Paul Thomas Bartone

Researchers and practitioners often have a need to summarize qualitative text data obtained from open-ended survey responses, case reports and various other sources. However, traditional methods using human coders are costly and time-consuming. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) tools hold promise for more timely and cost-effective processing of such qualitative text data. The present study assesses ChatGPT as an aid in conducting thematic content analyses. We analyzed archival data provided by West Point military academy cadets writing about their reactions to the 9/11 terrorist attacks. Cadet responses were analyzed first by human coders using traditional approaches, and then by ChatGPT. The ChatGPT results corresponded well with those of the human coders, with some minor differences. While caution is required in the application of AI tools such as ChatGPT, the present study suggests that AI tools can provide a useful adjunct to human coding, speeding the process of identifying underlying themes in qualitative text data.

The Tragedy Assistance Program for Survivors (TAPS) is the national nonprofit organization providing compassionate care and comprehensive resources to all those grieving a death in the military or veteran community. For children under 18, TAPS provides Good Grief Camp, where volunteer Military and Legacy Mentors, often with personal loss experience, serve as peer mentors support. Legacy Mentors are young adults who lost a loved one in childhood and received training to help other bereaved children. This study examines the TAPS impact on young adults, focusing on Legacy Mentors. A survey of 314 participants measured well-being, complicated grief, posttraumatic growth, and hardiness. A series of t-tests showed former Good Grief Camp attendees and Legacy Mentors reported fewer complicated grief symptoms, while also showing more posttraumatic growth in the domain of "Relating to Others." In the regression model, Legacy Mentor status significantly predicted fewer complicated grief symptoms. Findings suggest TAPS peer support programs provide benefits to both those receiving as well as those providing support during bereavement.

Deployments are stressful for both service members and their families. To promote the overall health and welfare of those impacted by military deployment, it is important to identify individual resilience-building resources that service members can employ to strengthen their own well-being, the well-being of their families, and the readiness of the force. This pilot study examines different resilience-building skills that may impact individual well-being, relationship quality, and family satisfaction post-deployment. A cross-sectional sample of 78 married U.S. military enlisted service members (n = 24) and commissioned officers (n = 54) completed the Coping Self-Efficacy Scale, Resilience Scale for Adults, Humor Styles Questionnaire, Mindful Attention Awareness Scale, Dispositional Resilience Scale, the emotional well-being and spirituality subscales of the Work-Life Well-Being Inventory, and the Social Problem-Solving Inventory-Revised. The use of a positive humor style was significantly associated with individual well-being. Spirituality and religious practices were significantly predictive of a service member’s family satisfaction. Responding to qualitative open-ended questions, service members identified their top 6 subcategories of stress, which were communication, moving, finances, family separation, children, and future employment during post-deployment. The strengths and resources reported as contributing the most to family effectiveness and well-being were personal character traits, external relationship skills, emotional maturity, and the ability to work. The results identified unique individual resilience-building resources for service members, which contribute to their well-being and the well-being of their families. Findings suggest that training on individual resilience-building resources for service members can offer support to the entire family system following military deployment.

Eating disorders are a persistent and debilitating problem, especially among college age men and women. This problem is exacerbated in occupations such as the military, where maintenance of strict standards regarding weight, fitness and appearance is important for job retention and promotion. Also, previous research confirms that stress is a contributing element to eating disorders. It is thus important to identify factors that may assist individuals to remain resilient and avoid stress-related health and eating difficulties. The present study utilizes historical data to examine the impact of stress on health and eating disorder symptoms in a representative sample of West Point military academy cadets, while testing the role of gender and hardiness as stress moderators in this relation. A survey containing measures of stress, hardiness and eating disorders symptoms was completed by 387 cadets in the fall and spring of 2000-2001. Moderation effects were tested with advanced conditional process analysis procedures developed recently by Hayes (2022). Results show that hardiness was a significant moderator, with cadets low in hardiness showing increased eating disorder symptoms and more general health symptoms. While gender was not a significant moderator with respect to eating disorder symptoms, it was significant for general health symptoms; female cadets showed more stress-related health symptoms than their male counterparts. These results suggest that eating disorder symptoms in military academy cadets and college students more generally may be reduced through programs aimed at developing hardiness attitudes and stress coping approaches.

The U.S. Military Academy at West Point is widely considered the premier leader development institution in the United States. Since first admitting women in 1976, few studies have examined factors that may influence female cadets to perform as leaders in this environment. The present study analyzed archival data collected during a unique longitudinal study of leader development conducted at West Point during the years 1993–2000, the Baseline Officer Leader Development Study (BOLDS). Personality hardiness, transformational and transactional leadership styles were evaluated as potential predictors of performance as leaders, according to supervisor ratings. Regression results showed that female cadets excel as leaders, outperforming male cadets as a group. Hardiness and transformational leadership style predicted leader performance for both male and female cadets. Additional analyses indicated it is the transformational leadership element of “charismatic” (or idealized influence) leadership that accounts for this finding. The transactional component “management by exception‐active” also predicted leader performance, but for male cadets only. This study confirms that hardiness and charismatic leadership style are important for leadership performance of both male and female cadets. For male cadets, leader performance was also tied to actively identifying and addressing failures in subordinates. Leader development programs for both men and women may thus be enhanced by including programs to develop personality hardiness and transformational leadership qualities.

BACKGROUND: Frequent exposure to acute stress increases risk of suicide, posttraumatic stress disorder, and other stress-related disorders. Neuroendocrine and immunologic dysregulation associated with stress may underlie predispositions to psychological disorders and inflammatory disease processes in individuals, such as first-responders and other healthcare professionals, who function in high stress situations. The Hardiness Resilience Gauge (HRG) can be used to psychometrically measure resilience, a psychological modifier of the stress response. Using the HRG alongside salivary biomarker profiling, may help to identify low resilience phenotypes and allow mitigation and early therapeutic interventions. There is a paucity of knowledge regarding biomarkers of resilience. This study aims to evaluate the relationship between factors of resilience with salivary biomarker levels and fluctuations during and following acute stress. METHODS: Sixty-three first responders underwent a standardized stress-inducing training exercise, providing salivary samples before (prestress), immediately after (post-stress), and 1 hour after the event (recovery). The HRG was administered before (initial) and after (final) the event. Multiplex ELISA panels quantified 42 cytokines and 6 hormones from the samples, which were analyzed for relationships to psychometric factors of resilience measured by the HRG. RESULTS: Several biomarkers correlated with psychological resilience following the acute stress event. The HRG scores correlated (p < 0.05) with a select set of biomarkers with moderate-to-strong correlations (|r| > 0.3). These included EGF, GROα, PDGFAA, TGFα, VEGFA, interleukin (IL)1Ra, TNFα, IL18, cortisol, FGF2, IL13, IL15, and IL6. Interestingly, fluctuations of EGF, GROα, and PDGFAA in post-stress compared with recovery were positively correlated with factors of resilience, which were negatively correlated from the pre-stress to post-stress period. CONCLUSION: This exploratory analysis discovered a small subset of salivary biomarkers that are significantly correlated with acute stress and resilience. Further investigation of their specific roles in acute stress and associations with resiliency phenotypes is warranted.

The U.S. Military Academy at West Point places young men and women in a highly demanding world of extreme mental and physical challenges. As such, it provides an excellent natural laboratory in which to study how people respond and adapt to highly stressful conditions. The present study explores the role of personality hardiness and coping as stress resilience resources in new (freshmen) cadets at West Point, while also considering sex differences. Using survey methods, N = 234 cadets were assessed during their first year at West Point. Measures included personality hardiness, coping strategies, health symptoms, and number of hospitalizations for all causes. Results show that female cadets are higher in hardiness and emotion-focused coping, as well as somewhat higher in symptoms reports. For the total group, hardiness is linked to better health, both in terms of symptoms reports and hospitalizations. Multiple regression results indicate symptoms are predicted by lower hardiness, higher avoidance coping, and female sex. Conditional process path analysis reveals that the effect of hardiness on symptoms is mediated by emotion-focused coping, and that emotion-focused coping can have both positive and negative effects. This study confirms hardiness is an important stress resilience resource for both men and women in the highly stressful first year at West Point. These findings lend further support to a growing body of evidence that hardiness influences health in part via the coping strategies that people choose to apply in dealing with stressful situations.

Previous research shows that psychological hardiness is an important factor contributing to stress resilience in individuals. Of the various instruments available to measure hardiness, the most commonly used is the Dispositional Resilience Scale (DRS). Despite its demonstrated utility, the DRS-15 still has a number of serious limitations, including low subscale reliability and limited construct validity. The present work aims to create a new hardiness scale that addresses these limitations. A pool of new items plus the original DRS item set was administered to a census-matched stratified sample of N = 2,021 men and women across the United States. Items for the new scale were selected based on item distribution characteristics, item response theory plots, scale reliabilities, item-total correlations, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). CFA results showed the best fitting model reflected a hierarchical structure with three factors (commitment, control, and challenge) nested under a broad hardiness factor. This factor structure is replicated in two independent validation samples and also holds invariant across gender and age. The new scale shows much improved reliability coefficients (e.g., Cronbach’s α of .93, .85, .84, and .89 for total hardiness, challenge, control, and commitment, respectively), as well as structural equivalence across gender and age. Validity is demonstrated in multiple samples via predictive associations of hardiness scores with theoretically relevant outcome measures, including coping, life satisfaction, anxiety, and depression. The Hardiness Resilience Gauge (HRG) possesses excellent reliability and validity and appears to be a more effective tool for measuring hardiness in adult populations.