory for all relevant government policies
- 5 September 2025
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 141-156
A HIA of Climate Change in Wales
- Open Access
- 8 July 2025
- Published by Wiley in Microbial Biotechnology
- Vol. 18 (7) , e70194
How Can ‘Health in All Policies’ Help Maximise the Potential of Microbial Biotechnologies for Health, Equity and Sustainability?
Microbial biotechnologies could affect health through multiple pathways, including impacts on food, nutrition, and the physical, economic, and social environment. Health in All Policies is an approach to ensure that plans and policies in all sectors maximise health gains and minimise any health risks. This approach often uses health impact assessment as a structured process to identify and assess positive and negative health impacts and make recommendations to improve these. There are very few examples where HIA has been applied to the implementation of microbial biotechnologies. As more biotechnologies are developed and implemented, more routine use of HIA could help to avoid adverse effects and realise their potential to improve health and reduce health inequalities. This will require greater awareness and understanding of the breadth of links to health, research to build the evidence base for these links, and governance mechanisms to oversee the development and implementation of microbial biotechnologies that prioritise health, equity and sustainability.
- 8 July 2025
- Published by Wiley in Microbial Biotechnology
- Vol. 18 (7) , e70194
Open AccessHow Can ‘Health in All Policies’ Help Maximise the Potential of Microbial Biotechnologies for Health, Equity and Sustainability?
Microbial biotechnologies could affect health through multiple pathways, including impacts on food, nutrition, and the physical, economic, and social environment. Health in All Policies is an approach to ensure that plans and policies in all sectors maximise health gains and minimise any health risks. This approach often uses health impact assessment as a structured process to identify and assess positive and negative health impacts and make recommendations to improve these. There are very few examples where HIA has been applied to the implementation of microbial biotechnologies. As more biotechnologies are developed and implemented, more routine use of HIA could help to avoid adverse effects and realise their potential to improve health and reduce health inequalities. This will require greater awareness and understanding of the breadth of links to health, research to build the evidence base for these links, and governance mechanisms to oversee the development and implementation of microbial biotechnologies that prioritise health, equity and sustainability.
- Open Access
- 11 February 2025
- Published by National Institute for Health and Care Research in NIHR Open Research
- Vol. 5, 11
Developing methods for systems-informed Health Impact Assessment (System-HIA)
Background Health Impact Assessment (HIA) is a process for systematically assessing the potential health and wellbeing impacts of a policy, plan, or project, including recommendations on how those impacts may be managed. Increasingly policy is seen as interventions in complex systems. Methodologically guidance for undertaking HIA do not explicitly draw on complex systems approaches. This study explores the potential contribution of systems approaches to HIA, with a view to informing practical guidance on conducting HIA. The study was registered with Research Registry (reference: researchregistry9504). Methods Scoping review, Stakeholder Workshops. Results 25 eligible sources were identified applying systems approaches in IA, mostly quantitative modelling approaches, such as system dynamics, though several advocated for the application of systems thinking more broadly. HIA is inherently seen as systems oriented, given the involvement of multiple stakeholders and the focus on the wider determinants of health. Workshop participants showed a range of reactions towards applying the systems tools. Major concerns were HIA already being under resourced and systems methods potentially adding pressure and reducing stakeholder buy-in for HIA. Whilst broadening perspectives was seen as enriching, the difficulty to apply system tools directly would require adaptation to the HIA process. Participants valued the tools for their capacity to structure discussion or stakeholder engagement, and their capacity to communicate findings. There was concern about adding to the structured HIA process. Conclusions This is the first study systematically assessing potential value and practical implications of applying systems informed tools as part of HIA. Although there is some conceptual overlap between HIA and systems approaches, there are practical challenges in incorporating new systems tools into HIA practice. Systems tools have a potential role in the initial setting of boundaries for a HIA, and as a lens to find opportunities to embed HIA in institutional decision-making processes.
- 11 February 2025
- Published by National Institute for Health and Care Research in NIHR Open Research
- Vol. 5, 11
Open AccessDeveloping methods for systems-informed Health Impact Assessment (System-HIA)
Background Health Impact Assessment (HIA) is a process for systematically assessing the potential health and wellbeing impacts of a policy, plan, or project, including recommendations on how those impacts may be managed. Increasingly policy is seen as interventions in complex systems. Methodologically guidance for undertaking HIA do not explicitly draw on complex systems approaches. This study explores the potential contribution of systems approaches to HIA, with a view to informing practical guidance on conducting HIA. The study was registered with Research Registry (reference: researchregistry9504). Methods Scoping review, Stakeholder Workshops. Results 25 eligible sources were identified applying systems approaches in IA, mostly quantitative modelling approaches, such as system dynamics, though several advocated for the application of systems thinking more broadly. HIA is inherently seen as systems oriented, given the involvement of multiple stakeholders and the focus on the wider determinants of health. Workshop participants showed a range of reactions towards applying the systems tools. Major concerns were HIA already being under resourced and systems methods potentially adding pressure and reducing stakeholder buy-in for HIA. Whilst broadening perspectives was seen as enriching, the difficulty to apply system tools directly would require adaptation to the HIA process. Participants valued the tools for their capacity to structure discussion or stakeholder engagement, and their capacity to communicate findings. There was concern about adding to the structured HIA process. Conclusions This is the first study systematically assessing potential value and practical implications of applying systems informed tools as part of HIA. Although there is some conceptual overlap between HIA and systems approaches, there are practical challenges in incorporating new systems tools into HIA practice. Systems tools have a potential role in the initial setting of boundaries for a HIA, and as a lens to find opportunities to embed HIA in institutional decision-making processes.
- Open Access
- 2 January 2025
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal
- Vol. 43 (1) , 57-69
Exploring the implementation of health impact assessment in Portuguese Public Health System
- 2 January 2025
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal
- Vol. 43 (1) , 57-69
Open AccessExploring the implementation of health impact assessment in Portuguese Public Health System