Sandra O. Gollnick

Introduction Science editors play an important role in ensuring the integrity of the scientific literature. While journal editors work with authors to improve the clarity and conciseness of manuscripts during the submission, peer review, and publication stages,1 inclusion of professional editors for authors early on during scholarly knowledge production also can be of high value. Specifically, author editors can provide authors with substantial editing support and customized educational resources that have the potential to improve faculty writing skills, boost their productivity, and enhance efficiency at later publication stages. Reports from various medical institutions on the use of such science editors are generally positive.2–6 However, shared experiences with these types of integrated editing–educational interventions targeted at faculty are scarce in the literature. Hence, this topic remains an underreported area of science communications that would benefit from further evaluation and discussion among all professionals involved in the knowledge production pipeline. This article provides a summary of 10 lessons learned from implementing a formal science editing program at Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center in Buffalo, NY—this information was presented earlier in the form of a poster at the 2023 CSE meeting in Toronto, Canada. Roswell Park, founded in 1898, is a National Cancer Institute (NCI)-designated comprehensive cancer center, with approximately 400 faculty who are engaged in basic science and translational, clinical, and population-based research. The editing program, formally called the Scientific Editing and Research Communications Core (SERCC) Resource, was conceptualized following a needs assessment by the Faculty Development Program and Grants Office in […]

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an effective anticancer modality approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Antitumor immunity can be augmented during PDT by inducing sterile inflammation in an acute manner, and this process is characterized by interleukin 17 (IL‐17)‐mediated neutrophil infiltration to tumor‐draining lymph nodes (TDLNs). However, the inflammatory factors that influence IL‐17 expression in TDLNs are poorly understood. Prior studies have linked the cyclooxygenase 2 (COX2)‐driven prostaglandin E₂ (PGE2) pathway to IL‐17 expression. Here, we report that an immune‐activating PDT regimen (imPDT) induces COX2/PGE2 expression in TDLNs, whereby IL‐17 expression is facilitated without corresponding effects on the expression of RORγt, the transcriptional driver of the canonical IL‐17 pathway. Pharmacologic inhibition with NS398, a COX2 inhibitor, was utilized to demonstrate that imPDT‐induced COX2 regulates RORγt‐independent expression of IL‐17 by B cells and neutrophil entry into TDLNs. Depletion of B cells prior to imPDT significantly reduced neutrophil entry into TDLNs following treatment, and diminishes the efficacy of imPDT, which is dependent upon antitumor immunity. These findings are suggestive of a novel role for B cells in the augmentation of antitumor immunity by imPDT.

Myeloid cells are critical cells involved in the orchestration of innate and adaptive immune responses. Most myeloid cells derive from the adult bone marrow in a process called myelopoiesis, a tightly controlled process that ensures constant production of myeloid cells. Sex differences in myeloid cell development have been observed; males exhibit greater monocytic differentiation in the bone marrow, and men have increased blood monocyte numbers when compared to women. Here we use a genetic mouse model of myeloid androgen receptor (AR) knockout (MARKO) and pharmacological inhibition of AR to investigate the role of androgen signaling in monocytic differentiation. We observe that although myeloid AR signaling does not influence total bone marrow cell numbers, it does affect the composition of the bone marrow myeloid population in both homeostatic and emergency settings. Genetic deletion of AR in myeloid cells led to reduced monocytic development in vivo. Similarly, pharmacologic inhibition of AR signaling in vitro reduced monocytic development. However, alteration in monocytic differentiation in the absence of AR signaling did not lead to reduced numbers of circulating myeloid cells, although MARKO male mice display reduced ratio of classical to non-classical monocytes in the blood, implying that blood monocyte subsets are skewed upon myeloid AR deletion. Our results suggest that the sex differences observed in monocytic differentiation are partly attributed to the positive role of the androgen–AR axis in regulating monocytic development directly at the myeloid cell level. Furthermore, we have identified a novel role for AR in regulating blood mature monocyte subset turnover. Investigating how androgen signaling affects monocytic development and monocyte subset heterogeneity will advance our understanding of sex differences in monocytic function at homeostasis and disease and can ultimately impact future therapeutic design targeting monocytes in the clinic.

Androgen receptor (AR) antagonism increases overall survival in prostate cancer; however, treatment failure leads to tumor progression and patient mortality. The effect of AR modulation on AR+ nontumor cells that participate in the resistance to AR antagonism is poorly understood. Tumor-infiltrating myeloid cells, including macrophages and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC), express AR and promote prostate cancer progression. We investigated how AR antagonism affects myeloid cell function and metabolism in an AR-independent murine colon tumor model. Systemic blockade of AR with enzalutamide resulted in increased MC-38 tumor growth in vivo even when AR was knocked out of MC-38 tumor cells. MC-38 tumor growth was also increased when immunocompetent, but not immunodeficient, mice were coinjected with tumor cells and MDSCs treated with enzalutamide or lacking AR, suggesting that AR regulated the ability of MDSCs to suppress adaptive immunity. Myeloid AR-knockout male mice also displayed increased growth of TRAMP C2 prostate tumors when compared with wild type. Inhibition of AR signaling suppressed mitochondrial respiration in myeloid cells via MPC/AMPK signaling pathways; suppression of mitochondrial respiration increased MDSC tumor–promoting functions. Our work showed that AR regulates a tumor-promoting myeloid cell phenotype and influences myeloid cell metabolism. These findings suggest that tumor resistance to AR antagonism is due, in part, to changes in myeloid cell function and metabolism.

Dr. Thomas Dougherty and his Oncology Foundation of Buffalo were the first to support my (S.O.G.) research into the effects of photodynamic therapy (PDT) on the host immune system. The small grant I was awarded in 2002 launched my career as an independent researcher; at the time, there were few studies on the importance of the immune response on the efficacy of PDT and no studies demonstrating the ability of PDT to enhance antitumor immunity. Over the last decades, the interest in PDT as an enhancer of antitumor immunity and our understanding of the mechanisms by which PDT enhances antitumor immunity have dramatically increased. In this review article, we look back on the studies that laid the foundation for our understanding and provide an update on current advances and therapies that take advantage of PDT enhancement of immunity.

The etiology of prostate cancer is poorly understood, but it is a multi-step process that has been linked to environmental factors that induce inflammation within the gland. Glands of prostate cancer patients frequently contain multiple zones of disease at various stages of progression. The factors that drive disease progression from an indolent benign stage to aggressive disease are not well-defined. Prostate inflammation and carcinoma are associated with high levels of myeloid cell infiltration; these cells are linked to disease progression in other cancers, but their role in prostate cancer is unclear. To determine whether myeloid cells contribute to prostate cancer progression, the ability of prostate tumor-associated CD11b⁺ cells (TAMC) to drive prostate epithelial cell tumorigenesis was tested. Co-culture of CD11b⁺ TAMC with non-tumorigenic genetically primed prostate epithelial cells resulted in stable transformation and induction of tumorigenesis. RNA sequencing identified the IL-1α pathway as a potential molecular mechanism responsible for tumor promotion by TAMC. Inhibition of IL-1α delayed growth of TAMC-induced tumors. Further analysis showed that IL-1α inhibition led to decreased angiogenesis within tumors, suggesting that IL-1α promotes prostate tumor progression, potentially through augmentation of angiogenesis.

MiR-30e* is overexpressed in prostate cancer and promotes NF-B-mediated proliferation and tumor growth miR-30e* is overexpressed in prostate cancer and promotes NF-κB-mediated proliferation and tumor growth

Effective therapy for advanced cancer often requires treatment of both primary tumors and systemic disease that may not be apparent at initial diagnosis. Numerous studies have shown that stimulation of the host immune system can result in the generation of anti-tumor immune responses capable of controlling metastatic tumor growth. Thus, there is interest in the development of combination therapies that both control primary tumor growth and stimulate anti-tumor immunity for control of metastatic disease and subsequent tumor growth. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an FDA-approved anticancer modality that has been shown to enhance anti-tumor immunity. Augmentation of anti-tumor immunity by PDT is regimen dependent, and PDT regimens that enhance anti-tumor immunity have been defined. Unfortunately, these regimens have limited ability to control primary tumor growth. Therefore, a two-step combination therapy was devised in which a tumor-controlling PDT regimen was combined with an immune-enhancing PDT regimen. To determine whether the two-step combination therapy enhanced anti-tumor immunity, resistance to subsequent tumor challenge and T cell activation and function was measured. The ability to control distant disease was also determined. The results showed that the novel combination therapy stimulated anti-tumor immunity while retaining the ability to inhibit primary tumor growth of both murine colon (Colon26-HA) and mammary (4T1) carcinomas. The combination therapy resulted in enhanced tumor-specific T cell activation and controlled metastatic tumor growth. These results suggest that PDT may be an effective adjuvant for therapies that fail to stimulate the host anti-tumor immune response.