Håvard Raddum

In this work, we present new cryptanalytic attacks on recently proposed, theory-inspired constructions of weak pseudorandom functions (weak-PRFs). We demonstrate attacks on several such designs, showing that the initial security arguments require significant refinement. Methodologically, our approach relies on novel observations about the structure of cyclic matrices, applications of Wagner’s generalized birthday technique, and conversion into polynomial systems over F3. These findings highlight the need for a more careful analysis of those weak-PRF candidates.

The growing adoption of secure multi-party computation (MPC) has driven the development of efficient symmetric key primitives tailored for MPC. Recent advances, such as the alternating moduli paradigm, have shown promise but leave room for cryptographic and practical improvements. In this paper, we analyze a family of weak pseudorandom functions (wPRF) proposed at Crypto 2024, focusing on their One-to-One parameter sets. We demonstrate that these configurations fail to achieve their intended one-to-one mappings and exploit this observation to develop an efficient key recovery attack.Our analysis reveals critical vulnerabilities, reducing the complexity of key recovery to O(2λ/2 log2 λ) for the Standard One-to-One wPRF and O(20.84λ) for the Reversed Moduli variant – both substantially below their claimed λ-bit security. We validate our findings through experimental evaluation, confirming alignment between predicted and observed attack complexities.

Fully homomorphic encryption (FHE) is a powerful tool in cryptography that allows one to perform arbitrary computations on encrypted material without having to decrypt it first. There are numerous FHE schemes, all of which are expanded from somewhat homomorphic encryption (SHE) schemes, and some of which are considered viable in practice. However, while these FHE schemes are semantically (IND-CPA) secure, the question of their IND-CCA1 security is much less studied, and we therefore provide an overview of the IND-CCA1 security of all acknowledged FHE schemes in this paper. To give this overview, we grouped the SHE schemes into broad categories based on their similarities and underlying hardness problems. For each category, we show that the SHE schemes are susceptible to either known adaptive key recovery attacks, a natural extension of known attacks, or our proposed attacks. Finally, we discuss the known techniques to achieve IND-CCA1-secure FHE and SHE schemes. We concluded that none of the proposed schemes were IND-CCA1-secure and that the known general constructions all had their shortcomings.