Chloé Girard
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Chloé Girard has a total of 52 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Raphael Mercier
Department of Chromosome Biology, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne, Germany
7 shared publications Christine Horlow
INRA, Institut Jean-Pierre Bourgin, UMR1318, ERL CNRS 3559,Saclay Plant Sciences, RD10, 78000 Versailles, France 2 AgroParisTech, Institut Jean-Pierre Bourgin, UMR 1318, ERL CNRS 3559, Saclay Plant Sciences,RD10, 78000 Versailles, France
4 shared publications- Wayne Crismani
St Vincent's Institute of Medical Research
4 shared publications Nicole Froger
INRA, Institut Jean-Pierre Bourgin, UMR1318, ERL CNRS 3559, Saclay Plant Sciences, RD10, Versailles, France; AgroParisTech, Institut Jean-Pierre Bourgin, UMR 1318, ERL CNRS 3559, Saclay Plant Sciences, RD10, Versailles, France
3 shared publications- Anne M. Villeneuve
Department of Developmental Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine
2 shared publications - Eric Espagne
Université Paris-Saclay, Commissariat à l’Énergie Atomiques et aux Énergies Alternatives (CEA), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), Gif-sur-Yvette, France
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 1 August 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature Communications
- Vol. 17 (1) , 9304
Polymorphism can extensively reshape the genome-wide crossover landscape in Arabidopsis thaliana
- 1 August 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature Communications
- Vol. 17 (1) , 9304
Open AccessPolymorphism can extensively reshape the genome-wide crossover landscape in Arabidopsis thaliana
- 31 March 2026
- Published by Agence Bibliographique de l'Enseignement Supérieur
FANCM et ses cofacteurs MHF1-MHF2, ainsi que FIDGETIN-Like-1 limitent la formation des crossovers méiotiques chez Arabidopsis thaliana
La grand majorité des espèces forment très peu de crossovers (CO) par chromosome en méiose, et ce quelle que soit la taille des chromosomes et en dépit de l'excès de précurseurs de recombinaison disponibles. Les mécanismes qui sous-tendent cette limitation restent, pour une grande part, inconnus. Pour identifier des facteurs limitant la formation des CO en méiose, nous avons mis en place un crible permettant d'isoler des mutants formant plus de CO que le sauvage. Chez Arabidopsis thaliana, les mutants présentant un défaut de CO (ex: les mutants zmm) présentent une réduction de fertilité directement observable sur la longueur des fruits. Notre crible repose sur l'idée qu'une mutation augmentant la formation des CO devrait restaurer la fertilité des mutants zmm.Le premier suppresseur identifié nous a permis de montrer que FANCM est un régulateur majeur de la formation des CO méiotiques, en limitant la voie dépendante de MUS81, normalement minoritaire chez Arabidopsis (Crismani et al., 2012). Nous avons ensuite montré que deux des cofacteurs de FANCM au sein de la voie de l'anémie de Fanconi (FA), MHF1 et MHF2, agissent dans la même voie pour limiter les CO. En dehors de ces trois protéines, les autres protéines FA ne sont pas des protéines anti-CO (Girard et al., 2014).Nous avons ensuite identifié FIDGETIN-Like-1 comme une protéine anti-CO agissant en parallèle de FANCM. En effet, si les deux mutations figl1 et fancm alimentent la voie dépendante de MUS81 de formation des CO, leurs effets sont cumulatifs et mènent à une augmentation d'un facteur 6 du nombre CO par méiose, et ce sans affecter la ségrégation des chromosomes. Ce résultat montre que FIGL1 et FANCM agissent à deux étapes indépendantes de la recombinaison, et nos données suggèrent que FIGL1 pourrait agir en amont de FANCM.Ce travail a révélé l'existence d'au moins deux mécanismes de limitation des CO méiotiques, et montre que la fréquence de CO peut être largement augmentée sans que la ségrégation des chromosomes ne soit affectée.
- 31 March 2026
- Published by Agence Bibliographique de l'Enseignement Supérieur
FANCM et ses cofacteurs MHF1-MHF2, ainsi que FIDGETIN-Like-1 limitent la formation des crossovers méiotiques chez Arabidopsis thaliana
La grand majorité des espèces forment très peu de crossovers (CO) par chromosome en méiose, et ce quelle que soit la taille des chromosomes et en dépit de l'excès de précurseurs de recombinaison disponibles. Les mécanismes qui sous-tendent cette limitation restent, pour une grande part, inconnus. Pour identifier des facteurs limitant la formation des CO en méiose, nous avons mis en place un crible permettant d'isoler des mutants formant plus de CO que le sauvage. Chez Arabidopsis thaliana, les mutants présentant un défaut de CO (ex: les mutants zmm) présentent une réduction de fertilité directement observable sur la longueur des fruits. Notre crible repose sur l'idée qu'une mutation augmentant la formation des CO devrait restaurer la fertilité des mutants zmm.Le premier suppresseur identifié nous a permis de montrer que FANCM est un régulateur majeur de la formation des CO méiotiques, en limitant la voie dépendante de MUS81, normalement minoritaire chez Arabidopsis (Crismani et al., 2012). Nous avons ensuite montré que deux des cofacteurs de FANCM au sein de la voie de l'anémie de Fanconi (FA), MHF1 et MHF2, agissent dans la même voie pour limiter les CO. En dehors de ces trois protéines, les autres protéines FA ne sont pas des protéines anti-CO (Girard et al., 2014).Nous avons ensuite identifié FIDGETIN-Like-1 comme une protéine anti-CO agissant en parallèle de FANCM. En effet, si les deux mutations figl1 et fancm alimentent la voie dépendante de MUS81 de formation des CO, leurs effets sont cumulatifs et mènent à une augmentation d'un facteur 6 du nombre CO par méiose, et ce sans affecter la ségrégation des chromosomes. Ce résultat montre que FIGL1 et FANCM agissent à deux étapes indépendantes de la recombinaison, et nos données suggèrent que FIGL1 pourrait agir en amont de FANCM.Ce travail a révélé l'existence d'au moins deux mécanismes de limitation des CO méiotiques, et montre que la fréquence de CO peut être largement augmentée sans que la ségrégation des chromosomes ne soit affectée.
- Open Access
Polymorphism can extensively reshape the genome-wide crossover landscape in Arabidopsis thaliana
Meiotic recombination, via the formation of crossovers (COs), re-assorts parental alleles and dictate which traits are inherited together, or not. The recombination rate is not homogeneous across the genome, and uncovering the causes of these fluctuations can inform our understanding of DNA recombination and genome evolution. In this study we show that presence of sequence divergence (polymorphism) between homologous chromosomes increases the local recombination rate in Arabidopsis thaliana . This effect is observed genome-wide, turning cold regions of the genome hot. This relocation of COs towards polymorphic regions occurs at the expense of non-polymorphic ones, which become colder. This global overhaul of the CO landscape is dependent on the mismatch repair (MMR) machinery. This suggests that MMR has a pro-CO role, driving COs to regions of the genome where it could detect sequence differences between homologous chromosomes. Our study demonstrates that polymorphism can be a major recombination driver in A. thaliana .
Open AccessPolymorphism can extensively reshape the genome-wide crossover landscape in Arabidopsis thaliana
Meiotic recombination, via the formation of crossovers (COs), re-assorts parental alleles and dictate which traits are inherited together, or not. The recombination rate is not homogeneous across the genome, and uncovering the causes of these fluctuations can inform our understanding of DNA recombination and genome evolution. In this study we show that presence of sequence divergence (polymorphism) between homologous chromosomes increases the local recombination rate in Arabidopsis thaliana . This effect is observed genome-wide, turning cold regions of the genome hot. This relocation of COs towards polymorphic regions occurs at the expense of non-polymorphic ones, which become colder. This global overhaul of the CO landscape is dependent on the mismatch repair (MMR) machinery. This suggests that MMR has a pro-CO role, driving COs to regions of the genome where it could detect sequence differences between homologous chromosomes. Our study demonstrates that polymorphism can be a major recombination driver in A. thaliana .
- Open Access
- 17 October 2024
- Published by Wiley in New Phytologist
- Vol. 244 (6) , 2442-2457
FIGL1 attenuates meiotic interhomolog repair and is counteracted by the RAD51 paralog XRCC2 and the chromosome axis protein ASY1 during meiosis
Summary: Two recombinases, RAD51 and DMC1, catalyze meiotic break repair to ensure crossovers (COs) between homologous chromosomes (interhomolog) rather than between sisters (intersister). FIDGETIN‐LIKE‐1 (FIGL1) downregulates both recombinases. However, the understanding of how FIGL1 functions in meiotic repair remains limited. Here, we discover new genetic interactions of Arabidopsis thaliana FIGL1 that are important in vivo determinants of meiotic repair outcome. In figl1 mutants, compromising RAD51‐dependent repair, either through the loss of RAD51 paralogs (RAD51B or XRCC2) or RAD54 or by inhibiting RAD51 catalytic activity, results in either unrepaired breaks or meiotic CO defects. Further, XRCC2 physically interacts with FIGL1 and partially counteracts FIGL1 activity for RAD51 focus formation. Our data indicate that RAD51‐mediated repair mechanisms compensate FIGL1 dysfunction. FIGL1 is not necessary for intersister repair in dmc1 but is essential for the completion of meiotic repair in mutants such as asy1 that have impaired DMC1 functions and interhomolog bias. We show that FIGL1 attenuates interhomolog repair, and ASY1 counteracts FIGL1 to promote interhomolog recombination. Altogether, this study underlines that multiple factors can counteract FIGL1 activity to promote accurate meiotic repair.
- 17 October 2024
- Published by Wiley in New Phytologist
- Vol. 244 (6) , 2442-2457
Open AccessFIGL1 attenuates meiotic interhomolog repair and is counteracted by the RAD51 paralog XRCC2 and the chromosome axis protein ASY1 during meiosis
Summary: Two recombinases, RAD51 and DMC1, catalyze meiotic break repair to ensure crossovers (COs) between homologous chromosomes (interhomolog) rather than between sisters (intersister). FIDGETIN‐LIKE‐1 (FIGL1) downregulates both recombinases. However, the understanding of how FIGL1 functions in meiotic repair remains limited. Here, we discover new genetic interactions of Arabidopsis thaliana FIGL1 that are important in vivo determinants of meiotic repair outcome. In figl1 mutants, compromising RAD51‐dependent repair, either through the loss of RAD51 paralogs (RAD51B or XRCC2) or RAD54 or by inhibiting RAD51 catalytic activity, results in either unrepaired breaks or meiotic CO defects. Further, XRCC2 physically interacts with FIGL1 and partially counteracts FIGL1 activity for RAD51 focus formation. Our data indicate that RAD51‐mediated repair mechanisms compensate FIGL1 dysfunction. FIGL1 is not necessary for intersister repair in dmc1 but is essential for the completion of meiotic repair in mutants such as asy1 that have impaired DMC1 functions and interhomolog bias. We show that FIGL1 attenuates interhomolog repair, and ASY1 counteracts FIGL1 to promote interhomolog recombination. Altogether, this study underlines that multiple factors can counteract FIGL1 activity to promote accurate meiotic repair.
- 1 September 2019
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Genetics
- Vol. 213 (1) , 79-96
Spatial Regulation of Polo-Like Kinase Activity During Caenorhabditis elegans Meiosis by the Nucleoplasmic HAL-2/HAL-3 Complex
Proper partitioning of homologous chromosomes during meiosis relies on the coordinated execution of multiple interconnected events: Homologs must locate, recognize, and align with their correct pairing partners. Further, homolog pairing must be coupled to assembly of the synaptonemal complex (SC), a meiosis-specific tripartite structure that maintains stable associations between the axes of aligned homologs and regulates formation of crossovers between their DNA molecules to create linkages that enable their segregation. Here, we identify HAL-3 (Homolog Alignment 3) as an important player in coordinating these key events during Caenorhabditis elegans meiosis. HAL-3, and the previously identified HAL-2, are interacting and interdependent components of a protein complex that localizes to the nucleoplasm of germ cells. hal-3 (or hal-2) mutants exhibit multiple meiotic prophase defects including failure to establish homolog pairing, inappropriate loading of SC subunits onto unpaired chromosome axes, and premature loss of synapsis checkpoint protein PCH-2. Further, loss of hal function results in misregulation of the subcellular localization and activity of Polo-like kinases (PLK-1 and PLK-2), which dynamically localize to different defined subnuclear sites during wild-type prophase progression to regulate distinct cellular events. Moreover, loss of PLK-2 activity partially restores tripartite SC structure in a hal mutant background, suggesting that the defect in pairwise SC assembly in hal mutants reflects inappropriate PLK activity. Together, our data support a model in which the nucleoplasmic HAL-2/HAL-3 protein complex constrains both localization and activity of meiotic Polo-like kinases, thereby preventing premature interaction with stage-inappropriate targets.
- 1 September 2019
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Genetics
- Vol. 213 (1) , 79-96
Spatial Regulation of Polo-Like Kinase Activity During Caenorhabditis elegans Meiosis by the Nucleoplasmic HAL-2/HAL-3 Complex
Proper partitioning of homologous chromosomes during meiosis relies on the coordinated execution of multiple interconnected events: Homologs must locate, recognize, and align with their correct pairing partners. Further, homolog pairing must be coupled to assembly of the synaptonemal complex (SC), a meiosis-specific tripartite structure that maintains stable associations between the axes of aligned homologs and regulates formation of crossovers between their DNA molecules to create linkages that enable their segregation. Here, we identify HAL-3 (Homolog Alignment 3) as an important player in coordinating these key events during Caenorhabditis elegans meiosis. HAL-3, and the previously identified HAL-2, are interacting and interdependent components of a protein complex that localizes to the nucleoplasm of germ cells. hal-3 (or hal-2) mutants exhibit multiple meiotic prophase defects including failure to establish homolog pairing, inappropriate loading of SC subunits onto unpaired chromosome axes, and premature loss of synapsis checkpoint protein PCH-2. Further, loss of hal function results in misregulation of the subcellular localization and activity of Polo-like kinases (PLK-1 and PLK-2), which dynamically localize to different defined subnuclear sites during wild-type prophase progression to regulate distinct cellular events. Moreover, loss of PLK-2 activity partially restores tripartite SC structure in a hal mutant background, suggesting that the defect in pairwise SC assembly in hal mutants reflects inappropriate PLK activity. Together, our data support a model in which the nucleoplasmic HAL-2/HAL-3 protein complex constrains both localization and activity of meiotic Polo-like kinases, thereby preventing premature interaction with stage-inappropriate targets.
- Open Access
- 23 April 2018
- Published by National Academy of Sciences in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Vol. 115 (19) , 201719029-E4452
Interdependent and separable functions of Caenorhabditis elegans MRN-C complex members couple formation and repair of meiotic DSBs
Significance: Double-strand breaks (DSBs) are deleterious DNA lesions, and impairment of the DSB repair machinery can lead to devastating diseases, such as Nijmegen Breakage Syndrome (NBS). During meiosis, DSBs represent a “necessary evil”: they are required to promote formation of crossovers between homologous chromosomes. Crossovers, in turn, ensure correct chromosome inheritance during gamete formation, which is essential for viability and normal development of embryos. During meiosis, numerous DSBs are actively created, so meiotic cells must ensure that all breaks are properly repaired to ensure crossover formation and restore genomic integrity. Here, we identify Caenorhabditis elegans NBS-1 as essential to properly process meiotic DSBs to both promote crossover formation and antagonize an error-prone DSB repair pathway, thereby ensuring faithful chromosome inheritance.
- 23 April 2018
- Published by National Academy of Sciences in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Vol. 115 (19) , 201719029-E4452
Open AccessInterdependent and separable functions of Caenorhabditis elegans MRN-C complex members couple formation and repair of meiotic DSBs
Significance: Double-strand breaks (DSBs) are deleterious DNA lesions, and impairment of the DSB repair machinery can lead to devastating diseases, such as Nijmegen Breakage Syndrome (NBS). During meiosis, DSBs represent a “necessary evil”: they are required to promote formation of crossovers between homologous chromosomes. Crossovers, in turn, ensure correct chromosome inheritance during gamete formation, which is essential for viability and normal development of embryos. During meiosis, numerous DSBs are actively created, so meiotic cells must ensure that all breaks are properly repaired to ensure crossover formation and restore genomic integrity. Here, we identify Caenorhabditis elegans NBS-1 as essential to properly process meiotic DSBs to both promote crossover formation and antagonize an error-prone DSB repair pathway, thereby ensuring faithful chromosome inheritance.
- Open Access
- 1 January 2017
- Published by OpenEdition in Revue française des sciences de l’information et de la communication
- Vol. 11 (11)
Les mécanismes de centralisation des données de la recherche
Derrière leur accès ouvert, qu’en est-il de l’hébergement des données de la recherche ? L’accès libre peut être exclusif et l’hébergement complètement centralisé. Qu’en est-il alors d’une science « ouverte » dont les chercheurs useraient des données, comme des données d’usage, à leur gré ? L’exclusivité et la centralisation ne sont pas compatibles avec la diversité des modes d’exploitation des contenus et par conséquent avec l’innovation. Nous verrons ici les mécanismes, sociaux, économiques et techniques qui, à tous les niveaux de la chaîne de publication, induisent pourtant cette centralisation jusque dans les sphères les plus enclines au libre. Nous proposerons des solutions pour penser et mettre en œuvre cet impensé de l’hébergement et de l’exploitation distribués et ouverts pour une science ouverte.
- 1 January 2017
- Published by OpenEdition in Revue française des sciences de l’information et de la communication
- Vol. 11 (11)
Open AccessLes mécanismes de centralisation des données de la recherche
Derrière leur accès ouvert, qu’en est-il de l’hébergement des données de la recherche ? L’accès libre peut être exclusif et l’hébergement complètement centralisé. Qu’en est-il alors d’une science « ouverte » dont les chercheurs useraient des données, comme des données d’usage, à leur gré ? L’exclusivité et la centralisation ne sont pas compatibles avec la diversité des modes d’exploitation des contenus et par conséquent avec l’innovation. Nous verrons ici les mécanismes, sociaux, économiques et techniques qui, à tous les niveaux de la chaîne de publication, induisent pourtant cette centralisation jusque dans les sphères les plus enclines au libre. Nous proposerons des solutions pour penser et mettre en œuvre cet impensé de l’hébergement et de l’exploitation distribués et ouverts pour une science ouverte.
- Open Access
- 10 July 2015
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS Genetics
- Vol. 11 (7) , e1005369
AAA-ATPase FIDGETIN-LIKE 1 and Helicase FANCM Antagonize Meiotic Crossovers by Distinct Mechanisms
Meiotic crossovers (COs) generate genetic diversity and are critical for the correct completion of meiosis in most species. Their occurrence is tightly constrained but the mechanisms underlying this limitation remain poorly understood. Here we identified the conserved AAA-ATPase FIDGETIN-LIKE-1 (FIGL1) as a negative regulator of meiotic CO formation. We show that Arabidopsis FIGL1 limits CO formation genome-wide, that FIGL1 controls dynamics of the two conserved recombinases DMC1 and RAD51 and that FIGL1 hinders the interaction between homologous chromosomes, suggesting that FIGL1 counteracts DMC1/RAD51-mediated inter-homologue strand invasion to limit CO formation. Further, depleting both FIGL1 and the previously identified anti-CO helicase FANCM synergistically increases crossover frequency. Additionally, we showed that the effect of mutating FANCM on recombination is much lower in F1 hybrids contrasting from the phenotype of inbred lines, while figl1 mutation equally increases crossovers in both contexts. This shows that the modes of action of FIGL1 and FANCM are differently affected by genomic contexts. We propose that FIGL1 and FANCM represent two successive barriers to CO formation, one limiting strand invasion, the other disassembling D-loops to promote SDSA, which when both lifted, leads to a large increase of crossovers, without impairing meiotic progression. Sexually reproducing species produce offspring that are genetically unique from one another, despite having the same parents. This uniqueness is created by meiosis, which is a specialized cell division. After meiosis each parent transmits half of their DNA, but each time this occurs, the 'half portion' of DNA transmitted to offspring is different from the previous. The differences are due to resorting the parental chromosomes, but also recombining them. Here we describe a gene—FIDGETIN-LIKE 1—which limits the amount of recombination that occurs during meiosis. Previously we identified a gene with a similar function, FANCM. FIGL1 and FANCM operate through distinct mechanisms. This discovery will be useful to understand more, from an evolutionary perspective, why recombination is naturally limited. Also this has potentially significant applications for plant breeding which is largely about sampling many 'recombinants' to find individuals that have heritable advantages compared to their parents.
- 10 July 2015
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS Genetics
- Vol. 11 (7) , e1005369
Open AccessAAA-ATPase FIDGETIN-LIKE 1 and Helicase FANCM Antagonize Meiotic Crossovers by Distinct Mechanisms
Meiotic crossovers (COs) generate genetic diversity and are critical for the correct completion of meiosis in most species. Their occurrence is tightly constrained but the mechanisms underlying this limitation remain poorly understood. Here we identified the conserved AAA-ATPase FIDGETIN-LIKE-1 (FIGL1) as a negative regulator of meiotic CO formation. We show that Arabidopsis FIGL1 limits CO formation genome-wide, that FIGL1 controls dynamics of the two conserved recombinases DMC1 and RAD51 and that FIGL1 hinders the interaction between homologous chromosomes, suggesting that FIGL1 counteracts DMC1/RAD51-mediated inter-homologue strand invasion to limit CO formation. Further, depleting both FIGL1 and the previously identified anti-CO helicase FANCM synergistically increases crossover frequency. Additionally, we showed that the effect of mutating FANCM on recombination is much lower in F1 hybrids contrasting from the phenotype of inbred lines, while figl1 mutation equally increases crossovers in both contexts. This shows that the modes of action of FIGL1 and FANCM are differently affected by genomic contexts. We propose that FIGL1 and FANCM represent two successive barriers to CO formation, one limiting strand invasion, the other disassembling D-loops to promote SDSA, which when both lifted, leads to a large increase of crossovers, without impairing meiotic progression. Sexually reproducing species produce offspring that are genetically unique from one another, despite having the same parents. This uniqueness is created by meiosis, which is a specialized cell division. After meiosis each parent transmits half of their DNA, but each time this occurs, the 'half portion' of DNA transmitted to offspring is different from the previous. The differences are due to resorting the parental chromosomes, but also recombining them. Here we describe a gene—FIDGETIN-LIKE 1—which limits the amount of recombination that occurs during meiosis. Previously we identified a gene with a similar function, FANCM. FIGL1 and FANCM operate through distinct mechanisms. This discovery will be useful to understand more, from an evolutionary perspective, why recombination is naturally limited. Also this has potentially significant applications for plant breeding which is largely about sampling many 'recombinants' to find individuals that have heritable advantages compared to their parents.
- Open Access
- 18 July 2014
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Nucleic Acids Research
- Vol. 42 (14) , 9087-9095
FANCM-associated proteins MHF1 and MHF2, but not the other Fanconi anemia factors, limit meiotic crossovers
Genetic recombination is important for generating diversity and to ensure faithful segregation of chromosomes at meiosis. However, few crossovers (COs) are formed per meiosis despite an excess of DNA double-strand break precursors. This reflects the existence of active mechanisms that limit CO formation. We previously showed that AtFANCM is a meiotic anti-CO factor. The same genetic screen now identified AtMHF2 as another player of the same anti-CO pathway. FANCM and MHF2 are both Fanconi Anemia (FA) associated proteins, prompting us to test the other FA genes conserved in Arabidopsis for a role in CO control at meiosis. This revealed that among the FA proteins tested, only FANCM and its two DNA-binding co-factors MHF1 and MHF2 limit CO formation at meiosis.
- 18 July 2014
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Nucleic Acids Research
- Vol. 42 (14) , 9087-9095
Open AccessFANCM-associated proteins MHF1 and MHF2, but not the other Fanconi anemia factors, limit meiotic crossovers
Genetic recombination is important for generating diversity and to ensure faithful segregation of chromosomes at meiosis. However, few crossovers (COs) are formed per meiosis despite an excess of DNA double-strand break precursors. This reflects the existence of active mechanisms that limit CO formation. We previously showed that AtFANCM is a meiotic anti-CO factor. The same genetic screen now identified AtMHF2 as another player of the same anti-CO pathway. FANCM and MHF2 are both Fanconi Anemia (FA) associated proteins, prompting us to test the other FA genes conserved in Arabidopsis for a role in CO control at meiosis. This revealed that among the FA proteins tested, only FANCM and its two DNA-binding co-factors MHF1 and MHF2 limit CO formation at meiosis.
- Open Access
- 7 November 2012
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of Experimental Botany
- Vol. 64 (1) , 55-65
Tinkering with meiosis
Meiosis is at the heart of Mendelian heredity. Recently, much progress has been made in the understanding of this process, in various organisms. In the last 15 years, the functional characterization of numerous genes involved in meiosis has dramatically deepened our knowledge of key events, including recombination, the cell cycle, and chromosome distribution. Through a constantly advancing tool set and knowledge base, a number of advances have been made that will allow manipulation of meiosis from a plant breeding perspective. This review focuses on the aspects of meiosis that can be tinkered with to create and propagate new varieties. We would like to dedicate this review to the memory of Simon W. Chan (1974-2012) (http://www.plb.ucdavis.edu/labs/srchan/).
- 7 November 2012
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of Experimental Botany
- Vol. 64 (1) , 55-65
Open AccessTinkering with meiosis
Meiosis is at the heart of Mendelian heredity. Recently, much progress has been made in the understanding of this process, in various organisms. In the last 15 years, the functional characterization of numerous genes involved in meiosis has dramatically deepened our knowledge of key events, including recombination, the cell cycle, and chromosome distribution. Through a constantly advancing tool set and knowledge base, a number of advances have been made that will allow manipulation of meiosis from a plant breeding perspective. This review focuses on the aspects of meiosis that can be tinkered with to create and propagate new varieties. We would like to dedicate this review to the memory of Simon W. Chan (1974-2012) (http://www.plb.ucdavis.edu/labs/srchan/).