Pradeep Kumar

Background: Management of Diabetic Macular edema (DME) requires repeated injections. Therefore newer Anti-VEGFs like Brolucizumab with longer durability have been introduced. We compared two different dosages of Brolucizumab, 6.0 mg and 3.6 mg, for their safety & efficacy in treatment of DME, in treatment naïve patients over 52 weeks. Method: A prospective, pilot randomised controlled, single centre, double blinded, two arm comparative study was conducted between Dec 2022 to Apr 2024. The study recruited 82 patients of DME who were randomised into two groups of 41 patients each, one group to be treated with Brolucizumab 6.0 mg in 50 μL and the other to receive 3.6 mg in 30 μL. All patients received the first dose of Brolucizumab at 0 week and were then followed up at every 4 weeks for detailed ophthalmic and OCT macula examination. Those who met the pre-defined re-treatment criteria were re-injected with Brolucizumab, the dose being fixed for each group throughout the study. All patient receiving an injection were further followed up on Day 1, Day 7 and Day 28 to look for any adverse reactions. The efficacy parameters included change in best corrected visusal acuity (BCVA), contrast and central macular thickness (CMT) on Optical Coherence Tomography. The average number of injections recd in each group were also calculated. Results: The change in BCVA from baseline in 6.0 mg group was 0.54 LogMAR units and 3.6 mg group was 0.59 LogMAR units, which was not statistically significant. The reduction in CMT from baseline in 6.0 mg group was 133.2 µm (μ) and 3.6 mg group was 110.6 μ, which was not statistically significant. The improvement in contrast from baseline in 6.0 mg group was 0.74 and 3.6 mg group was 0.95, with p value of 0.0002. The re-injection interval was 14.21 weeks in 6.0 mg group and 15.56 weeks for 3.6 mg subgroup. The total number of adverse events in both groups were similar at 70 in 6.0 mg group and 47 in 3.6 mg group with only one grade 4 adverse event occurring in each group. Conclusion: The results of present study show that the safety and efficacy of both doses of Brolucizumab, i.e. 6.0 mg and 3.6 mg, for treating diabetic macular edema is similar. Trial registration Study was registered with Clinical trials registry of India (CTRI ref no. CTRI/2023/06/054105), registered on 14 Nov 2022.

Purpose: To identify the pattern, distribution, and causes of ocular injuries among the security personnel participating in counterinsurgency operations (CIOps). Methods: This was a multicentric, retrospective review of chart records of patients reporting to three hospitals located in the geographic region affected by CIOps. The hospital registry was examined for all patients diagnosed with any type of ocular trauma between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2019. A standardized proforma was filled out using the case records, and entries were validated. Results: A total of 131 ocular injuries fulfilled the criteria of the study. The mean age of the patients was 32.46 ± 10.2 years. All the patients were males. The causes of the injuries were explosive blasts in 60 eyes (45.80%), gunshot wounds in 15 eyes (11.42%), stone pelting in 16 eyes (12.21%), training-related causes in 26 eyes (29.84%), vehicular accidents in 13 eyes (9.92%), and battery blast in one eye (0.76%). Among the type of injuries, open globe injuries included 66 eyes (50.38%), closed globe injuries included 35 eyes (26.72%), isolated lid lacerations included 14 eyes (10.68%), and isolated chemical injury was seen in two eyes (1.52%). Optic nerve head avulsion was seen in two eyes (1.52%). Conclusion: The study revealed a considerable number of ocular injuries related to combat, with explosive bursts being the leading cause. The incidence of ocular injuries was found to be highest in zone 1. This study emphasizes the importance of the need for soldiers deployed in active CIOps regions to wear protective eyewear, such as ballistic goggles or military combat eye protection, to reduce the risk of ocular injuries.

Background: The current standard treatment for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) involves intravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents. The aim of the present study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of two anti-VEGF drugs: brolucizumab and aflibercept, in treatment-naïve nAMD Indian patients over a period of 48 weeks. Methods: A prospective, randomized, single-centre, single-blinded, two-arm comparative study was conducted between March 2021 and February 2022. Of the 114 patients, 56 received intravitreal injections of brolucizumab (6 mg/50 µL) while 58 received aflibercept (2 mg/50 µL). The patients received 03 initial loading doses at 4-week intervals of both the agents and then respective therapies were given as individualized pro re nata (PRN) regimen based on the signs of active macular neovascularization. The functional and anatomical outcomes measured were mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA, logMAR), central macular thickness (CMT, µm), presence of intraretinal fluid, subretinal fluid or subretinal hyper-reflective material. Furthermore, the average number of additional injections required after the loading doses, the injection-free interval and safety of both the drugs were also assessed. Results: Brolucizumab was found to be non-inferior to aflibercept in terms of mean change in BCVA (−0.13 ± 0.21 logMAR vs. −0.10 ± 0.15 logMAR) and reduction in CMT (−112.59 ± 81.23 µm vs. −86.38 ± 71.82 µm). The percentage of eyes with IRF and SHRM was comparable between both the groups while fewer eyes treated with brolucizumab indicated SRF presence than aflibercept after the loading doses. These beneficial effects of brolucizumab were observed with significant (p < 0.0001) lesser number of injections (1.8 ± 1.1 vs. 3.8 ± 1.5) from week 12 to week 48. Moreover, the probability of no injections after the loading doses was significantly higher with brolucizumab compared to aflibercept indicating prolonged injection-free intervals. The average ocular side effects were comparable in the two groups. One adverse event of severe vitritis requiring treatment with oral steroids occurred in Brolucizumab group, while no such event occurred in Aflibercept group. Conclusion: The results of the present study suggest non-inferiority of brolucizumab PRN regimen to aflibercept PRN regimen in treatment naïve nAMD Indian patients while achieving longer inter-injection intervals. Trial registration Clinical Trial Registration of India (CTRI/2021/06/034415). Registered 03 March, 2021, http://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/pmaindet2.php?trialid=54328&EncHid=&userName =