L. Filipe. O. Costa

The physical interpretation of the exact solutions of the Einstein field equations is, in general, a challenging task, part of the difficulties lying in the significance of the coordinate system. We discuss the extension of the International Astronomical Union (IAU) reference system to the exact theory. It is seen that such an extension, retaining some of its crucial properties, can be achieved in a special class of spacetimes, admitting nonshearing congruences of observers which, at infinity, have zero vorticity and acceleration. As applications, we consider the Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker (FLRW), Kerr and Newman-Unti-Tamburino (NUT) spacetimes, the van Stockum rotating dust cylinder, spinning cosmic strings and, finally, we debunk the so-called Balasin-Grumiller (BG) model, and the claims that the galaxies' rotation curves can be explained through gravitomagnetic effects without the need for dark matter. The BG spacetime is shown to be completely inappropriate as a galactic model: its dust is actually static with respect to the asymptotic inertial frame, its gravitomagnetic effects arise from unphysical singularities along the axis (a pair of NUT rods, combined with a spinning cosmic string), and the rotation curves obtained are merely down to an invalid choice of reference frame -- the congruence of zero angular momentum observers, which are being dragged by the singularities.

The physical interpretation of the exact solutions of the Einstein field equations is, in general, a challenging task, part of the difficulties lying in the significance of the coordinate system. We discuss the extension of the International Astronomical Union (IAU) reference system to the exact theory. It is seen that such an extension, retaining some of its crucial properties, can be achieved in a special class of spacetimes, admitting nonshearing congruences of observers which, at infinity, have zero vorticity and acceleration. As applications, we consider the Friedmann–Lemaître–Robertson–Walker (FLRW), Kerr and Newman–Unti–Tamburino (NUT) spacetimes, the van Stockum rotating dust cylinder, spinning cosmic strings and, finally, we debunk the so-called Balasin-Grumiller (BG) model, and the claims that the galaxies’ rotation curves can be explained through gravitomagnetic effects without the need for dark matter. The BG spacetime is shown to be completely inappropriate as a galactic model: its dust is actually static with respect to the asymptotic inertial frame, its gravitomagnetic effects arise from unphysical singularities along the axis (a pair of NUT rods, combined with a spinning cosmic string), and the rotation curves obtained are merely down to an invalid choice of reference frame—the congruence of zero angular momentum observers, which are being dragged by the singularities.

The curvature invariants have been the subject of interest due to the debate concerning the notions of intrinsic/extrinsic frame dragging, the use of the electromagnetic analogy in such classification, and the question of whether there is a fundamental difference between the gravitomagnetic fields arising from the translational and rotational motions of the sources (which have been subject of observational and experimental tests, including the dedicated Gravity Probe-B and LARES space missions). In this work we clarify both the algebraic and physical meaning of the curvature invariants and their electromagnetic counterparts. They are seen to yield conditions for the existence of observers measuring vanishing electric/magnetic fields and gravitoelectric/gravitomagnetic tidal tensors, respectively. We determine these observers (in the gravitational sector and in the presence of sources, for the more relevant gravitomagnetic case) obtaining their velocities explicitly in terms of the fields/tidal tensors as measured by an arbitrary observer. The structure of the invariants of the astrophysical setups of interest is studied in detail, and its relationship with the gravitomagnetic effects is dissected. Finally, a new classification for intrinsic/extrinsic gravitomagnetism is proposed.

Originally introduced in connection with general relativistic Coriolis forces, the term frame-dragging is associated today with a plethora of effects related to the off-diagonal element of the metric tensor. It is also frequently the subject of misconceptions leading to incorrect predictions, even of nonexistent effects. We show that there are three different levels of frame-dragging corresponding to three distinct gravitomagnetic objects: gravitomagnetic potential 1-form, field, and tidal tensor, whose effects are independent, and sometimes opposing. It is seen that, from the two analogies commonly employed, the analogy with magnetism holds strong where it applies, whereas the fluid-dragging analogy (albeit of some use, qualitatively, in the first level) is, in general, misleading. Common misconceptions (such as viscous-type “body-dragging”) are debunked. Applications considered include rotating cylinders (Lewis–Weyl metrics), Kerr, Kerr–Newman and Kerr–dS spacetimes, black holes surrounded by disks/rings, and binary systems.

In electromagnetism, the concept of Poynting vector as measured by an observer is well known. A mathematical analogue in general relativity is the super-Poynting vector of the Weyl tensor. Observers for which the (super-)Poynting vector vanishes are called principal . When, at a given point, the electromagnetic field is non-null, or the gravitational field is of Weyl–Petrov type I or D, principal observers instantaneously passing through that point always exist. We survey characterizations of such observers and study their relation to arbitrary observers. In the non-null electromagnetic case it is known that, given any observer, there is a principal observer which moves relative to the first in the direction of his Poynting vector. Replacing Poynting by super-Poynting yields a possible gravitational analogue; we show that this analogy indeed holds for any observer when the Petrov type is D, but only for a one-dimensional variety of observers when the Petrov type is I. We provide algorithms to obtain the principal observers directly from the electric and magnetic fields (in the electromagnetic case) or electric and magnetic parts of the Weyl tensor (in the gravitational case) relative to an arbitrary observer. It is found that in Petrov type D doubly aligned non-null Einstein–Maxwell fields (which include all classical charged black hole solutions) the Poynting and super-Poynting vectors are aligned, at each point and for each observer, and the principal observers coincide. Our results are illustrated in simple examples.

The curvature invariants have been subject of interest due to the debate concerning the notions of intrinsic/extrinsic frame-dragging, the use of the electromagnetic analogy in such classification, and the question of whether there is a fundamental difference between the gravitomagnetic fields arising from the translational and rotational motions of the sources (which have been subject of observational and experimental tests, including the dedicated Gravity Probe-B and LARES space missions). In this work we clarify both the algebraic and physical meaning of the curvature invariants and their electromagnetic counterparts. They are seen to yield conditions for the existence of observers measuring vanishing electric/magnetic fields and gravitoelectric/gravitomagnetic tidal tensors, respectively. We determine these observers (in the gravitational sector and in the presence of sources, for the more relevant gravitomagnetic case) obtaining their velocities explicitly in terms of the fields/tidal tensors as measured by an arbitrary observer. The structure of the invariants of the astrophysical setups of interest is studied in detail, and its relationship with the gravitomagnetic effects is dissected. Finally, a new classification for intrinsic/extrinsic gravitomagnetism is proposed.

In electromagnetism, the concept of Poynting vector as measured by an observer is well known. A mathematical analogue in general relativity is the super-Poynting vector of the Weyl tensor. Observers for which the (super-)Poynting vector vanishes are called principal. When, at a given point, the electromagnetic field is non-null, or the gravitational field is of Weyl-Petrov type I or D, principal observers instantaneously passing through that point always exist. We survey characterizations of such observers and study their relation to arbitrary observers. In the non-null electromagnetic case it is known that, given any observer, there is a principal observer which moves relative to the first in the direction of his Poynting vector. Replacing Poynting by super-Poynting yields a possible gravitational analogue; we show that this analogy indeed holds for any observer when the Petrov type is D, but only for a one-dimensional variety of observers when the Petrov type is I. We provide algorithms to obtain the principal observers directly from the electric and magnetic fields (in the electromagnetic case) or electric and magnetic parts of the Weyl tensor (in the gravitational case) relative to an arbitrary observer. It is found that in Petrov type D doubly aligned non-null Einstein-Maxwell fields (which include all classical charged black hole solutions) the Poynting and super-Poynting vectors are aligned, at each point and for each observer, and the principal observers coincide. Our results are illustrated in simple examples.