Peter Fairbairn

Peter Fairbairn

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Peter Fairbairn has a total of 35 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    A Retrospective Study Using a Novel Body-Shift Implant Design with a Novel Alloplastic Particulate Grafting Material in Immediate Extraction Sockets

    by Dominic B. O'HOoley, Costa Nicolopoulos, Mark G. Worthing, Petros Yuvanoglu, Fotis Melas, Peter J. M. Fairbairn, Gregori M. Kurtzman

    With resurgence in immediate tooth replacement therapy (ITRT) as a method of preserving both hard and soft tissues for improved aesthetic outcomes, this multicenter, prospective study looked at two novel products and their effect on those outcomes. Thirty-one maxillary single-tooth implants were included, of these 54.8% were central incisors, 25.8% lateral incisors, and 19.4% canines. Three complications were reported; one case nondraining fistula, one case a nonseated provisional restoration, and one case a fractured zirconia abutment. The definitive restorations were delivered between 4 hours and 18 months postimplant placement and all restorations were screw-retained. ITRT is frequently utilized when a tooth to be extracted will be replaced by an implant aiding in preservation of the hard and soft tissue that may be lost due to resorption during healing of the extraction socket. The narrower neck region of the Inverta implant results in thicker crestal bone around the implant, where loading under function occurs. Grafting that area around the implant at placement with EthOss results in more predictable bone stability in the long term.


  • Open Access

    Outcomes of a One Year, Retrospective Single-Arm Cohort Study Using both a Novel Body-Shift Implant Design with a Novel Alloplastic Particulate Grafting Material in Immediate Extraction Sockets

    by Dominic Brenden O'Hooley, Costa Nicolopoulos, Mark Worthing, Petros Yuvanoglu, Fotis Melas, Peter Fairbairn

    With a resurgence in ITRT (Immediate Tooth Replacement Therapy) as a method of preserving both hard and thus soft tissues for improved aesthetic outcomes, this multi-centre, retrospective study will look at two novel products and their effect on these outcomes. A new synthetic particulate graft material along with a novel Implant design was utilized in the study and a 1 year follow up assessment, analysed for hard and soft tissue regeneration.

  • Open Access

    Sinus Augmentation for Implant Placement Utilizing a Novel Synthetic Graft Material with Delayed Immediate Socket Grafting: A 2-Year Case Study

    by Peter Fairbairn, Stuart Kilner, Dominic O’hooley, Andrew Fish, Gregori M. Kurtzman

    Frequently, sinus augmentation is required when replacing failing or missing molars in the maxilla due to loss of alveolar bone related to periodontal disease, pneumatization of the sinus or a combination of the two factors. Various materials have been advocated and utilized; these fall into the categories of allograft, xenograft and synthetic materials. This article shall discuss a study of 10 cases with a 2-year follow-up utilizing a novel synthetic graft material used for sinus augmentation either simultaneously with implant placement or in preparation for sinus augmentation and implant placement in the posterior maxilla. The results of the 10 cases in the study found consistent results over the 2-year study period with maintenance of the alveolar height at the maxillary sinus. A lack of complications or failures in the study group demonstrates the technique has useful applications in increasing ridge height to permit implant placement inferior to the sinus floor.


  • Top Cited Papers
    Open Access

    Synthetic Material for Bone, Periodontal, and Dental Tissue Regeneration: Where Are We Now, and Where Are We Heading Next?

    by Chia Wei Cheah, Nisreen Mohammed Al-Namnam, May Nak Lau, Ghee Seong Lim, Renukanth Raman, Peter Fairbairn, Wei Cheong Ngeow

    Alloplasts are synthetic, inorganic, biocompatible bone substitutes that function as defect fillers to repair skeletal defects. The acceptance of these substitutes by host tissues is determined by the pore diameter and the porosity and inter-connectivity. This narrative review appraises recent developments, characterization, and biological performance of different synthetic materials for bone, periodontal, and dental tissue regeneration. They include calcium phosphate cements and their variants β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) ceramics and biphasic calcium phosphates (hydroxyapatite (HA) and β-TCP ceramics), calcium sulfate, bioactive glasses and polymer-based bone substitutes which include variants of polycaprolactone. In summary, the search for synthetic bone substitutes remains elusive with calcium compounds providing the best synthetic substitute. The combination of calcium sulphate and β-TCP provides improved handling of the materials, dispensing with the need for a traditional membrane in guided bone regeneration. Evidence is supportive of improved angiogenesis at the recipient sites. One such product, (EthOss® Regeneration, Silesden, UK) has won numerous awards internationally as a commercial success. Bioglasses and polymers, which have been used as medical devices, are still in the experimental stage for dental application. Polycaprolactone-TCP, one of the products in this category is currently undergoing further randomized clinical trials as a 3D socket preservation filler. These aforementioned products may have vast potential for substituting human/animal-based bone grafts.


  • Open Access

    Bone Healing in Rabbit Calvaria Defects Using a Synthetic Bone Substitute: A Histological and Micro-CT Comparative Study

    by Minas Leventis, Peter Fairbairn, Chas Mangham, Antonios Galanos, Orestis Vasiliadis, Danai Papavasileiou, Robert Horowitz

    Bioactive alloplastic materials, like beta-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) and calcium sulfate (CS), have been extensively researched and are currently used in orthopedic and dental bone regenerative procedures. The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of EthOss versus a bovine xenograft and spontaneous healing. The grafting materials were implanted in standardized 8 mm circular bicortical bone defects in rabbit calvariae. A third similar defect in each animal was left empty for natural healing. Six male rabbits were used. After eight weeks of healing, the animals were euthanized and the bone tissue was analyzed using histology and micro-computed tomography (micro-CT). Defects treated with β-TCP/CS showed the greatest bone regeneration and graft resorption, although differences between groups were not statistically significant. At sites that healed spontaneously, the trabecular number was lower (p < 0.05) and trabecular separation was higher (p < 0.05), compared to sites treated with β-TCP/CS or xenograft. Trabecular thickness was higher at sites treated with the bovine xenograft (p < 0.05) compared to sites filled with β-TCP/CS or sites that healed spontaneously. In conclusion, the novel β-TCP/CS grafting material performed well as a bioactive and biomimetic alloplastic bone substitute when used in cranial defects in this animal model.


  • Effect of isolating the periosteum with a resorbable barrier membrane on neovascularization in guided bone regeneration: an experimental study

    by Minas Leventis, Danai Anna Papavasileiou, George Agrogiannis, Orestis Vasiliadis, Peter Fairbairn, Demos Kalyvas

  • Open Access

    Evaluation of an In Situ Hardening β-Tricalcium Phosphate Graft Material for Alveolar Ridge Preservation. A Histomorphometric Animal Study in Pigs

    by Minas Leventis, George Agrogiannis, Peter Fairbairn, Orestis Vasiliadis, Danai Papavasileiou, Evangelia Theodoropoulou, Robert Horowitz, Demos Kalyvas

    The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of a resorbable alloplastic in situ hardening bone grafting material for alveolar ridge preservation in a swine model. Seven Landrace pigs were used. In each animal, the maxillary left and right deciduous second molars were extracted, and extraction sites were either grafted with a resorbable alloplastic in situ hardening bone substitute, composed of beta-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) granules coated with poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid (PLGA), or left unfilled to heal spontaneously. Animals were euthanized after 12 weeks, and the bone tissue was analyzed histologically and histomorphometrically. Linear changes of ridge width were also clinically measured and analyzed. Pronounced bone regeneration was found in both experimental and control sites, with no statistically significant differences. At the experimental sites, most of the alloplastic grafting material was resorbed and remnants of the graft particles were severely decreased in size. Moreover, experimental sites showed, in a statistically nonsignificant way, less mean horizontal dimensional reduction of the alveolar ridge (7.69%) compared to the control sites (8.86%). In conclusion, the β-TCP/PLGA biomaterial performed well as a biocompatible resorbable in situ hardening bone substitute when placed in intact extraction sockets in this animal model.


  • Open Access

    Alveolar Ridge Preservation Using a Novel Synthetic Grafting Material: A Case with Two-Year Follow-Up

    by Peter Fairbairn, Minas Leventis, Chas Mangham, Robert Horowitz

    This case report highlights the use of a novel in situ hardening synthetic (alloplastic), resorbable, bone grafting material composed of beta tricalcium phosphate and calcium sulfate, for alveolar ridge preservation. A 35-year-old female patient was referred by her general dentist for extraction of the mandibular right first molar and rehabilitation of the site with a dental implant. The nonrestorable tooth was “atraumatically” extracted without raising a flap, and the socket was immediately grafted with the synthetic biomaterial and covered with a hemostatic fleece. No membrane was used, and the site was left uncovered without obtaining primary closure, in order to heal by secondary intention. After 12 weeks, the architecture of the ridge was preserved, and clinical observation revealed excellent soft tissue healing without loss of attached gingiva. At reentry for placement of the implant, a bone core biopsy was obtained, and primary implant stability was measured by final seating torque and resonance frequency analysis. Histological analysis revealed pronounced bone regeneration while high levels of primary implant stability were recorded. The implant was successfully loaded 12 weeks after placement. Clinical and radiological follow-up examination at two years revealed stable and successful results regarding biological, functional, and esthetic parameters.


  • Open Access

    Protocol for Bone Augmentation with Simultaneous Early Implant Placement: A Retrospective Multicenter Clinical Study

    by Peter Fairbairn, Minas Leventis

    Purpose.To present a novel protocol for alveolar bone regeneration in parallel to early implant placement.Methods.497 patients in need of extraction and early implant placement with simultaneous bone augmentation were treated in a period of 10 years. In all patients the same specific method was followed and grafting was performed utilizingin situhardening fully resorbable alloplastic grafting materials consisting ofβ-tricalcium phosphate and calcium sulfate. The protocol involved atraumatic extraction, implant placement after 4 weeks with simultaneous bone augmentation, and loading of the implant 12 weeks after placement and grafting. Follow-up periods ranged from 6 months to 10 years (mean of 4 years).Results.A total of 601 postextraction sites were rehabilitated in 497 patients utilizing the novel protocol. Three implants failed before loading and three implants failed one year after loading, leaving an overall survival rate of99.0%.Conclusions.This standardized protocol allows successful long-term functional results regarding alveolar bone regeneration and implant rehabilitation. The concept of placing the implant 4 weeks after extraction, augmenting the bone around the implant utilizing fully resorbable, biomechanically stable, alloplastic materials, and loading the implant at 12 weeks seems to offer advantages when compared with traditional treatment modalities.